Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive14

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search



Delete I just can't see anyone ever laughing at this. It's just not funny.--Kafeithekeaton 17:25, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, neither can I, cause it's hard to laugh at an article that doesn't exist, OMGWTFPWNEDROTFLMAO!!!!11oneone --Spintherism 17:36, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
This sort of stuff can go to QVFD, by the way. --Spintherism 17:39, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Boig jerk and Adam Taylor

It is just vanity. Looks like the author is trying to insult a friend. Mosquitopsu 17:22, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Deleted. --Spintherism 17:27, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Dump truck mode

Delete Seems the author just tried to link to an outside picture, then ignored it.--Kafeithekeaton 17:20, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Making up Bob Dole quotes

Delete Hey hey, ho ho, Making up Bob Dole quotes has got to go! It's boring, unfunny, overly political, and whoever wrote it doesn't know anything about formatting. And it's not as if I'm being political by calilng for it's deletion. It's just a crappy page. Also, FYI: I'm a big fan of making up quotes in general. (I'm trying to popularize HowTo:Make up quotes - check it out!) It's just that this particular page sucks. This is the first time I've ever submitted a page for deletion in any wiki ever ... wow ... If anybody wants to reformat it and try to think of something really really funny to say and save it, fine by me. Go for it! I'd prefer that happen. But otherwise, it's NUKE TIME! Nerd42 23:46, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Already been deleted 3 times. The stupid thing just keeps growing back! http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/c/c5/Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 00:00, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Would you prefer I did not link to it from HowTo:Make up quotes? I was just doing it sort of in the interests of fairness ... even though I wanted the page deleted ... isn't there some kinda tag you admins can add that locks the page down so people can't edit it? I've seen that done on wikipedia ... Nerd42 00:07, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
There is, but we use it sparingly - mainly for the CVP. You can leave it if you want or omit it - your choice, it tends to grow back slowly. http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/c/c5/Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 00:41, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)


Biased, mostly unfunny. Copied the only redeemable paragraph to Windows Vista. - Guest 13:24, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

It also expired. Now terminated. http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/c/c5/Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 23:54, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Dog City

Yes, I'm obnoxious, I know, but if there was a point to this article, or humour involved, then it went right over my head. Also, everything else edited by the same guy seems to be one-line unfunny stuff. --Malleus 09:10, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

1895 war of cookies, Arc the lad, BatTom, Crapola, Coon

I found these while looking through the uncategorised articles section, and couldn't find any redeeming features. Am I the only one who thinks articles like these should be shot repeatedly? If they had physical bodies, anyway. --Malleus 03:25, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Money saving tips

Copied from [1] as listed on article. 02:11, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Hendrix and Jimmmi Hendrikz

The first one seemed pointless and generally not funny, while the second one had no redeeming features that I could find. Oh yeah, I have no idea what the first one has to do with planets... --Malleus 23:22, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Kellogg, Brown, & Root

This seemed to me to be completely pointless. The reference to Neocon doesn't seem to have any actual meaning, and I couldn't really make any connection between this and the reference to it in the article for Dick "Robot" Cheney. --Malleus 09:56, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Johann Gutenberg

Yeah, it's me again. This one isn't funny in any way, is random, and as far as I can tell screws around with continuity. --Malleus 01:55, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC)


This is complete and utter spam. It's not funny at all. Delete please. -- 18:35, 19 Oct 2005 (PST)

Rigondas Gang

I'm still new, but I saw this and thought that it should be put here. It's pointless, not funny, and neither are the others that are linked to it. It also had a badly written sentence referring to it in the Latvia entry. If I'm wrong about this, please point it out. --Malleus 00:53, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC)

You know what? I don't like it either. Consider it burninated. --http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/c/c5/Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 01:19, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC)


This article is pointless randomness. And the P section (added Aug 29) is really stupid. --Ogopogo 23:04, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)

The admins (actually, an admin, but we seem more godlike the other way) took pity on this article and made it better. Tell us what you think. --http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/c/c5/Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 00:04, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Not really very much better though.
I'll stub it.

I must say that the re-write is a lot better than before (and is already a lot better than many articles on uncyclopedia), though needs work of course. This re-write will give others a chance to work from that. Thanks. By the way, I just finished doing a Lorena Bobbit type of edit to free a certain part of the old article from its misery. --Ogopogo 01:45, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I actually sort of liked the whole "His Story, His Death, His Penis" thing that was going on with the headings. --Spintherism 04:59, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC)


Another copyvio directly from the MorphOS Home Page at [2] 22:00, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Sophie Mohammad Augusta Ali Frederickqxa

Please delete this too. It's a pointless redirection to the now-huffed Catherine the Great article. Thanks. --Ogopogo 06:50, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Undictionary:Catherine the Great

I also recommend Undictionary:Catherine the Great, another pointless random-humour ditty, for removal. --Ogopogo 04:49, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)

DELETE - Between the fact it's nearly impossible to read and may contain outright facts, it should eat it. I'm tired of the random junk, too. -- --http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/c/c5/Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:35, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Pierre Eliot Trudeau [sic]

I recommend Pierre Eliot Trudeau, a pointless random-humour ditty, for removal.

