User talk:Necropaxx

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
80px Ye Eternal Home Of Ye Olde User Necropaxx 80px
HomeHoly Cheese Prayers and CursesMy Master Works and other JunkMy Wonderful AwardsMy Templates & Userboxes
November 2020

Here Thou Mayest Either Praise or Curse, Whichever Doth Suit Thee.
If you're interested, see Archive 1 -- From 26 April 2007 to 11 October 2007
See also Archive 2 -- From 12 October 2007 to 2 July 2008
And Archive 3 -- From 12 July 2008 to 2 February 2009
& Archive 4 -- From 2 February 2009 to 4 May 2009
+ Archive 5 -- From 4 May 2009 to 24 July 2009
If you're still interested and/or a stalker, see Archive 6 -- From 28 July 2009 to 17 October 2009
Also this Archive 7 -- From 18 October 2009 to 4 January 2010
Don't forget Archive 8 -- From 5 January 2010 to 18 March 2010


Nice meeting you! —Paizuri MUN (Talk Contribs Poll!) 03:42, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

That took a grand total of 3 minutes after I archived. New users, they don't make 'em like they used to. Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 03:44, Mar 19 2010
You beat me. No fair... I haven't had non-consensual loving with a dead man for DAYS. Puppy Debarked Friday, 03:54, Mar 19 2010 UTC
It's like the old adage says: You snooze, you lose. Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 03:55, Mar 19 2010
I'm not that new...I've been here for like 5 months. But I am an expert rapist. And that sounded much better in my head... —Paizuri MUN (Talk Contribs Poll!) 03:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
You should advertise: "For the quickest, highest quality rape around, just call 1-PEL-ARG-ONAD." Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 03:59, Mar 19 2010
Scary is - I was just ringing someone about a beauty the rapist job. Puppy Debarked Friday, 04:01, Mar 19 2010 UTC
Well, it has to be more, "Specialist in unexpected advanced love techniques looking for young, busty mate (either gender may apply)"Paizuri MUN (Talk Contribs Poll!) 04:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Subtle?! Feh! If you don't state right out what you're advertising, how will those poor innocent potential clients know which rapist to pick?! Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 04:06, Mar 19 2010
But that's the best part--they won't. They'll have no idea what to expect when they do pick me; all the better for my pleasure. Or something like that, anyway. —Paizuri MUN (Talk Contribs Poll!) 04:10, 19 March 2010 (UTC)


Am I late? FreddThe Redd 09:18 • Friday, 19-03-2010

Yes, you are extremely late. No professionalism these days, I swear... Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 14:47, Mar 19 2010

Needlessly Offensive Religious Discussion[edit]

With regards to my assertion that "Mormons believe that God has marital relations with his spirit wives", and "also believe that his spirit wives are eternally pregnant" in the antbortion article, which one of those statements is incorrect? I'm fairly certain that Mormons believe in eternal marriage and the production of spirit children, although I might be overly carnalizing the concept. --Mn-z


03:42, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Both. God has a spirit wife (as in singular). I'm not sure if she is a "spirit" wife b/c Mormons believe God has a body of flesh and bone, but this is beside the point. And I have never heard anything from my bishop or anyone else about her being eternally pregnant. That really kinda freaked me out, there. O_O Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 04:15, Mar 21 2010
I thought Mormons believed God had multiple spirit wives (or heavenly mother or wives of God)? But that is beside the point. I have seem mentions of divine wives (of wife) being perpetually pregnant on the internet. But, that may have been an amateur extrapolation of her producing billions of spirit children. And, I might have been putting too much weight on the word "perpetually". It could mean that the spirit wife gets pregnant soon after giving birth, not that she is literally constantly pregnant every second. --Mn-z 04:35, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
Like I said, I haven't ever heard about Her pregnancy status at all, so it isn't taught by Mormons. Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 05:32, Mar 21 2010
But they also don't explicitly that God does not have marital relations with his gravid wife{s), so it still is a possibility, right? --Mn-z 16:10, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
Well, seeing as how I already said no one in the church teaches about it, or even considers it an issue, I can't very well say no, can I? Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 05:21, Mar 22 2010
What I heard about Mormons is that they're all perverts! Did you know that, hidden under their clothes, they have penises and vaginas? Even their children do! Shocking! Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  20:31, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost 25th March 2010 (hand delivered for added flavour)[edit]

