User:ChiefjusticeDS
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
 | This user is on vacation, sabbatical, administrative leave, or is otherwise goofing off with the knowledge and/or consent of the Admins. Or, more likely, they've buggered off without saying boo to anyone. Their expected date of return is when they can be here. If you're lonely, or you miss them, leave a message. |
Reviewer of the Month July 2009
| http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/0/07/CUN.png Commander of the Order |
Welcome to Chief's user-page, if you don't want to read it run, run, run far away and I promise I won't log your IP/Username and cry over you leaving my user-page on your talk page.
Contents |
[edit] Chief's Current Activities
- Reviewing articles
-
Valiantly reverting the Leeds article over and over againHappily UU has now closed off that particular avenue of pleasure. - Reviewing more articles
- Working on HowTo:Use medicine safely.
- Sleeping
- Filling out this list.... it's a good life isn't it?
- Reverting article vandalism and prowling around on recent pages waiting to revert article vandalism.
[edit] What Chief is doing right now
Going out into the big wide world to see what life has in store, it's been good guys, hope to see you all here again sometime.
[edit] Templates
| This user can also be found elsewhere on the internet. |
| This user doesn't trust Wikipedia as far as he can throw it... but nonetheless uses it on a daily basis. |
| This user rejects the theory of global warming or at least thinks it's someone else's problem. |
| This user uses public transport and so has most likely been mugged, raped or murdered. |
| So hand it over. NOW. (List of users who NEED caffeine) |
| This user kicks butt at Tetris: not that that's anything to be proud of. |
| This user is part of The Proofreading Service. |
| This user is a total UKer and knows how to spell. (British Uncyclopedians) |
| teen | This user is a teenager and so hangs around bus stops in large intimidating groups and beats up old ladies for drug money. Probably. |
| This user is a member of the Welcoming Committee, because no other Committee would take them. |
| This user bought a PS3 and now regrets it. Probably. |
| LV-2 | This user considers him/herself an intermediate gamer and so probably has some sort of social life. |
| 19 | This user has written 19 articles because they like to keep busy while shirking real life responsibilities. |
| This user is a member of the Evil Atheist Conspiracy. "We're after your children and pets." |
| ∞ | This user is an ageless Immortal or so they like to think. |
| This user is a Transformer and has the powers to obliterate you! Be aware of this user's laser cannon. |
[edit] Articles what I wrote, or what I helped write
HowTo:Interrupt Serious News Broadcasts
UnBooks:Catholic Church's Version of Harry Potter
Why?:Why do Non-Conservatives Exist?
There were some others but they were shite so I won't put them here.
[edit] Articles that I have reviewed.
| This user is constantly PEEING. S/He apologizes for the mess. |
“Because without criticism we would probably all still be building houses out of sand and microwaving our heads.”
~ A critic on criticising
ExOps: Mainly because I thought it was so rubbish that someone had better review it so it could be deleted swiftly. ExOps Review
ExOps II : Somewhat tentatively I took a second look at Thomasfan's article and was pleasantly surprised that he had made some changes to it. Many of the issues from the first review (see above) still persisted and prevented the article's score climbing very much. However the signs were encouraging and my hope is that the article can be edited further and fulfill the potential that I think it has. The 2nd ExOps Review
Pious Christians Against Shellfish : Reviewed this one because.... well I was looking mournfully at Pee Review hoping my article might be reviewed and the name caught my eye. It turned out to be pretty good and written by someone who is better at this than me, so I didn't really have much to say. PCAF Review
Using Jokes Properly : An article I took a look at because it had been reviewed a few times prior and because it looked all unloved on the review list. Ultimately a good solid article that got a deservedly good review, marred only by the fact that it was not in the HowTo and some very very minor humour problems. Using Jokes Properly Review
UnBooks:Daddy, There's a Zombie in the Garden : A superb article written by someone who is far funnier than me, the tosser. My review effectively affirmed what Orian57 had already decided may be problems. Only the images needed revisiting... oh and there was a miniscule issue with one character, who, upon reflection, may have been more necessary than I gave credit for. The Review
Singapore : Probably the hardest review I have done so far... not saying much granted, but still. The article was VERY long but still witty and engaging. It is saddening to think that it will probably lose out on any recognition due to the length and the effort required to finish it. Scored reasonably well, but needs a good editor, preferably one armed with shears.
