Uncyclopedia:Reviewer of the Month/archive2
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
[edit] 2009
[edit] August
[edit] Boomer (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Strong For vote for this guy.
Strong For vote for this guy.
Strong For vote for this guy.
Strong For vote for this guy.
Strong For vote for this guy.
Strong For vote for this guy.
Strong For vote for this guy.
Strong For vote for this guy.
Strong For vote for this guy.
Strong For vote for this guy.
Strong For vote for this guy.
Strong For vote for this guy.
Strong For vote for this guy.
Strong For vote for this guy. Thank you. --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 22:07, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Weak Abstain I would vote 4 but he won this already. zh I hate me new sig 12:46 August 3
- for political figureheads that come to life and play catch with me in my backyard. and also they do reviews. 16:53, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- Strong for. He may be a lazy bum, but this here Boomer instigated PEEING in the first place, and ruled it with an iron toilet brush. He also instigated this here award. Given that so many people seem to do a ton of reviews in order to win this award, and then never review again, he is therefore one of the main reasons that so many good reviews get done on this site. He also always turns in good reviews when he deigns to do one. Puppy is young, enthusiastic, and will be a worthy winner, but Boomer deserves recognition for all his contributions. Vote Boomer next month folks! --UU - natter
08:46, Aug 30
- For Because he's got no chance of winning this month so I'm willing to risk voting for him. MrN
http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/4/4e/HalIcon.png http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/6/6d/Goldboobs.jpg 08:50, Aug 30
Spiritual for As per UU, but I'm suggesting we nominate for Reviewer in perpetuam, rather than of the month. (Was waiting until the end of the month to suggest so nobody thinks I'm trying to steal his thunder.) Puppy/Radio VOTE POOF!
[edit] PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom+For. I've seen him about and he does great reviews. 11:55, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- For Definitely, I would have voted for him last month but my vanity prevented my doing so.--ChiefjusticeDS 16:18, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- For, per my vote last month.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 19:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
For Ah, vanity. My lover, my curse. Puppy/Radio VOTE POOF!
Ha! Weak Abstain again because it's still early. zh I hate me new sig 12:46 August 3
- For Always does in-depth reviews and gave me my first one (review) too. Calindreams 09:51, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
For. He has a very creative reviewing style which is unique and effective ... ...KUN...Spam 07:10, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
For. per above. --Mn-z 18:18, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. Per his consistently excellent reviews. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:58, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Sure. http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/9/97/MacManiasig.png Sir MacMania CUN—[23:32 28 Aug 2009]
[edit] July
[edit] Boomer (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Score: +4 lazy bums
- Nom & for. I think he had something to do with PEEING, at some point. We should probably recognise that by giving him this. Oh, and he's going on what for him is the reviewing rampage to and them all at the moment, and I wanted to see if a nom would encourage him to keep it up. --UU - natter
16:57, Jul 4
But I did 30 last month! You stink, UU, you big meanie! *cries* Also, For. Saberwolf116 17:36, 4 July 2009 (UTC)For Even though he only has five.Staircase 17:39, 4 July 2009 (UTC)- for. hooray for figureheads! 17:59, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- For Good review for me actually gave me something constructive to work with. Much appreciated. Puppy/Radio VOTE POOF! 06:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Whenever I needed a review, he was my immediate go-to guy. Always available, always helpful, always constructive, and a real swell guy to boot.