--ChiefjusticeDS 21:57, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

your page doesn't have enough me[edit]

Here is an item left over from the garage sale. Give it to a favorite relative! Thanks for your vote, appreciated. Al en chain 23:06 28 3 mmx What's wrong with templates? Also you're welcome. Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 23:09, Mar 28 2010

so here i am. also, danke schön für das vote! FreddThe Redd 22:43 • Sunday, 28-03-2010

Aw, man! Now you've got your essence all over the place! It'll take me weeks to clean this up! also, you're welcome, but "für" has an umlaut. Tut tut! Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 23:04, Mar 28 2010
Scheiß. Du bist right. FreddThe Redd 23:11 • Sunday, 28-03-2010
Watch your language, Fredd. And of course I'm right. I'm always right. --SIR Pretentious Loser (Have a mocha cappuccino and a sit down) 23:15, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, sorry. FreddThe Redd 23:27 • Sunday, 28-03-2010

Thank you[edit]

Thank you very much for your input. My article "God Orders Global Women Recall" has just won "Featured Article of the Month" thanks to you!  : ) Smuggler!

You're welcome! Thanks for the funny article! Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 01:08, Mar 31 2010

Sorry again...[edit]

...very much for that forum bit. It's nothing personal - you just happened to be the first on spot. Also, I've seen you do that thingy quite a few times, and I feel I have the moral right to pointedly say what I think of the habit - in you or anyone else. But you already knew that. So, no hard feelings, OK? After all it's only about humour. You kick me back if you want to, I'll not mind. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 08:41, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

I have absolutely no problem with users posting topics about problems in Uncyclopedia, it helps the site grow. I do have a problem with users (you, in this instance) making forum topics about problems in Uncyclopedia and not trying to make anything constructive out of it. I really don't like it when the whole thing repeats after a couple weeks. Forgive me if I don't buy your apology, but I don't really believe you are that sorry. Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 14:53, Mar 31 2010
Well, I am. Not because of what I said but because I wouldn't like it to be on some personal level. I really am sorry I did pick your vote and comment as an example. It could have been anyone who does it that way, and I would have been just as sorry about it whoever it was. Also, I am trying to be constructive. That really is all I am, if you haven't found it out yet. I won't gain anything by appearing an uptight arsehole on Forum. I don't see myself writing articles on Uncyc in the near future, possibly never - so I really just put myself on line to try and improve the spirit of the place. Call it what you will. If you choose to believe I do it to somehow promote myself - OK. For what? -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 15:29, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
I'm not complaining about you taking umbrage with my vote. I could care less. My vote is my vote and if someone doesn't like it, then good on them. I don't think you're doing it for self-promotion, I think you're doing it because you want to have a debate with someone. You said yourself that you're bored. What better way to unbore yourself than a spirited debate? Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 15:35, Mar 31 2010
Well, good point. Could be just that. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 15:38, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
Well then you can understand that some Uncyclopedians may be a little irritated by that and not wish to play along. Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 21:02, Mar 31 2010

UnSignpost 1th April 2010 - Always on time[edit]

File:PuppyOnTheRadio sig.gif                                                  Friday, 04:44, Apr 2 2010 UTC


Thanks for you vote on HowTo:Blow a dog, something I've been practicing and perfecting since childhood (my dad, he made me at first, then I liked it, and then he had me do it to dogs too). That was a surprising nom. Thanks again, appreciated. Aleister in Chains 11:44 2 4 mmx

No problem, classy ribaldry is always a pleasure to read. Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 22:34, Apr 2 2010


I also had a flash about bunnies this morning since there's a lot of unnecessary blabber about city-bunnies here (they only recently spread into Finland). I'll try to come up with an "expert-article" after I've seen which direction you go with those/one of those. There should also be a bunny lobbyist I suppose. Also - are you good with templates and shit? I could make up a Truth-logo, png or so, and you might work it into a template maybe. Same with Lies. Then the office would basically be set up and ready to go. Later, if we feel like it, there could be other templates but since the spinning thingy is mostly covert (except when they get caught) I doubt those would be necessary. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 16:07, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Oooh, your idea is better. Those filthy illegal immigrant bunnies are stealing all our jobs! Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 16:10, Apr 2 2010
That would be the con-side. How about the pro-article about how bunnies keep the soil healthy by burrowing into it, providing necessary ventilation. Other ideas? ...and which side is truth? I think the "cute-wuvvy-bunny" people could be our main client on this issue since you'd naturally expect otherwise. The (real) truth then would be that they actually are evil, and have a sinister agenda (stealing jobs, what else?). If we play it smart it will be a hilarious series. So then: Wuvvy-bunny people have us propagating articles that are labeled as TRUTH. They pay us. Sometimes a false article about their secret motives slips in since we don't controll all the media. How does this sound? -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 16:14, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
Yes, yes, yes. Also, if you get the images, I can slap them into a template. Off to school! Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 16:22, Apr 2 2010