(Note it's not to be confused with the Pierre Trudeau article on the famous Canadian politican who died a few years ago in his 80s or the Pierre Elliott Trudeau redirect, both of which should be kept, of course.) --Ogopogo 04:49, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Mercilessly Huffed under Forest Fire Week rules. Wasn't even UD worthy. -- --http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/c/c5/Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:38, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Max Headroom

Bad. --Spintherism 05:32, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Bad meaning Good, like Michael Jackson. Hell Yeah. --11011 05:45, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Against Deletion - May ramble, but it could certainly go somewhere. ----http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/c/c5/Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 07:21, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Actually, now that I look at it again, there's definitely some potential. --Spintherism 18:28, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite There's a few good lines, but I think it needs to be better. --Sir AlexMW KUN PS FIYC 22:59, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Conquer online

Also bad. --Spintherism 05:34, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Huffed for great justice. -- --http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/c/c5/Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:48, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Tanner Hux

Non-notable person, just looks like slandanity, vanity, or harassment. Woulda QVFDed except it is a registered user, so giving benifit of the doubt. --Splaka 01:29, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Heh, already deleted, but you forgot Image:Tanner.jpg --Splaka 03:51, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Splaka, would you please put your personalities back together? You're disturbing the other children. Thanks. --http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/c/c5/Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 04:40, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)


Advertisement for some silly washed-up band. --http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/c/c5/Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 10:29, 17 Oct 2005 (UTC)


external link page, stubby, little potential for a good article --Paulgb Talk 18:17, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)

i don't know what that page used to say ... but I've made a better related page: Aidepolcycnu its much better ... but could be longer and funnier i'm sure. edits please! Nerd42 23:50, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)


Unfunny history of SA.com, wtf is it doing here? --Caiman 15:26, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Deleted - wikipedia cut and paste --Paulgb Talk 18:22, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)


Pointless and unfunny.Needs a delete or a total overhaul. It even says in the article "Im wasting valuble, payed for space on a server! Im also wasting the time of whoever is reading this! Yes! You! Right now, as you read this, you're older than youve ever been. And now you're even older. And now you're even older. And now you're older still".(Foo21 03:02, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC))

HEY, They said it would be left alone aslong as I put a "work in progress" note up. Its there. Lemme alone. Jack Cain 03:29, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Well, it just lets them know it is being worked on, but you added {{WIP|02:04, 21 Sep 2005 (EDT)}} and the last edit was "27 Sep 2005" before Foo21 nominated it here. "In Progress" usually means, more than zero edits per two weeks. --Splaka 03:53, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Just, leave it be. Its still a work in progress, I just havent had any ideas for it. Jack Cain 04:28, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)
If you really think you will keep working on it, Move it to User:Jack Cain/iliveinyourbathroom if it really is your "personal" experiment. Wikis are for everyone to edit it, personal stuff goes in user namespaces.(Foo21 18:57, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC))
Thats agreeable. Done. Jack Cain 22:55, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Deltaco Da cheated. This type of crap should be put on QVFD. Exterminate without mercy. - Guest 07:17, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Its an experiment! Leave it alone for now, read the talk page for some clarification. Jack Cain 08:05, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)

The X-rated journals of Private Seth Parts of the 69th sperm airborne, and Major Edna Melons the undercover egg, depicting the bloody, gory, and intensely violent war against the Gonorrhean army led by some infamous French guy named General Genitalia

Great Scott!!! - Guest 16:56, 14 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Keep--Spintherism 18:30, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Keep and Expand the title --Nytrospawn 22:54, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Change my vote to that The title's not long enough! --Nintendorulez 10:57, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Not Smarts

This article is... not smart. And pretty fricking lame. --MonkeyGem 21:22, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Del-eat --Splaka 21:44, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Not Keep --Spintherism 05:49, 14 Oct 2005 (UTC)

It should be titled Not Funnies --Josie v. 3.1

Door C - Howard Nosliw - The Underlying False Facts of Existance - Mr. M. Thew

See user's contributions for (possibly) more pages worthy of closer scrutiny. Drivel, all of it. And this person likes to make news and anniversaries out of this Door C crap. The above four seem to be the biggies. --Bouahat 17:04, 11 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I vaguely went "huh, shaped a bit like a joke." Shove it all in Door C and redirect the rest to discourage recreation - David Gerard 23:39, 11 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Come on... haven't you ever wanted a pet to play with... such is the case with Door C. You just can't comprehend the joke in it's entirety. If you actually read it, then you might understand.

I read it... it's just not funny at all. Funny material has at least something to do with the real world. Funny material takes reality and gives it a verbal wedgie. Door C is just random sentences. Maybe you could explain the brilliant social commentary or literary technique behind it. I'm not holding my breath. --Bouahat 05:56, 14 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I don't really see any reason to delete this. It's pretty funny when you think about it all. And I just love the stuff on those two guys. EH, I say keep Door C! --Kfc21

Delete Considering the ephemeral nature of the alleged Door C, it's fitting that the article on it be equally short-lived. --Spintherism 04:38, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Not fair what has Door C ever done to you?

