User talk:King In Yellow

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search



Arc 1 Arc 2




As promised...[edit]

...teh funni is still here, now that I'm back. Seems like the Poo Lit exceeded expectations in producing a pile of potential VFH contenders. Good, because I'm fresh out of ideas.  :) It's good to see you still doing well! Once again, your name is being whispered about (there is no cabal) for consideration as sysop. That can only help us to raise the quality around here. Speaking of which, when's your flood of original articles due to arrive?  :) I hope it coincides with the next drought on VFH, like the Poo Lit seemed to. ~ T. (talk) 11:12, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

A present for you and a token of my appreciation...[edit]

Ann Coulter and her final solution...

King, just for you, I have taken the Ann Coulter WORTHLESS and converted it to this image which I feel really expresses my feelings towards her. And I think we both we seem to have the same reaction (carefully chosen word) to her and her unreasonable outlook on life. Hugs, Dame PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:14, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

GAWD... that's wonderful! But I didn't get you anything! :~( I'd have to agree with your choice of the word "reaction" as well -- assuming, of course, that we're speaking of the type of reaction produced in sane humans by pictures of bestial fisting or the drinking a strychnine latte. There are simply some people in the world (Coulter, Jack Thompson, Fred Phelps, just to name a few) that, upon exposure to their rancid festering hate-prop, can make even the most charitable and forgiving soul pray for Fenrir to hurry up and eat the damn sun so 3 out of 5 people can be spontaneously devoured by wolves! (At least, that's what I think the Fimbulwinter's all about. I'm not as Norse as I let on.) Still, it's good to know that there are good folks out there such as yourself that can see these charlatans for what they really are... tapeworms in the bowels of modern society. I salute you, Pret-Pret, and cheer you on! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 12:54, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


sorry, I didnt mean it to become a discussion, but I am using this to write another article about avoiding questions. I know this sounds strange even for here, but it will make sence very soon. So please dont delete any of it yet. thank you. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Carlj (talk • contribs)

No problem, but I'm not an admin. I can't delete anything. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 12:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Joycean Fantasy XXI![edit]

I had to go back and reread that vote several times to try and figure out your meaning behind it. "What the hell does Joyce have to do with Final Fantasy?" I pondered. They do say that any type of information one is looking for can be interpreted within The Wake's pages, so I thought you knew something I didn't, like hidden cheat codes in Book III. I bet if you look real hard you can find upupdowndownleftrightleftrightba somewhere in thar. Thank gods you cleared that up so I can get shit-faced and soak in huge amounts of mindless euphoric patriotism for 'da fourth instead of spending it in ridiculous wikicontemplation. -- Imrealized 03:06, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Hee! Yeah, sorry about that! Poirot would call it the case of the roaming vote. Although Finnegan's Fantasy would be an interesting title... or maybe Portrait of the Moogle as a 54th Level Black Mage. I hope the 4th treated you well enough... and what the hell day is it anyway? Monday? Wednesday? Pluto? --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Rock, Paper, Scissors, Thermonuclear Weapon[edit]

What was wrong with the article, just wondering? And I will get an account, some day. -- 17:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

OK, I have an account now. I know the article's pretty short, but is that the only thing wrong with it? Or should I just stop trying to be funny and become an accountant or soemthing? --Smelly999 17:53, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Yes, the primary fault is in the article's length -- as it is, it's little more than a stub. Perhaps, in order to increase the credibility and ultimately the humor of your idea, you could go into how the system came to be. Think of the movie "Wargames" -- was there a supercomputer that got its wires crossed and blended two "games?" And what's the deal with paper, anyway? Is the U.S. military funding paper-penetrating weapons projects now? These are possible things to explore in the article, sidebars that could take it from a "what the hell is this" article to a "damn, that's clever" article. Hope this helps! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Left Behind[edit]