What for text? "This article, and everything it implies, is the truth on the matter." "The writers of this article are vicious perpetrators of lies." Small font, and place the template somewhere unnoticeable in an article - because we are a covert organisation as far as media is concerned. Maybe set float to right so it will be bottom right? I will make the Lies-image more disgusting later. About the bunny article: what if the Truth-article, the one we're "paid" for, concentrated on the indubitable benefits of rabbits, without mentioning refugees or anything like that? Just sell the idea that rabbits are there to stay and they are a great benefit to all of us. And maybe not mention Finland? Just "in our country" without specifying it at all? I don't know though. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 16:36, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

This article, and everything it implies, is the truth on the matter.
The writers of this article are vicious perpetrators of lies and other falsehoods.
The images look good, and I like your ideas for the templates. But I have to protest against not including Finland. If we don't specify, people will naturally assume America or G.B. (whichever one they live in), and in my opinion that makes it more serious than I'm aiming. I want this to be very lighthearted. If there's an undercurrent of condemning/praising real illegal immigration, it won't be as funny. By keeping it in a very stable country, like Finland or Switzerland, etc., we can still provide a commentary on illegal immigration without it being sarcastic. Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 18:31, Apr 2 2010
Here are the templates: {{SpinTruth}} and {{SpinLies}}. Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 18:54, Apr 2 2010
Yes, I thought the same - but in Finland - and Switzerland too - immigration is also seen as a problem. How about we make it Northern Siberia? Nobody in their right minds would immigrate there, least of all fluffy bunnies. Or Lappland? That way it would be Northern Finland, Sweden and Norway. I think that might be best. Fluffy Bunnies invading Lappland, and a covert organisation trying to make Lapps see how this is a bonus (in fact the bunnies would have nothing to eat there, and wolverines and arctic foxes would pick them up easily... we could maybe play with that too). -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 19:03, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
OK, good. I didn't know that immigration was an issue among the Finns and Swiss. But Lappland sounds good, we could maybe work in how the fluffy bunnies have already taken over the Kola peninsula, maybe refer to a previous incident where the fluffy bunnies supposedly caused the economic collapse of a different nation (I was thinking Iceland, too soon?). Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 21:06, Apr 2 2010
Iceland's OK. I'll make a subpage for the "client" first, then we maybe should collect facts on why fluffy bunnies should be such a boon to Lappland, and one of us could write the pro-bunnies newspiece. Or both. Then maybe collaborate on the "twisted evidence" article for main space, and basically collect the evidence against fluffy bunnies for the "bunnies are actually evil -article" (which isn't endorsed by our client, the pro-bunny people, so they will make us write a swift retort). If a third writer wrote the "EVIL" -article, the series would get nice variety. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 10:03, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
I made a change to the angle of the Fluffy Bunnies article scheme since if we want to make Fluffy Bunnies look beneficial to Lappland, I think we shouldn't call them immigrants (just leave out the immigrant part, thus making it look more like they somehow belong in Lappland). If you want to write of them as immigrants, it's OK though: it will just make it easier for Minutemen to destroy the scheme. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 10:59, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Potato head chopper of the Month March 2010[edit]

When I got the Nobel Piece of Ass Prize for being the Nobel Piece of Ass in appreciation of my saving the Universe, I was proud; but THIS is positively humbling! Thanks!!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png 20:16, Apr 3

No problem! Necropaxx (T) {~} Saturday, 20:17, Apr 3 2010

logo thingy[edit]

It's not the easiest thing in the world to do, by the way. File:PuppyOnTheRadio sig.gif                                                  Sunday, 05:52, Apr 4 2010 UTC