May as well keep it's existance is certainly not stopping the creation of the much funnier Door C article.--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM [email protected] (Petition) 12:08, 14 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Sequel to Truth & Simon Cowell

Delete both. Probably QVFD material, but methinks the submitter should be publicly flogged for this tripe. --DWIII 16:09, 11 Oct 2005 (UTC)

what the fuck is QVFD? i'll vote for my own fucking deletions. fucking fucktards. I agree that it was stupid, but i still hate you. --gostbait 23:15, 11 Oct 2005

Is that a "Keep," then? --—rc (t) 05:28, 12 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Folks, we have a winna for a Darwin Award for worst deleted articles and snotty attitude of the writer, I think the articles sort of deleted themselves, know what I mean? --Orion Blastar 00:45, 14 Oct 2005 (UTC)

uh-uh. kill it. --- User:Gostybaity

Your wish is my command. --Spintherism 04:59, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Spearman melton

Non-notable, seems to be slander. -- 19:41, 9 Oct 2005 (UTC)

delete -- ComaVN 07:43, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Keep No worse (and in fact slightly better than) most of the others in Category:Teachers who let their students visit Uncyclopedia during class--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM [email protected] (Petition) 12:11, 14 Oct 2005 (UTC)


Non-notable, seems to be slander. -- 19:41, 9 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete--Spintherism 05:02, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete--ComaVN 07:43, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Jack Van Impe.

retarded redirect includes period. I'm new, so I wasn't sure if this is the place to list redirects. if not, lemme know. thankz, Poopface Mcwilliamstein 19:00, 8 Oct 2005 (UTC)


Short page, seems to be vanity. -- 17:08, 8 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Micah Carlson

Pure vanity as far as I can tell. Seems to be one editor, although split between logged in and anon-IP. Non-notable. -- 16:37, 8 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete Whatever happened to the good old days of voting to keep things? Have the articles gotten worse, or am I just more of an asshole? --Spintherism 05:10, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)


It's funny because it kind of sounds like the word "asshole", but instead it has the name of President George W. Bush where "ass" should be. Delete --EvilZak 05:54, 8 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Deletezor, these pathetic anti-bush jokes are given us real lefties a bad name. --User:Jordon:Jordon Sometime in October 2005

Delete Yeah, well I gave your mom a bad name last night. --Spintherism 05:03, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)

More bushbashing please till it registers with the brainwashed voters...Wolf

Delete because we cannot let those Liberal Terrorists win. --Orion Blastar 00:47, 14 Oct 2005 (UTC)

James Allemann

Part of a set of other shitty articles that I deleted. This one seems to be the ring leader it has more mass. --Spintherism 01:14, 8 Oct 2005 (UTC)


This article, along with eets leetle friinds below, appears to be a whole set of vanity articles about the local water polo (!) team. I originally submitted them to QVFD because I'm a heartless killing machine, but my gun jammed so I'll submit them for execution discussion here.

Oops. In my haste to put out the hit, I neglected the obligatory horse-head-in-the-bed. I've now added {{vfd}} tags. Sorry. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] http://uncyclopedia.org/images/e/ef/Prince%21.gif 17:25, 7 Oct 2005 (UTC)

“Kill them all, I say, and let God sort them out.”
~ Oscar Wilde on Gwillinbury

-- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] http://uncyclopedia.org/images/e/ef/Prince%21.gif 16:34, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)

"Kill the foo' !" - Mr. T on Gwillinbury



It says "Please finish this article." I'm tempted to do so, but the author and I probably have a different sense of the word "finish" in mind.--Spintherism 05:36, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Brian Peppers (look out, disturbing images)

Remove images I'm not sure those pictures could be funny under any circumstances. I don't care if the article is kept, but I think either the opposite strategy should be taken (i.e. replace with a picture of an exceedingly handsome guy - the people who know about Brian Peppers from Snopes or elsewhere will get it), or there should be an original image. Like a really bad hand-drawn mugshot or something. --—rc (t) 06:24, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • delete. Google the guy and you'll get a bunch of crazy hits. He's been mocked enough. --Steve Johnsenson 02:30, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite&Reimage About 15 pages now link there. Either unlink all and delete page+pictures, or replace pictures with non-factual ones. -- 17:13, 8 Oct 2005 (UTC)

This "let's make fun of an ugly sex offender lol!" fad on the net wasnt even funny back in early 2005 when it started. --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere Icons-world.gif CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere | Talk 02:18, 17 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Starship Troopers

Delete or at least total rewrite It's a straight synopsis of the movie. --the drizzle 00:35, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite it if you wish, but the movie was funny as hell the way it was made. --Nytrospawn 03:04, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Great Burnination