Yeh, it's too bad about NSFW (I'm still trying to get over the fact that some people do things at work other than work). Initially I was pissed, but the new version is growing on me. The rump is less...distracting, more comical. Still, the thong will be missed. To be perfectly honest I'm surprised that it lasted this long on VFP (rapturists are a small enough minority that most people know very little about their reprehensible righteous mission...for a loving god, no less). As long as I've spread word of the dangers of fundamentalism my mission is accomplished. Odd, that last sentence had more power I gave that speech on the aircraft carrier...or maybe that was someone else. Modusoperandi 16:51, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Blah, NSFW is for people who actually care about their hamster-in-a-mill "jobs." I still love the idea -- I wish it (the original) could be segued in to Islam and the "Forty million drunk virgins that will meet me in heaven if I detonate my torso." Still, I couldn't in good conscience continue to support the image once it had been changed, as it wasn't the one I voted for. Sorry for the reneg, but my sense-o-funny pulls no punches. Oh, and about the rapturists... I'm still shuddering at the FPS computer game that's coming out. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
No biggie. Originally I googled "rump" (or a synonym thereof) and that was the least pornish pic that it found. I still giggle when I remember thinking it up while on the can, pun tho' it may be.
The "Left Behind" game fascinates me. Just think of the "pitch" meeting, "Okay, you kill buddhists. For Christ. So it's righteous. Because god commands it." <shudder>.
I'm guessing they are making the game: 1) to cash in, 2) preaching to the choir, 3) as a recruiting tool. #1 I understand (but despise), #2 is obvious (but despisable) and #3 makes me think they saw "America's Army", maybe?.
Speaking of Islam (when I was in the Superfriends my superpower was "seque"), I made freedom of speech. It seems kind of quaint now, but I was crazy pissed-off when I was writing it, as people were rioting... Modusoperandi 17:27, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
You hit the nail on the head with your third point. It's a brainwashing attempt. "Hey kids, if you like violent videogames, you'll love the Army!" Only now it's the cult of the rapture. Also, while I'm not sure if it's substantiated, but I've also heard rumors of a RTS franchise based on the "Left Behind" mythos. Talk about cashing in. Hey, all you Jack-jumpers, now there's a game that's sanctioned by GOD! "Left Behind: Global Christian Genocide" (or whatever euphamistic name they're going to nail on it... pun.) Oh, and kudos on the freedom of speech article. Not quaint at all, considering some people are still up in arms about that ridiculous little episode. And people look at me strangely when I describe myself as a student of Sufism. You know, I think I'm going to re-reneg on my vote. It deserves support for the idea alone. Thanks for the parley. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:43, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
As per Freedom of speech on "Faith and Reason" Salman Rushdie said, "What kind of a god is it that's upset by a cartoon in Danish?" My thoughts exactly. Modusoperandi 18:07, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


Thanks for the nod! Just FYI, I'm a guy. Pretty sure now.The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shandon (talk • contribs)

No prob! I always try to give credit where credit is due. Dude. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:22, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Geez. I shall Sign My Comments!--Shandon 19:32, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
That is the LAW. ....oooooo scary.... --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


Caternest.jpg Acid likes you. Be thrilled.
Now go make him a sandwich.
Ham or turkey? :) (thanks, btw) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 12:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

American Fundie[edit]

Since you were one of the people who got "Left Behind", I just finished another pic along the same general theme. This time Christian Fundamentalists. It's a bigger and more frightening target than the Dispensational Premillennialists (who are too much of a parody of themselves to be really dangerous), and ipso ergo facto (I think that's Spanish) more in need of a good piss take (which I really hope means something different in the U.K. than it does here). It's just been uploaded to American Fundie Magazine: I'll put it on Pic Review Thingy after I've had a chance to rest my eyes (shift work...sigh). Then maybe VFP, but that'll probably be awhile, I don't want to be a self-nom whore (plus posting Mcgrue was, politely, an error). I'm also telling Prettiestpretty as the she (or is it "they"?) seemed to get "Left Behind" too.