Bland Gift Manual, Prison City : An interesting take on the Grand Theft Auto series that appealed to me because of the narrative style employed by the author. Saberwolf had already reviewed and everything he had suggested be changed had been looked at, only a couple of niggling issues remained which collectively prevented this article from scoring higher. BGM:PC Review
Bland Gift Manual, Prison City II : It was very encouraging to see the change that the author had brought to the article in a relatively short amount of time. The article feels complete, and only a couple of issues remained, once these are sorted I would not be surprised to see the article on VFH in the near future. The Second BGM:PC Review
Tampa Bay Rays : Another good article which makes me feel bad about my own writing ability. Very few difficulties, only a couple of problems with grammar and the images, lead to the article losing out on highest scores. Otherwise the article was one of the best examples of the encyclopedic style that I have seen so far and I may cite it as an example in future. Tampa Bay Rays Review
Astronaut : A good solid article that I picked up because it had the shortest title of all the articles on the Pee Review waiting list. It was a good article that stumbled only with regard to a lack of images and an excess of text in parts. The first article that I have ever given a 10 for content, but I felt it was deserving because of the amount of effort that had gone into making the article thorough and complete. Was also amusing and I would recommend that anyone looking for hints on writing in an encyclopedic style while still being funny have a look. Astronaut Review
HowTo:Defend your Home : An article that reminded me very much of my first attempt at a HowTo. Good overall concept that was let down by a couple of minor difficulties. All that needed changing was the tone and the style, it was also open for a bit of expansion. Hopefully it will reappear on Pee Review at some point after a bit of re-working. The Review
UnScripts:Trapped at Sea : I went into this review with very high expectations, and was very happy to see them fulfilled. The script was an intuitive and very amusing satire of movies like Deep Blue Sea and Open Water, a point I didn't raise in the review was the randomness of the pirate attack, but I ignored the idea as I was just enjoying the article too much. I may submit some more of Orian's work to Pee Review just so I can learn how he does it. Another high scoring article. The Review
UnScripts:A Vignette From Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater : I reviewed this as it had been sat on Pee Review for a while. Ultimately it scored quite highly despite some problems, namely profanity and redundancy from the original source. However despite all my criticism the article had a number of good aspects that were just weighed down by some unfortunate errors of judgement. The Review
Longinquusimperiumaperophobia : One of the strangest articles I have ever read, because all the jokes seemed to be crying out for something more, ultimately I decided that it was that they were out of a context which could make them much funnier. The article got an average score and I fervently hope the author rewrites it and it reappears on Pee Review in the near future. Longinquusimperiumaperophobia Review
HowTo:Host an emo pity party : A relatively good article, that did some things right and other things wrong. It had a very good concept and was only marred by a slight tendency to go off topic, that and some minor humour issues were the only problems with this article, and I hope to see it back on Pee Review in future. The Review
Chief is too lazy to keep on adding to this list, so if you are looking for a particular review then message him and ask how to find it, or find it yourself if you are an intelligent sort.
NB: Issues with my Reviews??? Try not to cry yourself to sleep, after that ask me on my talk page or ignore them completely.
[edit] Welcome Message
| Member of the Order of Uncyclopedia This person has successfully registered on Uncyclopedia. They should be proud of themselves for making such a smart move. |
Hello, <insert name here>, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for registering an account with us. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for people like you:
- Beginner's Guide
- Our Vanity Policies - why we don't care about your friends
- How to be funny and not just stupid
If you read anything at all, make it the above three links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:
- About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
- How to get started editing on uncyclopedia
- Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue
There are literally hundreds of things that you, <insert name here> can do to help Uncyclopedia, take a quick look at this list of things that need doing to get started. While you are editing please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button (
) above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.
At Uncyclopedia, writing articles is not a requirement, but it certainly is a fun and easy way to express your creativity. To write an article, it's recommended that you start it in your userspace (to do so type: User:<insert name here>/-->Name of page here<-- into the URL. You should end up with something like: www.uncyclopedia.wikia.com/User:ChiefjusticeDS/My New Article) now you can edit it at your leisure. If you decide to create it in the cold world of mainspace, make sure it is in accordance with the policies laid out above, and if you're not done put the "Work-In-Progress" template - {{construction}} - onto it as well.
If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, or ask an administrator on their talk page. Additionally, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply leave a message on an adopter's talkpage to join. Above you will find a very nice shiny template, which it is my great pleasure to bestow upon you. You may now proudly display it to all your friends. Again, welcome!
