Uncyclopedia:Useless Gobshite of the Year/archive
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
[edit] Voting for the 2008 UGotY
[edit] Cajek (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: +2 _NoCajeks_
- Nom and for. Come on, it's Cajek! -
Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate
17:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- For Wikia? C'mon, it's Cajek. Srz. • <23:00 Jan 14, 2009>
[edit] Cows go moo when they poo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: 1 MS Paint fans
- N♥m && f♥r. I just hate this user so much. He's inspired too many joke noms in his short stay on Uncyc. Although his Gordon Brown image wasn't bad. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Joe SheA (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: 4.5 GuyS WHo CAn'T reAd THE RuLes
- Nom and for. In the words of Joe SheA himself:
- He can'T Write foR Shit withouT Typing iN ALL CAPS.
- He caN Not learN Correct capitalizatioN
- He waS Just burninG Your doG!
- He iS A nE'E dO Well (seE Block historY)
And he nominated himself for GOTM. The evidence is clear. --Docile hippopotamus 00:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
PWHORE THAT FUCKING ASSHAT J-Shea 00:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
For.Bastard disqualified himself for humiliation! Give 'im what he wants! Not A Good Username360 01:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- MAKE HIM UGOTM, if not UGotY. J-Shea 01:21, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 moar thing. penis. J-Shea 19:39, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- I concur. - [19:42 13 January 2009]
- Your mom likes it big, hard and fast. J-Shea 19:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Why, you god-forsaken little- <This message has been deleted for excessive cussing, name-calling, flaming, and very illeagal pony fights> <Joe SheA, by the way, sucks.> This guy should win Sockpuppeteer, too! Not A Good Username360 00:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Your mom likes it big, hard and fast. J-Shea 19:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- I concur. - [19:42 13 January 2009]
- 1 moar thing. penis. J-Shea 19:39, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- MAKE HIM UGOTM, if not UGotY. J-Shea 01:21, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
For. I think I did that right... - 66.233.240.67 23:02, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- FOR! --Poobear 07:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Kip the Dip (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: 1 Guys who still wonder WTF happened to Kip.
Nom and For Oh man this guy used to be one of our best contributers and have gotten so much attention of the Cabaladmins. Since then he hasn't been block for worth a darn except for FFS and other things. This guy used to get blocked on a regular basis sometimes even more than Cajek. Now I think he lost his touch and therefore very useless. Please Vote for him as UGotY. —The precedingunsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 01:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Wikia (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: 5 citations needed
Nom and For Arguably their finest year to date, Wikia continue to raise the bar on defining what it means to be a Useless Gobshite. My gut feeling is they could be a regular contended for this award, but for me after a slow start to the year Wikia made this award their own. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me)
For. - I never usually vote on Gobshite awards, but it's rare to see such dedication to gobshitery--Sycamore (Talk) 08:58, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. Outstanding contributions to fail. --UU - natter
13:53, Jan 13
For. • • • Necropaxx (T) 17:13, Jan 13
For. As much as I'd like to see Yettie take this, Wikia is both more useless and far more of a gobshite. 19:36, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
lolDomain Colin
ALL YOUR BASE
Heaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 22:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment don't throw away this award on Wikia, at least give it to a real person, like Jimbo Wales --Mnbvcxz 18:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Are you confusing Wikia with the Wikimedia Foundation? 19:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Wikia is the company the owns uncyclopedia, right? --Mnbvcxz 19:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- I think they host us, not own us. At any rate, Jimbo is not associated with them. At least, I don't think he is. 19:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- I thought we were owned by the same people (more or less) who run wikipedia? --Mnbvcxz 19:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No, Wikia is a company set up by Jimbo Wales built around wiki software and helped out by people like our own Sannse. Wikimedia Foundation is a company set up by Jimbo Wales built around wiki software and helped out by people like our own Sannse. Its important to highlight the differences. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me)
- No, Wikia is a company set up by Jimbo Wales built around wiki software and helped out by people like our own Sannse. Wikimedia Foundation is a company set up by Jimbo Wales built around wiki software and helped out by people like our own Sannse. Its important to highlight the differences. -- Sir Mhaille
- Hmm. It does seem that Wikimedia and Wikia have common founders and investors. Including Jimbo.[1] However, they're separate projects, and neither of them own us. 19:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Then who in the name of Oscar Wilde owns this wiki? --Mnbvcxz 19:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think anybody owns it. Certainly not the Cabal. That would be silly, because there is no Cabal. 19:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, then who is responsible for the .wikia.com being in the sites url? --Mnbvcxz 19:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Who owns this? MrN
http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/4/4e/HalIcon.png http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/6/6d/Goldboobs.jpg 19:59, Jan 21
