Uncyclopedia:VFH/X Japan

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search


X Japan (history, logs)

Article: X Japan

Score: 12.5 scientifically impossible hairstyles 300x1.jpg

Nominated by: Black flamingo
For: 12.5
  1. One of the best articles I've read for a while, had me giggling all the way through. --Black Flamingo 15:33, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Weak for. I laughed only some, but that's probably because I don't know much about X Japan.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN Candidate NOTM USS Pees Stain ) On Sunday, 03:35, June 13 2010 UTC
  3. Self-for. Naturally. User:Hiatus Hernia/sig215:40, Jun 13, 2010
  4. Ankh smite.png For Article of the month, and that guy TOAST could learn a lesson from Hiatus about editing, editing, editing a page until it shines. Aleister in Chains 20:37 13 6 MMX
  5. I was all "I gotta go update my Marty Friedman article" but apparely the links were there already. -- monika 20:40, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Symbol for vote.svg For. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 21:48, 13 June 2010
  7. Symbol for vote.svg Toast. --Matfen 20:36, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
  8. For. SURE! But a bit less drab boring factual content could be well served with more of the absurd. Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/7/7a/Agnideva-small.jpg http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/0/02/AGT-logo-small.jpg 23:02, Jun 14 23:02, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
  9. For. InMooseWeTrust 09:39, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Symbol abstain vote.svg For. Per Romartus -- the humor level could be bumped up a bit for the non-visual kei inclined.  Happytimes are here!* http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/9/94/Happytimes.gif (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  20 Jun 2010 ~ 18:52 (UTC)
  11. Symbol for vote.svg For.. Only half-funny when you've never heard of the band, but the same goes for my article and I'm no hypocrit.--thehallway 08:07, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
  12. For. Horace Donald Westenchester 22:54, June 24, 2010 (UTC) invalid vote, banned user rev. zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) I am the dirt under your rollers. 03:25, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
  13. For. I giggled. Necropaxx (T) {~} Saturday, 19:37, Jun 26 2010
  14. For. What makes this so funny is that half of this stuff is actually true. You probably won't get much out of it if you're not a fan, but I wouldn't change a thing. 82.130.26.9 18:12, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 0

No against votes

Comments
  • 'Abstain. A worthy effort and well written. It just didn't make me laugh which is a shame. Sorry. RomArtus Imperator(talk) 23:01, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
    That's a question I've had since I've got here, the laugh factor. Lots of satire is not "funny" satire, but presents a twist or a comment on an existing reality or an important "issue of the day". That type of non-laugh satire appeals to me, as well as the unexpected bellylaugh (which I've gotten from some of the stupidest things here). Aleister 23:50 13 6 MMX
If I couldn't can't even raise one small inner laugh then I can't see how I can honestly vote for a yes. It has all the right ingredients - except that one for me. It's not unlike Guildy's Red Sea which also is very well put together but that again I couldn't laugh with. --RomArtus Imperator(talk) 06:12, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
Ouch... I didn't write it to be "not funny satire", though. It's supposed to be funny. I mean, I laughed when I wrote it. I'm thinking even though you don't need to know X Japan, some fundamental knowledge of J-rock and visual kei is required. User:Hiatus Hernia/sig206:24, Jun 14, 2010
Ok I will sign up for an on-line course. I know you were writing to be funny here - just that It wasn't to my taste. That's why I have otherwise praised it but at the same time couldn't vote for it. --RomArtus Imperator(talk) 06:31, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.