Fucking against. --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 06:04, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] ChiefjusticeDS (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Nom He's been tiring me out this month, and his reviews are pretty good. Saberwolf116 15:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- For Excellent review, peope are really using them. Staircase 16:42, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Changing to Chief. He's a great new reviewer. Saberwolf116 17:24, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Self for I decided not to be humble, thanks for the nomination, I'm glad the reviews are being well received. A brief note, I won't be reviewing anything for a couple of weeks as I'm going away, but will try and keep it up until I go and afterwards. Thanks again --ChiefjusticeDS 18:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Superstrong
For. clearest vitamin-free pee ever! ... ...KUN...Spam 09:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- 45 Excelent for both my articles and my ego. Orian57 Talk
12:03 7 July 2009
- Yes! Excellent reviewer, could be a little less enthusiastic with his scores, but meh. ~LL suuucks.~ ~vandalise here~ 12:33, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- There's currently SIX reviews on the Pee queue. SIX! And all (well, largely) because of this guy. I rest my case. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 18:11, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Not anymore. My checking gun is out of ammuntion. Saberwolf116 21:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
For. Bad picture, but still for. Mr Brute! It's 11 July-03:10 ...with savings!
-
Having a look a little while ago there were 20 PEEreviews pending. Due to the diligence and hard work of ChiefJusticeDS that number was whittled down to 6, an easily manageable number. Now he's stopped reviewing and it's gone to 13. COME BACK YOU BASTARD. How do you think I feel having to pick up your slack like this? Oh, no, don't stop to care about the Puppy's feelings, just go skipping off through the meadows. YOU MAKE ME SICK! And while I think about it
. Puppy/Radio VOTE POOF! - There's a chance that I may have voted twice by accident... ooops Puppy/Radio VOTE POOF!
- For. I just remembered, I don't have to wait until the end of the month to vote anymore. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 22:42, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Abso-fucking-lutely. - T.L.B.
WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 05:32, Jul 31
- Does good reviews. 22:35, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom. Though my vote is cast elsewhere, Puppy gave me an exceptional Pee the other day, and has done the same for others as well, and therefore deserves at least a nomination. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Next month. Staircase 17:57, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. Contributes many a high quality review.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 00:50, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Against Per Escalator Puppy/Radio VOTE POOF!
[edit] June
[edit] Staircase (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Nom and For. He has been here for less than a week and he did, like, 15 pee's already. Also, he is a good reviewer. Also also, vote for him. Also also also, I ran out of things to say. Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/4/4c/Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 11:51 June 1 '09
For. Saberwolf116 13:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
For. For a noob, he sure did pick up this racket easily... More easily than yours truly, in fact. • <14:16 Jun 01, 2009>
For. per above. --Mnb'z 15:17, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
For winning two awards in June, his first full month. http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/b/b0/Icons-flag-it.png Puttano 19:12,1June,2009
- For -
RAHB
19:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
For. Per Cajek. 19:16, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:32, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Mega-For! I took a look at this guy's reviews, and the things are hugely indepth. As good as UU's or Gerrycheever's. Yes. Vote for him. • • • Necropaxx (T) 02:57, Jun 3
- Uh-Huh.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 22:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Most Definitely for. from fellow n00b It's Me Bitches! Don't worry, I won't kill you.
Um... Ya! —The la Zhel 14:39, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
For. For a man I saw on the stair who wasn't there. It must have been you !--RomArtus (talk). 20:10, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yup. - T.L.B.
WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 02:23, Jun 7
- I like this guy. —Sir SysRq (talk) 23:34, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- pointless last-minute for. hooray! 13:05, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Saberwolf116 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom(omnomnom) and For. I go for quality over quantity, and this guy actually has both to offer. And that nutcase of a sockpuppet noob needs competition.