Delete Unfunny. --Algorithm 04:30, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

put this out of it's misery

Kanye West's Interview with Justice John Roberts

It's hilarious guys! Really!! It bears no resemblance to beating a dead horse. Seriously. Ok, this might have some humor value, but I'm humorally deficiant today. -- 16:32, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Since nobody has replied either way, I figured I'd take a look. Now I know why nobody has replied. They fell asleep. It's boring, but in a potentially humo(u)rous way. Weak keep in hopes that it goes somewhere, someday, and in the meantime I'll bookmark it for use when I have insomnia. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] http://uncyclopedia.org/images/e/ef/Prince%21.gif 17:35, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete just strong enough to cancel out the weak keep and bring the score to a nice negative one. I really don't see it going anywhere. Ever. --Spintherism 05:20, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)


Funny once or twice, unfunny when uncreative morons splash it across every single god damn page on this site. -- 22:09, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I dont think we can delete it seeing as how articles use it, but maybe we should find a way to discourage its use --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere Icons-world.gif CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere | Talk 03:31, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Just like the Ballmer template, some people seem to find that it gets funnier the more you overuse it. I say keep it, it's not very annoying. --Carlos the Mean 17:32, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

You do have a point. Because I still find the Balmer one pretty funny. I was just venting my frustration at having to delete bunches of this template from a number of pages where it was just plain stupid. "George Bush doesn't care about people for whom quotes are made up." "George Bush doesn't care about 2b or not 2b." "George Bush doesn't care about User:OneTopJob6." With no connection to the articles, I guess it's on the same level as dumping "Bush is ghey!!!" on the same pages. While I don't seriously expect this to be deleted, I'm using this as a soap box to say:
Please tie this template into the content of the page. If you don't, I will have to kill you. Thanks.
And now I will waste 2 hrs deleting it from 75% of the pages it is on. Feel free to help. -- 15:09, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Ok, now I am no longer amused with the Balmer quote. Once I perfect Giantmutantspideration a whole bunch of you are totally screwed. -- 15:31, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep. The template is not guilty that it's overused. Strip it from articles it doesn't belong to. - Guest 17:40, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep with restrictions. There are some articles which fit in well with the context of the article. Just like the Ballmer quote, it should only be added if it somehow relates to the article it's posted on, and not just at random. --sColdWhat 10:42, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)

And therein lies the problem. 98.3% of the usage is not in context (or only vaguely-so) when the template is so easy to use. If it's worthy, just put it directly in the article. --http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/c/c5/Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 15:29, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Why delete a template because it's so easy to use? If we are to write the quote right into the article, I think we should keep the template so we can {{subst:}} it. But I'm starting to forget the purpose of this template. --sColdWhat 22:18, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC).
It's better to use the Randomquote template. If it's totally canned and has no variation, it probably has only a handful of suitable uses on the entire site, which means you might as well go to the effort to place the entire thing in the page, rather than just the template. Random quotes of the canned variety may sometimes add to a page, and they're easier to change/rotate. Since "Ballmer" and "Kayne" are canned and cannot really be used for quotes from anyone else, they are dead-ends and only temporally entertaining (Bush's lease expires in 2009, for instance). --http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/c/c5/Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 22:52, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Merge. Unify all of the templates so that one of them is used at random. Each time the article is displayed, a different type of quote appears. For a similar type of template, see Template:Really random sighting. --KP CUN 03:06, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Do you mean like this? Template:Randomquote (view the source). Minimalistic, and quote forms can be added or removed later as they become/unbecome popular. The originating quote templates can be deleted and the forms moved to this quotepage too. Also, with proper weighting, it will rarely show. --Splaka 03:17, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Splaka, that’s perfect. --KP

CUN 03:28, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

A second thought occurs too. All the occurances of Template:Really random sighting could be deleted and replaced with this, and the template Template:Really random sighting added to the list. Maybe bring this up in the VD. --Splaka 03:34, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)
I think that they should be kept separate. The really random sightings involve Elvis, the Loch Ness Monster, UFOs, and Big Foot. These should appear only sporadically. The random quotes should appear more often. Some articles may want to have a random quote appear every time. --KP CUN 04:05, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Ok, that makes more sense. A way to vary the amount of randomness would be to have a parameter (ie: {{randomquote|50}}) that went directly into <option weight="{{{1}}}"></option>. Higher number = more odds of being blank *shrug*. It might be, if there were enough one-line quotes (Kanye/Ballmer style), that we might not even want a blank option. --Splaka 04:10, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Oh now that I like--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM [email protected] (Petition) 16:00, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Personally, I'd vote to keep the ReallyRandomSighting template. It has a separate purpose from this template. I've also recommended in the talk page that we move RandomQuote to HateQuote or something, to make it obvious for new users what it is. That way if we need a random, non-hateful quote we can set one up. But overall, nice work. -- 13:53, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Lord Mud Loach

Slandanity? --Splaka 10:59, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)



Unlike the {{Oscar}}, {{Ballmer}}, and {{Kanye}} templates, which can be used for a wide variety of subjects, this template seems like it would only be funny to fans of whatever game this is from. If it's nearly unusable outside of the articles on the game's other characters, then should this be moved inline with the articles it's in? --EvilZak 01:21, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete As much as I love Tales of Symphonia, I don't find it particularly funny. --AlexMW 01:09, 20 Sep 2005 (EDT)

Comment Perhaps it could be converted to a template concerning slandanity or non-notible fictional characters ? 17:06, 20 Sep 2005 (EDT) Overhaul to make it funny to anyone. Re-written from scratch I've changed it up a little to be something different. Does this work?--Kafeithekeaton 01:45, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Hmmm. Needs to be a bit wittier, but I say keep. --Hobelhouse 00:25, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Mariusz Gaworczyk

First: in Polish. Second: no censorship. Third: short, stupid and pointless (I know, beacuse I'm Polish, like many people here). So please: delete this crap.

