| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete - this article was written by Cheeseboy, an infi-banned user, and it would not be able to get it's proper help--Sir Manforman
 12:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- It is not good, nor is it funny. While this could be turned around, the author has been infi-banned for a month and thus it wouldn't be able to improve--Sir Manforman 20:41, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
-
|
| Keep |
*Week Keap On the grounds of the many red links throughout the site that may lead to vandalism. We can delete after the rewrite. -- Kip teh Dip • Talk • Works • Special:Userlogout •  22:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete, I've attempted a rewrite, and it's not getting any better. It is very listy. There is some humor behind the rough list however, but most of it is jokes about how fat your mother is.--Sir Manforman 22:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yo' momma's so listy, her article got huffed. Listy. Awful. Needs a rewrite, but in the meantime, kill, redirect to something, and protect the redirect to prevent vandalism. When somebody's got a rewrite they're happy with, then it can be moved in place later on. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • tweetings) 22:02 Aug 29, 2007
- Delete -- Kip teh Dip • Talk • Works • Special:Userlogout • 00:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Roman Dog Bird 00:35, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Based on the quality of the article. The Oblong Lobster 21:51, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 19:38, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Kip, a red link is not a good reason to delete. Why not redirect to Your Dad, which is not awful, and than protect the redirect. My rewrite I was working on, just won't work, and a better writer needs to handle it. --Sir Manforman 23:03, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- I will change my vote if you promise to fix the double redirects after deletion. -- Kip teh Dip • Talk • Works • Special:Userlogout • 23:21, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Promise--Sir Manforman 23:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
I am rewriting this for UN:CW. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon  (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 15:56, Sep 3, 2007
- Kept. MadMax 00:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Oh yeah, you're right. Sorry about that. ----OEJ 00:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Why does Sbu vote to keep every single article on VFD?--Sir Manforman 14:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Her heart is filled with love and joy. It's true. My heart, meanwhile, is several sizes too small. That's how it's supposed to be, dammit. Sir Modusoperandi Brute! 17:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kept. MadMax 00:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep - It's short but is a concept piece. Obviously, its concept doesn't please this month's delete voters, but oh well. --Ogopogo 03:59, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - 'Tis an interesting concept. I've changed my mind, this doesn't really need expansion.
 Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep Short but kind of chuckly. --
 (but) Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 15:10, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't know much about art. That's all; I really don't. Sir Modusoperandi Brute! 18:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
That's it. I'm getting fed up with this 200Xcruft shit. Therefore, I will personally invalidate any further votes giving that as a reason. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)18:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Why? People have to read the article to vote on it, and they can see for themselves how bad it is. -- Mitch
 01:56, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, but that doesn't give an excuse for people to use "200Xcruft" as a deletion reason. Not giving a reason at all is better that saying 200Xcruft, because 200Xcruft does not say anything about what exactly is wrong with the article. Also, there are many genuine 200Xcruft pages that will not get deleted, which again implies that 200Xcruft is not a sufficient reason for deletion. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:25, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Dexter ... Looks like you forgot something. As the rules say: "Add vfd to the article in question. Failure to do so may invalidate the vote." --Ogopogo 21:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Sorted that out for you --http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/thumb/1/1b/Is_loading_3.gif/12px-Is_loading_3.gif (Bonner)
 (Talk) (Take A Look At Nexus War) 13:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep, surprisingly. I think y'all are being too picky. It is an interesting idea, and it doesn't rely on memes. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:16, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Late last week, I fell out of bed and bonked my head. Well, I was pushed, actually. Sir Modusoperandi Brute! 03:41, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and link into the Uncyc timeline somehow. Don't see anything wrong with it. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 15:06, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep' Nothing's wrong --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 18:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and remember the {{VFD}} tag, Dexter! --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 01:14, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Very odd, but there is a silent beauty.The Oblong Lobster 21:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep If an article is good, it is good. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Doesn't really matter what people put as the reason...read it and decide. The Oblong Lobster 21:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Kept. MadMax 00:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
