User talk:Boomer/People for the Evaluation of Excrement and Influencing Nominations for Greatness

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Main Current Reviewed Archived Guidelines FAQ Committee RotM

Archive 1 • Archive 2 • Archive 3

Contents 1 Backlog 2 Ahoy from Imperial Colonization! 3 Stupid Question but... 4 I'm scared... 5 Hey, new guys

[edit] Backlog

Seems we have more article being posted than reviewed, I can manage to do 2 reviews a day at most what with work, but we have a real back log on here. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 13:11, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

You haven't seen a backlog! When me and Cajek started reviewing, there was only old OEJ doing anything on Pee, and the queue was about 5 - 10 pages long! The queue is currently shorter than it has been in a little while, and I thought it wasn't looking too bad at present! That said, all it would take is a couple of other members to do a review or two each to cut it right down to size. Anyone? (I'm trying to find time to do a couple myself, but things are so hectic right now!) --UU - natter 13:36, Mar 18

Well there are the ones that are in needs reviewing, but they're all re-writes and I've reviewed the originals, its just 4 or 5 articles (I might be mis-counting) are added everyday and less are reviewed. I'll do a couple more tonight. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 13:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

I know what this needs!

We need your PEE! Good day loyal PEEING member.The management was wondering if you had noticed the state of the toilet recently. We appear to have developed something of a blockage, and wondered if you might have a plunger handy. Possibly you are one of the rare PEEING members who does actually do regular reviews, in which case please flush this message immediately, otherwise... It's time you reviewed something you lazy bum!

Everyone knows templates fix everything. UU: If ever times get so harsh as to require this to be sent out, give MrN9001 a poke in the trousers and he can spam it to all PEEING members... (I wonder if UU has managed to post this on my talk page before I have saved this message...) MrN  http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/4/4e/HalIcon.png http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/6/6d/Goldboobs.jpg 14:50, Mar 18

I'm doing reviews when I can! I think the most recent one might qualify me for a PEEING membership, Daddy. Next goal: Steel Kidneys... ^_^ -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/8/80/Heart_anim.gif Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 14:58, 18 Mar

Next you'll be after UU's throne :p --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 17:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

How can you be sure I'm not a middleaged male or an FBI agent myself? :D -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/8/80/Heart_anim.gif Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 18:15, 19 Mar

Can I poke 9001 without his trousers? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 17:37 18 March 2009

No. MrN  http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/4/4e/HalIcon.png http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/6/6d/Goldboobs.jpg 17:38, Mar 18

Hmm... Uncle UU's throne? No thanks. I've got my own little pack of loyal followers already. I'll let him keep his. :) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/8/80/Heart_anim.gif Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 02:00, 19 Mar

I vow not to repeat my initial responses to that. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 11:35, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

What was it? :D -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/8/80/Heart_anim.gif Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 15:40, 19 Mar

You really don't want to know. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 16:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, I doubt you'd survive the initiation rites anyways... ;) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/8/80/Heart_anim.gif Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 17:11, 19 Mar

Wouldn't be anything I hadn't seen/done before ;-) --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 17:30, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm not gonna question what you thought I meant... You do know you worry me o.O -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/8/80/Heart_anim.gif Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 17:45, 19 Mar

Well you should know better than to talk to strange men. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 17:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Ahoy from Imperial Colonization!

It's Saturday, and you know what that means. —Sir SysRq (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Stupid Question but...

... wouldn't you be better off renamed People Evaluating Excrement and Influencing Nominal Greatness. Puppy/Radio VOTE POOF!

No. Longer has smartness sounds and the acronym is the same anyway.    Orian57    Talk   23:52 4 July 2009

Hmmm... he's wrong but how do I explain to him that shorter adds more punch and accentuates the joke while slightly amending the definition of the second part of the acronym as "Greatness" has a far different weight then "Nominal Greatness" without offending him needlessly. I can't? Bugger it, I'll forget about the whole bloody idea then. Some people... mutter mutter mutter.. still haven't Nommed me for NotM... mutter mutter Puppy/Radio VOTE POOF!

/Me punches POTR./ Hey how do you liek that for punchy!? /me kicks POTR in the face/ And I'm not wrong I'm Writer of the Month and as such am infalible, like the pope but only for a month and when I don't call rape, rape it's called perversion of justice.    Orian57    Talk   01:03 5 July 2009

ow potr sir

The name is "Influencing Nominations for Greatness" because the Pee Reviews influence whether or not an article becomes of high enough quality to be featured. See here. http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/9/93/Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 05:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh dear Lord it hurts... I understand that, but that definition doesn't get lost in the change, but the nuance gets added. Strictly speaking they mean... ow... exactly the same thing... I'm sorry, I'll try not to have any ideas going forward... potr

I appreciate the idea Puppy, and semantically, on balance I agree with you. But I don't think it's worth the effort of changing it. How's that? (Incidentally, don't forget the "/" in your closing HTML tags, thanks!) --UU - natter 15:25, Jul 7

I personally prefer "Nominations" anyway because it has more of a connection to VFH, wheras "Nominal" would insinuate simply that the article is being improved for the sake of being improved. People use Pee Review to prepare for VFH, as they are looking for a feature. Plus, and I looked this up to verify, in this context nominal would mean "small or insignificant", certainly not what we're looking for in terms of article greatness. The other definitions make even less sense, so I say leave me alone and get off my lawn! http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/9/93/Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 16:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Cool. I just read it and thought it a clunky acronym to be honest and thought I'd throw an idea into the mix, but I get the feeling that there is a significant school of thought against the potential change. I would probably say the may reason that I wouldn't change it myself would have been the fact that this has become an established tradition and while I don't hold any tradition sacred myself, I can understand the advantage of tradition. Maybe if we're looking at a re-brand down the track this can be considered again. And Boomer, I see your point. Just thought you might be interested to know that nominativus is the Latin derivation for both words, and it effectively means "to name." Just a little Etymology to brighten your day. Puppy/Radio VOTE POOF! 01:17, 8 July 2009 (UTC) <small>And I have to create a macro button to add my signature and to add small for myself - things to do list <small> oops.

[edit] I'm scared...

...given the response to the last suggestion I made on here. Having said that though I've got an issue with the PEE reviews we have been doing for Audio stuff, and as it will most likely become a more regular feature on here, I guess also for the video stuff. At the moment the PEE review system is designed for written articles only, which covers the vast majority of what is done on here. Having said that we are expanding into more of a multimedia entity, so as such shouldn't we be looking at a different review system for Audio and Video stuff (and I guess also for images, but that's beside the point.)

Now I've been playing with this review format for PEE reviews for UnTunes, but to be honest I'm not happy with it (and not just because of the bugs in it.) I'd like to see something a little more focused on these areas. What does everyone else think? Puppy/Radio VOTE POOF! t 06:18, 30/07/2009

Well, the Prose and Image sections should be removed, but I think a retooled Pee Review template could work just fine. Question is, what should be added? Sound quality is an excellent addition, but it feels like there should be one more section there. Perhaps musical value (under a better name) that grades the overall rhythm and tune? http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/9/93/Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 06:39, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Hey, new guys

e|m|c just recently pointed me back in the direction of this, and I thought you young bucks might like to see where PEEING came from. Educate thyselves! I got all nostalgic while reading it. http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/9/93/Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 21:32, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Just been asked to review again, however if you must all know, I was promoted and am now busy 24/7. Tell you guys what, I'll try and remember to review some this weekend, will make the effort though promise. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 11:45, 13 August 2009 (UTC)