Portal of evil

Defeated --—rc (t) 16:44, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)

'kin hell! What is going on on this page! --http://uncyclopedia.org/images/b/bc/Gay2.gifIMBJRhttp://uncyclopedia.org/images/b/bc/Gay2.gif 22:27, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)


I decided to give this one a fair trial. Ordinarily, it probably wouldn't be worth it, but compared to the shit I just deleted, this is quite impressively coherent. --Spintherism 05:28, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)


Again, probably not worth voting on.--Spintherism 05:30, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Just delete it--Monkeysfighting 09:58, 9 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Axel F

I should just be deleting this stuff. --Spintherism 05:32, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete/Rewrite looks like vanity to me, and the picture is very obviously a grue, which is plagarism; however it has some potential in its randomness -- Jordon Sometime Around Noon, 6 Oct 2005
  • Delete. It looks too much like vanity for me.--Josie v. 3.1 20:53, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)Josie v. 3.0

Deleted --Spintherism 02:54, 8 Oct 2005 (UTC)


Is this based on some cultural phenomenon that I've never heard of? --Spintherism 04:57, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, I think it's the last name of some people on a crappy show on Disney, or whatever. Just Kill it to death. --Cheeseboi 13:33, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Dull Delete --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM [email protected] (Petition) 22:42, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Mc Donalds and Cronic Instant Death Syndrome

Hurt my brain :( --Splaka 22:55, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete Mc Donalds, and if I get my hands on some inspiration (drugs are bad, kids) might try to rewrite Chronic Instant Death Syndrome. --Spintherism 04:34, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Satisfy my otherwise insatiable hunger by deleteing Cronic Instant Death Syndrome. I've actually been living with the real chronic instant death syndrome my entire life. It runs in my family so deep that I find this phony version to be racist. --Magotchi 07:43, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Maybe it can be merged to McDonalds after a rewrite ? 23:34, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Unless someone rewrites them Delete both --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM [email protected] (Petition) 22:43, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • Kill it dead. --Hobelhouse 00:22, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Random Insanity Redux

The article has been recreated. The humor content is still 0. --KP CUN 17:48, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Dropped a note on the recreator's page about recreating it. Suggested that information about the article be written up ala Steam Forums, and if that page's contents must be around, that they be a sub-page of that article, rather than the main text. Bare minimum, there has to be some body of information which explains what all that worthless crap is. Even if it's made up. -- 18:10, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Keep new version --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM [email protected] (Petition) 22:45, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Julie Pitta

Vanity? --Carlb 04:15, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Smells like vanity, and is an orphan with one anon-ip editor. I'm taking it home and calling it deleted. -- 23:31, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Mr. Pike

If he was a fish, I'd say let him swim in the cesspool of Uncyclopedia. Unfortunately, he's not. -- 16:22, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep Becuase I stole their article and filled it full of rubbish that only those who have knowledge of British TV would get. --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM [email protected] (Petition) 14:25, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

KEEP because there is little to be gained from deleting this article, other than a group of angry high-school students who will terrorize the site. But, if not, they will be happy smiley children.

Oscar Wilde: Keep this article, or I'll blow steaming hot jizz all over some five-year-old's face. Again.

You just got banned. No vote for you. -F

Mr. Pike is now nearing completion, with non-Brittish TV edits to fill out the end. Can we get the same sort of polish on Mr. Kachi? -- 01:17, 29 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Category:Boksters & Category:Witchcraft

We really don't need "Witchcraft" cause we already have Category Magic, Magick, Magicians etc. There's really no need. Boksters is also completely retarded. Wth? Yeah, so watch out for Wayland's contributions. --MonkeyGem 12:16, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete. For the same reasons that MonkeyGem listed. Luffy 00:47, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Pointed Stick

Go-o-o-one... Not only is it a straight rip from Monty Python's Fresh Fruit Self-Defence sketch, but there already is a pointed stick article. --theRewittenSheep 16:52, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Merge --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM [email protected] (Petition) 12:34, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)


Looks like two kids fighting, but not sexy like if it was the Olsen Twins (speaking of which, what happened to their article?). Plus, it's plural. I hate that. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] http://uncyclopedia.org/images/e/ef/Prince%21.gif 15:24, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep Nothing wrong with the origal article surely? It needs expanding etc but damn I thought it was amusing :) --TheRappingShoe 18:14, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Tourette's Syndrome

This article is NOT funny and is in fact very insulting towards me and other people with Tourette's Syndrome. I have asked the creator to change it but he just deleted my plea and so I am putting it up for deletion. -DrPoodle 03:45 30 Sep 2005

Rewrite (only slightly funny) also, please put back the version that upset you so we can make a judgement on it, rather than your message that is there now. Thank you. --Splaka 11:00, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I am re-writing it at the moment. should be finished in a few days!

