User talk:Codeine/archive1

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

That's exactly what I've been doing... hm, maybe not for the templates, but I can fix that.-- 17:42, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I only wrote something here because I was sick of seeing that one little red link in the top right of my screen, dammit. ~ Codeine 22:13, 21 July 2005 (GMT)

Glad you're back. Welcome home. We left some pie on the table for you, but it got all moldy. On the plus side, you can use it as an antibiotic if you get hurt.--Flammable CUN 20:10, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Why, thank you. And all these shiny new buttons to play with, too. POWER, POWER, MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!111111111 *ahem* -- Codeine 20:21, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • Yay! First ban. You should hang up his empty, lifeless IP as a trophy.--Flammable CUN 22:47, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • I'd have given the bloke 50 days, but then again, i rule with an iron fist. However, underneath that iron fist is a very anemic hand. It balances out, I guess.--Flammable CUN 17:34, 22 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Well, I'm trying very hard not to abuse the power yet, although I have developed a tendency to sit here stroking a globe and staring maniacally into the middle distance. Next one gets 24 years. -- Codeine 17:47, 22 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip, but I was already working off of those instructions. The MTU kept showing up even after I had deleted it from the editing page, and the dict wouldn't show up at all. Ah, well. --Marcos_Malo S7fc BOotS | Talk 11:12, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)

That is to say, the dict only showed up as the word dict between two pairs of brackets. MM
  • Can you take care of the cruftcombing and idiot annihilation duty today? I'm around, but I need to finish this application. Now. Or I die.--Flammable CUN 18:10, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Reckon I can manage a couple of hours with the big stick. Good luck with the app. -- Codeine 18:13, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)


I know I already thanked you for voting me NOTM in channel, but here's your hard copy suitable for printing, framing or archiving.  :) Thanks again. -- T. (talk) 00:21, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)


I enjoyed Gulf War (video game) quite muchly. Clap clap! Bravo! Hee hee, ha ha! --Savethemooses 17:29, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

What can I say, I'm a comedy genius. But it'd never have existed if it wasn't for the outstanding World War I (video game) -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 19:31, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Thank you pathetic peasant

For your VFH vote (World War I (video game)). Thankfully your self-esteem is low enough to vote for my articles despite my obnoxiously huge Eggo. By the way, how did you know I love oversized waffles? --Savethemooses 17:01, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

They're clearly the only thing that'll fill your mouth well enough to bring a temporary halt to your shameless self-aggrandisement :D -- Codeine OUN Bur. (Petition) 18:07, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Unless anyone objects

I'm giving myself the Burninator template, because:
a) it's by far the coolest template on Uncylopedia
b) I burninate lots of stuff. So there.
Templates moved to front page

Damn! I was just coming here to give it to you. Greedy prima donnas! Oh well, have another:

Templates moved to front page

(Glad you like it, btw!) Splaka 20:56, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Neat-o. Let's try out this signature thingy, then -- Codeine OUN Burninator

Thank you for the awards. I promise to burninate faithfully, until sworded to arrowed. --Marcos_Malo S7fc BOotS | Talk 23:59, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I am looking forward to my first act of bannination. Since this is a rite of passage, I'm hoping to find a severe case that I can ban for a decade, so that it will always be a treasured memory and something impressive for my resumé. --Marcos_Malo S7fc BOotS | Talk 10:26, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)


glad you like them :)--Insertwackynamehere CUN 19:27, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Gooten morning Burninator

There has been an AOL user making redirects, I had to fix a few doubles -> singles (but they fixed their last one, Otto Von Bismark -> Otto von Bismarck -> Otto Von Bismarck (or something). You might wanna keep an eye out. Cheerlets. Splaka 08:48, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Gas cannisters and flamethrower at the ready. Cheers for the tip. -- Codeine OUN Burninator 10:03, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Second good morning. I am outie, enjoy the spammers. ZzZ! --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 12:24, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)


I saw the edits you've just banned this guy for, and I'm not sure that they were meant to be malicious. It looks to me like he was just panicking about potential slander/annoying SdG. Still, he should have spoken to an admin and not just wiped 'em, I suppose. As you were. :) -- Codeine 16:40, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Perhaps, but I have a strong suspicion that he was directed to make the changes by DiGrippo itself. 2004 is an ED user, quite possibly SD has some leverage over him (threats or personal information: we know how SD operates.) --16:47, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Ahh, I see. Fair enough. -- Codeine 16:59, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Leave off him for a bit, he seems to be trying his best, bless him--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM [email protected] (Petition) 12:49, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Sorry. I was just having a bit of fun with him. But you're right, it is a bit like laughing at the Special Olympics. -- Codeine 12:59, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

sig splits, ouch!