- I appreciate the nom Luvvy, but I won this last month and already voted for Stairs. That being said, I do enjoy having my ego boosted, so thankies =P Saberwolf116 23:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- But... A competition without competition isn't even worth voting about, so the sockpuppet needs competition. Hence, I nommed a good, high quality reviewer. You. -- DameViktoria 09:37, 21 Jun
- Who is Steps meant to be a sockpupet of? Or is this a joke from somewhere else that I'm missing out on? Orian57 Talk
11:50 21 June 2009
- He's a sock of Cajek, isn't it obvious? —Sir SysRq (talk) 16:11, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm a sockpuppet of Sir Hymie Rae Tooten. Staircase 16:39, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oh right, it's a template. No but seriously, are you a sock? Orian57 Talk
16:40 21 June 2009
- Do I look like a sock? And who would I be a sock of? I don't get what's up with you people and socks anyway. Why would someone do that, besides as a joke? Staircase 16:41, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Well people become a sockpuppet if they've been banned and come back under another username. Or that's my understanding anyway. Orian57 Talk
16:47 21 June 2009
- Oh. Well. That'll come in handy if I ever get banned. But seriously, I just came here to have some fun and write things. Staircase 16:51, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah I thought you were just a normal user, too. Any ideas why luvvy's being so cunty about you? Orian57 Talk
16:57 21 June 2009
- No, she said something on her talk page about me whoring everything everywhere. Staircase 17:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah I thought you were just a normal user, too. Any ideas why luvvy's being so cunty about you? Orian57 Talk
- Oh. Well. That'll come in handy if I ever get banned. But seriously, I just came here to have some fun and write things. Staircase 16:51, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Well people become a sockpuppet if they've been banned and come back under another username. Or that's my understanding anyway. Orian57 Talk
- Do I look like a sock? And who would I be a sock of? I don't get what's up with you people and socks anyway. Why would someone do that, besides as a joke? Staircase 16:41, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oh right, it's a template. No but seriously, are you a sock? Orian57 Talk
- I'm a sockpuppet of Sir Hymie Rae Tooten. Staircase 16:39, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- He's a sock of Cajek, isn't it obvious? —Sir SysRq (talk) 16:11, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Who is Steps meant to be a sockpupet of? Or is this a joke from somewhere else that I'm missing out on? Orian57 Talk
- But... A competition without competition isn't even worth voting about, so the sockpuppet needs competition. Hence, I nommed a good, high quality reviewer. You. -- DameViktoria 09:37, 21 Jun
- For. Thoughtful commentary, insightful recommendations, and a work ethic that I greatly admire. His effort and the results I've seen, and continue to see, are beyond reproach. I'll vote the same next month, as it seems unlikely he'll win this, but he was deserving of back to back awards. --T. (talk) 17:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] May
[edit] Saberwolf116 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom but not for yet - withholding my vote in true Boomer stylee in case of last minute ties. However, he's done a darn fine job in the last month. --UU - natter
10:59, May 1
- Self-for. makes me feel like a Douche, though. Saberwolf116 17:30, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Um... What the fuck is that suppose to mean, Jew?
PlebKUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 00:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm a Christian-get it right! And I didn't write that comment, so you know who did... Saberwolf116 22:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Um... What the fuck is that suppose to mean, Jew?
- For (tied for) most reviews last month, and far above anyone else who hasn't won this award yet. --Mnb'z 21:09, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yup. Per above. 21:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ay. Per his review. --silicson 17:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Comment I'd feel stupid if I won this award without doing a review this month, so here. Saberwolf116 21:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Keep. I'm not gonna promise anything, but I'm voting here for now. If someone decides to go on a reviewing rampage, as is so often the case, things may be... something. I don't know where I was going with that.--http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/b/b0/Icons-flag-it.png Puttano 18:38, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Permanant keep now, for his review of my Leprechaun.--http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/3/35/SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods13:13, 5 May 2009 13:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Bless. per his reviews this month Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/4/4c/Egypt_orb_spinning.gif 13:05, 5 May '09