Rewrite it has potential (with some tweaking), and if anyone is offended by it, I don't care. -- Jordon Sometime Around Noon, Oct 6, 2005


Vanity page with too many edits for QVFD. Splaka, why do you think it's worth saving? -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] http://uncyclopedia.org/images/e/ef/Prince%21.gif 15:24, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)

  • Comment Perhaps a rewrite is in order ? this article certainly has the potential for an article such as Bob for example and certianly any line from Monty Python deserves a fair chance in my opinion. 22:22, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)
An MTU is not necessarily a vote to keep. When a rather short page is a bit better than a QVFD, I put it on MTU, to give it 7 days to shape up, before a VFA/QVFA/Move. The MTU entries (I hope) will be judged by an admin sometime down the line. Feel free of course to put any bad ones on VFD/QVFD you think appropriate. (This is not a vote, just a comment) --Splaka 20:47, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete If somebody wants to write a tim article, they can start over from scratch. There's nothing here worth saving. --Spintherism 17:33, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)


There's already a category for that. It's useless. --MonkeyGem 13:02, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Content Moved to Category:Mythology --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM [email protected] (Petition) 12:38, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Simon Wai's Sonic 2 Beta

Injoke? --Splaka 10:59, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Actually, SWS2B is a website found at [[3]] pertaining to Sonic 2, or, more specifically, a prototype of it. Simon Wai is the discoverer of the beta, though I guess it can be considered an injoke, though if you read the Sonic and Hedgehog religion article that should be more than enough to get it. ----Guess Who 05:07, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)

What tigers are made of

Delete First half taken directly from Calvin and Hobbes (not a bad source, but still). --Rcmurphy KUN 04:40, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Adjexust Listing things from fictional sources as true, seems a staple of Uncyclopedia. Perhaps some credit should be given though. citing calvin and hobbes or Bill Waterson (I don't know if he's the right guy, but that's the name that came to mind) as a reputable source of tiger-related information. --Spintherism 20:17, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Actually, that article should be deleted and merged with a Tiger article if it exists. --Spintherism 20:18, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)

highlight on front page It is supposed to be a reference to Calvin and Hobbes and I'd support moving it to the tiger article. Seems to make sense. --Spooner 01:24, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

No highlight You have to check the quality of the highlighted pages and compare them to this --Nytrospawn 19:41, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Consider Moving to 'Tiger' or other appropriate article. COuld be used to expand either a mediocre article or act as a springboard for a new one.--Sir Flammable KUN 15:52, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep but categorise it in Tired Pop Culture References and label it as sporked. --Carlos the Mean 12:30, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Category:Texas Cities

Looks like the doings of one Brephophagia (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) who has added 73 towns from Paris, France to Vancouver, BC to this category. Revert this mess and delete category? --Carlb 21:50, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Stop this madness I was looking over this guy's edits and I couldn't help wondering... "Why?" -- Codeine 21:58, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

This would be great material if Uncyclopedia was a guide for citizens of New Orleans that were looking to resettle in Texas. Since Uncylopedia is really a guide for people that want to resettle in Arkansas, it should be deleted. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 23:07, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Look here, I'm a proud, lifelong Dallasite who loves his state every bit as much as his country. Arkansizing Texas in jest is no vice. We city slickers can get a decent laugh at random off-color craziness at least occasionally. Brephophagia is not doing anything really bizarre. Besides, isn't this a site for utterly pointless articles? Who cares if every city is also represented in Texas. Keep it!

annul, black out, bleep, blot out, blue-pencil, cancel, clean, clean up, cross out, cut, cut out, decontaminate, dele, delete, destroy, drop, edit, efface, eliminate, exclude, expunge, gut, knock out, launder, obliterate, omit, pass up, remove, rub, rub out, rule out, sanitize, snip, squash, squelch, sterilize, strike out, trim, wipe out --EvilZak 02:06, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Remove-itate. Also, take away Zak's thesaurus. We need an Athesaurus. A collection of words and what they should be replaced with. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 02:11, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Resounding Keep No harm, no foul. --Nytrospawn 02:16, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I second the motion to Keep --Spintherism 04:18, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I already voted, and I stand behind my vote. I'm not a flip flopper, like some. However, upon examining the broader social issues at play, and the deeper impact this article could have on promoting the (much needed) Texan sense of self-esteem that has taken such a drubbing since 2000, I think we should reopen the issue and commission a feasibility study. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 06:36, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep It's kind of pointless, and I don't get the joke but by the same token, I don't think it detracts from anything. Might as well just leave it. --Cap'n Ben CUN 08:03, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

