Uncyclopedia talk:VFH/queue

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

I've noticed that the queue keeps getting not-full by the time switchover comes around. I hate to bitch, but could somebody make it a policy to always have the queue filled to at least +2, if not +3, to prevent this?

It just looks... UN:Professional.

    EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   02:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)  

Yeah, but keep in mind that it's still way better than the old system, when it would be updated whenever an admin felt like it... which was ok when RC was doing it, as he's the epitome of reliability, but nobody else is, so three hours out isn't all that bad. Anyway, I've filled it up to 4 days in advance, and will try to keep it at 1 or 2 or 3 ahead when I have the chance. Spang talk 05:20, 03 Sep 2007
Yes, it rocks the socks off of the previous system - auto-switchover > *. It just seems silly to have an automatic system, and then not bother to use it to it's full potentional. Given the current VFH magic number of 15, it seems that it'd be easy enough to just move an article to the queue as soon as it hits 15, instead of having it linger on the nom page until it's turn comes around, you know what I mean? And thanks for filling it up!     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   21:16, 3 September 2007 (UTC)  
I've only joined sometime Juneish, so I'm not 100% positive about this, but I think the number of voters goes up after the summer. I don't really think there's a magic number, it's whatever has the top score and, in case of a tie, whatever's been on VFH the longest. I think.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • elk cloner) 21:16 Sep 03, 2007


Are we attributing the fact that Why?:Cancer is Great gets two days to somebody having blown up "Uncyclopedia, The British Parliament, which anyone can attempt to blow up" ?

Or laziness?

Yes, I'm ALWAYS bitching about VFH not being turned over. Don't bother telling me.

    EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   12:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)  

I DIDN'T READ THAT BUT I AGREE!! --  Le Cejak <-> 13:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

CHANGE THE DAMN QUE ALREADY!! --  Le Cejak <-> 15:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


I believe they switched back to featuring an article every day, but the information on the page still says other day. --Mnbvcxz 04:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)