- Depends on how you define ownership. Due to the licensing, I believe the author retains the "copyleft" of any contributions. But, I could be wrong. But, that still doesn't answer the question of who has the legal ownership of the wiki itself. --Mnbvcxz 05:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- As far as I know, the code is open source, and all the contributions are owned by the contributors. So that would make it owned, basically, by no one. The only thing that requires ownership is the servers; Wikia owns them, but we could move. 06:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- I believe Wikia does the uncyclopedia.org site name. Also, I believe "Uncyclopedia" is a non-profit entity owned by Wikia, right? Despite the fact that the content itself is owned by the authors, and licensed under a copyleft Creative Commons license. As for moving, I think we also create mirrors (and if fact, there are some independent mirror sites floating around) without actually moving off of wikia. --Mnbvcxz 06:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Forum:Some links to Uncyc forums of the past. Uncyclopedia WAS a non profit site. Wikia then bought the domain name from the sites founder without the knowledge of the community. They then added links to their other wikis which run adverts, and then changed our name to deceive their advertisers. All of this was done against the will of the Uncyc community. Considering how Uncyc is being used by Wikia now, I think it's a stretch to consider us a non-profit site. We clearly make money for Wikia. Try asking them how much. ;) MrN
http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/4/4e/HalIcon.png http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/6/6d/Goldboobs.jpg 12:53, Jan 24
- As to who "owns" Uncyc... Well Jimbo Wales clearly thinks he does. I find his "we know how to not fuck people" comment particularly ironic. MrN
http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/4/4e/HalIcon.png http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/6/6d/Goldboobs.jpg 14:53, Jan 25
- Theoretically, if we left Wikia, could we sue Wikia for violating the copyleft of our contributions by using them in a for profit manner? --Mnbvcxz 20:57, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- As to who "owns" Uncyc... Well Jimbo Wales clearly thinks he does. I find his "we know how to not fuck people" comment particularly ironic. MrN
- Forum:Some links to Uncyc forums of the past. Uncyclopedia WAS a non profit site. Wikia then bought the domain name from the sites founder without the knowledge of the community. They then added links to their other wikis which run adverts, and then changed our name to deceive their advertisers. All of this was done against the will of the Uncyc community. Considering how Uncyc is being used by Wikia now, I think it's a stretch to consider us a non-profit site. We clearly make money for Wikia. Try asking them how much. ;) MrN
- I believe Wikia does the uncyclopedia.org site name. Also, I believe "Uncyclopedia" is a non-profit entity owned by Wikia, right? Despite the fact that the content itself is owned by the authors, and licensed under a copyleft Creative Commons license. As for moving, I think we also create mirrors (and if fact, there are some independent mirror sites floating around) without actually moving off of wikia. --Mnbvcxz 06:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- As far as I know, the code is open source, and all the contributions are owned by the contributors. So that would make it owned, basically, by no one. The only thing that requires ownership is the servers; Wikia owns them, but we could move. 06:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Depends on how you define ownership. Due to the licensing, I believe the author retains the "copyleft" of any contributions. But, I could be wrong. But, that still doesn't answer the question of who has the legal ownership of the wiki itself. --Mnbvcxz 05:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Who owns this? MrN
- Ok, then who is responsible for the .wikia.com being in the sites url? --Mnbvcxz 19:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think anybody owns it. Certainly not the Cabal. That would be silly, because there is no Cabal. 19:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Then who in the name of Oscar Wilde owns this wiki? --Mnbvcxz 19:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- I thought we were owned by the same people (more or less) who run wikipedia? --Mnbvcxz 19:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- I think they host us, not own us. At any rate, Jimbo is not associated with them. At least, I don't think he is. 19:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Wikia is the company the owns uncyclopedia, right? --Mnbvcxz 19:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Are you confusing Wikia with the Wikimedia Foundation? 19:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] YesTimeToEdit (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: 1 YesTimeToAbandonUncyclopedia
Nom and for leaving the wikia. If that isn't gobshitery, I don't know what is. Also, she pretended to be a boy for several months. --Mnbvcxz 15:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
The name's Gobshite, Useless Gobshite - [15:54 13 January 2009]
- Erm, I believe you already voted, Yettie. Gobshite. 05:35, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- What? No, I didn't vote for Joe, I was merely concurring. - [11:03 17 January 2009]
- But there is a 'for' picture next to your concurificationism. --J-Shea 11:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Mmm...Not A Good Username360 added that. And besides if I was making a vote, it would not be indented. - [11:16 17 January 2009]
- But there is a 'for' picture next to your concurificationism. --J-Shea 11:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- What? No, I didn't vote for Joe, I was merely concurring. - [11:03 17 January 2009]
Against. Acorrding to the thesaurus: "Concur=Agree". What other kind of person would put "I agree" on a nomination and not be voting for said person, then get upset when someone else thinks that said person forgot the
For. template? Answer: A gobshite, however, YTTE comes off as a useful gobshite, and his sin is not a big one. I shall NOT condemn/vote for such a user. There are more deserving gobshites this year. Sir Not A Good Username360
KUN 18:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment but she doesn't know what gender she is, she left the wiki, and sense she sorta came back, most of her posts have been about confusing people about her gender. --Mnbvcxz 00:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment not really, in my opinion, one cannot win UGotY and N00b Of the Month. UGotM, maybe, but not UGotY. Sir Not A Good Username360
KUN 00:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I never won NotM. You know why? Because Uncyclopedia is the WORST. 19:34, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Da boi's (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: 1 Javall-obsessed maniacs
Nom and For He (it?) definitely deserves this. What a moron. Da boi's0 07:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)