put on a diet and exercise program if it must be kept: Cities has 133 articles. Texas Cities has 115 articles. If you can figure out which 18 cities are Not Texan Even If You're Insane and, more importantly, why this is so, you're a better person than I. --Hessef 08:59, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I know where to find 16 of them.--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 16:28, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Comment out of curiosity: Is there an amusing pattern that distinguishes them from the "Texan" cities? --Hessef 04:15, 3 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Only my misplaced patriotism, oh and the fact that Wigan is the only Texas city of the lot (probably a bit OTT for that one joke) --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 10:46, 3 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Just wanted to point out that in Texas you can find a town named just about anything (from London to Paris). --D3matt 18:45, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Too stupid. --Awshit 21:57, 3 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep It's kinda sorta funny, possibly unintentionally. I was a bit perplexed when I saw my Shelbyville article added to Texas but I'll admit to snorting when I saw Ringgold, GA on the list of Texas cities. --Bouahat 22:44, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep, and consider turning Category:Cities into a redirect to Category:Texas Cities. Well, maybe not go that far, but it's funny, especially now that there is a Category:Definitely not fucking Texas Cities Mandiatory disclaimer: I'm from Texas.--BobBobBob 22:25, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)

“Never ask a man if he's from Texas. If he is, he'll tell you. If he's not, don't embarrass him.”
~ Oscar Wilde

'Keep Harmless in itself, too much effort to revert. I'm also no sure why some cities AREN'T in texas. --Chronarion 18:37, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)

End of the world

Not quite funny. A couple of good lines, but comes off as an instrument of torture from a poetry open mike night. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 08:12, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Could to Better Rewrite--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 19:13, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)
I tried to brush it up a bit. Flyingbird 18:09, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Kevin Dickson

I don't know what's going on with this. -- Codeine 14:31, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete. a {{what?}} candidate if ever I saw one. --ComaVN 14:49, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Keep Patent Nonsense (patent pending) --Nytrospawn 16:12, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Delete - Too rendickity. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 16:14, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Keep I completly disagree with what Nytrospawn said --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 16:14, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Burn Ok, this isn't everything2... --Chronarion 18:35, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Project Quicksilver

Long and unfunny --http://uncyclopedia.org/images/b/bc/Gay2.gifIMBJRhttp://uncyclopedia.org/images/b/bc/Gay2.gif 11:54, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Severely Dull - User:Barberella 13:52 31 Aug 2005 (BST)
Keep has promise and has had a fair amount of work put into it, I've had a quick shufty and it dosn't appear to be plagarism or slandanity.--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:51, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Someone put a lot of work into it, sadly they forgot that it had to be funny too. Needs a humour injection rewrite. AmyNelson 15:45 31 Aug 2005 (BST)

  • Keep It is funny cuz it is so not funny. The other shoe never falls, there is no punch line. Admittedly, this could be a dangerous thing to allow lest a precedent is set. Qaz 07:32, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
  • I agree, Keep but maybe a few funny additions should be made, although I did enjoy the picture of the quicksilver test subject posing with a cow. Jordon -unknown date, sometime in september-

"Draugystes Stadionas"

Maybe in some foreign lingo this is funny, but I don't govareet the russki.--Spintherism 04:03, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I think it's lithuanian, maybe merge into one of their existing articles?--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:40, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Oh, so it is. I had done a google search on the word "Tusovshika" and got a bunch of things in cyrillic, but now that I've done the same with the other words it does appear to be Latvian. Any ideas about which article to merge it to?--Spintherism 14:50, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Could this be referring to the Numa Numa Dance - a transliteration from the O-Zone song?? --Rollo75 00:31, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)

"The Greatest Witticism of All Time"

The witticism itself isn't so bad, but it would need a bit more of an article to survive in the wild.--Spintherism 04:03, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Needs expansion by someone who gives a shit. Or Deletion --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 08:33, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Expand or MTU--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:38, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
I might try to add a bit to this at some point, but that point probably won't be until some time tomorrow. --Spintherism 14:59, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Added a bit. I really have no idea if it's funny though. I can never tell. --Spintherism 00:17, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)


Dumb, no lolz. --Awshit 21:47, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Might have rewrite potential --ComaVN 21:54, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)
It might, but it might not. Let's give it 5 - 7 days and see what happens. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 23:57, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep I laughed, and I generally don't. It's a thing of beauty. --Spintherism 04:05, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Weak Burn in Hell --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 09:19, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I guess some people just don't understand art. Go ahead and delete then. There are plenty of other nonsensical pages to satisfy me. --Spintherism 14:54, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

No judgemnet - I have been doing a few rewrites around the place and thought I could ressurect this one... Thoughts? --theRewittenSheep 18:57, 16 Sep 2005 (UTC)


A complete spork of Wikipedia's Lutheranism with the word "Lutheran" replaced with "Zoroastrian". Some other editing has been made to it, but it's a loooong way from being funny. -- Codeine 17:44, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

delete. Yawn. --ComaVN 18:15, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Oh come on. I thought it was funny.