Oh. My. Gosh. That is perfect! Perfect! It's amazing, POTR, thanks so much! Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 06:00, Apr 4 2010
One small tiny minuscule microscopic suggestion: Could the image be transparentized at the corners to make it circular? If not, it's still amazing, and thanks again for all the help! Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 08:50, Apr 4 2010
I was thinking about circular as well, but figured making circle out of square is easier than other way round. How does timing work for you? File:PuppyOnTheRadio sig.gif                                                  Sunday, 09:53, Apr 4 2010 UTC
The timing's great, it works perfectly. The 100x100 and 25x25 ones are coming soon, right? Thanks again, Puppy! Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 21:42, Apr 4 2010

File:Truth to lies 300px.gif
scaled to 300px
File:Truth to lies 100px.gif
scaled to 100px
File:Truth to lies 25px.gif
scaled to 25px
File:Truth to lies 12px.gif
25px version cut to 12px height
this can go into a sig after all
You'd go dizzy looking at all these after a while. File:PuppyOnTheRadio sig.gif                                                  Sunday, 22:55, Apr 4 2010 UTC
Hubuzzabmbm... what-? Thanks Pup, you're the best! Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 22:58, Apr 4 2010

The truth/lies-revolver...[edit]

Great! That will go on my userpage right now. Can be used on some articles too, I guess? -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 11:02, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I made a template (with POTR's help) that links back to the main page. {{Summit of spin badge}} <-- Here it is. Also, I was thinking, maybe we should have subpages that link to individual storylines. Like, Summit of spin/Bunnies would link to page that had all the pieces that made up the "bunnies" storyline. This way a user can read all of the stories without getting lost. Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 14:11, Apr 5 2010
That one is possible... maybe. Let's try with one - for instance when the bunnies-series is ready. Makes it look less real-worldly but I guess that's impossible to avoid. Maybe we should do that after the "fight" is over, so as to make it look less planned? By the way - as further evidence of goodness of Fluffy Bunnies, link your newspiece to rodents, pointing out how it never mentions our fluffy little friends. And give me a link to your piece, I might get ideas. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 18:13, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
Alsow--- what if the word "truth" in the small text in the TRUTH-template linked to the article Truth rather than to Summit of Spin? I would like to keep the office slightly less accessible, even if it's not actually hidden. After all, it is a partly covert organisation as far as open information goes. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 18:52, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
Mm. I'm ambivalent to it. So long as we have one link back to the main hub (right now it's in the badge at the top), I'm good. Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 18:56, Apr 5 2010
OK, keep that and link Truth to truth. I would like it to look more like we actually wanted to appear telling the truth (whichever way it is defined here). It seems to undermine the Summit a bit if we have a label Truth in an article, and it points right back at us. Since this is just Uncyclopedia, it obviously doesn't matter, but inside the game I would like to keep appearances. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 19:06, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay in the Pee[edit]

but it is ready now Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Do I need to provide this? (2nd) -- Sir SF13 (Talk) Upsilon Sigma Sigma's last completed collaboration GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 02:46 EST 4 April, 2010

Thankee kindly, skinfan. Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 08:51, Apr 4 2010
I thought I was restoring a link you had put in originally. My mistake. But really, I would think the link was funny even if the article and user had a different name. Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  23:50, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
Um. What? Necropaxx (T) {~} Tuesday, 00:30, Apr 6 2010
There was a link in the version I Pee Reviewed that I restored and you removed. I put it back, although in a slightly different form, because I thought it was funny. I think a link like that would be funny even if the article and title were different; for example, an article titled "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?" with a link to User:Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf where the link said "It's not just a question; it's a person." (By the way, the idea of the link actually predates the article--a long time user here suggested it when I was relatively new, but I never got around to writing the article. I think it was either MadMax or MacMania who suggested it, but I don't remember now). Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  00:44, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
It was macmania, but I was only removing it so Romartus wouldn't against. You can put it back once the nom is over. Necropaxx (T) {~} Tuesday, 00:55, Apr 6 2010
Oops; I think I misread your note. I'm going to look like an ass. But the user in question hasn't posted anything here in 36 hours, and a certain article will likely be promoted very soon.... Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  01:09, April 6, 2010 (UTC)