*Keep - If this article to be deleted, might as well delete all the other article about races or religion.--Mikididi 17:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Conditional Keep - If the article doesn't get any funnier sometime soon, might as well delete it. --Omb 18:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
*Keep - This article is should be keep for re-editing --matrempit 18:41, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep, as its creator. If this gets the axe, I'd like it put back into my userspace --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 02:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- I fucking love it --Roman Dog Bird 18:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- PARTY HARD!!! --Dexter111344 23:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- KEEP If you can't PARTY HARD what can you do? Literally, what is there left to throw your dirty soul against? Come on!! The Oblong Lobster 21:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, purely for the use of random colours. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 12:07, 30 Aug 2007
- Well, I'm a big fan. Stole your random colours and your timestamp sig bits. Sorry. Someday I promise to make it up to you. Maybe I'll give you half my soul or something. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • tweetings) 00:26 Aug 30, 2007
- PARTY HARD --PARTYHARD 00:12, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- :O Keep! I think its fantastic --http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/thumb/1/1b/Is_loading_3.gif/12px-Is_loading_3.gif (Bonner) (Talk) (Take A Look At Nexus War) 14:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 14:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- PARTY HARDER!!! PARTY HARD!! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
|
| Delete |
- PARTY NOT Another article that repeats the same thing over and over. -- Kip teh Dip • Talk • Works • Special:Userlogout • 01:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Move to userspace Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Needs more than one joke. ----OEJ 23:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Clone of AAAAAAAAAA!! --Nordamus (blab • crap) 03:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Repetition can be used for comedic effect, but it must be used with other techniques, or it just gets repetitive. In other words, it just gets repetitive. Sir Modusoperandi Brute! 17:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- De-1337 -- [sir] e|m|c [TALK] 00:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I was bored of all my WiPs and felt like mainspacing an article for once >_> So sue me! --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 02:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Fine. I'm sure having a username proclaiming your murderous and green tendencies won't look good to the judge. I don't care if it ain't easy bein' green. My lawyers will have a field day with you. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • tweetings) 02:55 Aug 27, 2007
- Don't pretend you can outmaneuver me in court! I've scrutinizingly memorized every line in Pink Floyd's The Trial, I'm legally invincible! --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 02:39, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- The problem with "prose" that just repeats itself over and over is...there is one joke, and that's the repetition. AAAAAA's joke is repetition. I look at the page, I scroll down and see it's all the same thing...and I just click off to another article. Repetition is so fucking fucking fucking repetitive it doesn't even rate a slight smile anymore. Not interesting. Not even slightly interesting. ----OEJ 23:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kept. MadMax 01:24, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete One of the oldest pages. Not that funny. -- Kip teh Dip • Talk • Works • Special:Userlogout • 01:45, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I my change my vote if it is expanded. As it stands nearly every possible joke suggested by the subject is avoided in favor of a two short paragraphs of maundering and a bad Norris. ----OEJ 12:16, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Let there be huffing. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:50, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Roman Dog Bird 18:06, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - It could be expanded, but I doubt that it will be within the next week. At the moment it is far too short and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:18, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Not that funny and really short. --R. Daneel Olivaw (Gaia - Foundation) 21:38, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Comment The Chuck Norris thing wasn't so bad when this was first written. You must realize that back in 2005 and early 2006 the Chuck Norris jokes were still fresh. -- Kip teh Dip • Talk • Works • Special:Userlogout •
- Yeah, like any meme it's funny at first...or it wouldn't have made it to memehood. But at this point we ought to go through and cut out all the irrelevant Norris references. The meme is stale. ----OEJ 23:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep. Are you not on the internets? Sir Modusoperandi Brute! 00:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- PENISPENISPENIS -- Kip teh Dip • Talk • Works • Special:Userlogout •
- Weak keep - This isn't very funny, but it has the potential to be a good satire. Perhaps we should rewrite tag it. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Changed to Strong Keep per my new paragraph. :) Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 08:57, 27 Aug 2007
- Flaccid keep. I've never encountered this - the internets, you say? I'll give them a try. Can you get them on slide-rules these days? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Very weak keep --Roman Dog Bird 18:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- CockCockCock -
 RAHB 05:30, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Personally, I thought it was pretty funny. -- Hanyouman 08:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep penispenisenis. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 18:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- I added another paragraph, just to give you all an idea of the satirical angle I was thinking about. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kept. MadMax 10:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete, Red links, no pics, old, and short--Sir Manforman 21:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:34, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 06:09, August 24, 2007