Keep/Rewrite If somebody wanted to rewrite it, I'm sure they could make dramatic improvements, but until then, I see no harm in keeping it around. The Humor to Length Ratio could be better, but the Sum Humor is comparable to most other articles that wouldn't be VFDed. --Spintherism 22:51, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep/Rewrite We need a theologian to have a go at it and make it funny, anyone know any with a sense of humour? --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 09:04, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Comment: Perhaps a pun would do. I can think of one pun but I'm not sure how far a "Zorro's ass" joke would go, though. There may be a far better pun to work with, though.--Hessef 01:38, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I just so happened to sign up for a comparative religion course today, and Zoroastrianism has always interested me. That don't quite make me a theologian, but I'm no writer or humorist either, so it should all balance out. I'll do me a little research perhaps and see what sorts of funny I can whip up. --Spintherism 20:50, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Baleet Long and boring, as well as stolen. --Poofers 05:37, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Yes Zorro's Ass pun, as well as a play on the deity Ahura Mazda?--slack 15:22, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Chow Zhi Wan

was qvfd, maybe vfd is needed. Looks like vanity crap to me, but maybe I'm missing something extremely funny. --ComaVN 16:48, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete Much better than most vanity articles, but still in the Vanity, Attack, Inside-joke, Non-notable category. I feel so clever with my acronyms. --Spintherism 22:58, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep I'm not sure it is actualy Vanity, as the article says say Chow Zhi Wan quickly = Choosen One, which I think is a reference to Kung Fu Hussle (a film)--Sir Elvis KUN FIC <small>Bur. | Petition 09:00, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I thought I'd posted a reply to this earlier, but apparently not. I think I said something like: 'Yeah, elvis is right.'--Spintherism 04:23, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)


It’s in German. And from what I can read, it looks like offensive and vain. Maybe a Template:Qua? --KP CUN 20:15, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep babelfish.altavista.com seems to suggets that it's a satire about he German Social Democrat Party (hence notable), is also looks like a WIP if ever I saw one, being offensive is not grounds for deleteion here, idealy we need to wait for it to be more fully rounded and then looked over by a german speaking Uncyclopedian or two (although it could do with being moved to, furthermore we should destroy Max Kool--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 20:21, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Has racist elements, isn't very funny, could be tidied up. I vote for it to be Suspended over fire until improved AmyNelson 22:18, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

Move it to pending closer inspection by a German speaker. -- Codeine 21:14, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

The Guardian

Rewrite or burn? --http://uncyclopedia.org/images/b/bc/Gay2.gifIMBJRhttp://uncyclopedia.org/images/b/bc/Gay2.gif 12:32, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)
DestroyTheres like a million "The Guardian" newspapers, and they're all non-notable --Nytrospawn 20:37, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)

But there's only one real "The Guardian" ;-)

Hey! I like muesli! I hate this article. It smells funny and insults breakfast food.--Flammable CUN 20:39, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Rewrite/Expand Although I don't like muesli and am certainly not a vegetarian--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 21:17, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Can some who reads The Times and votes tory (or "Local Tax Payer" post '97) please work on it, I lack the needed distance to be funny about it. --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 21:30, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)
I dunno, I read the Gurgle and I can plainly see why people should mock it. --http://uncyclopedia.org/images/b/bc/Gay2.gifIMBJRhttp://uncyclopedia.org/images/b/bc/Gay2.gif 21:35, 22 Aug 2005 (UTC)
The problem is there is not much more than "Your all lefties and you can't spell" to which the usualy response is "Yer so and I know crazy isn't it you should have seen it during the '70's, Cuh!" which dosn't really have the quality of good satire.--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 23:32, 22 Aug 2005 (UTC)
The Gurgle is ripe for piss take because of it's middle class bias. I hate the middle class, as might be seem from some of my articles where I will usually have a little dig at it, even though I may be working-class-cum-middle-class. No there's something about the middle class that needs mercilessly lapooning 'til their over-educated branes pop. They are neurotic fucktards that need taking down a level. --http://uncyclopedia.org/images/b/bc/Gay2.gifIMBJRhttp://uncyclopedia.org/images/b/bc/Gay2.gif 19:00, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Sounds like the start of a "I'm more working class than you competion (a perenial favourite of all british middle class people, see Julie Burchill).--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 23:12, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite: The Guardian should be easy to mock. Unfortunately the only good joke on the page as it stands is the "papers read by people who think they / know they / really do run the country", which is lifted from Yes Minister. --CrunchyCapsicum 01:13, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)

well do it then I've tried with my Rapier Wit parody of the history of the Sun</sarcasm> but I'm all played out --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 08:48, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)

REWRITE: I was going to write one, but after doing The Sun I simply couldn't be arsed to write another newspaper entry. The Grauniad should be a great target, so long as it's not a summary of all the Private Eye pisstakes. It's easy (and fun) to mock the right wing rags, and as a filthy, beardie, sandal-knitting leftie I know there's a good article ready to be written. -- 20:52, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I might re-visit it when the new berliner version comes out, have to have a quick shufty at it first. --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM [email protected] (Petition) 14:46, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)