Talk:Blank Page

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Under Scrutiny
The article to which this talkpage refers is being scrutinized by the user Lenoxus for the duration N/A. In his/her words, the reason is: A redirect to Nihilism seems obvious, but I'd like to hear what others think. At some arbitrary point, I'm sure one of us will say there's enough consnesus to go ahead and make the change.

Lenoxus will be dropping in at various moments to see how things are going, and will possibly make a variety of changes ranging from the meaningless to the universally despised. Submitters may interpret this notice as motivation to either praise or fear this user. If your thoughts concerning Blank Page might specifically enlighten this user, please talk to him, her, or the Dark Lord. — Lenoxus

Don't we already have something like this? http://uncyclopedia.org/skins/uncyclopedia/user.gif Efitu (T W @) 12:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Seeing as the differences are such that Blank Page comes off the worse, I am most certainly for a simple redirect, as is done with Blank page (lowercase) and Blank. Anyone else? —Lenoxus 23:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

I think it's unique. Keep them both. Conniving 18:27, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Blank, Blank page, and Blank Page are all non-psuedo-religious. Nihilism is. They're seperate. I think Blank & Co should all be completely blank, not just with the content removed. ie, all-white, not even Sophie showing, as it is now(for me, at least) --Ekashp 04:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

We also need "This Page Intentionally Left Blank" somewhere.

i don't know if making the whole page completely blank would be possible. that way, the article... well, it says nothing. anyway, this page is completely different form Nihilism, I think. Pangusto 04:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)