User talk:Guildensternenstein/archive4

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Heterosexual Rape![edit]

Completely Non-sensual. Don Puttano cHeDDs User talk:CheddarBBQ 01:07,12July,2009

Ewww! —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:36, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Stephen Chow[edit]

You should write an article on him, since you do those articles on international directors. I like his movies more than any other Chinese (or maybe Japanese, I think it's Chinese, but I'm not certain) movies. Or any movies made from Asian countries. Anyway, yeah. Stephen Chow is cool, and they don't have an article on him here. Don Puttano cHeDDs User talk:CheddarBBQ 18:11,13July,2009

Okay, yeah, he's chinese, and his chinese name is Chiau Sing Chi, or 周星馳. He's an actor, screen writer, director, and producer. He directed Kung Fu Hustle and Shaolin Soccer, which were both award winning movies (both of which I saw and loved.) Don Puttano cHeDDs User talk:CheddarBBQ 18:18,13July,2009
I'm not really a fan (or familiar with him), so.... —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 21:11, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Aw. He's the only asian director I like (or know of). He makes comedies though, so if you're a drama-movie person (which I think you are), then eh. But I want you to at least watch one of his movies. I had to watch them in subtitles, and I still almost fell out of the seat from laughing. Don Puttano cHeDDs User talk:CheddarBBQ 21:46,13July,2009
Well, I like comedies, too (or else I wouldn't be here). I do admit most of my movies air a bit on the drama side of things, but virtually all of my favorite television programs (with the except of The X-Files) are comedies. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:13, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
You only watch comedy shows? What about House, Fringe, Heroes, Mental, and the Listener? I watch movies of every type: comedy, drama, war, horror, action, family (Kung Fu Panda was awesome) and musicals (only Sweeney Todd) Don Puttano cHeDDs User talk:CheddarBBQ 01:31,14July,2009
Actually, most of the TV shows I really like aren't even on anymore. And it's not that I only like comedy, I like whatever's good. In the case of TV, most of that happens to be comedy. Anyway, I gave Heroes a try, but I gave up on it after about half way through season 2. The only shows I actually go out of my way to watch that are still on now are The Office and Thirty Rock, both on NBC. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, they are really cool. But you don't watch House? That's by far my favorite show ever. Don Puttano cHeDDs User talk:CheddarBBQ 01:49,14July,2009
I like House, but I hardly watch it. My favorite is Lost. Staircase CUNt 01:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Never watched it. Don Puttano cHeDDs User talk:CheddarBBQ 02:02,14July,2009
It's amazing. Staircase CUNt 02:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Instead of talking about how awesome various TV shows are, you fine gentlemen should be reviewing any of the three (soon to be four) articles of mine that are on Pee at the moment cough. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 06:00, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Whore. Anyways, I thought you might know the guy since you do those other ones of guys who I can't pornounce the names of and/or have never heard of. Don Puttano cHeDDs User talk:CheddarBBQ 16:09,14July,2009
Gotcha. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 21:29, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

DU question[edit]

hi guildy. i have a query converning der unwehr rewrites. must new content be added, or can a total article cleanup be counted? for example, i took this mess and cleaned it up, resulting in this article. while i added minimal new content, i feel this sort of cleanup (removing bad content, removing non-useful redlinks, correcting formatting, etc.) is in line with the mission statement of DU: to improve the wiki. there's a whole slew of articles requiring this: Category:Cleanup is just one place that lists over 250. so: should we count these as rewrites? perhaps count them as cleanups, and receive one point instead of two? or is DU focused on writing only? thanks. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:46, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

That's an excellent question, actually, I never even considered the Cleanup category initially. Seeing as a cleanup isn't as involved as a full-fledged rewrite, how about we make that one Point instead of two? I'll update Der Unwehr page accordingly. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:02, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Also, it's probably worth mentioning that your cleanup looks about 100 times better than the prior version. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:08, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thanks! the kicker is, it involved a miminal effort compared to writing or re-writing, because there's little original content being added, so the creative process doesn't muck everything up. so: we should be able to get a lot of cleanups done, as a group!SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:22, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Nice thinking, Gerry. And, at 1 Point apiece, it should be a relatively simple way to rack up Unwehr Points. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
I can get points without being creative? Count me in. Don Puttano cHeDDs User talk:CheddarBBQ 00:49,16July,2009