Man, someone kept giving you a signaturecumcision. You might wanna upgrade to Sig 2.0. Just put all your sig (minus the "--") into a folder like "User:Codeine/sig" (for example User:IMBJR/sig), and in preferences put in for your sig --{{User:Codeine/sig}} (be sure to check the raw box). Your 4xTilde sig in the edit window will (on future edits by you or others) appear just as "--{{User:Codeine/sig}}" with the timestamp. And remember, it's not the meat, it's the motion. ((Noob on Duty!)) --Splaka 21:08, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Ah-ha! Well, let's take the little bugger out for a test drive -- -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 23:23, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Yay, workslet. Btw, the history of Uncyclopedia:VFD seems to have been screwed up a bit/lot, some entries got deleted (one readded, but the votes for it lost) but it is too tangled for me to look at on a slow modem, plus I must be off. Also, FreeLunch has been doing odd things, moving some pages, blanking minor stuff, hard to see an agenda. Cheerio --Splaka 23:35, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

coffee for you

Btw, I've been using Elvis's {{subst:MTUsign|~~~~~}} to also timestamp the articles, so after a timeperiod the page can be judged. Of course, it fills the page with the code of the template which is slightly annoying. Anywho Cheerio, mon amico. --Splaka 09:15, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Darn, having just read the talk page for that template, it seems you only need to use {{MTUsign|~~~~~}} which puts the time in the same, without using the annoying template gooeness in the code. Ok, I need coffee. --Splaka 09:20, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Oops, was just putting in a merge tag when you deltreeleeted it. Redelete it if ya wish! --Splaka 23:27, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Reverting an administrator! 24 YEAR BAN!!!!!!!!111lelevn1 -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 23:29, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Damn, even if I outrank them? TANJ! Ok, tell my stubs I love them, and will see them when they are all grown up... *sniffle* --Splaka 23:50, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)


Im not from the Sacred Cow board :) Im trying to startup the Polish Uncyclopedia, any help are welcome :)--Yossarian 17:28, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

If you intend to write a number of foreign-language articles, please title articles with PL:<article name>, as not to place them into the english (default) uncyclopedia.--Sir Flammable KUN 17:31, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)


I added Category:War Games to Template:Wargame, so you can just add the template if ya want to be lazy. Laziness is next to.. something... will look it up later. Cheers. --Splaka 11:00, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Nice. You're too damn efficient, you know. You make us admins look like the bumbling know-nothing fools that we are, dammit! -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:02, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Maybe I just enjoy watching all you sockpuppets of Chron (don't think I don't know!). But don't tell anyone. Sadly, I've been upstaged several times tonight by an anonymous IP, who beats me to reverts, qvfd, and ban patrol. Worst part? Aol! Random proxy-cache IP every few minutes. *shame* You should give admin powers to all AOL IPs. --Splaka 11:05, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)
That's a splendid idea! Or maybe an administrator lottery: every day, sysop privileges are granted randomly to IP adresses from Romanian and Latvian ISPs? I'm sure we can trust them, for God's sake. I'll suggest it to Chron immediately. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:12, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Yay! I for one welcome our Latvian overlords (farkism, sorry). I am for to sleep now, my brain can't good talk anymuch. Happy burnination. --Splaka 11:16, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)


Thanks :) all articles and categories to delete are here--Yossarian 01:46, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Ok done, thanks :)--Yossarian 22:05, 21 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Done, thanks :)--Yoss 09:45, 12 Oct 2005 (UTC)



Codeine, hope you OK. This is NeoPopRealism funny version:

NeoPopRealism is style in visual arts created and named by artist Nadia Russ. NeoPopRealism combines deep smartness of Leonardo Da Vinci with bright stupidity of Andy Warhol. NeoPopRealism reflects new millenium with its technical/cultural achievements, social diversity & top crazyness, carries hi color energy and has craphic nature.
Also NeoPopRealism is philosophy, which unites beautifull & fabulous people under flag of perfectionism and hi IQ. [[1]]
NeoPopRealism creator, Artist Nadia Russ is 6'2" tall nut, with hazel eyes, blond hair, long legs & uncontrolled nature.
There's rumors. Some intocsicated Bahamian lawyer said about her: "When she'll fishish, you'll have nothing..." But there's another rumors: "Victims" had nothing from the beginning: no clothes, no money.
Warning to those who want to be one minute made millionaire: Do not even try to make it happen by possessing Nadia Russ paintings without million dollars payment. Riff-Raff professionals and law people are watching you.

