Talk:Martin Luther King Jr.
This user Kike77 modified this article several times with anti-semitic and pro-nazi bullshit, so I returned it to the version of 4 november (nothing special with 4 november, I just selected it.) Ma engrish is to bad. Sorry.
This is so damn stupid
Very stupid, this article needs a fixin'. Enemy of superman? What the Fuck?
The image of MLK Jr with the dreamcast, that's one of the most funniest things I've ever seen by far. But what if it sparked controversy?
Very dangerous, but hilarious
He's the freakin' Liberal messiah and Obama was his 2nd coming of their own christ. Nobody can say shit, criticize or joke about MLK without pissing off them white libs and black folk. I always thought what would happen if MLK came back from the dead...and met another dead historic figure who's his opposite? Hitler! That would be the battle of all time: bigger than Jesus vs. Satan. + PotatoSmut 02:31, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
This article is not funny at all
This article was once funny but after reading it tonight I noticed that whoever rewrote the article made it really bland and unfunny. It needs a serious re-edit. It is possible to make this article both respectful to MLK and funny at the same time. --King84 04:27, January 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm... Tricky. Looks like you two guys have rather a different editing style. Looking at the page history you might notice that I have edited this one a bit also... I can see this from both points of view. This kinda issue is exactly what makes editing Wiki cool. I think it's possible for you guys to reach a compromise here. Hopefully something can be worked out. Woody needs to be less serious and King a bit more so. Or... A second article be started so that you can each write in your own style. My preferred option would be you guys both changing your editing style a bit. What I do not want to see anymore on this page is either of you simply reverting each others edit without giving suitable justification in the edit summary and I also don't want to see the same passages of text being re-added without them being discussed or adjusted to fit with the rest of the prose or the ideas of the other editor. If this happens I may well start randomly blocking people. Probably Template:U for example. I'm sure he is to blame for all of this somehow... ;) MrN 10:54, Jan 24
- I bit more serious? All I've done so far is exaggerate the real facts. But a different article might be what ends up happening.--King84 04:49, January 25, 2010 (UTC)