For. Quantity + quality. 22:44, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. His pee of my UnBook was quite good. —Sir Guildensternenstein 22:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. Fuck waiting, I'm voting now. Also, fuck voting for me - thanks for the nom, but I've won this already and really don't need it again. Saberwolf here has done more reviews than anyone over the last month and a half, has drastically improved his quality, has done a good job, and deserves this award. --UU - natter
08:21, May 13
- Ayup. • • • Necropaxx (T) 02:44, May 14
- For. Can't be bothered to wait either. -- 20:19, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Clearly deserves it. – http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/f/f2/FuhQ.gif http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/8/84/ZDsig.gif ...·º•ø®@» 15:18, 16 May 2009
Who else deserves this? —The la Zhel 15:43, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- UU always deserves it, but seeing how he said he didn't want it, I guess I do. :) Saberwolf116 18:20, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Totally. He reviewed my article medium rare, exactly per my requests. Boy, I hate it when reviewers freakin' overcook your review.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 19:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm a vegetarian...>.< Saberwolf116 03:24, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. Is there anyone else? Pieface 12:32, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yup Been on the reciveing end of a one of his reviews. Was helpful. ~Orian57~
~Talk~
16:36 24 May 2009
- For 45 in-depth reviews versus the person in second place's 14. No contest • <21:20 May 25, 2009>
- For. SaberWolf's just put an incredible amount of work into Pee Review this month. He deserves this. 22:50, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- For -
RAHB
20:32, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- For --Dame http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/b/bb/Sonjesig.pnghttp://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/7/70/Cherry-blossom.gif 16:58, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Under user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom
and for. Honestly, I don't think Saberwolf116 is ready for this award yet. No offense, SW: you're doing a great job, but I just don't think you're quite there. Granted, UU only did one (fantastic) review last month, but he spends hours and hours keeping the whole Pee Review system running. And he's got almost as many reviews as the next two runners-up combined. Guy deserves to be recognized again.22:14, 1 May 2009 (UTC) - It's alright hype, I don't really expect to win, though i'd love to. UU does a good job at maintenence, too. Saberwolf116 22:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I kind of notice this award is aimed at treatising users who produce reviews, not organise the system. That is more of a UotM category in my opinion, of which UU thoroughly deserves a shout at some point this year. I'm withholding my vote until I see some nominations who actually produce more reviews than just one. Even if it's just Saberwolf116 in the end, I wouldn't care. Someone who keeps up the deliverance of reviews is rewarded. -- 00:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Actually Nach, i've produced several reviews this month. Saberwolf116 00:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Apologies, I didn't intend to imply that you had only done one review, this is bad wording on my part - I mean to say that I'm withholding my vote until there is competition for thou. If not, then I'll happily vote for you. -- 22:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Actually Nach, i've produced several reviews this month. Saberwolf116 00:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I kind of notice this award is aimed at treatising users who produce reviews, not organise the system. That is more of a UotM category in my opinion, of which UU thoroughly deserves a shout at some point this year. I'm withholding my vote until I see some nominations who actually produce more reviews than just one. Even if it's just Saberwolf116 in the end, I wouldn't care. Someone who keeps up the deliverance of reviews is rewarded. -- 00:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- For That one review was really good. --C:\syndrome\_ 16:30, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. --Docile hippopotamus 11:11, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. Nobody does better PEEs than UU period(.) -OptyC Sucks!