I really do feel better after making pics/writing about things that scare/annoy/enrage me. <yawn> Good night... Modusoperandi 04:28, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Can't sleep so I put pic on Pic Review Thingy. Maybe some Katamari Damacy will help... Modusoperandi 05:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
I like it, although I think it's less clever than the "Left Behind" thing. Perhaps because it's too overtly false? For example, of course Fred Phelps is an ass, and tries to justify why God Hates Fags with every breath of air he thieves from the people who actually deserve a continuous supply of oxygen. But on a propaganda rag devoted to that brand of bigotry, I doubt that his "message" would be so distastefully displayed. Perhaps "Plus! Exclusive Interview with Fred Phelps: "God Can Love You Too! (Fags need not apply)"" --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:21, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
It's not false at all, most of that page is cobbled together from an intensive (and depressing) interweb search. I meant it more to be a propaganda mag just for them (preaching to the choir, as it were). Besides, when an actual persons says "God hates fags", you can't improve on that. It's already the perfect parody of itself (plus "God hates fags" has considerable emotional punch, which is probably part of why they use it). The thing about outrageousness is it's already outrageous and, I feel, is best presented that way. Especially with the American Fundie Magazine page I felt it was best to zing them using their own message. Their own biblical references are so outrageous that they, again, pretty much write the parody themselves (plus the Pat Robertson going off-script incident was priceless). Fundies are best when they speak their minds: Phelps specifically wants you to know that God does not love you, he wants you to know that his God, in fact, hates you. The hardest part about making the page, was making the page without it coming off as too vile, too bitter. I'll reread it, but I don't think I missed the mark on this one...maybe it just takes awhile to sink in, like syphilis. Modusoperandi 15:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, maybe "false" wasn't the word I should have used. I didn't mean to imply that the statements on the image did not coincide with the actual views of the vermin pictured/referenced. You're right, you hit the nail on the head (as scary and infuriating as that is) where that's concerned. I was suggesting that an actual publication, especially one that would receive mass distribution/marketing, might not come across as blatantly "preaching to the choir/septic tank" (same diff, in this case) and instead adopt a (superficially) more subtle tactic of spreading said propaganda and roping in the weak-willed swine that might actually swallow this garbage. Can you tell I have an opinion on this topic? However, I think I get the idea of a "private circulation" (KKK Monthly, per se) and in that context, I think the image works just fine. And you have my sincerest condolences for having to wade through that festering morass of ignorance, intolerance, and spite in order to get the images for this montage. Fortunately, in today's society, we can always recharge our depleted human empathy batteries with a good violent videogame after such an ordeal. I recommend UT2K4, and make a bunch of bots with "Fundie" names and the intelligence set to "drooling moron." It's wonderfully theraputic to watch "Phred Phelch" repeatedly blow himself up with a rocket launcher. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
True that. It would make me feel ill to try to "soften" their image to make it palatable enough to increase the fictional readership of a fictional magazine. Shooting from the hip is more fun. Also, when your playing UT2004 on the interweb if you see someone running around in circles taking headshots pretty much constantly, that's me. I used to rank somewhere near the bottom of mediocre, but now I just suck. Fundie bots would be awesome, we just need some skins that have them with those godawful signs (I'm sure there's a good Uncyc pic idea the Google mobile!). I just don't have the time to play enough of it anymore. I think Uncyc has supplanted UT as my stress reliever. Modusoperandi 14:04, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Two words... quantum motherfuckin'-physics. That's where the future is at gentlemen. Religion is a dinosaur, I'm drunk and all is not right in the world, but it will be once I have my way with it. That is all. Well, for me anyway. Phew, I oughtta just apologize now for that — but I won't. Ha! -- Imrealized 07:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure that's at least four words... Modusoperandi 11:53, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Nigger Claus[edit]

You seem to be an expert on proper use of VFD — could ya tell me if I can put the above article on there? I wasn't sure based on its creation date if it was still eligible, so I just put that template on the top for the time being. I'm fairly certain that it wasn't an overreaction on my part (was it?) as the article is nothing like Niggers since it seems like complete and full-on hate with not a speck of humour to me. Do you agree, or am I off on that? Just wanted a second opinion and some direction. Scary that you were the first I thought of when I needed direction, huh? You're becoming a guru of sorts. Anyway, happy reading. -- Imrealized 00:27, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Heh, thanks! About the article, I think that you are correct in saying that it's nothing but a hate rant. Add an ugly list, and we've got a real loser. As it stands, I'd be tempted to put it on QVFD instead of VFD -- blatant racism is a candidate for insta-huffing, or so past experiences have led me to believe. Still, if you go the VFD route, I'm sure it'll get bombed almost as quickly. I'll let you decide which path to take, but you are absolutely right in thinking that Nigger Claus has no place here. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
No, no... thank you. I just put it on QVFD, so if that doesn't work out I'll go with VFD. I should trust my judgement, but a second opinion seemed worthwhile as well, especially a good second opinion. Let me know if one turns up (zing!). -- Imrealized 15:13, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Youch! "Message for you, sir!" --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:29, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Yowza! Uh yeah, evidently it wasn't good enough (bad enough?) to be QVFDed... weird, huh? It was "overruled". So I put it on VFD because honestly, if I'm offended, there must be something wrong. <rant>What the fuck? Why would someone "overrule" the huffing that is coming to this pile of hate? Could someone actually find this funny?</rant> Guess we'll find out, huh? (Sorry for the rant; I'm slightly drunk and had to vent my frustration to an understanding soul). Thanks for the ear? Uh, I guess, thanks for the eyes (such an odd way of communicating). Drunky McGee, out. -- Imrealized 06:58, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Guilty as charged; I "overruled" on QVFD solely on the basis that it possessed some semblance of structure and history. If anybody considers it necessary, I'll send it to CVP to forestall this sort of awfulness from ever happening again. --DW III CUN.pngOUN.png 16:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


