User:Orian57/Letters to Awful IP Users
letters to those awful IP users
when an IP adress deleated a section of my Thurso article:
Dear sir or madam, 18.104.22.168 (that's your IP address incidentally)
Thank you for your interest in the article "Thurso", however I (the author) would like to ask what precisely you found unfunny about section 6 clause 4 (the bit called "Dodgy"). Generally it is considered polite to post a message on the talk page of an article before making significant changes, as it gives the author some idea of what in particular you did not like about the piece, and suggest what could be done to make it funnier. If however you found the Paragraph in question offensive then it is customary to edit the prose in such a way that you will be moreoffended on the next occasion you choose to read it. Although you may find this a waste of your time, in which case use the time you allocated to re-reading the offending joke to do the dishes or something useful. Don't be a dick and just leave the joke for other people that have a sense of humour.
- Thanks again for your interest (Tell all your friends!), sincerely --orian57 14:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
P.S. If you would like to further this discussion, please go here or here (Newer posts towards the bottom please). Again, sincerely --orian57 14:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
in response to user page vandalism:
Thank you Mr/Mrs (Ms?) 22.214.171.124 for vandalising my User page (User:Orian57)! That has, in all honesty, set me up for the day: knowing that i am popular enough to be hated. your message too i felt carried some profundity (after spelling and grammar was corrected):
'lolololololololllolol orian iz gh3yzzz hehehehahehehehahehehahehehehehahhehehaheh
[Laughing out loud] orian i[s] g[a]y! [i indeed find this rather amusing]
sadly though someone felt it was not very help full to leave comments such as that on a user page (they must have made the mistake that you were too stupid to know what you were doing, which in all fairness isn't difficult) and reverted your edit within seconds. i am so dredfully sorry that your time has been wasted. Have Fun! MuCal. Orian57|Chat|Chuckle|PEE List|Awarded|UnBlog| 07:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
In response to Pee Review Page vandalism. It amuses me to think that this guy may be 126.96.36.199 in disguse...
|Gay Marriage is the single most retarted idea ever created. Two dudes going up each others' bung holes using a holy tradition known as Marriage. Where the fuck is the world headed? Send the fags to Canada!|
I’d like to give you the benefit of the doubt here but seen as how you vandalised the review page I’m inclined to be a little less forgiving. For a start it's not just two dudes that can get married lesbians are entitled to marry as well and (whatever they do) it's unlikely that they will be having anal sex. This, I presume, is your primary concern - what other people decide to do in the privacy of their own sex lives. Ok, you find the idea of anal sex unpleasant. Your solution to this is to not think about anal sex, no one will force you to think about gay sex and no one is forcing you to watch gay porn. It’s only ever going to be your business if you make it so and doing so probably means you're secretly gay. Why is the idea of gay marriage retarded, exactly? I mean two people who want to commit to a stable, monogamous, life-long relationship - that's such a horrifically original idea! Except it isn't. And as for "holy tradition" *snort*, that's so painfully naive it makes me want to cry. There is nothing sacred about marriage. It’s a way of insuring your loved one has rights to your stuff if you die ect... and it can end with divorce if the arrangement doesn't work out. Although – lets end on a positive note – hell yes let’s move all the fags to Canada! Such a mass of homosexuals in one place could only lead to a good olde fashioned orgy! Of anal sex. You can watch – but only if you want to.
Feel free to vandalise my user page as well I’ll just revert your edit and come back here to further demean you (if that's possible).
In response to usepage vandalism
Why? Why, six-four point two-five-two point one-seven-two point one-three-seven, did you blank my userpage? I just don't understand your motivation for such an attack. I've looked though your contributions to this site (all four of them) and twice you've blanked pages and once edited a usepage to insult that user and your actions seem unprovoked (I haven't done anything to you except run over your dog but that was an accident as I explained). I really am just curious about why you're being such a nuisance. Grow up, yeah? MuCal. BFF Sir 14:36 25 June 2008