CUN18:00, 9 May
For. This is like that time in March that I nommed UU for all these reasons and more, and everyone was all like "na-uh" and I was all like "ya-huh". IronLung 07:56, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
For. Holy shit, UU hasn't won this yet???? >:O • <16:21 May 16, 2009>- Of course he has. Else everyone would have instantly voted for him. 16:22, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Whoops, I'm dumb... Really, really dumb. • <16:26 May 16, 2009>
- Perhaps you should switch over then? ;) Saberwolf116 19:03, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- And they call ME a whore http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/b/b0/Icons-flag-it.png Puttano 19:24,16May,2009
- Well, I don't go spamming every talk page I can find. Saberwolf116 19:50, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Neither do I. I just, well, *mumble* http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/b/b0/Icons-flag-it.png Puttano 20:10,16May,2009
- Well, I don't go spamming every talk page I can find. Saberwolf116 19:50, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- And they call ME a whore http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/b/b0/Icons-flag-it.png Puttano 19:24,16May,2009
- Perhaps you should switch over then? ;) Saberwolf116 19:03, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Whoops, I'm dumb... Really, really dumb. • <16:26 May 16, 2009>
- Of course he has. Else everyone would have instantly voted for him. 16:22, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] April
[edit] Projectmayhem666 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom & For (again) He should've won last month--http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/3/35/SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 02:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- Problem is I've not reviewed anything this month, so I don't really qualify, I will, however now just so that I do. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 11:31, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- Please don't vote for someone else again this month. Modesty can be annoying.--http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/3/35/SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 19:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- Problem is I've not reviewed anything this month, so I don't really qualify, I will, however now just so that I do. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 11:31, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
For. I'm apparently annoyingly modest. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 12:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- Yes you are--http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/3/35/SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 19:14, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- For per above. -Sir Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:23, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- For and I suspect this is going to be yet another RotM coronation... 22:37, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks guys, I didn't expect to win, my cast isn't off until April 21st, so I can't do much on here, will keep reviewing as much as possible though. Really appreciate votes. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 12:05, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
For. Man it was awesome when I won this award instead of Projectmayhem in a month in which I only did one review. I wish that could happen all the time! IronLung 03:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- OH YEAH!! I DID MY FIRST REVIEW OF APRIL!! IM CATCHIN UP TO YA PM666!!--http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/3/35/SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 14:38, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- For -
RAHB
08:43, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- For per above. --Mnb'z 04:56, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- For. How'd you get the cast? Breaking a bone presumably, but how? -- 20:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- I was hit by a car cycling to work, the doctor also seemed to think my bent wrist was far more of a concern than the bashed in bleeding head and the puking everywhere. But what can you expect from the NHS :p. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 22:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ouch, blimey. I've only ever fractured a wrist in my lifetime. I'm must be invincible or something. I hear you at the NHS comment though. -- 01:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hey Everyone! Did you know I Broke My Nose!!! Just in case all of Uncyc didn't know. Woody On Fire!
Talking Woody Stalking Woody 03:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- I can top all of you. I broke my middle finger, and had to get a cast on it that prevented me from lowering it when I put down the rest of my fingers. Pissed a lot of people off...--http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/3/35/SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 13:13, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hey Everyone! Did you know I Broke My Nose!!! Just in case all of Uncyc didn't know. Woody On Fire!
- Ouch, blimey. I've only ever fractured a wrist in my lifetime. I'm must be invincible or something. I hear you at the NHS comment though. -- 01:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- I was hit by a car cycling to work, the doctor also seemed to think my bent wrist was far more of a concern than the bashed in bleeding head and the puking everywhere. But what can you expect from the NHS :p. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 22:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- For. I've been away for a while and have been unable to contribute. For that I apologize; but I'm glad to see others keep contributing. Even though I haven't agreed with all your reviews I'm glad you're trying to help so my vote is there for you =) --Kit talk
23:21 24 April
- For. I thought this month I'd follow ol' Boomer's policy of not voting until late in case of last minute ties, but it's pretty clear there won't be one. And I'd just like to comment that this guy is one of the most improved reviewers I've seen - from one line a box specials to genuinely helpful contributions. I just hope it continues once he has the award! --UU - natter
08:29, Apr 28
- You know it will, oh, I'm back by the way :p --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 09:34, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] March
[edit] Projectmayhem666 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom + For According to the PEEING page, he is tied for 1st (with me) for the most in-depth reviews this month. Therefore, obviously, nomination. (I see this as the best reviewer "of the month," not just good reviewer. I don't care if you just got here 2 seconds ago or 80 years ago, I go by the month)--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 19:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ya know, there should be a nominator of the month award. Just Saying.--http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/3/35/SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 01:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