OK, you're getting closer to what Uncyclopedia's about. But the problem is that this is still basically an advert for Nadia Russ's work. I appreciate that you've put some work in, but our policy is not to provide what we call "vanity pages". These are articles that in some way serve the purpose of promoting a website, person or business, or refer to a person that most of our readers haven't heard of. I'm not trying to be rude to Miss Russ, but she's not as well known as (for example) Andy Warhol or Salvador Dali.
However, I promised you I'd be fair about this, so I'll open a discussion about it on our forum, the Village Dump. If there's reasonable support for your idea, the Neopoprealism page will be unlocked and you can have the article. So I suggest that you check here in a day or two to see what the group consensus is. As a rule, admins here are more forthcoming in matters like this if you register a username rather than posting from an IP, and if you contribute more articles about a wide range of subjects. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:27, 21 Sep 2005 (UTC)


I've written an article!I don' think what I wrote was funny. But I wrote it! It's name is Ryan Stiles.--Alfred 22:37, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

deletion of guestbook piracy

Hey Codeine, even though I understand that some pages have to be deleted: why did you delete the guestbook piracy-page? I didn't intent to leave it that way and was just about to extent it when I found it removed. Also, what do you mean with this “vanity” remark?

A "Vanity Page" is what we call an article that either makes reference to non-notable persons or appears to exist mainly for the purpose of promoting an external link. Your page appeard to do both of those. If this really wasn't the case, and you want to do some more work on it, let me know and I'll restore it for you; but bear in mind what I mentioned above.
If you're new here, please have a look through the Beginner's Guide - even if you've edited other wikis before, since this is a parody site our standards are fucked-up and weird different to most. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 17:53, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Well, the external links linked not even to sites that belong to me and should only demonstrate, what guestbook piracy might look like. And, to be honest, I don't know who would promote old archived pages from some german military unit's guestbook. ;)
That pages must not make references to non-notable people was new to me, though. What about fictional non-notable people interconnected to each other to build some kind of plot? Even though I'm not that new here, I read the Beginner's Guide again but haven't found anything about that.
The article was far from complete, thats true. It was simply a first draft to be extended over time, that's why I put the Stub in there. I'll definitly write some more on guestbook piracy, but probably not today, for I have other work to do that, sadly, is more important. I know of others, though, who might also work on that article.
It's up to you whether you trust me on that and restore the page or wait until someone else writes a new article on guestbook piracy.
Thanks for your quick and helpful reaction, by the way.
Fair enough. Guestbook_Piracy has been restored. It's just that we get a lot of pages with self-referential pointlessnes on here, and occasionally I use a flamethrower rather than a sniper rifle. Happy editing :) -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 18:54, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)


Oh, I mean, oh no!

Why did you delete Wimbo Jales? --WikiFan05Talk Contribs 23:45, 14 October 2005 (CDT)

Because it was a) very short; b) orphaned (not linked to by any other pages); and c) not funny. Jokes based around swapping the first letters of names have been done to death, so unless one of them shows itself to be real comedy gold it's not likely to survive long. If you want to expand the page and make it better, let me know and I'll restore it for you. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 16:59, 15 Oct 2005 (UTC)
OK. I can expand the article with maybe negatived pictures of Jimbo, fake stats and a link from Jimbo Wales. Does that sound good at all? --WikiFan05


{{en:}} Why have you reverted my changes? {{pl:}} Czemu zrewertowałeś moje zmiany? 17:08, 17 Oct 2005 (UTC)

It wasn't your changes I was reverting. It was the changes of the guy who edited before you, who vandalised the page. Sorry about that, but if somebody like you has made a legitimate edit right after a vandal attack, it sometimes means that the page gets rolled back to a state that we know was the last unvandalised version. Please go ahead and add your contributions again, by all means. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 18:48, 17 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Sorry about oneinamillion