Donkey schön[edit]

Für happy birthday sagen und ein geschichte für mich schriben. (sorry for my lousy german, I don't know much of it, Führer) Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 11:12 July 16 '09

Haha, you're welcome Mooshy. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost: July 16nd, 2009[edit]

THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 22:20, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

hurricane machine[edit]

i like your changes a lot. i particularly liked the ending line, that was exactly what i was looking for. the only problem i saw ws the earth day line, which, after the changes, is kind of by itself and comes out of nowhere, so maybe you can play around with another sentnece or two leading up to that. i'd certainly support this on VFH, but i see you've put it up for one more review, so i'll hold off on nomination-ing it until you get one more opinion, if that's what you want. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Ah, perfect, glad you like it. Seeing as I've got four (soon to be five) articles up for Pee, someone's bound to review them, right? Right...? —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
yup. the pee process is fairly streamlined nowadays, and you usually don't have to wait too long. although having that many articles up for review at the same time is somewhat treading into a moral gray area... SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Why is having that many articles up treading a "moral gray area?" —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:20, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
there may or may note have been a note in the guidelines a while back about keeping only one or two requests in the queue at a time, mainly due to long queues and the tendencies of some writers to get reviews and not change the article at all. however, as the queue is rather short these days, and you've proven your intention of improving your articles in a timely manner, i wouldn't worry about it unless UU takes issue, which i doubt he will. tl;dr version: carry on, then. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:48, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
I honestly never knew that. Well, if anyone takes issue, I'll remove some of my queued articles if that's what has to be done, or whatever. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:53, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
<Drive bye> No one cares how many reviews you have waiting. I remember Cajek had 6 or 7 on the go once. The thing is... If you do lots of reviews yourself then it's fine to submit lots of reviews yourself. If you never bother to review yourself then that's not good for the "suck blow" ratio and people will get pissed off... ;-) </End drive bye> MrN Icons-flag-gb.png 16:45, Jul 17
Thanks. I was just about to do a review, actually, after reading Joe Namath for the third time in as many hours. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:47, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Wait.... Is reviewing someone sucking or blowing? Are we talking about milk and straws here? Sucking would cause the milk to move into your mouth. But blowing would just cause bubbles to form. Sucking will satisfy your thirst, but blowing is a lot more fun to do. I usually don't giggle when I suck with the straw, but blowing bubbles in my milk usually causes that reaction. I'm not really sure which one I like better. And what if you love reviewing, and hate getting criticism in a review? Do the two switch? I'm not sure if you've fully thought through this analogy MrN9000, sir Woody On Fire! Wood burning.gifTalking Woody Stalking Woody 16:53, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
It's my understanding that it's customary to suck whilst you blow? I may be out of date on these things... MrN Icons-flag-gb.png 17:31, Jul 17
Suck WHILE you blow? What kind of milk are you drinking?!?! Woody On Fire! Wood burning.gifTalking Woody Stalking Woody 17:51, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
I! Drink! Your! Milk...shake. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey Woody? SUCK IT! LOOLLOLOOLLOLOOLOOL! -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN17:04, 17 Jul
Well, I do enjoy milk, and I was thirsty. I guess my mind is made up. Thanks Op..... Hey, WAIT JUST A GOSH DARNED SECOND HERE! You're talking about PENISIS! Woody On Fire! Wood burning.gifTalking Woody Stalking Woody 17:09, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
penisis? is he the egpytian god of something? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Yes. The Egyptian god of milk. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN17:14, 17 Jul
The Egyptian God of Milk, and Penisis. And the blowing of both. Woody On Fire! Wood burning.gifTalking Woody Stalking Woody 17:17, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
So getting back to the moral implications of this all, there's no issue for me as I suck hard but blow harder? <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 07:11, 19/07/2009

D&D RLE[edit]

Okay, I'm going to take a bit of time over this, as although you've asked that this be done just on the "overview" page, the reality is that as this relies so heavily on the "support" pages I'll have to make a comment on those as well. I've read through the whole lot and let me think about it for a while to get it all straight in my head and I'll have a review for you within the next 24 hours. <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 07:14, 19/07/2009

Wow, thank you. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:24, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Isaac the Tank Engine review[edit]

Hi Boss. Thanks for the review. Much appreciated. A couple of quick questions just to help me get this moving in the right direction. I've made a bunch of edits already, including the destruction of the last section, which when reading back after reading your comments I can see what you mean, but I still have a fair bit more work to do. So a couple of quick questions.