I know you were involved on the VFD discussion of the rap article, which I said I would rewrite. I've finished the article, and I'm just looking for some opinions, since nobody checks Pee Review. Can u take a look at the article and give me some feedback? If you have any suggestions, I want 2 try 2 VFH this soon, and I want it to be really good. Thanks, -- Sir Cornbread The Great America...Fuck Yeah!!!! [SHOUT] [MUN] [GET THIS FEATURED!] 19:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Votes to NRV on VFD[edit]

Just in case you didn't know, you may only NRV articles less than a week old. If that wasn't the case, I would probably've NRV'd sooner. Then again, VFD gets the articles deleted a lot quicker. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

That's true, but it's still slower than the good old QVFD - an area that I've made myself quite familiar with since I started my burnination quest. Some of the shorter, more obviously junky junk junk "articles" posted on VFD would have been adequate fodder for the insta-huff machine. I'm not faulting your ethic for cleaning up this joint, but I don't want to see you get smacked by a cantankerous admin for cluttering up the VFD page with crap that really doesn't deserve the time and effort of the voting process (it's happened before.) I'll admit, you got me on the NRV grace-period thing, but QVFD knows no time limits. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Good point. However, QVFD requires little or no history to be submitted. However, I'll check the history next time to see. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Never had that problem come up. There have been things I've thrown on the pyre that have had 40+ edits, but remained shit nonetheless. I guess it's what overall effect the edit history has had on the offending article that ultimately decides whether it deserves a trial. However, there are a few things that I look for when deciding if something should be insta-huffed:

  • A.) Vanity
  • B.) Slander (libel, actually)
  • C.) Racism/Theism
  • D.) Length (minor, but when coupled with other factors can mean the difference between VFD & QVFD)
  • E.) Plagiarism (even articles that merely rehash events/episodes of other shows/comics/websites etc. fall under this umbrella)
  • F.) General Stupidity

History's usually not high on my list, although I do check to see if what I'm looking at is actually a vandalized version of a good article. If not, and one (egregious) or more (less egregious) faults from the above list can be applied to the crap in question, onto the fire it goes, to be speedily executed without trial! Hooray for war crimes! Erm! I mean... yay, quality! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:55, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I'll keep that in mind too. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 18:03, 1 August 2006 (UTC)



Just for the sake of it, I've decided to give you a spare dalek (just in case The Doctor destroys your other one) which you can see at the right. However, it is not yellow, nor speaks by itself. To make it speak, you must hover your mouse over it. I found it lying in some UnBook and decided that this'd be the best place to send it. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 18:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

