From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Rules and procedures:
- Before doing anything else, make sure that you are well versed on Uncyclopedia's deletion policy.
- If you're too lazy to read the deletion policy, please, at least, carefully read this list of rules.
- But seriously, read the deletion policy.
- Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
- Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
- If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
- Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.
- Add
{{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so may invalidate the vote.
- Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
- If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
- Thank you.
- No, really, thank you very much.
- Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
- Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a *
- * - Creates a bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the *).
- Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
- --~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
- Do not revert edits of the administrators.
- If you are neither an administrator nor a designated poopsmith, do not remove anything from VFD; doing so will get you banned for a very long time.
VFD: Where bad articles go to get
recycled.
[edit] Pages for Deletion
Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nailbat before we tear our hair out in frustration.
This also applies to Uncyclopedia In jokes (see: Category:Uncyclopedia In-Jokes).
To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.
Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.
If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions. This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the 
Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.
If VFD is full, or if you are an IP or a user of less than 4 days, and you want to report something as potential rubbish for us to vote on in the future, please proceed to the Poopsmith's Lounge. Just remember not to sit on the chairs.
Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete rather random sectional template put together rather sloppily. I think the subject is just too broad to have a useful sectional template. Of course, if someone wants to fix it, I might be willing to change my vote. --Mn-z 20:50, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. --Docile hippopotamus 00:16, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Ahhhhhwaaaaaaahuhhhhhhhh --Roman Dog Bird 20:20, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
 Delete. --Mn-z 20:42, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
 Comment. Surely there's some humor in a bunch of posters where Uncle Sam points at you and tells you to do something not particularly funny? --C:\syndrome\_ 04:32, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete typical Moviecruft. I.e. most of the article consists various listcruft and other unfunny filler. --Mn-z 18:10, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete This was just babbled out with out pause for thought or contemplation. This utter cock was a rolled red carpet from the very jaws of a dirty Hell. This article came into my flat and stole my cat. It put said cat in a microwave and baked it like a soft jacket potato. This article has let me down it's let you down - but most of all it's left it self down. I don't want to see or hear anything about this redundant Soda-Stream of a misguided side spunk of an article again. I want us all to join hands, surround this article and hoki-kokie this bad child of crass dogged menace into the darkest most unwelcome grave on an island infested with the congealed blood of misunderstood wasps. I don't like this article. OBLONGLobster. (hello) 19:20, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete is this vanity/cyberbulling, random, or some sort strange of British (or minor-nation-ish) humor? --Mn-z 17:18, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete as nominator. This has been made redundant by the removal of Category:Censored from {{C}}. I already removed one transclusion from my userspace, but there are others which need to be dealt with. --Pentium5dot1(read this)t~^_^~c 05:39, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete although I would suggest a redirect, as its used in old forum posts, which can't be edited. (Well, they can' but then an admin would need to protect it, and it would be out of historical order in the archives.) --Mn-z 13:45, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- Is it okay for me to perform the redirect myself? Also, shouldn't the page be fully protected once redirected (to match the full protection on {{C}})? --Pentium5dot1(read this)t~^_^~c 19:02, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, and upon actually checking the current transclusions, none of them seem to be from the Forum namespace. Does Special:Whatlinkshere handle the forums correctly? --Pentium5dot1(read this)t~^_^~c 19:15, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- It appears that I was looking at all links, not just transclusions. However, certain admins don't like red links in forums, so I'd suggest a redirect. As for doing the redirect, I'd suggest waiting and let an admin do it since its already on VFD. --Mn-z 20:17, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. --Docile hippopotamus 00:16, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
- YesTimeToRedirect. I agree with Mnb'z: It wouldn't have been a big deal to redirect it to begin with, but since it's already here on VFD, might as well follow through. --C:\syndrome\_ 04:41, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete as nominator - Unfunny use of Japanese text; seems to duplicate subject material covered at Caramelldansen and Kawaii, but hard to merge into either; sparsely edited; original creator serving prolonged block. --Pentium5dot1(read this)t~^_^~c 05:27, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mn-z 13:48, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete a typical fugly random genealogy tree. --Mn-z 16:27, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
- LOL LOL OMG --
 the spawn of hitler him self, YO!! 19:55, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing worth saving here. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:08, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 03:37, Sep 10
- Delete What in the name of scone-based-pizza is this thing ? ? ? OBLONGLobster. (hello) 17:46, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
 Keep. Excessive in length but of passable quality. Could be just as funny at a svelte 2/3rds length. Remove some of the filler and EDness and it could come together. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:20, September 4, 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Removing the cruft will probably render a decent enough stub. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  KUN SotM UotM 21:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete Apparently 'Games Workshop' have pissed the author off. OBLONGLobster. (hello) 21:57, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. This is a 'what's the point ?' articles by authors who want to drone on until you lose the will to live by the second mirthless paragraph.--RomArtus (talk). 23:11, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
- LOLirony. Anyways, Delete. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN23:22, 2 Sep
- Delete UN:N about warhammer 40k --Mn-z 04:46, September 3, 2009 (UTC)
- uugggghuhggggughfrbuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhwhocaresgruuuuuuuhhhhhhhbuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhh -- the spawn of hitler him self, YO!! 04:42, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete • • • Necropaxx (T) {~GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 03:38, Sep 10
|
| Comments |
- Droll Troll ! --RomArtus (talk). 19:45, September 3, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. a template that basically says, "please excuse the fact that the following article makes no sense whatsoever." --Mn-z 05:22, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. --Docile hippopotamus 00:17, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Mnbvcxz, I'm going to start taking all these templates you're nominating and subst them into the end of Avril's Butt (Template Family). --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate 03:21, September 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Defeats the purpose, that is supposed to show templates that still exist. --Mn-z 04:40, September 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Consider userfying. If deleted, then subst where it is used on User:ArtemisFowlThe2nd/Chiyo Mihama. You might also want to check on ArtemisFowlThe2nd's other template creations. --Pentium5dot1(read this)t~^_^~c 04:27, September 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, we are now archiving most deleted templates. Well, actually, they are being deleted, then hacked up by MadMax if they are on old forum and userpages, and then slapped with an archived tag. --Mn-z 04:40, September 3, 2009 (UTC)
|
[edit] Archived VFD Discussions
Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.