This is based vary heavily on "via crucis" or "the way of the cross", also known as "the passion of the Christ." (Yes, Mel Gibson and I used the same source material, and we grew up in the same town. Scary.) In the "new" via crucis there are 14 stations, of which I've just used the first 6 as I was concerned about overdoing the point. Would you suggest that I continue with all 14? Should I have a "random" sample of the 14 (so I can have the crucifixion in as well)?

Also let me know if you prefer the newer version of "Denial Station." There's a part in there that is proving to be difficult and I've potentially <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 21:54, 19/07/2009improved it but I'd like your feedback on that as well.

PEEing all over the place[edit]

This is all for you

One thing I didn't mention was that I have not read the first review as I wanted to give you an opinion based upon what I thought and felt on reading it. If you have any questions about what I've thrown in there then feel free to ask away.

Am I allowed to stop writing now? <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 04:18, 20/07/2009

Holy Crap. That's the biggest review I've ever seen. Staircase CUNt 04:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, this hits 17,500 bytes, followed by Princess Diana at 13,000, and then Destroy all Humans at 12,000. However it's all overshadowed by Pox, which is not a PEEReview but uses a similar format, which sets the bar at 25,200 bytes. <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 05:05, 20/07/2009

Hurricane Machine[edit]

I lolled, and therefore I nommed it. Well done! Vote away. Nameable mumble? (UnScr:PWotM) 19:27, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

17 Years of Cheddar[edit]

My birthday is coming up next month, and to commemorate it in a completely original way, I made a forum. Check it out! 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 14:51,21July,2009

A swift PEE for you[edit]

I have cast my highly trained reviewers eye over your article for a second time and was pleased, as all reviewers and critics are when people do as they say. In my view the text is fine, it feels like a lot less of a trek between jokes now, and all it took was a couple more lines which, depressingly, have no spelling errors in them (I know, I checked). Otherwise my other comments still stand, you have corrected the one flaw that jumped out at me when I reviewed it earlier on and all that was left bar that were my suggestions. I'd say it would now score about 43, so you should consider tossing it into VFH.

Oh, if I had reviewed it a few weeks ago it would have gotten over 45 but it turns out I'm too enthusiastic with dishing out the points so you must suffer for it. --ChiefjusticeDS 16:57, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Hey, Chief is back! Are you going to review like a madman again? Staircase CUNt 17:09, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
I don't know, I only did 3 today, and I'm kinda jet-lagged. I wouldn't say like a madman, the PEE queue is just much more wonderful to look at when you don't have to scroll down to view it all.... OK, yes probably.--ChiefjusticeDS 17:49, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Hah, thank you, Chief. I'll think I'll try Mr. Smith's luck, and then revise accordingly based upon how he does. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 21:13, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Well PEEd[edit]

ThinkerToilet.jpg The article Pious Christians Against Shellfish has been reviewed by PuppyOnTheRadio(talk)
Version as at 24 July 2009 PEE review

Sorry Guildy[edit]

I'm not interested in the fantasy football thingamajig. Sowwy. Pleb CUN KUN Dexter111344 Complain here Vote now! 02:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Ah, no big deal. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:42, 24 July 2009 (UTC)


I do so love sports simulation. Not football so much as baseball or some other sport, but okay, you can count me in. -RAHB 05:54, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Hurray! We are in the midst of our draft right this moment, and you are taking Bad Shroom's place, which means you have the first overall pick!Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Alright, everything's all set up. Now just how do I go about picking in this weird wide world of sports drafting strategy we've got going? -RAHB 19:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
this should be a useful link for you, RAHB. It suggests who you should pick when.--<<>> 20:42, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost: July 23rd, 2009[edit]

This edition is on time, and anyone who tells you differently is lying! THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 19:38, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles[edit]

