Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Matthew Good
An article on Matthew Good and the Matthew Good Band, a Canadian rock group. This article might be a little too close to the truth, but maybe running it through here might be able to change that a little. -- Spillin DylanTALKEDITS01:06, Jan 22
|A big mug o' reviewin' strength tea? Why, that must mean this article|
is being reviewed by:
UU - natter
(While you're welcome to review it as well, you might like to consider helping someone else instead).
(Also, if the review hasn't been finished within 24 hours of this tag appearing, feel free to remove it or clout UU athwart the ear'ole).
|Final Score:||24.4||Well it's not the dire bandcruft article it could have been, and that I was expecting. It would probably survive as a middling article around here. However, if you want it to shine, you have to figure out a way to avoid the traps I've mentioned above, and also open it up a bit more to those who've never heard of the guy. The lack of band related articles here shows you what you're up against.|
|Reviewer:||--SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 14:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)|
OK, start by reading this: HowTo:Write A Funny Band Article. I'm not kidding, it sums up the problems you face quite well. If you want to write a genuinely good article (as opposed to a better than usual band article, which is what this currently is), you have to really work at it, and avoid these pitfalls. It's tricky to do well, although as always, HTBFANJS should be of some help.
Basically, I do wish you luck: a good band article is a very hard thing to pull off, and I'd like to see a few around here, just to show it can be done. However, you will have to think carefully about your approach, and try to find a different spin on the task that avoids as many of the classic bandcruft pitfalls as possible.