Forum:Semiprotect All Vanity Pages

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Ministry of Love > Semiprotect All Vanity Pages
Note: This topic has been unedited for 4830 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Right then. I think that all allowable vanity pages should be semiprotected. This will cut down on the high amount of IPeon vandalism, and reduce the chance of it ever violating vanity policy. Thoughts? Major insignia.png Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) 06:42, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Sounds like an idea that we should seriously consider. It would help... » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:46, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, this didn't get much attention. I'm moving this to Miniluv; hopefully, other admins will NOTICE it! —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 21:20, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Like what is considered acceptable vanity? ~Sir Rangeley Icons-flag-us.png GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 18:39, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Template:Vanity would be a good place to start... —Hinoa talk.kun 22:12, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Why don't we just leave them unprotected and then when they go to crap we can VFD them. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke.gif 14:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

As long as you help with VFD. —Hinoa talk.kun 20:48, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Personally, I favour the deletion of all vanity pages and schoolcruft except those which are about something undeniably notable; by which I mean stuff that even my mother would have heard of. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:06, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

I've got to agree with that, what's the point of a page that makes sense to 20 people in a D&D club (or whatever). They can put that on their personal website. -- sannse esnnas 20:36, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
I have long supported DELETING IT ALL (except WJU). And you have a very good point there; if it's that specific, put it on your own site! » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 20:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC)