User:Iwillkillyou333/Archive 2

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Bad ass smile face.png Welcome. This my talk page (no shit). Discuss whatever you like but please follow the rules.


  • 1. No saying crap that doesnt make sense.
  • 2. Do not be an ass
  • 3. Be smart, not stupid.
  • 4. If I placed your article on QVFD and you get mad and want to say something horrible to me, don't even try. Cause I will likely bitch punch you.

More Serious Rules

Due to recent events, I place these rules here. Unlike the other 4 rules above, these rules MUST be taken seriously. Orian's comment below doesnt count as I know he's being funny.

  • 5. No vandlism. That happened to me by a IP user before Mahm00shA reverted it back. That pissed me off, so none of that on my talk page.
  • 6. No flame wars. Due to a recent flame war between two or more users, I'm combining rule 2 and rule 4 and making this serious one. Theres no need to get mad at me (or anybody else) for whatever reason. Anything offensive placed on my page will be used as evidence.

Violation of either of the two rules will result in me reporting you to a administrator. I don't take that kind of crap so know I am not bluffing. You can place funny comment like Orian did below, but nothing hurtful, as I will ignore it and report you. And kill you 333 times

Now that we tooken care of that, please enjoy!

Those who dare break the rules.........


Me takes a shit on your user talk page[edit]

And then I did a flying in a rollercoaster for the ammusment of FUCKING YOUR MOTHER! If a tree falls in the woods will we all sufficate from global warming? And, er, you haven't qvfd'd anything I;ve written so I can't break your fourth rule but I do think you're a jerk for QVFDing that article that one time. Faggot.    Orian57    Talk   Union pink.jpg 02:45 16 September 2009

Oh no, a rule breaker, better get my chainsaw--IwillKILLyou333 Talk If you dare 04:29, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

Pee Review of UnScripts:The Badass Soldiers[edit]

I Pee Reviewed User:Iwillkillyou333/UnScripts:The Badass Soldiers based on version 4167706 of 00:22, October 19, 2009. Hope this helps! Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  19:06, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost 29-10-2009[edit]

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png 01:35, Nov 3

I Pee Reviewed your Relationshit[edit]

I Pee Reviewed HowTo:Get Out Of A Relationshit based on version 4167969 of 02:34, October 19, 2009. I hope this helps! Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  02:45, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Okay, you mangy colonists.[edit]

I've been commissioned by Mooshy to rerererevitalize IC. I'm to be the glorious leader, etc. because Sissy, Gerry, and Opty have all fucked off. So, I have a few general ideas to start with on what to do. First of all, no fucking infighting. What's said by the authority figures goes. This is Imperial Colonization, not Imperial United States Congress. Second, there should be more of a limit on articles for nomination. Somewhere between 5 and 10. We'll never get to all 17 that are up there if people's votes are so scattered. Third, an active recruiting drive. It fits the name. We're going to draft Satirical Soldiers to deal with the bloody natives at those shit articles on IC. This said, I still want to hear all of your opinions on what to do. Either drop me a line on my talk page, or I'm on IRC damn near all day very weekday. So lets get going, Colonizers! Where the Wild Colins Are - LET THE WILD RUMPUS START! 16:54, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Re:Pee Review[edit]

OK, when I said cut back on the nonsense I generally mean try to stick to talking about the storyline and what Capcom have confirmed as being true. Admittedly the writing in Resident Evil isn't the best, but try to avoid breaking the fourth wall and describing her as though she has a say in what she stars in, the reason for this is that it provides a good, already established framework for you to use, writing nonsense can lead to easy distraction and can cause you to easily stray into irrelevance.

When you are looking for things to get rid of try to focus on profanity and obvious nonsense first, then once you are comfortable with that you should graduate up to getting rid of parts that change the truthful events to something else for no real reason, names, places, events. Try to use HTBFANJS and your own judgement as much as possible. As for the video, I would recommend a paragraph, but I leave it up to you. My reason for saying paragraph is that the video can very easily be received in the wrong way, and could alienate readers from your article. Again there is no substitute for your own judgement on this one.

