Talk:Page with no links
Why not take a screenshot of the whole page, and replace the article with it? That would remove all the links, but it would take away the interactiveness. Maybe custom-design the HTML from scratch? The fact links do exist is annoying!
if this is ever featured, expect heavy vandalism -- 18:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Link... link nowwwwwwwwww!
Cheddar Cheesia 20:09, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
I like self reference though. Not quite funny.....
- I liked how the categorys didn't work either, I was amused they managed to do that. The hand is clickable unfortunately...--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 08:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'd like the Uncyclopedia links on left disabled too. 22.214.171.124 14:30, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- And the math - it goes as well. Links, all of them. --Alksub 06:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
this would be funnier if there were no links at the sides or bottom
Maybe this page should be expanded a lot more. When I made it, I didnt expect anybody to find it. I jsut saw the page full of links and tried my best(not really best) to make the page. It would have been better if I knew wiki codes.Can of Worms 17:22, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Believe it or not, I found this page by following "What links here". --Dr. Steel
This is great. Red Link is awesome, and whoever went through and said "Okay, these articles," say Captain Obvious or Wikipedia, "will probably be in their recent history," needs an award or something. --Wehpudicontok-- 03:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Clarification of my last edit summary
My point is that were this an ordinary article, the "What links here" links within the body would probably be written like this:
[[Special:Whatlinkshere/Page with no links|What links here]]
and thus they would not display the same hover text as the "What links here" item in the left navigation bar. Hope this clears things up. Pentium5dot1 00:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey, just FYI, the real wikia/Creative Commons/MediaWiki are poking out over the fake ones at the bottom. Any way to remedy this? 126.96.36.199 21:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- uncyc logo
- left navigation
- the links on the top right page
- the tabs
looks like there's no way to make them linkless. although the non-highlighted tabs could somewhat be overlapped, when a user is logged in and sees this page, the cover-up gets misaligned. 04:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Wikia's rating system
... seems to be screwing up the alignment of some of the navigational elements on the page. Does anyone know how to fix this? --Pentium5dot1 22:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- To clarify: The problem is that the arrangement of the linkless overlays fails to take into account the presence of the rating box. I am neutral as to whether the rating box itself needs to be de-linked. --Pentium5dot1 00:34, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
I made the navigation links all gone so that the pages is SUPER self-reference. This page is probably a real deadend. Also, if you want to edit, just add
?action=edit at the end of the location bar, like this:
http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Page_with_no_links?action=edit In fact, it works for every article.
You can also double-click. Tino768 20:50, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Hidden Link Issue
Should this page have hidden links at all? (They exist to create pseudo links to this article in the "what links here" special pages.) I can see why its done for this article, but it sets a bad example. (It would get real annoying if every page did that.) --Mnb'z 07:27, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Funniest Joke Used on Uncyclopedia
Okay, Uncyclopedians. You caught me. That was too fucking funny. Where the fuck are all the fucking hyperlinks? Oh, wait. It's a joke. Ha-ha! Why did you have to make no hyperlinks on the article? -Joe Momma
WOT DA CRAP A LINK?
It's not a page with no links, there are links for editing. >:P