Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/archive9

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search


Deleted by RCMurphy, but I really can't be bothered restoring so it'll stay that way--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 21:20, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC) From QVFD

Expand/Rewrite I think it's OK --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 16:09, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Jesus!!! Edits on Uncyclopaedia for vanity!!!???!!! Christ. --Jagman 15:00, 16 Aug 2005 (UTC) Jagman

Encyclopædia Dramatica

Rewritten put the new version up for VFD if need be--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 21:19, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Little known site of non worth. Uncyclopedia is not a live journal. --Sophia 20:16, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Huff it --Nytrospawn 20:38, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Redirect to 404 or perhaps to this page.--Carlb 20:57, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite it to indicate an inferior product and then protect the page. --IMBJR 20:57, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)

^^Agree except that I think we should note that it died after alientating its sponsors/promoters. --Famine 02:06, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Rewrite/Agree. I like. I like a lot. Or maybe put a funny template. Such as
Nuvola apps important.svg
Avert thine eyes!

This page is extremely offensive and should not be viewed by anyone.
It may be illegal in several countries as well.

--47Monkey MUN HMRFRA s7fc | Talk 07:56, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Might as well get of template:Encyclopediadramatica while we're at it. -- 06:48, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep, Surely us and them have a lot more in common than we have differences, I know technicaly the page is a a bit too un-uncyclopedic but I think it's a useful place for stuff that dson't fit here and vice verse.--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 11:48, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)

If we do keep the article, lets make it worse. This Sherrod fellow has been playin DMCA games for awhile. --Nytrospawn 15:11, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)
After reading the goings on at the dump I'm more inclined to Delete or Heavily Rewrite to massively rip the piss, Nelson Muntz getting his commupance style. --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 15:43, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Move to Encyclopedia Melodramatica, an article about the “fictional” wiki devoted to LiveJournal-obsessed foul-mouthed juvenile people with fragile egos. --KP CUN 18:16, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Deleted --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 21:15, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)

The rubbish at the dump is mild compared to Wikipedia:talk:Encyclopædia Dramatica or a Google on "Sherrod Degrippo" - I still can't make head nor tail of this. Why would a supposed computer security expert build a teenybopper-style LiveJournal fan site, use realname publically on whois, then go off on a DMCA-abuse rampage both here and at Wikipedia in response to that name appearing in the respective encyclopædia Dramatica articles? Editing from an IP belonging to US Department of Energy in Nevada to try to get rid of the realname info, and multiple Wikipedia handles (encydra, encydra2...) with the same edit pattern (remove site owners name from wikipedia:Encyclopediadramatica, unlink image, spew spurious DMCA nonsense) isn't dramatic, it's stupid. Almost seems a few fries short of a happy meal... not something I'd really see wanting to link to right now, even if a few pieces of the puzzle are still missing. --Carlb 17:02, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Not only that, but some more

Someone send our dialogues to slashdot for the uberfication of our situation. Or something. Ive done searchs of this Sherod Degrippo, and "it" seems like a very shady character who could be the leader of the League of Maladjusted Individuals --Nytrospawn 19:01, 16 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Wiggidy wang dang doodle

Merged and Redriected to Led Zeppelin --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 20:25, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete! fot nunny eor nnejoable. --47Monkey MUN HMRFRA s7fc | Talk 01:50, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Merge content to Led Zeppelin (where it presumably "belongs"), then delete. And let us never speak of it again. --DWIII 02:05, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)
I say we implement a radical new Darwinian deletion system by which the stronger articles are able to consume or destroy the weaker ones of their own volition and without the help of admin. --Spintherism 02:12, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)
I say, I think you're on to something! --47Monkey MUN HMRFRA s7fc | Talk 02:34, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)
How about a 1000 Uncyclopedians Typing Hamlet article? The contents of all deleted articles can go into this article. As the unfunny and uninteresting text accumulates, others can delete the unfit strings of characters. Eventually, we can get Hamlet to evolve out of this mess. --KP CUN 07:34, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)
That seems like a good idea, but we should likely also allow two types of deletion: 1) page content lacks humour and is moved to the 1000 Uncyclopedians article. 2) page is a vanity page or offensive and is just plain baleeted -- ERTW MUN 17:29, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:No Adverts seems like a good place for vanity articles as well as spamvertising. --Marcos_Malo S7fc BOotS | Talk 21:24, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)
There, I made the 1000 Uncyclopedians Typing Hamlet article. --Spintherism 18:10, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)