YAY!! That was kind of you! One can never have too many homicidal, clinically insane garbage cans, I say! Thanks! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:59, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I have a large supply of alien knowledge, so I knew immediately that that was a Dalek Supreme, so I thought you'd like it. Not as good as the Emperor Dalek, but I believe it to be of very high quality. ~ Ghelæ the Alien Expertask about aliens!alien-related edits 19:07, 1 August 2006 (Ultraterrestrial Time Coordination)
Heee! Yeah, the Emp-y-rah wouldn't even fit on the page! And as far as your alien-themed crusade goes, shine on you crazy diamond! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:10, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks... not that I can be bothered to figure out what that means... anyway, I believe that the Emperor is being help captive by Wikipedia for display in its Doctor Who museum. It is surrounded by highly-trained guards, but if your Daleks can get it then... they're welcome to try. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 19:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Oh, and to your left is a half-finished Special Weapons Dalek. They didn't have enough materian to finish him on the homeworld, so he's imcomplete. Oh well, at least you've got Davros, supreme evil genius of the Daleks. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Dear god, my optics! XD --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Hey, the Dalek that escaped from UnBooks:The Creature! Must have been the Dalek urge to group together... --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 14:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
There should be more coming to Uncyc... I'll keep a look out. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Crap, Hindley's figured out my plan to amass an army of rubbish bins... we must deal with him, my children. But how? He's a visible and respected member of the community! Well, accidents can happen, can't they? Support cables of bridges spontaneously disintegrate every day, and what's to say that... wait... holy hell, am I saying this aloud, or just thinking it? Uh oh... Ha Ha! You are correct, Mr. Ite, sir! My goodness, yes! That should do it... --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:09, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
ex-ter-mi-nate! EX-TER-MI-NATE! ex-ter-mi EX-TER-MI-NATE! ex-ter-mi-nate! EX-TER-MI-NATE!

On, and to your right again is an authentic™ Dalek war machine. If you're quet you can hear the sounds of Daleks chanting "EX-TER-MI-NATE!" inside. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Ah, the old family sedan. Such memories... summer vacation, flying kites on the beach, burning human flesh, eating at roadside diners... --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, and seeming as you agreed about the FFM, here's a forum topic about it. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:48, 2 August 2006 (UTC) File:Dalekcover.jpg To the left is a limited-edition ComicBookDalek™, with the power to turn into a picture, and turn back into a living thing. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)


Thanks for the vote. You just helped fulfill one of the more obscure prophecies in the Book o' Revelations. It's no "Left Behind" but, whatever...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

When death stalks the night, remember, it's all your fault



Suburban homeboy[edit]

In honour of your good taste and breeding for selecting a deep, socially conscious and literate satire as Suburban homeboy for featuring, I tip my cap to you. Hurrah!--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:18, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

I know your secret identity[edit]

I discovered your secret identity (MWAHAHAHA), which coincidentally wasn't very secret, but nonetheless I found it and plan on waiting for your reaction to this--Wit (tawk) 07:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Damn, the secret of Powdered Toast Man is out! But seriously... what? I have one? And just who am I supposed to be? --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:20, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
You are...The King In Yellow, or does Lewis "Back in Black" ring a bell?--Wit (tawk) 02:32, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
O_o ... Don't tell me you think I'm Lewis Black! Man, that's a compliment! Thank you. But I'm not so fortunate. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
I thought you would get it by now man but c'mon. (Sigh) [1]This is the King in Yellow I am reffering to, in his angry dome--Wit (tawk) 04:37, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, Witt... 11 years and 7 days too late to be me... interesting coincidence, though, that we're both Aquarii... --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 22:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome back[edit]

There's some hot chocolate for you by the fireplace.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, Modus... just popping in to see how things look. New job takes up a lot of the editing time, ya know... I'll try to visit more often. Tell the irregulars I said hello. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 22:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
You've got your priorities all wrong; get a job where you can come here during the quiet times. Not that I'd know anything about that...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:50, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


Tvcc.jpg Bradaphraser was throwing away last year's Christmas cards, and
realised they had purposefully forgotten about you.
This user is completely thoughtless, doesn't care about Multi-culturalism,
and therefore DEMANDS you have yourself a Merry little Christmas... NOW!

Failure to comply with result in disciplinary action up to and including excommunication from the Capitalist Church

May you focus on your successes and forget your failures here at the end of the year. Never forget how we all improve one another's lives. Season's Greetings.--<<>> 17:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Xmasmoosewreath.png Nothing says [[Insert religious or pagan holiday of your choice]] like getting drunk with a moose. So this year, why not savour a treasured Canadian tradition with a bottle of hooch, horns, hooves, and hypothermia? The drinks are on me. ~ Todd Crown Royal.jpg

--Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 16:16, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Tvcc.jpg Hindleyite was throwing away last year's Christmas cards, and
realised they had purposefully forgotten about you.
This user doesn't care about Multi-culturalism,
and DEMANDS you have a Merry Christmas... NOW!

And a Happy New Year. -- Hindleyite Converse?pedia 19:55, 20 December 2006 (UTC)