Hope this helps. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:03, November 16, 2009 (UTC)



Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 05:48, Nov 29 2009

Pee review[edit]

I did your Pee Review. Happy holidays... --Matfen 19:28, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

If you want another helping of Pee Review[edit]

Yes, you may well already know this. But just a reminder that if a Pee Review by any reviewer, including me, doesn't help you in the way you hoped, you are free to request another one. Happy editing! Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  17:36, December 25, 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost Delivery! - December something![edit]

Late deliver courtesy of Pleb CUN KUN Dexter111344 Complain here Vote now! 00:05, December 30, 2009 (UTC)

Hey you![edit]

I just made a new rule for my usergroup, namely that members have to put the official userbox, {{User Apocalypse Grue}}, on their userpage, and that they must somehow link to the group's page somewhere in their signature. Please do so, and have a nice day. --InvincibleFlameGrueMaster 12 31, 06:35, 2009

Regarding your legal activity...[edit]

If you wish to sign up, I need to know your area(s) of expertise.  –  User talk:Zana Dark User:Zana Dark (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN 07:18, 3 January 2010

Do they need to be real or fake?--Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 12:54, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
Surprise me! =D  –  User talk:Zana Dark User:Zana Dark (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN 05:59, 5 January 2010
Sorry for not responding, been kinda busy. Anyways, I an ace in Law Enforcment, Criminal Law, and Legalization of Extreme Punishment--Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 16:51, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
No worries, I like how the UFBI is beginning to shape up.
In accordance with the Uncyclopedia Legal Department, I hereby verify your membership. You are now legally official and stuff.  18:21, January 9, 2010 (UTC)

Let me stop you right there[edit]

Please don't use any personal maintenance templates. We have enough of them and the one you just created will not go into the maintenance queue, so it doesn't add anything to the maintenance process. There are other things you can do as part of your usergroup without stamping templates on articles. Thanks. ~ 13:21, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

Oh sorry, I didn't know about that. If I knew that, I wouldn't have done it. Again, sorry--Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 13:26, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
No problem. ~ 13:40, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
I userspaced it for you here, in case you wanted it for another reason, but yeah - what Mordillo said. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 14:42, Jan 4
Why thank you--Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 14:43, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
Dang! Shut down by the man! Seriously though, the U.F.B.I.'s got some good points that we can still work with. I'll be doing a reconfig on UN:PROOF soon and after that I'll help you with this. Don't be discouraged.  Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  05 Jan 2010 ~ 06:52 (UTC)
What's going on over at UN:PROOF? I haven't joined that because I hate the pink templates.  –  User talk:Zana Dark User:Zana Dark (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN 19:46, 7 January 2010
Answered here.  Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  09 Jan 2010 ~ 05:52 (UTC)
I haven't joined unproof either cause i suck at grammer my self--Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 05:55, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
That's too bad. You're right though, you obviously have to be able to blow grammer to have the formatting come out right.  Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  09 Jan 2010 ~ 06:12 (UTC)

I know it's late, don't bitch at me. Bitch.[edit]


Oh, and thanks for the vote :)
--It's Magically Fucking Delicious


- ho scopato tua madre nel culo - 20:55,4January,2010

Pee Reviewed Stewie[edit]

I Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Stewie Griffin (Second Opinion) Stewie Griffin based on version 4309999 of 13:10, January 2, 2010. I hope this helps! Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  05:22, January 10, 2010 (UTC)

Commie in my closet[edit]

Hey, I saw you pee reviewed the article. This was a poem "by my friends and me" that the user had put up, I saw it and spent an hour or two finding photos to illustrate each line of the poem, lol the whole time when I found a new one, thinking of what he'd think when he came back to the poem. So all the graphics were mine, and you said in your pee review that he should get rid of all the graphics! They're perfect, look at the liberal on the floor (well, ok, the photo on the top of your talk page would fit too!), the muslim in the kitchen. Where else will better graphics be found. The nazi on the wall, for Goddesses sake, how to improve on that? I knew that he wouldn't get a feature from this, but why say to dump the photos illustrating his poem? Thanks, Alesiter in Chains Vikings win the playoff game, MMX

Ok, maybe I was a bit harsh on the pics, but hey its my opinion, doesnt mean he has to go with it. Im just trying to be as indepth as possible.--Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 02:38, January 18, 2010 (UTC)


I wrote a pee review for Worst Article Ever. You can send it back because I'm a total n00b though. :( HELPME 07:58, January 18, 2010 (UTC)HELPME

UnSignpost January several-days-agoth[edit]

I swore I'd never hand-deliver this again. Here it is. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 10:14, Jan 18

I LIKE PIE!!![edit]

You like pi too?--I LIKE PIE!!! 21:52, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

I don't just like pie, I'm addicted to it--Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 23:16, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

OH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Um... .--I LIKE PIE!!! 00:29, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

DUDE!!!--I LIKE PIE!!! 03:31, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

SUP!!!--Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 03:31, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

What's that supposed to mean?--I LIKE PIE!!! 03:33, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

It's short for whats up--Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 03:35, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I knew that looked familiar to me!--I LIKE PIE!!! 03:39, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

And here I thought it was supper time... Well I'm off to a super time with pie to follow.  Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  19 Jan 2010 ~ 07:31 (UTC)

YES!!! Have you heard of Pi Day?--I LIKE PIE!!! 03:16, January 20, 2010 (UTC)

Hello?--I LIKE PIE!!! 22:46, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

Where are you iwillkillyou333?--I LIKE PIE!!! 13:44, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

Zana Dark's new name is Zany Park, OK.--I LIKE PIE!!! 13:44, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

Um... OK. So, Zana Dark, check out your talk page and see which vote is winning!--I LIKE PIE!!! 21:16, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost 21th January 2009[edit]

Also, it's MrN9000's mum's 60th birthday! 9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png 17:35, Jan 21

Laird Hamilton[edit]

Dude! Thanks for the nice review. I'll get to those changes, and if you don't mind, I'll see if you can check it again. The only thing is the YouTube. I don't think it is funny either, but Laird's being so brave almost has to be seen to be believed - the joke is based on the madness. I don't think Norris, Bauer, nor Superman, want to go surfing with Laird. Having grown up surfing I can say that what he does is the most scary thing on Earth. Do you think letting people see Laird surf is a good way to reinforce the humor?

In the Baddest Wave, how about I mention what is already known : It's a "wave with teeth". Longest wave is patiently absurd, but I'll mention he lived off "Jello-Fish" ??

Anyway thanks for the help, and I'll let you know when It's ready. You're also most welcome to delete, rewrite or edit any part of it. Next I'll get onto the G-Rex. Cheers!!!--Funnybony 02:46, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

Your welcome. And yes I think letting people see him surf would be a great idea, I've actually never thoght of that. Anyways your welocme and good luck with any changes. :) --Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 02:53, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

Dude! OK, I think I got everything you mentioned. I kind of like silly lists, but I see your point, so I just really shortened it with mostly insider surfing humor. But I did leave in the mention of Bauer and Norris not visiting Hawaii. Jeez, Laird might take them out at 50 foot Jaws, and then you'll see real fear in the faces of Bauer and Norris - Ha! The pussies!! Anyway, please let me know of anything I missed. For watching him surf I just put a link to the VDO and removed the VDO. Also removed one picture, spaced them out, and removed all but the quote you liked. Once I get your OK on this, then I'll do same with G-Rex. Thanks again.--Funnybony 06:40, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

---Thanks for the vote!!! I hate to spoil your image, but you really are a nice cat!!!--Funnybony 04:06, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

Shoop da woop[edit]

Uncle-Dad.jpg Uncle-Dad thanks you in the only way he knows:
a long glass of moonshine and an hour with
his niece-wife.

IronLung 22:28, January 22, 2010 (UTC)


Dude!!! Got em all. Thanks!--Funnybony 18:25, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

Pee Review[edit]

Thanks for the pee review. I'm glad you liked it, and I very much like your content suggestions. THis was my first article ever, written about 4 or 5 months ago now, so at the time I had barely any idea what Avatar was about. Still, all articles on actors, on wiki or uncyc, need updating with new info. The thing with the kermit the frog images is that they're gif formats, and aren't able to be resized very well, so I might not be able to. It's been a while since I added them though, so I can't remember if I could or not. I'll give it a go, anyway.

The main reason i wanted a review though, was to reduce its size, as the first time me and another user tried to get it featured, it failed after about 6 votes, (4 for, 2 against). The against ones were because it was so long (well, one was because the guy's a dick). Being an unknown user at the time also didn't help with getting anyone to vote on it. Back then there seemed to be a bit of a voting recession to match the economy as well, whereas now I think people seem to realise the importance of voting. Anyway, enough blubbering about the past! Thanks for your input, you're already becoming one of my favorite reviewers (aside from Chiefjustice and Why, although they bribed me with cake). --Matfen 21:08, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

Your very welcome. If you need anything else review, I'll be happy to do it!--Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 14:57, January 24, 2010 (UTC)


UnSignpost 28th January 2010[edit]

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png 14:54, Jan 28

Promises Promises[edit]

As ChiefjusticeDS asked me to help him now and then with Pee Review stuff, I'm here. I understand a reviewer can plan to review an article in 24 hours, then unexpected things come up and it's delayed. I'll be honest and say it's happened to me, and more than once. And you did post a note saying it would be delayed, which is good. However, you posted a note for a delay, then another note for another delay, then another note for another delay which was about two and a half days ago, and the review's still not done. Don't you think this is a bit excessive? So I'm going to give you a spanking and send you to your room. Unless you want to be spanked or go to your room, in which case you can stand in the corner. (Seriously, next time try to be a little more punctual, all right? Thanks.) Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  20:10, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

Ditto with this. You also might want to read a quote by an editor here who wanted a Pee Review during the period of time a couple editors were waiting for one from you: "Mind doing this? Nobody has yet and its really making me impatient." Iwillkillyou333 21:54, January 28, 2010 (UTC) (Quote found here). Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  08:37, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

Let me put this another way: if you tell someone you're going to do a review, make sure you have the time to do the review then and there. Otherwise you put other people off doing the review and the person submitting the request gets frustrated waiting for you. I consider that unacceptable, and if it's brought to my attention again, your ass will get banned for it without question. I hope that's crystal clear. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 09:41, Feb 4


Duty Calls! Imperial Colonization has been commandeered! With a shiny new, waterproof coat, we're heading out to sea once again. We need you for our next colonization. You have one week to nominate or vote from right now, Sunday the 31st of January 2010, to Saturday the 6th of February 2010. (See Protocol for how to nominate an article for Colonization. And remember, if you vote for an article that means you intend to help colonize it.) Then starting Sunday, 7 February 2010, we will start colonizing another savage land (i.e., improving whichever article gets the most votes). Come on board and vote or nom now, to the glory of Her Majesty!

EXTRA: Our most recent colonization, Transformers, has just been Pee Reviewed. If you're interested in making improvements, please check out the article and the review. With a little work, we may have another glorious Feature article! Wouldn't that be just spiffy? And remember, if you participate and this does get featured, you get one half feature credit!

For the Glory of Her Majesty and by Order of your Fearful Fearless Leader, Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  19:42, January 30, 2010 (UTC)

Do you I LIKE PIE???[edit]

Um, hi. I lefted a note for I_LIKE_PIE!!! you might like to read. That is all.  Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  01 Feb 2010 ~ 11:08 (UTC)
Ok thanks--Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 22:09, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

OK, I saw it.--I LIKE PIE!!! 21:14, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost 4th February 2010[edit]

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png 15:13, Feb 4

NY vs G0[edit]

Dude! Thanks for the review, I had thought the first sentence which starts, "Recently the City of New York was evicted from “Ground 0” for its refusal to provide a one billion Amero security deposit plus interest retroactive to the birth of Muhammad (c. 570 AD)." - explained why the city was evicted. Any way, it's absurd because how can NY evict NY. That's supposed to be the angle. But your points are well taken and I will make the corrections you point out.

You are one of the most helpful reviewers, who spends time helping others rather than serving yourself. Personally I just don't "get" the formula, as my repeated noms all failing have shown. So what advice could I give, when my slant on humor is not Uncyclopedia formula. I think I'm a good idea man, I have a Cheech & Chong type of take and love the totally absurd, such as a Don Martin cartoon. If I make more advancement in Uncyclopedia winning formula, then I'll make reviews. As is I cannot recommend myself as advisor if people are aiming for an FA. But you're pumping those reviews out like a champ. BRAVO!!!--Funnybony 07:53, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

I did the changes you suggested, and I think I straightened it out (thanks to you).--Funnybony 18:13, February 9, 2010 (UTC)


The Bible says God created the world in six days by himself--our crew of talented colonizers can surely recreate an article in a week and a half! Remember, any Colonizer is welcome to work on our current project, which is the Creationism article. But before you begin, check "READ THIS FIRST" at the top. From Sunday, 7 February to Wednesday, 10 February 2010, a hearty crew of brave colonizers plotted a strong course for the article by consensus. We have the beginning of a great colonization, so go forth and colonize to the glory of Her Majesty!

Special Note for Lobsterbacks (i.e. those who signed up but haven't yet worked on a successful colonization). We plan to keep your name on the honored membership list if you make worthwhile contribution to the article or other parts of Imperial Colonization between 31 January 2010 and the end of this project. If your name is removed from the list, you are welcome to reapply when you plan to become active. Why do I need to provide this?, Uncyclopedian Priest and Buccaneer Admiral of Uncyclopedia Imperial Colonization Project IC Buccaneer Admiral WHY??? (stratagems)  05:17, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost 11th February 2010[edit]

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png 13:01, Feb 11

I read your user page[edit]

... by mistake and it made me leave a message. So here it is:
Your language is offensive. Keep up the good work.  Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  16 Feb 2010 ~ 03:55 (UTC)

Lol Thanks--Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 22:16, February 22, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost 18th February 2010[edit]

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png 23:35, Feb 18

UnSignpost 25th February 2010 (It's not late your mum is)[edit]

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png 20:51, Feb 28

Imperial Colonization: Creationism and Batman[edit]

IMPORTANT: If you want to make comments on any part of this message, please post your comments on my talk page. I've sent this notice out to about 40 people, and will likely never see your response if you put it on your talk page. But if you insist on doing it anyway (sigh), please at least start a new section using == Your comments == below my signature and make comments there. This message is set up as a template, so if you try to make edits in this message, it will edit it everywhere, and get me nasty notes from admins.

The seventh day of Creationism[edit]

If you haven't heard the rumour, it's true. The new and improved and absolutely perfect version of Creationism has been created. And because it was so perfect, we got it Pee Reviewed so it could be even more perfect. Post-review edits are being done, and will be completed very soon so our colonized version can replace the current Creationism.

I gave credit on The Big Board to every colonizer who worked on the article (if I somehow missed you, put a note on my talk page). I really appreciate everyone's help; I think we have a great article. If this gets featured, however, I feel that only those who made the more substantial contributions should get co-feature credit. Otherwise, someone could add two words and get 1/2 credit for writing a feature article, which doesn't seem fair. (But note that half a dozen people or more could each get 1/2 credit; that's one of the advantages of being a colonizer as aren't limited by the laws of mathematics). Any opinions on this or anything in this notice are welcome on the IC talk page. Buccaneers traditionally work by group consensus, and I'm all for sharing the blame tradition.

I'm Batman[edit]

Our current colonization is Batman. Writing on it begins now. By consensus built over the past few days, this will feature a psychiatrist talking with Bruce Wayne, a delusional Arkham Asylum mental patient who thinks he is some hero named Batman--or is he delusional? See I'M BATMAN for the guidelines for this article.

Any colonizer is welcome to edit the article! Any non-colonizer who wants to apply is welcome to do so on the Imperial Colonization page. We promise we won't throw you to the sharks. Well, probably not.

The future[edit]

We are taking nominations and votes for our next project. As per previous IC discussions, old nominations which aren't in the lead and which haven't received any recent votes will be removed. Check out the current nominations before they fade into history--but an article removed from the list can certainly be renominated. Nominate and vote on the IC page.

Go forth and colonize! Why do I need to provide this?, Uncyclopedian Priest and Buccaneer Admiral of Uncyclopedia Imperial Colonization Project IC Buccaneer Admiral WHY??? (stratagems)  03:43, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Shape up[edit]

Hi Iwillkillyou333, this is just a quick message regarding the Pee review you promised here. I need to tell you a couple of things, the first is that 48 hours is an unacceptable amount of time to book a review for, the reason we book reviews is to prevent edit conflicts when reviewing articles, by booking in for 48 hours, especially with the queue as short as it is you are preventing other reviewers from being useful, please don't do it in future.

The second and far more serious problem is that once again you have proved unreliable in doing your reviews on time, and there is a very strong case for saying that holding an article for 48 hours and then still not having reviewed it, especially when you have been in trouble for this sort of thing before, warrants another, much longer ban. The reason I don't want you banned is because you do have something productive to offer at Pee review, you review pretty well when you put the time in and you have other things to offer Uncyclopedia in general. I also realise you may have personal stuff to do that has stopped you doing this one, but this is why you shouldn't book a review before you start working on it.

So here is how I think we should move on with regards to Pee Review: I don't want to see you booking a review for longer than 12 hours in future, this I hope, will encourage you to only book in when you are about to write the review, I also want you to understand that you will be banned for longer than you were last time should you fail to do another review on time. Seriously man, I know you are capable of better than this, and would hate to see you stop contributing. --ChiefjusticeDS 13:02, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost 4th March 2010 (your calendar is wrong)[edit]

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png 00:09, Mar 6

UnSignpost 11th March 2010[edit]

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png 11:02, Mar 12

Advice about Pee[edit]

I sort of picked this up a while ago. When you have short sections anywhere, make sure to make up for it elsewhere. For example, this review by Hiatus Hernia. The image section is small, but the humor section compensates. This kind of review is what's considered good. But, do try to make every section long, of course. Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! CUN.png Icons-flag-us.png NOTM 23:12, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

Or do like I and a couple reviewers who imitate me do (I assume if someone else does what I do they're obviously imitating me): do a long combined Humour AND Prose & Formatting section, with a note in one that it's covered in the other. I find otherwise I end up repeating the same comments in two sections, and really it's difficult to completely seperate Prose from Humour. I made this template (with a little help from Puppy) which you're welcome to use if you want to. Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  03:15, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice guys--Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 03:00, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
"Yes, much better. ChiefjusticeDS" :)Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! CUN.png Icons-flag-us.png NOTM 20:45, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

The Pee Review'd article[edit]

That was a rewrite someone did. :P The Man In Black. 00:06, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Oh ok, thanks for telling me that--Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 01:13, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Your Pee Review of UnNews:New species discovered in Mexico[edit]

Thanks for such a thorough treatment of my little monstrosity. Your points were clear, concise yet adequately detailed, and well thought out. The gist of your criticism seems to be concerned with article length and detail. Were this not UnNews, I would agree with you.

Usually UnNews articles are not very lengthy. Some occasionally warrant being long, and UnEditorials certainly may be lengthy, but mostly, we try to present our "facts" in a somewhat condensed format, like many news outlets. That being said, I will address your criticisms where length and detail are not concerned.

Concept - My ego loves that you called it "brilliant"

Prose and Formatting:

  • chupacabra eradication program: the words should be capitalized
  • Presidente Vicente Fox- Pesidente should just be President
  • and of children who had gone missing: be better if worded as ’’children who have mysteriously disappeared’’
compromised "of children gone missing,"
  • from the blackness: better go with darkness instead, would sound a whole lot better.
That would make 2 uses of the word darkness in the article. I avoid that sort of thing.
  • This little bugger: I highly doubt a German would say something British, so it would be wise to change the word to something else.
I don't see why not, and because the guy teaches in Germany doesn't mean he himself is German.
  • ellow bloodsucker, the marine chupacabra perhaps taking the place of the rattlesnake on the national flag: Better if it was worded like this ‘’fellow bloodsucker, the marine chupacabra. Some members of the party think it should take the place of the rattlesnake on the national flag because of its veracious look and behavior ’’ and you can possibly add something like this ‘’would strike fear in any American who likes to joke around about Mexicans, and stop with all those damn Mexican jokes’’
In fact, I wasn't aware that last sentence had been added. I like it, though. I think tinkering with it may make it less better.

You had some trouble with the flow of the article, where there seems to be some confusion about whether the original chupacabra is a real creature. I've reread it and asked others, and I think it's clear and it works well.

Thanks again, you rule! rev. zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) I am the dirt under your rollers. 20:43, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Your very much welcome, I really enjoyed reading and reviewing it. Keep up the good work.--Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 21:06, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Odd user groups[edit]

UFBI is much the same as Legal department, and for help on PEE reviews there is the PRG as well as numerous steel kidneys around the place, not to mention many of the adopters of AAN who are still active are steel kidneys themselves. As of this point there hasn't been any need for a group like Pee review 101 that I can see and there is only one example that comes to my head of someone who has been consistently doing reviews that are not in-depth. Also having done one or two reviews in my time I would find it personally an affront for someone to turn around to me and say "Hey, I've created a group that is all about reviewing. As a person who has done very few reviews and a significant proportion of them are not in-depth, I'm declaring myself the president, and you, as one of the most consistent contributors to PEE reviewing are able to come along and be my lackey, and give me some credibility by association."

