Talk:Music

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Music article. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that. For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

[edit] Let's see..

A couple of comments about this. First I think the irony is lost in the modified second law: "The number of musical pieces is always increasing." It's a truism and I would argue isn't as funny as my original "The quality of Music is always decreasing." Anyone care to comment? Also, I think maybe the Laws of Robotics ripoff should go. It's already been done rather well on The laws of thermodynamics and I think it doesn't work here.

In general, I don't think it helps in like this to have too many lists. The 'several things, including:' cliche really should be on the Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid page.

Okay, rant over. You can come out now. --Clanger 07:06, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

I modified ti to say that Quality is constant, and music is ever increasing. This is a clever way of saying that the quality of music is always decreasing.

Anyone else think that Spang's 'cleanup' on 9th April 07 was a little random? or is it just me?GrantRS 18:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

I agree, too many lists... If I have time, may do a cleanup tomorrow. TheLightOfSpeed 10:33, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Massive listicide carried out. Anyone who takes up the challenge of rewriting this properly could always look in the history to see if there was anything usable in them, although I didn't think so. --UU - natter 09:23, Nov 8