::For I just saw this a second ago, I'm still trying to do reviews, but again with the broken wrist doesnt help. Thanks for the nom. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 15:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- My vote is going on someone else. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 15:54, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Aw, that was nice of you. Give up your vote for someone else. Hmph. Making me all teary-eyed.--http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/3/35/SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 20:13, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- My vote is going on someone else. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 15:54, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Crap, you just pulled ahead of me for most reveiws. I'm gonna have to fix that.--http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/3/35/SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods
- I have a fractured wrist too, so it's quite impressive. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 11:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- I fixed it. We tied again (as soon as the PEEING list is updated).--http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/3/35/SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods
- I've done 2 reviews since it was last updated, so we're still not at a tie, I consistently do between 1 & 2 a day for reviews. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 10:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- DAMMIT! Stop pulling ahead of me! *cry* --http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/3/35/SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods
- I've done 2 reviews since it was last updated, so we're still not at a tie, I consistently do between 1 & 2 a day for reviews. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 10:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- I fixed it. We tied again (as soon as the PEEING list is updated).--http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/3/35/SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods
- I have a fractured wrist too, so it's quite impressive. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 11:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Well even so, remember, only one part of your review was very helpful :p --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 17:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- What? You talking to me? Which review. Most of my reviews are very helpful, the only one that wasn't was the review of your article. --http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/3/35/SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 23:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yo, man. I'm sorry you only got my vote. With all you've did here, I thought you would've pulled ahead, but aw well. Maybe next month.--http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/3/35/SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods
[edit] Under user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom +
ForThere doesn't seem to be any obvious choice this month. The top active reviewer who hasn't one this award is only at 14 good reviews. Under user did 109, and is 44 ahead on the person in second place. And, I believe he did some (like 40+) reviews before the Review committee started keeping track. --Mnb'z 23:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)- But I've only done about 4 this year so far. Seriously gize, reward those who are putting in the effort at the moment, don't just go by volume alone. --UU - natter
09:24, Mar 2
- I'm going to leave my vote here, for the same reason I nominated you last month: you seem to be given a new job here every month and keep doing them all to a high standard. IronLung 18:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- But I've only done about 4 this year so far. Seriously gize, reward those who are putting in the effort at the moment, don't just go by volume alone. --UU - natter
- For. Crazily enough, I actually think that he deserves this award. Bizarre! IronLung 02:18, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Wait, you can win this more than once? I didn't know that. But still, he hasn't reviewed anyone this month, so how can he be RotM?--http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/3/35/SBQ3.JPGSmokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods
- I'm sure he has. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 10:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Kit paddle (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom & for. Strangely enough, RotM isn't just here to recognise those who've done vast quantities of reviews, it's about making an impact, and being a good, helpful reviewer, which Kit has done. Polite, helpful, consistent, he might not be a machine on the level of some, but he does a good job. MDL won this award when he had done about 12 reviews, so forget the quantity, and reward those who are doing a good job. --UU - natter
09:24, Mar 2
- For. Seriously, why is UU being nominated? We need to encourage new reviewers, not LUFC fans who are past it. Anyway, Kit here gave me a tasty review, so I'm voting for the IKEA founder. -- 16:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- For per U.U. --Mnb'z 17:46, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] IronLung (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom. IronLung has also been doing a decent shift, giving helpful feedback and popping up with some quality reviews. Deserves at least your consideration. --UU - natter
09:24, Mar 2
- For. Yesh. • • • Necropaxx (T) 16:07, Mar 2
- For I always find his reviews to be fair and helpful. He puts out quality reviews at a consistent pace. They may not be frequent, but quality over quantity I say. I always am happy to see a little note promising a review from him when ever I have a review request out. Keep it up! ~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 16:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- For. Quality reviews. -- 19:55, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- For. --Docile hippopotamus 23:36, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Decent pee. // ( • • ) 11:58, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Gerrycheevers (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom&for Gave me a very good and helpful review, so get gets my nom.—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 15:48, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- For. He reviewed UnNews:Massacre at Brookfield Zoo once. I'm still grateful for it. -Sir Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] February
[edit] Tagstit (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom + 4 had 22 (according the the Cajek's list) good reviews last month. --S'r Mnbvcxz 20:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Obvious for. I doubt there's even going to be another serious nomination. 22:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- That is what, the 3rd coronation in a row? Nothing wrong with that though, we just had obvious choices --S'r Mnbvcxz 00:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Pee Review is weird. It's weird how everyone has a massive run of frantic reviewing and then burns out right around 60 reviews. 03:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- I think some of the older reviewers are still going up slowly but surely, a month or two ago, the burnout level was closer to 50.--S'r Mnbvcxz 03:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Looks to me like many people review like machines until they win this, and then come to a juddering halt. Look down the winners list: going like trains; win award; little to nothing. Some then pick back up again, slowly, months later. Anyone would think we were obsessed with awards or something. --UU - natter
14:39, Feb 10
- You described me pretty well there. When I win EVERYTHING I'm going to jump ship to ED. --Nachlader 23:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- i've noticed this too. RotM's stop reviewing, UotM's stop doing mundane tasks, WotM's cease to write...maybe we need to rethink our award system...
