Talk:Freedom of Expression

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on February 8, 2012. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Was up everyone? Great article! Why was this moved from Censorship? --RoboJesus 02:55, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

I don't know, sir. I just do what I'm told! Just following orders... --epynephrin 03:02, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Dammit, I cant read the friggin page! I highlight it, and it doesn't work. COULD SOMEONE FRIGGIN FIX THIS????-- 23:38, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Firstly: Chill out, moron. Secondly, the problem is not on this page--meaning it's not our problem. For some reason, the admins have deemed it worthwhile to screw with the censored template. (I'm starting to think it's because of the recent Google conflicts, but I'm not really sure). In future, if you have a problem, do feel free to use the talk page, but I think you'll find you get better responses from actually saying "I have a problem. What can someone do to fix this" or even "how do I fix this?"... You're lucky to actually get a response, because I looked at this and thought "I don't friggin' care!" --epynephrin 02:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
I'll log in and create {{C2}}
All right. Created. Now everyone's happy. Pine 20:50, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
And deleted, we are not 'screwing' with the template, we are trying to resolve issues with the site. --Splaka 20:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Although, I still beg to differ that "screwing with the template" will actually resolve the site issues.--epynephrin 22:01, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
I think it's because Google sees this 'hidden' text as an effort to cover up spam links, which would lead to ranking penalties for Uncyclopedia --King Nintendoid 23:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
It's a work in progress. I sent an e-mail to someone, and got a response that there's a team looking into it. Granted this was about two weeks ago, but still... --epynephrin 14:13, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


is this page really had norminated in UN:VFH? GSPbeetle complains Vandalisms 11:50, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

now the Quasi-Featured thing is no longer a joke...for those who didnt or vote against, please screw yourselves GSPbeetle complains Vandalisms 09:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

From VFH[edit]

  • Against Gimmicky and similar to the already-featured North Korea. —rc (t) 02:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I don't mean to imply that this article was copied from North Korea, just that something with this theme has already been featured. And for the record, I didn't vote for Morse Code. —rc (t) 01:47, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment I see... I personally dont think it was sporked from North Korea. In this article the truth is covered and in North Korea it censor by substitution. But anyway different people have different thoughts.GSPbeetle complains Vandalisms

Censor my ass[edit]

You highlight the censored words and becomes visible. ----Micoolio101 (whinevandalism) 02:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes. And? --epynephrin 13:55, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Greatly disappointing article![edit]

I would love to kill whoever wrote this article. It is one of the best examples of article-writing stupidity I have ever read. ~ ███████████████

what the what is this????[edit]

i think this artical is perfectly NOT ok! I would love to fuckin delete this artical to make this artical BETTER! um better. I would love to kill this kind of artical. I don't! love it! +I'm afraid you fail. Pasta of Muppets 05:33, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Not Good article[edit]

This is one of greatest example of supid writing I have ever seem in my life.

You know what's really funny? In Google Chrome, holding your mouse over the censored text makes it viewable.[edit]

No shit, Sherlock. --User:Magic man/sig4 02:19, January 1, 2012 (UTC)

Not so good article[edit]

This article is perfect to see what dumbasses can do. In fact i want to give it a Shit-award. I hope you don't like it. P.S. Is it illlegal to sell uncensored porno movies? Actually I don't need to know. -- 01:41, January 1, 2012 (UTC)