I meant to delete it right away, i won't get into the specifics as to why i did it but it was completely justified and sexy, and the results were hilarious... and sexy

congrats on the speedy response

That's OK. But for future reference, Uncyclopedia isn't a tool for you to abuse your friends. If you do it once or twice it'll generally just get deleted, but if you make a habit of it, you could end up being banned from the site. And in all honesty, we'd much rather that people stuck around and made the place better, rather than having to block them. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 20:40, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

S.O.S. Rewrite Requests

Hey, my pleasure. I'm glad you liked it. When I read your comment in the changes log I agreed that David deserved better, and figured I could overhaul the story without completely replacing the original author's premise. Anyone else wanna expand on it further, go for it. I give you credit for leaving it for someone else to work on, rather than killing it outright.  :) -- T. (talk) 21:42, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

You're helpful contributions


I would just like to thank you because I see that your helpfully correcting spelling mistakes with you're spelling skills. I am sorry that your frusterated with the ammount of mispellings that occur. I know that your good with spelling, and I am not so much. I would give you an award for you're user page, but I am not sure if there are any that would fit you're accomplishments. Anyway, keep up you're good work and I look forward to seeing more of you're contributions. --Paulgb 23:27, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Nah, I'm not offended :). I know I am a poor speller, and their they're there are some things that a spellchecker misses. I will try to use the right words from now on ;) --Paulgb 02:35, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Listen I know what you're thinking about the Dylan page, but I don't see why it has to be deleted. Its just a fictional story about the life of a character who everyone in our school jokingly uses as a scapegoat. As said on the front page this place is supposed to have no content and this article clearly has no content I can also have some of my friends back up the story. Thank you for your time, --Griffman 00:44, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

OK. Having looked at the links that lead to the page, I'll leave it be. Usually we take a pretty dim view of "in-jokes" that refer to a non notable person or something that only a small number of people may find funny (see HTBFANJS), but I see what you're doing here, and I admit I may have been a little hasty in deleting it earlier on (put it down to war trauma from the usual amount of vanity/slander nonsense we get on here) . So long as it doesn't spawn a rash of related pages about your friends' fictional characters it won't get any hassle from me. OK? -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 00:49, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Thanks man. I really appreciate it. --Griffman 01:01, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

GAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!! Why is it in CVP again?!?!

why it was deleted 'shut up' hardly qualifies for a reason or/and an explanation. i am left to guess.

You mean Whimwham? For a start, please mention which page you're talking about when you leave me a message, so I don't have to trawl through the deletion log, and sign your comment (using the sign button above or with four tildes like so: ~~~~).

It was deleted because it was non-encyclopedic, one sentence long and (here's the crunch) not in the least bit amusing. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 20:37, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

re: Aha, I get it - thanks for pointing out. btw, me not bothering to mention "whimwham" was a joke in itself (funny). and the original whimwham, despite it's flaws, was extremely hilarous to me. i don't know, i just laughed like a madman after reading it (cookie to the one if anyone gets the admittedly cryptical joke) but that's just me i guess.

re: QVFD

Sorry abou that. Thanks for the clarification. --Isra1337 01:31, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

McIntosh update

Thanks for reviewing the Vanity Policy! I have re-created the article conforming to the new guidelines; the teacher's name, photo and location have been removed completely. I will keep an eye on the article to make sure that the banned content doesn't make its way back in there. Hope this is all ok.

OK with me for now, but I can't guarantee the response of my fellow administrators. However, the fact that you've left a note on Talk:Mr_McIntosh is a good move, and I should think you'll probably be alright. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue)

Strike up the BANned!