- Weak delete. MadMax has sorted out most of the red links, and there are some OK ideas in there, but I can't see anyone being bothered to make much of them, and it's not strong enough as it is. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Roman Dog Bird 18:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Article kept. 12:39, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep --Dexter111344 23:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Yeah, it's random, but it's also kinda funny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I either love it or I hate it. I'm still not quite sure which - when I skim read it it looked awful, then I read it all and thought it was great, and now I'm just confused. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Sir Roger 07:30, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete--Sir Manforman 20:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Now, this is a poor keyboard article. ----OEJ 01:56, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete This is the only one that is SHIfT out of the keyboard articles you put up here. --Dexter111344 02:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I was going to say keep because it would be the only red link on the keyboard. Then I noticed > is already red. So it will have company. Shift out of luck. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 06:09, August 24, 2007
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 20:44, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- You can't strike out votes Dexter, you're not a Sysop--Sir Manforman 19:30, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- It was my vote... I'm changing it. Don't tell me I can't change my own vote. --Dexter111344 06:39, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep. Yes, it's schoolcruft. This page (of schoolcruft), however, has some merit. Sir Modusoperandi Brute! 19:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- There is no cabal... --Dexter111344 02:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep One of the better schooly ones, in that I understand what it's going on about and laughed. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:38, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- I keep suspecting there is a small cabal involved in writing articles around and about Pontypridd. A small cabal of students who like the Ponty pubs. But they are too clever for me to figure out their IPs and whatnot. Or, rather, I am too stupid and lazy to put any effort into it. ----OEJ 01:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete, based on the following criteria:
- It's a blatant copyright violation of GFDL
- It fails UN:DUMB
- Most of the information in it is true.
- It's feeding the trolls
- It will no longer be parody if the Wikipedia version of Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense is deleted.
- If you want to keep it, at least delete the subpages and tag the page as {{Historical}}--Sir Manforman 21:06, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Since when did we care about copyright violations? I don't believe this is a copyright violation anyway.
- Err...no it doesn't. Wikipedia is based on factual articles. This isn't an article, and it isn't particularly factual either.
- Most of the information on all Uncyclopedia articles is false.
- I don't believe it's feeding trolls.
- BJAODN will be remembered long after it is deleted. If it is deleted, it won't render TFAODP obsolete. That's like saying we can't write articles about Hitler because he's dead.
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Ah Cs1987, this is a joke nomination based on this. Yes, Nobody Cares if it's a copyright violation, but reading the Wikipedia discussion, everybody is talking about that. That was a flaw when I said most of it was false, I meant was true. Also, this may not fail UN:NOT, it fails UN:DUMB. The rest, is your opinion, which I encourage you to have, but how would this be a parody if it was deleted at Wikipedia? --Sir Manforman 13:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Kp I lik this. Th ltter in qustion is alrady dltd, which is why it is so funny. Sriously. --Dexter111344 01:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kp - Not too bad. Keyboard pages should only be deleted if they are really crap. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:49, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Really makes me appreciate the letter E. Think of people in poor nations such as Bosnia and China that have none. Sir Roger 06:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kp pr vryon ls. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. It's not too bad, and links well to lipogram, which fits with it (but is much better). --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:21, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kp, aftr sing Dxter 111344 and Dr. Skullthumpr do work, I gt th jok now. --Sir Manforman 13:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
Delete--Sir Manforman 20:54, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Gee Manforman, you're sure mad at letters today. But in this case I'll have to agree with you. -- Kip teh Dip • Talk • Works • Special:Userlogout •
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:46, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Comment if you look at the discussion, everyone who participated wanted it deleted, yet it remains, and someone was too lazy to delete it apparently, because I see no logs of it being deleted, and/or hacked up by STM. ~
 Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 23/08/2007 @ 16:08
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- sigh OK, I give in. I've looked at the Euroipods talk page. Euroipods was the greatest controversy that wasn't, sorta funny because it was the least funny featured article in history. But still, I'm not going to vote to keep either. ...and I'm not afraid of Savethemooses. Well, only a little. Sir Roger 05:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