User:The Woodburninator and myself have been talking about improvements to Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles and I was wondering if Der Unwehr would be interested in helping create a few articles? MadMax 21:51, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, the thing about Unwehr members is they all work by themselves. I really can't order them to do anything, DU only serves to motivate people. I do like the idea, though, and will attempt to contribute to this whole improvement thing if I can find the time. So yeah. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:49, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I've actually been thinking of creating a new award, {{reqaward}}, for articles created from UN:REQ. Do you think this might encourage either Der Unwehr or UN:IC? MadMax 13:08, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

I suppose so. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Just wanted to let you know the award is now official. By the way, do you think anyone from Der Unwehr might be interested in working on this new article? I mentioned it at UN:IC and someone suggested it might be more suited to DU. MadMax 01:44, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

UnBooks:"Incoherent Overwritten Literary Trainwreck" by Thomas Pynchon[edit]

I actually started doing a review for this about four times, but each time I stopped for the same two reasons. 1) PEEReview had started to become the Puppy and Guildy show (yes, in my mind I get top billing) and 2) I haven't read anything by Thomas Pynchon, and that's where my problem with the concept of this piece lies. I've read a few of the comments that you've made about the author's literary style, which made things a lot clearer to me, and that sort of thing should be included in the article, and I've been racking my brains as to how to get around it, and I think I now know what may be done to overcome this issue.

  1. Cover quotes Every overblown literary trainwreck has cover quotes, usually one by Clive Barker/Stephen King, and then a second from an author who writes in a similar style. I'd probably pick on Dan Brown for a second one, because he's a more recognisable name, has a similarity in the overblown melodrama aspect, writes as a pseudo-intellectual but in reality writes pulp for the masses. (I HATE Dan Brown.) The quotes could be along the lines of "This is the novel I wish I had written, assuming that I'd wanted to write a barely comprehensible, vain, over-intellectualised novel that had no plot line." or something to that effect.
  2. In narrative self-referential commentary which is me saying "the stuff you did in the singing, but just more of it" but as I'm reading your article at the same time it's becoming harder for me to not be an intellectual snob. What can I say, I have histrionic personality disorder. But something along the lines of adding in here "We can't understand the plot; Maybe it doesn't have a lot; It's hard to work out; My sanity is at doubt; So why don't I just croon along." or something to that effect. I spent a total of three second writing that line, so I won't be offended if you don't use it.

With the exception of nothing in the PEEreview about concept, I agree with most of what's already been said, so I won't say it again. <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 01:23, 25/07/2009

Gotcha. Well, regardless of what happens, I think I'm going to shelve IOLT for a while, because writing it (and the revising it) was fairly involved. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 04:49, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
You mean the legendary Guild finally has too much on his plate! But... I thought you could do everything. <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 07:22, 25/07/2009
So did I...[sniff] did I.... —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:44, 25 July 2009 (UTC)


Homie, you iz on da clock. ~~Oaktown Holla 04:08, 26 July 2009 (UTC)


Homie, you iz on da clock. ~~Oaktown Holla 04:08, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

You press 'save' multiple times a lot. Staircase CUNt 04:14, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanx. Also, Guildy is back up. ~~Oaktown Holla 22:56, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanx. Also, Guildy is back up. ~~Oaktown Holla 22:56, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

It's your turn[edit]

Someone forgot to tell you.--<<>> 01:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


You stole Rnady Moss from me. Bastard. Staircase CUNt 02:24, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Hah! Yeah, it was either him or Calvin Johnson. Then I realized Calvin Johnson plays for the Lions. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:27, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Whatever happened to Reggie Wayne? Staircase CUNt 02:28, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Well, he did have sort of a disappointing season last year, but keep in mind that was because the Colts had no O-line and no run game. Now that Peyton's got a tandem backfield and therefore a fresh set of legs always behind him, plus an improved O-line, Indy should be able to get the whole play action thing rolling again. In short, (I think) Reggie will have a rebound next season, though not everyone is of a like mind, and so Reggie's ranked a little lower. I selected Moss because I'm willing to bet that he's going to be waiting for me in round four (provided Liver doesn't take him the pick before). And, even if he does, I should have either Greg Jennings or Roddy White to choose from. In any event, it's a win for me. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

You stole Drew Brees from me. Bastard. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 12:44,27July,2009