Just wanted to let you know that you helped me catch my first notable vandal! You'd deleted the craptacular Jamie Lewis the Turtle, but when I looked at the Delete Log it was back. So I went to huff it again, and put a tiny ban on the IP address ( Then, I took another look at the IP's contributions, and he'd vandalized five separate articles in the space of an hour, not including the time he wasted pushing out his Turtle head. Went back and banned him for a year. w00t! Couldn't have done it, though, if you hadn't caught his crap the first time. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 15:39, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Yay! Stomp dem vandals! Glad to be of help. Next one should get 24 years, I reckon. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 15:47, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I tried to "educate" the wee young scamp in the ways of Uncyclopedia. I think he's a fellow UKer, from his chosen "edits" - have a look at User_talk: You might want to look at User_talk: too. I know the Admins love their Banfest, but sometimes I think we need a Good Cop to the Bad Cop. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb.png (talk to me)
Heh, I was there whilst you were posting that. He's got some short reading time, since it was a first offence and probably not malicious. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 15:53, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
I for one am looking forward to reading the new and improved Jamie Lewis the Turtle (whoever he may be). Infact, I may write it myself, in the style of a ranting Lancastrian. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb.png (talk to me)
Can I (or someone else) nominate Mhaille for a cookie? He does so much, and his user page is embarassingly devoid of kudos. -- T. (talk) 16:14, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Well, it's Monday, so I'm in a pissy mood anyway. But the edits he made to the other articles were just dumb vandalism. However, I'll go ahead and change the ban to just a day. I'm putting his IP on my watch list, though... -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 16:18, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Looks like Jamie The Turtle Lewis has been recreated, User has signed up for an account, but I'm sure you can check the IP. I'm hopeful that someone THIS determined to add content, will stick with it and improve. :) -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb.png (talk to me)
Oh noes! You put an Invincibility Charm on the page -- if I delete it now, I'll die in Seven Days! But you're right -- since they were willing to work a little harder, I'm willing to let them finish their work. Then I'll huff it. bwa ha ha -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 21:46, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Codeine is away from the phone, please leave a message

Just FYI, you have a call holding on IRC. It looks like User:DrFoster is still banned, though he has apologized. I'm not going to mess with the bannination (learned my lesson 'bout messing with other admins' bans!), but he seems apologetic:

*** DrFoster [[email protected]] has joined #uncyclopedia
<DrFoster> Hi, i would like to work on my Simon The Sorcerer article
<DrFoster> but i am banned
<DrFoster> its so sad!!
<DrFoster> can anyone help?
<DrFoster> just because i edited Splakas userpage twice because i accidently did not hit the preview button ...
<DrFoster> please
<DrFoster> help
<DrFoster> i am very sad
*** DrFoster [[email protected]] has quit [Remote closed the connection]

Interestingly, Special:Ipblocklist has some listings that look like you may have attempted an unblock, but it got tangled up somehow. At least, that's what it looked like when I was all tangled up in blocking/unblocking. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 17:42, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)


I know you already added it, but I just wanted to say congratulations. If anyone deserves this award its you. --Paulgb 02:12, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Force redirects

They are not unnecessary. Sophia has a link to Forces of the Universe; fundamental force aka fundamental interaction is a real concept in science that should have correspondingly ridiculous pages here, and force is the closest we've got. Someone looking for fundamental force or fundamental interaction should just get redirected to the force page until someone else makes content for them. --zandperl 13:21, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

"fundamental force aka fundamental interaction is a real concept in science that should have correspondingly ridiculous pages here."

There are many concepts, both concrete and abstract, in the world that Uncyclopedia does not have articles about. If we were to make them all into redirects, the whole site would become clogged and exceedingly difficult to edit. If you think those particular articles should exist, then go ahead and create them. We'd rather encourage humourous and inventive articles than redirects any day. Also, if a redirect really seems necessary, please make it point directly to the article that you want. Redirecting Fundamental force to Fundamental interaction and then to Force is annoying and creates work for someone else to do. Thanks. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 13:30, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the kudos

Thanks for the thanks, Codeine. I didn't really think anyone was looking! I created Octember since a few entries to Uncyclopedia referred to it. I'm not a big fan of dangling references (yeah, this is a dangerous statement). Should I add Octember to the Months project, or mark it for deletion, or ... ?

Thanks again.

Well, it's NeoEva88's baby, so I'd suggest leaving a message on his talk page. See what he thinks. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 14:46, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Short --Splaka 06:17, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Help... Need Admin... Can't Stand The... Pain

There are times like now where I lust for the banstick. has decimated Attack of the 500 foot Jesus and I have a desparate need to smite him.


-- T. (talk) 16:59, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion

It was a joke. I didn't expect my votes to be counted in any final tally. But there was no need to remove them. :( I assure you it wasn't intended as vandlism. Are jokes only allowed in articles? If so, I'll cease and desist. Cheers. AnalRetentive 13:10, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Well, jokes aren't only allowed in articles, but you have to look at it from our point of view. We get a lot of petty and senseless vandalism here, and there really wasn't anything to suggest that what you were doing was not intended to be taken seriously. Also, there's not really any reason to be insincere on the VFD, or even on the VFH; as this is a wiki, content control is one of the most important areas, and you shouldn't really do anything that might adversely affect that. Thanks. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:42, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)