You wrote Elevator! That's, like one of my favorite articles. Cheers! --PaizuMaj. • JStwMUNLOBCrapWHORE • (Talk) 07:04, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Really? Wow! Thanks! I actually thought it was one of my more average ones, but I'm glad you like it! Also: WTF are you still doing up? Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 07:08, Apr 4 2010
Watching Fullmetal Alchemist. What are you still doing up? --PaizuMaj. • JStwMUNLOBCrapWHORE • (Talk) 07:21, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Okay, maybe not. >.< --PaizuMaj. • JStwMUNLOBCrapWHORE • (Talk) 07:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Ha! Gotcha! I'm watching music videos on YouTube/trying to tune up Why do I need to yadda yadda. Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 08:16, Apr 4 2010
I'm still up..and I'm in EST...Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! 17px Icons-flag-us.png NOTM 08:51, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
So it's about 1? Dude, it's 3 over here. Before I go to bed, though, I gotta say, don't trust Onion69. He'll break your heart. Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 08:53, Apr 4 2010
What, no! It's almost 5. And I can't help it, he's so pretty.../droolSir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! 17px Icons-flag-us.png NOTM 08:55, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
Oh, right, I was thinking backwards. So you got a death wish or something? Staying up till 5... (I've never done anything like that, no not me, no sir, especially not going 36 hours w/o sleep...) OK, OK, I'm going to bed. For realz this time! Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 08:58, Apr 4 2010
Sleeping at night? That's so 2005.Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! 17px Icons-flag-us.png NOTM 09:00, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
My record is 40 hours or something along those lines. --nldr 11:03, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
You slept at night for 40 hours? You must have been changing time zones like crazy. Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  01:10, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
Here comes the sun,
It's time to run!
Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  01:12, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
My record is 32. Almost died when I did it... But now, here comes the sun (really, really) and it's time to run (to college, actually, I have to be there at the first light of the fifth day, for a student is never late nor is he early, he arrives percisely when he means to) FreddThe Redd 03:13 • Tuesday, 6-04-2010
If we're talking about not-sleeping records now, mine was about 23 or so hours before I passed out at like 9 in the morning. Good thing it was Saturday. —Pelozurian (talk) 03:51, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
I stayed awake with partying followed by coffee. It was an unusual end to the party - we were just old enough to consider alcohol just about revolutionary for teens but there was still a clique of us who liked to do nothing more than talk to another as the sun re-rises. Now I'm all alone and lonely. ;( --nldr 10:47, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
The longest I went was 47 hours. There was no special occasion, I just decided on one weekend "Fuck it, I don't want to go to sleep."--Sir ~HELPME~ Count! Awards! Pee! Help! 19:13, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
You people be craaazy. Necropaxx (T) {~} Tuesday, 19:16, Apr 6 2010

Now...[edit] have some serious evidence of fluffy bunnies' usefulness. Tables don't lie! -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 06:19, April 6, 2010 (UTC)


This here is a bit of nitpicking - but what do you think? I think it gives the UnNewses more credibility if the truth they refer to is outside of the UnNews itself. After all, they're ostensibly news. (I'm not even sure if ostensibly means what I think it means. The same goes for masturbation.)

*Idea: the TRUTH-template might have a more intelligent impact if it was used on the articles we use as evidence. That way the pointing out would be one step removed, thus more credibly misleading true.

-- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 08:55, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, that sounds good, but remember, this is a Summit of Spin. We are spinning the truth into what we want. It seems to me that we should use {{SpinTruth}} whenever we are spinning/twisting something into the "truth," not just when citing outside sources. However — it's your project, I'm just writing a story for it. (BTW, that story will be delayed... finals are upon me.) Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 16:18, Apr 7 2010
Whichever way - it really is nitpicking on my part since nobody would notice why it's done any which way. Probably best just use the TRUTH on anything we want to label so. And - while the idea for the larger project is mine, this bunny thingy is yours. I just did some background research. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 17:05, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
And one other thingy occurred to me: there should be an intermediate step between the "truth" the template links to. Not straight to Summit of Spin but to some page with maybe... hm. I'll figure it out one of these days. Anyway, that page would then have almost only the link to Summit of Spin. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 19:31, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
OK, if you need some help with it just knock on my talk page. Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 19:32, Apr 7 2010
Some sort of ad for the Summit of Spin, or "Are you ready to face the truth?" or something like that. It will drop down when we let it wait. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 19:35, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
Done. If you can make this look better without too much trouble, and link to it from the truth-template, would be cool. Want me to make an image for the last one (Are you ready to create it?)? -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 19:43, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
Done diddly. Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 19:46, Apr 7 2010
Good, I'll make a banner of the "create" part in a jiffy, see if you can use it. refresh in about 10 min, I'll put it on the page. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 19:52, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
Dun. Would look great if the clickable ...create section was that image on a black or dark dark blue background. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 19:59, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Damn you and your edit conflict![edit]