- You described me pretty well there. When I win EVERYTHING I'm going to jump ship to ED. --Nachlader 23:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Looks to me like many people review like machines until they win this, and then come to a juddering halt. Look down the winners list: going like trains; win award; little to nothing. Some then pick back up again, slowly, months later. Anyone would think we were obsessed with awards or something. --UU - natter
- I think some of the older reviewers are still going up slowly but surely, a month or two ago, the burnout level was closer to 50.--S'r Mnbvcxz 03:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Pee Review is weird. It's weird how everyone has a massive run of frantic reviewing and then burns out right around 60 reviews. 03:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- W♥v. A fantastic reviewer. Plus, I'm sort of obligated to vote for my own adorable noob. —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. He has been doing a great job around here. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. • • • Necropaxx (T) 17:35, Feb 5
- For. He's reviewed some of my stuff before, and was very helpful to me back when I was but a mere N00b, even if I didn't exactly appreciate it then. Keep it up, dude. --Guildensternenstein 06:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. Has blossomed quickly into a model reviewer. --UU - natter
14:39, Feb 10
- For. I might not always I agree but I sure damn respect his opinion - constructive and helpful. Gets my vote! --kit 17:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. Not really the deciding vote, but anything to boost his confidence. --Nachlader 23:42, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- for. 21:30, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Under_user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom + for. Our new Captain Catheter is doing a sterling job of doing both his job and someone else's job. Also, I wanted to prove Hyperbole wrong. IronLung 06:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'll kill you. 06:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Didn't he already win. --S'r Mnbvcxz 15:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, but technically there's no rule that you can only win these once. 22:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] January
[edit] Mnbvcxz (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom & Strong For. By far the most active reviewer on site in Dec, averaging a review a day to catapult into the Top 10 - no mean feat. I just hope he doesn't stop after winning this award, as he's doing a great job. --UU - natter
09:34, Jan 1
- Uber w♥v. Mnbvcxz is my hero. He's a wrecking machine! —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:26, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Darn, I wanted to nom him first. Oh well, for. • • • Necropaxx (T) 20:03, Jan 2
- For. It's kind of obvious. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:56, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. I'm for this! Dame http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/b2/PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
For. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:34, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- For -
RAHB
05:32, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- For Mnbvcxz definately deserves this. --Docile hippopotamus 06:39, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. -- 20:44, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. IronLung 04:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. Even gave himself an (unfavorable) review over at UGotM! 04:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
For. Of course! Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell • Latest literary excretion) __ 20:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
For. --Tagstit 20:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Docile hippopotamus (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom & For tied with Nachlader for 2nd most good reviews for December. I hope he starts reviewing again after the holiday season is over. --Mnbvcxz 18:02, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Five He did a good review on my article that I'm willing to waste a vote just to whore it on RotM. J-Shea 06:02, 9 January 2009 (UTC)