Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Object permanence

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

FAQ

Object permanence[edit]

FOR YESTIMETOEDIT ONLY (Don't base your review on any of the other ones for this article that are here, YTTE. You'll do fine)   Le Cejak <Apr 22, 2008 [20:58]>

: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|0|1}}comment}}}
: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|1|1}}comment}}}
: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|2|1}}comment}}}
: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|3|1}}comment}}}
: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|4|1}}comment}}}
Final Score: 38.75 I reckon my scoring has been quite harsh: it's a good article, but I still don't think it's quite VFH, I mean I would still vote for it if it came up for VFH now, but I think it can be better. It's funny, but could do with just a few more funny lines. Images: as I said one more would be good, concept is brilliant, the formatting does need a little bit of cleaning up. Why are all images on the right? VFH is achievable with this one, just needs a little bit of work... Good luck!
Reviewer: - 06:01 23 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!


Gerrycheevers[edit]

Has gone through many, many revisions. It is one of my oldest articles. In-depth review, please?!   Le Cejak <-> Jan 11 (16:09)

Cheevers99.jpg
This article is under review by
<font-weight:bold>Gerry Cheevers.

Sayeth Gerry: shotgun!!

my glorious return to peeing. get used to seeing my name on the 'reviewed' page again, caj ol' buddy.--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|0|1}}comment}}}
: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|1|1}}comment}}}
: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|2|1}}comment}}}
: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|3|1}}comment}}}
: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|4|1}}comment}}}
Final Score: 40 you've got a winner here, caj. my preview button tells me my/your final score is a nice, round 40, putting it in the 'might be VFH' category. in its current state, it would certainly have my support on VFH, and i'd like to think that i'm an average enough guy that my opinion reflects the rest of the voting yahoos here on uncyc. i think if red light was as popular as it was, this one could be a successfully featured article as well. good luck!
Reviewer: --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)