Well, Liver just grabbed Wayne with the pick just after mine, so I guess that kills my whole draft strategy for this round. Bummer. Also, Cheddar, your name was not on Drew Brees. Plus you've got McNabb at QB, so don't complain. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Did u see McNabb last season? I love the Eagles, but I'm gonna need a miracle. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 14:45,27July,2009
McNabb performed well down the stretch, which is all that matters, plus he's got some shiny new receivers to throw to. Statistically speaking, he should do alright. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Stats, schmats, who needs 'em. He'll either throw the ball good or not, and my guess is he won't. Staircase CUNt 14:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Well, in FF, all that matters is stats, is what I'm saying. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Final Fantasy?--<<>> 15:13, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
you are up again, sir. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 12:55, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

my email[edit]

[email protected] ~~Oaktown Holla 23:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

my email[edit]

[email protected] ~~Oaktown Holla 23:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Sent you an invite. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:25, 28 July 2009 (UTC)


Don't think I've ever said hi to you before but keep up the good writing. Anyway, I remember you said something once about killing all memes by 2010, well I'm trying to kill a big one right here on VFD and need some support. It would be appreciated. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent OZ! Noobaward.jpg Wotm.jpg Unbooks mousepad.PNG GUN.png 08:02, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Nice pick[edit]

I actually considered picking him instead of Romo, since he's such a great talent who'd fallen so far. Ah well...--<<>> 14:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. I always tend to wait on my RBs, seeings as you can seemingly always find guys like Chris Johnson in the later rounds. If Woody doesn't take Aaron Rodgers by the time I'm up next, I'm thinking about nabbing him, too. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:22, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
That would be just a little retarded of me, now wouldn't it? Woody On Fire! Wood burning.gifTalking Woody Stalking Woody 14:23, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey, always be prepared.--<<>> 14:32, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
And you never know when I might go CRAZY! Woody On Fire! Wood burning.gifTalking Woody Stalking Woody 14:34, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Is this when someone makes a joke about condoms? Pleb CUN KUN Dexter111344 Complain here Vote now! 14:34, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
No, straws. Woody On Fire! Wood burning.gifTalking Woody Stalking Woody 14:35, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Or some wacky combination of the two.--<<>> 14:36, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh Holy Mr. Guilder of le Steinsensterns[edit]

It's just about a week 'til my birthday (8/7). That means only about a week for presents! Go man go! 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 23:28,29July,2009

Don't worry about it, I've already got something in mind. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Oh Goody!!! 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 15:28,30July,2009

Further liturgical discussion on the ramifications of Levitcus[edit]

I saw this last night and thought that you'd appreciate it. (Forgot to sign. Oops) <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 05:27, 30/07/2009

God, people in my country are stupid. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Also, thanks for the video. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
To be fair, I know people like this in Australia as well, but most of them have friends living in Dallas. <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 05:48, 30/07/2009
Yeah, there are stupid religious people all over. Like pretty much every Muslim person to ever live. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:01, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
You ever been to Italy? One of the most religious places in the world (*ahem* the pope *ahem*). Someone on the street probably would've stoned the kid. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 15:35,30July,2009
I have not. Europe on the whole, though, is a lot less religious than the US. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:40, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Actually, I know some really nice Muslims as well. It's unfortunate that a lot of them get tarred with the same "Jihad" brush. There's another sketch the chasers did earlier this year in Vatican city, but that was about Catholics rather than Christians. I was raised a Catholic, and the reality is Catholics don't follow the Bible, they follow the Catechism, which is a very different thing, even if based initially on the Bible. <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 21:24, 30/07/2009
I was raised Catholic too! And, by some astonishing coincidence, I'm also an atheist. Imagine that. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 21:48, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

'Tis your turn[edit]

Just sayin'.--<<>> 14:10, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Thomas Isaac the Tank Engine[edit]

I've made a few changes since your first review and the second review from Chief, just like to know your gut reaction in regards to this as it currently appears. (I'm not after a full review, but feel free to say as much or as little as your like, and take your time as I'm juggling about five things at the moment. Thanks. <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 01:51, 31/07/2009

Sergio Leone[edit]

Not only have you written an article on one of my all-time favorite directors, you've fufilled one of the oldest requests on the site. Sir, I salute you. MadMax 17:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Thumbs up2.jpg

This user created Sergio Leone, an article originally requested on Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles. Good for them us!
(for more information, see award statistics)

So, what do we do...[edit]

If RAHB is just abandoned us? Like, for months, or whatever?--<<>> 23:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Replace him? Or auto-pick for him and then just keep track of his stuff? 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 23:58,31July,2009
When do we make a call of that nature, though? At a week?--<<>> 00:08, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
probably. I still say we should go ahead and autopick this round. It's been 2-3 days now (I lost count) 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 02:45,1August,2009
I left something on the Draft page, though I'll say it again here. Give it until the end of the weekend--RAHB may be extremely busy for all we know. If he still hasn't picked, we'll autopick for him. From then on out, everyone has 24 hours to make their pick. If they have not picked within 24 hours, they will be given the highest player according to Yahoo! ranks. So there. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:49, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
He also might be dead. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 02:58,1August,2009
Sounds good. (The plan, I mean. Not the chance he could be dead. That'd suck.)--<<>> 11:39, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I'll feel real bad if he is. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 15:02,1August,2009

I finally[edit]

Got that review done for you. ~~Oaktown Holla 00:59, 2 August 2009 (UTC)


You are now the best friend of the world (for this month) 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 02:01,2August,2009

Your ban[edit]

Was more for consistency after I banned Sock and Dex than anything else, but when Mordillo puts that drama template on a VHF vote, don't bother responding to someone on the vote page, maybe take it to their talk page, OK? --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 14:50, Aug 3

I was banned? —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:24, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Yeah. For 5 minutes. Unlike me who got a bunch of unwarranted bans when I was doing work. Pleb CUN KUN Dexter111344 Complain here Vote now! 15:25, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Heh. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
One of us! One of us! 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 15:49,3August,2009
But which article was the argument on? 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 15:52,3August,2009

getting it rolling again[edit]

now we're truckin'. keep us going, sir. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:12, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost: July 30th, 2009[edit]

It's on time, you were just high and didn't realize when it got here! THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 23:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

One half hour until you need to auto-pick for Staircase[edit]

By my calculations it would be Pierre Thomas (RB-NO). Am I correct?--<<>> 22:33, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Possibly. I dunno, we'll have to see. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:11, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Ur up. ~~Oaktown Holla 23:22, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
your move again good sir. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:30, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Quentin Tarantino[edit]

Shall I nominate it for you? Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 01:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Holy fuck. Um, I finished it about five minutes ago, but if you've read it already and think it deserves a highlight, then sure, go right ahead. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:31, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Ah. I'll go right ahead. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 01:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Longliver's pick[edit]

Are we giving him the best available player (Hines Ward - WR - Pit), or the best of what he needs (Rob Bironas - K - Ten)?--<<>> 17:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Well, according to my tally, the highest-rated player is Kevin Smith of Detroit. However, since Liver seems to draft the best Colt available more often than not, I'm thinking his autopick is going to be Joseph Addai. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 18:13, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


Hi Guildy, long time no speak, nice work on Leone, Tarantino, Pious Christians etc.. it's really quite hard to keep up with your work tbh, but I haven't yet seen a mediocre article.

Regarding the request on the forums, I did leave a message for NBK earlier, but he appears to be absent anyway. The acronym is the HANEKE one and I just need to turn it into authentic-sounding German that would still be funny if you can only understand a couple of words as a non-German speaker. Haneke is a doomsday device and the pinnacle of depressive stimulus if you're wanting to know what ball park I need it to be in. Cheers :)--El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 15:15, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Ah, gotcha. I actually watched Funny Games two weeks ago because of your article and its bringing of Haneke to my attention. Anyway, as soon as I work out something that works, I'll message you back. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:19, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Cheers, I think I might have mentioned this before but - since it's so long since I've seen Funny Games - it's mainly "The Piano Teacher", "The Seventh Continent" and "71 Fragments of a Chronology of Chance" that I'm working from at the moment. Especially "The Seventh Continent" which I really like actually, but can't imagine a more depressive or anti-consumerist anti-modernist nihilism-drenched film (don't watch it to be entertained btw, it's just masterful and doing exactly what it sets out to achieve, it's far from fun).--El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 15:26, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Gotcha, I'll have to see it sometime. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:28, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

You're up, Sternenguildenstien[edit]

~~Oaktown Holla 05:49, 9 August 2009 (UTC)


I find it a pain to go through the people left, and I know I'm gonna screw up my picks, and I don't care about the people left. So would you mind auto-picking my bench players, giving the highest available person? Thank you. Bitch. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 21:58,9August,2009

Sure, it would certainly speed things up a bit. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 22:03, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Cool, but I do have one rule. PLEASE DON'T PICK ANYONE FROM THE STEELERS. I don't care if they're the best available pick, I do not want a Pithead on my team. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 22:25,9August,2009
Speaking of which, it's Cheddar's turn. If I pick for him (it'll be Tomorrow morning, apprx. 7AM EST, methinks), it'll be Kellen Winslow, Jr (TB-TE). You can, of course, pick whoever you want for the man.--<<>> 01:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
I really don't care who picks for me, as long as I don't get crap *ahem* Big Ben *ahem* 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 03:13,10August,2009
et tu, guildy. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 03:18, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Well, regretfully, I've decided that I want Michael Vick. I don't like the guy, but McNabb and Reid do, and he's an Eagle, so i'm gonna have to adjust to him. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 04:46,14August,2009
Just kidding, don't actually give him to me. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 13:30,14August,2009

UnSignpost! August 6th, 2009!! WE BE LATE, Y'ALL!!![edit]

Hand delivered by Pleb CUN KUN Dexter111344 Complain here Vote now! 21:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Chutes and Ladders[edit]

At the moment it looks quite better and the images are looking really good now. I really do like the examples of the board games as a metaphor for something else (e.g the guy being famous for his work on 'Free Parking') so if you are able to sprinkle those throughout the piece then it should be good. They also tie into the theme of 'board games are serious business' nicely so once you put more of those in it I would probably vote for it on VFH. --Sequence 01:04, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll make some more changes/additions in the near future, and then have you look at it again, if you don't mind. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 07:35, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Okay I had a look over it again and I definitely think the footnotes are a great addition. It's looking very nice. --Sequence 12:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
VFH huh...Well I'll say that I would vote for it, but that's because I can appreciate humour even if it doesn't cause you to laugh out loud. At the moment it is still quite subtle humour for the most part so I can't vouch for how other people would vote (e.g some people base their vote on how many laughs they have throughout the piece. If you want to you could try putting it up for vote, or you could chuck it onto pee review and see if someone else gives you a different opinion to what I have said. Hope that helps, I'll support you whichever you choose. --Sequence 12:27, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Well, if you like it, that's good enough for me. If it fails, I can always revise it again. Thanks. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:55, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for helping make Six Hats a feature...[edit]

... by not voting against it! <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 09:37, 11/08/2009

Well, I probably would have voted For if I were a tad bit more familiar with the subject, so yeah. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:48, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
That's cool. I'll let you make it up to me in whatever way you like! <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 10:04, 13/08/2009


Please stop commenting on against votes. Everyone gets to vote whichever way they want, and you don't need to express you opinion on these votes. Thanks. ~ 13:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Fair enough. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

draft pace[edit]

hey guildy, i'll most likely not be around for my next few picks in the draft, but i just may, so could you pick for me if i haven't picked in, say, 2 hours? that way i might still catch it, but i won't hold you guys up to long if i'm away. if you do pick for me, please pick the highest remaining WR for the next pick, then the highest overall position player in each following round. thanks! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 03:47, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Will do, Cheevers. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:21, 12 August 2009 (UTC)


It seems the draft has slowed to a crawl again. If I end up picking for Staircase, my pick would be Kellen Winslow, Jr., again, but it's becoming apparent you're looking at something very different from what I'm looking at when you pick, so I'll give you until I return from work to pick who YOU think he should pick. Cheers.--<<>> 11:36, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm picking for him now, and yes, it does seem that way. I'm going by Yahoo's rankings in the "Pre-Draft Rankings" section. As players are picked, I add them to the "my rankings section." So yeah. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:45, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm using the mock draft figures at the same site. I guess that's what's been giving us the different numbers. I guess we can keep going as we've been, where you pick unless you're not available for a long time, then I'll pick.--<<>> 21:10, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Sounds good to me. We've only got four rounds left to do, so hopefully this'll all get wrapped up soon. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 22:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Incidentally, Staircase just gave his blessing for you to draft for him.--<<>> 00:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
And it is his turn, I believe. Woody On Fire! Wood burning.gifTalking Woody Stalking Woody 00:50, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it is. Why no one can be bothered to finish their drafts is beyond me, but whatever. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:04, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Are you picking for Gerry?[edit]