Yeah, I'm having problems with Uncyc being uncooperative today lol (I was in the middle of judging that review lol) -- Sir SF13 (Talk) Upsilon Sigma Sigma's last completed collaboration GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 17:29 EST 7 April, 2010

You and me both. It's lagged out on me twice while saving. I thought it was the network I was on, but it was really your fault! Congratulations, you broke Uncyclopedia! :P Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 21:35, Apr 7 2010
OK, maybe it is the network. It lagged out on me again while saving the previous message. Congratulations, you didn't break Uncyclopedia! Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 21:38, Apr 7 2010


Why do I need to provide this header?[edit]

Because it's a sunny day in Las Vegas and OMIGOD WHY IS A FEATURED ARTICLE! Not even Mhaille could achieve that. :P —Pelozurian (talk) 22:25, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Two words: Gerry Cheevers. Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 22:27, Apr 7 2010
How could I forget Gerry? I was more of a lurker back when he was still active, but now he's gone and he' never coming back! /me starts cryingPelozurian (talk) 22:32, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
stfu noob Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 22:44, Apr 7 2010
No u —Pelozurian (talk) 23:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

That Word[edit]

See here. Also congrats on that article with the best name ever! Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  04:43, April 8, 2010 (UTC)


Way to go! Hey, next time you go for a 2nd Pee and do NOT want a Nom, in spite of a rework after first pee already has it qualified, and it's ready to Nom. If you don't want a nom, please warn people. I took a look of shit for that innocent Nom. The article was like a bear-trap for me. But I really enjoyed it. Specially because it breaks every rule in the Wikipedia law book - style wise - I'm a long time Wikipedian. So most of my articles are more like Wikipedia style. It's nice you can get away with murder here! BTW: Did you see my little collection of articles that stuck has gone over the 100 mark. I donno, it that a lot, or somethin'? Cheers!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png 10:16, Apr 8


This is what you're up against now. You and your anti-bunny propaganda. I'll publish this one after you've published yours so we'll get it going in good order. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 11:04, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost 4/8/10 - Oh hi Signpost.[edit]

Pleb CUN KUN Dexter111344 Complain here Vote now! 19:48, April 8, 2010 (UTC)


Erm.... could you cast your eyes over this for me... I could do with an opinion or two. I don't know whether to highlight the film titles in some way to make them more obvious (I've done it with some already like sixth sense but not with oceans twelve for example). I've stuck a link to imdb at the bottom so I guess the fun could be finding them yourself? Hmm.. Also do you know anyone who could bodge up a picture on the "structure of" bit? I was thinking just like a atomic diagram with bruce's head at the centre where the nucleus should be. Any help would be great. Cheers! --Tragicbooty 15:31, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

Itty bitty wussy bussy bunnies[edit]

I pushed the first two bunny-articles out already. Waiting for yours before the next one, since now is the time to cast doubt on the little bastards. Then I'll strike back again. I know you wanted to start with a neutral article - but I went ahead while the thingy was still warm - so now you can forget neutral and go for alarmist. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 17:51, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

I won't be able to start writing until at least the 21st. (Finals, you know) Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 06:24, Apr 11 2010
No problem since the idea was to link the series arbitrarily together anyway. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 19:21, April 11, 2010 (UTC)


Forget what I said, Zim came across really nicely, I'm not splitting. Sorry for the fuckup. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 04:28, April 13, 2010 (UTC)

Drat, and here I had plans for usurpation of SoS all set up! Anyway, glad you're not leaving! (But still do that IRL stuffs.) Necropaxx (T) {~} Tuesday, 04:49, Apr 13 2010
You surper! Let me know when you're ready with the bunnies, and I'll follow it with the Nietzsche column. -- Random File:Oranssiviiva.jpg Man 05:22, April 13, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost 15/4/10 - Yet another on time delivery.[edit]

--ChiefjusticeDS 20:27, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

Who are you?[edit]

And why aren't you wearing pants? File:PuppyOnTheRadio sig.gif                                                  Thursday, 13:04, Apr 22 2010 UTC