I appreciate the effort you are putting into improving Uncyclopedia, but make sure you are doing it to make it a place that you like to be, and not purely because you want to see your name in lights. PuppyOnTheRadio sig.gif                                                  Tuesday, 22:39, Mar 16 2010 UTC

I agree with you. I think the project is fail anyway. UFBI is kinda similar to Legal but UFBI enforces the rules and checks up on vandalized articles and VFD some bad ones. And yeah I am using effort to help Uncyclopedia, not for fame. I make articles for that, yet they all suck.--Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 22:49, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
Can I make a suggestion? Join UN:IC and get on board the latest colonisation, and also have a look back through the talk pages of previous colonisations, especially those that have been featured. That way you get an idea of what works and, more importantly, the thought processes that go behind something like this working. Have a chat to User:Why do I need to provide this?. PuppyOnTheRadio sig.gif                                                  Tuesday, 23:56, Mar 16 2010 UTC

I Peed on your article, the smell will go away[edit]

I did a pee review on your article HERE--M'su Carencro (Talk) 15:39, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

Cool thanks--Grue ApocalypseDirectorEye 4.gifWILLExplode 3.GIFYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 02:15, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

Imperial Colonization Buccaneer Admiral walking the plank![edit]

IMPORTANT: If you want to make comments on any part of this message, please post your comments on the IC talk page. I've sent this notice out to about 40 people, and will likely never see your response if you put it on your talk page. But if you insist on doing it anyway (sigh), please at least start a new section using == (Your comments) == below my signature, or click the + tab up above, and make comments there. This message is set up as a template, so if you try to make edits in this message, it will edit it everywhere, and get me nasty notes from admins.

Actually, I'm looking for a temporary assistant/permanent successor as head of Imperial Colonization. I got put in charge of IC because I kept bugging a certain admin. I'd say, "Why isn't somebody doing this with IC?" and "Why isn't somebody doing that with IC?" So that admin basically said "Why, you're somebody; go do it" (see discussion here). But as you can see, I took on the position planning to update IC, get it moving again, and see it through one colonization. Well, that happened. IC was updated and reactivated and, thanks to some great colonizers, Creationism was recreated in a spirit of cooperation, was rewritten on deadline, was Pee Reviewed and, as a bonus, was voter-chosen as a feature article within about a day of being nommed. Our current project, Uncyclopedia:Imperial Colonization/Batman is scheduled to be written by 20 March, and then we'll begin another. IC is moving...and I'm looking for someone to keep it moving. If interested, please post a note on the IC talk page--experienced and successful users only need apply. Ability to say "ARRRRR" like a pirate is not required, but would be nice.

Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  16:54, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

Ancient Uncyclopedia[edit]

Thanks, Dude! I just read the review and made a book mark. I'll make all the changes you suggested, then leave it a week and go back. Once I'm back, well, I'm fucking back! Cheers!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png 19:51, Mar 17

Dude! Could you please take another look after my post pee major overhaul. There is also a gif in there too (kaliman_Kanos-732784.gif) and I can't see how to get it working? It's fine as is, with the "K" on top of his head, but it's better when working. It works, but not on the page. Must be some code thingy - I bet you know what's wrong. Your help is much appreciated. And I'll start doing some Pees once I earn an award like you. Bravo! Cheers!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png 23:03, Mar 17

Pee review things[edit]

Hi again Iwillkillyou, just a quick note, while I appreciate you looking at the current Pee's and seeing what is what please do not remove articles from the queue, if you do see one that you think should be removed then give either myself, Necropaxx or UU a shout and we will do it. I prefer to keep the people who can remove articles from the queue to a minimum as if everyone starts doing it things will get a bit stupid. I'm not telling you off for doing it, just reminding you of the way to do it in future. Thanks. --ChiefjusticeDS 10:43, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost 18th March 2010 (on time as always)[edit]

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png 11:47, Mar 18