Or am I? 'Cause it's time he was picked for.--<<>> 23:09, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

I got it. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Time to pick for Longliver[edit]

Unless you want me to, etc etc. Also, Chedz noticed he hasn't picked in like, three rounds, so we might want to shorten his time limit (only two more rounds, though, so not TOO much of a point... I think at one pick per day we'll still beat out the season.--<<>> 02:11, 19 August 2009 (UTC)


Cheers Guildy, I like that one a lot. NBKieler did get in contact actually and so I have an alternative, but I really like that one. It has the right amount of silliness, thanks --El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 09:56, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Hah, wonderful, glad you like it. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:13, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

The Foreign Office[edit]

Hi Guildy, you seemed interested in this project didn't you? Well the thing is, it seems to be very popular with the other uncycs so far, but ours doesn't seem to be doing much at all, apart from myself (and Dexter has put his name down too). Since noone seems to be replying seriously to the forum post anymore, I was wondering whether you'd like to be involved (unless you're busy) or whether you knew of any bilingual folk who might be interested.

The "-> English" page is here and several translations have been started so far (4 by me and 1 by Pirc). I don't know the best way of advertising the service other than the forum, any ideas? --El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 10:12, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I am interested in the idea, though truth be told I would rather spend my efforts writing my own original work, and not translating that of others (and in all honesty my German isn't nearly good enough to translate anything anyway), so yeah. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:48, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I understand that too, no problem. What I was thinking more was to do a basic translation and then hand it over to the writer whose style is most similar to the desired end-product for them to put the finishing touches to. What do you think? Would you be up to that if you had the time? --El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 14:56, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Eh, I suppose so. We'll see what happens, I guess. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:33, 15 August 2009 (UTC)


I nommed a pic. Check it out plz. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 23:15,15August,2009

if PCAS falls out of VDH now...[edit]

Does that make it an ultra-quasi feature, as at the moment it would have a HIGHER score than anything in there that would be picked as a feature, just been in there for a while... <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 21:04, 16/08/2009

Why would fail now? It's leading the next highest thing by two votes with only a day left until it gets its due, and its health is still in the 40s. If it is kicked out of the queue with less than a day before it's featured with a score higher than anything else, I would be FUCKING PISSED, and probably have some choice words for whatever brilliant admin decided to do that. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 21:21, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Because by the "Health" it's the second lowest, and it has not been pushed over to featured yet. It would be a fucking stupid decision, agreed, but if six things were thrown into the queue now, then that would put the total number to 21, which would mean that it would be eligible to be failed (low health) as it would be to be featured (highest score). I honestly can't work out why it hasn't gone to feature yet as health is not used to decide what to feature and it has a higher score than a number of these. <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 08:23, 17/08/2009
Correction: when you have two articles with the same score, the one with the higher health will be featured. ~ 08:26, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Okay. Is there any articles at the moment with a higher score? If I spam the VFH queue with new articles (quality or not, still within the 3 day rule) do you choose which article goes through to VFH prior to working our which gets removed? Not arguing, understand, just confused. <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 08:43, 17/08/2009
All goes to common sense, I'm not going to remove PCAS just because someone spams the VFH with a few articles. The only way it's not going to make a feature if we'll have a few more articles beating it to the feature queue by a higher score in which case its health will drop further. To be honest, normally I'd remove it since it's been there for quite some time, but at the moment it doesn't seem like something is going to overtake its score. ~ 08:50, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Gotcha. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
That clears it up... sorry if it seemed I was being critical, just curious. Oh, and w00t! <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 03:17, 18/08/2009
Hah, it's all good, and thank you. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 04:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks—the remake[edit]

Thank you for supporting! Sir MacMania GUN[21:26 16 Aug 2009]

Why, thank you for the compliment! Sir MacMania GUN[21:32 16 Aug 2009]

UnSignpost 13th August 2009. It's not late. You are![edit]

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png 20:45, Aug 18