Do you have a facebook? (I know you do, just friggin add me) SIRE FREDDMOOSHA Lord of Egypt AMUSE ME 16:07, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
And you might as well add me too, considering you know almost everything there is to know about me (and you can probably figure out what school I go to by looking at my friends). —Pelozurian (talk) 16:58, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
No! My privacy! Mine! Necropaxx (T) {~} Thursday, 20:06, Apr 22 2010
I don't know why you're not wearing pants, but I like it.--Sir ~HELPME~ Count! Awards! Pee! Help! 20:31, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
Actually, I created a facebook account just to check out the uncyc page. I have another fb account that is under my name. (No, my name isn't Jack Dougan.) I generally don't use fb, except as a way of vote whoring, but the temptation to become the semi-real me on fb is there. File:PuppyOnTheRadio sig.gif                                                  Thursday, 22:15, Apr 22 2010 UTC
I'm not really seeing the point of it. Sure, the FB page is good for attracting new visitors, but I'm already here. Have been for 3 years. Everyone already knows I "like" Uncyc. Necropaxx (T) {~} Thursday, 22:21, Apr 22 2010

UnSignpost 1 May[edit]

Brought to you by fucking magic. Sir Socky1px 1px 1px (talk) (stalk)11px Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 09:56, 1 May 2010

To arms![edit]

Good day loyal Peeing member, the management was wondering if you had noticed the state of the toilet recently, if not, why not? This is a call to you, as one of our better active reviewers, for a couple of reviews from you over the next few days. The queue is in the worst state it has been in for a little while and I would really appreciate you taking the time to do a couple of reviews. If you are able to help out then please review the older requests first.

What else do you need to hear? Get pissing! --ChiefjusticeDS 15:16, May 2, 2010 (UTC)



Where are you?--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN Candidate NOTM USS Pees Stain ) On Saturday, 07:57, May 22 2010 UTC

He's dead. I killed him. —Pelozurian (talk) 20:07, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

PLS judging[edit]

I'm sending you this because you are signed up to judge the Poo Lit Surprise. If you no longer want to judge or are incapable of doing so, please tell me as soon as possible. If you're still good to go then here are the instructions:

First, read all of the articles in your specified category. Second, judge them. Judge how you like, as long as it's at least fair and based on merit (one suggestion would be to use the Pee Review format). Post your top 5 articles here. Hit me up on my talk page for questions, comments, if these rules are not cognizant within you, or of you don't know what the word "cognizant" means.

Thank you again for your valued participation in the balletic train wreck that is the Poo Lit Surprise! -- [sire] EMC [TALK] 12:56 May 24 2010

Problem: Necro doesn't seem to be around. You could just use a tiebreaker judge, though.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN Candidate NOTM USS Pees Stain ) On Monday, 07:07, May 24 2010 UTC
Oi! I'm alive! Barely. I'll judge the stuffs, no need to worry about that. It's just that my parent's home has dial-up, so I am online very rarely. But I'm still judging. So nyeh. Necropaxx (T) {~} Tuesday, 08:56, May 25 2010

It could have been worse...[edit]

I was considering changing your sig. File:PuppyOnTheRadio sig.gif                                                  Sunday, 06:29, Jun 6 2010 UTC

Your sig[edit]

I've never looked at the coding behind it until yesterday. It's wonderful. File:PuppyOnTheRadio sig.gif                                                  Monday, 02:18, Jun 7 2010 UTC

Wonderful? More like an incomprehensible mess. But if that's your thing... Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 05:17, Jun 9 2010
It's a plethora of subtlety and humour. I really like it. Not as much as mine of course, but still. File:PuppyOnTheRadio sig.gif                                                  Wednesday, 05:54, Jun 9 2010 UTC

Thanks for your PLS vote and comments[edit]

Thanks for the vote and comment on HowTo"Be Reverend Zim_ulator. With regard to your comment, "Abstain on VFH because of in-jokiness". My wife and I had a lengthy about if this article is vanity. I hadn't thought of it as a kind of in-joke, however. Could you give me examples, or is it just the article as a whole? Thanks for your work, for PLS and Uncyc in general. Cheers! rev. zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) I am the dirt under your rollers. 21:27, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

You know, when I was reading the article, it didn't cross my mind that it was "vanity." Because, after all, who is Reverend Zim_ulator? However, I do think it is an in-joke, because only certain people (Uncyclopedians) know who you are and would make the connection between you (and your love of random humor) and the article. That, in my mind, makes it less accessible to average Joe who wanders on to our site. Necropaxx (T) {~} Tuesday, 07:57, Jun 8 2010