User talk:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
|
This is Sockpuppet of an unregistered user's talk page, where you can send messages, comments, and pie to Sockpuppet of an unregistered user. | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Archives: Archive1 • Archive2 • Archive3 • Archive4 • Archive5 |
Contents |
[edit] RAEP
--Mn-z 16:40, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
[edit] A quick question
Hey Socky, I was just wandering around on recent changes and doing some reverting and I decided to ask you something which has been bothering me for a while. When I revert an article, is there a reason why I get this edit summary: Undid revision 4096985 by 128.109.70.90 (talk), while other users get one like this: (Reverted edit(s) of 98.100.219.130 (talk) to last version by MadMax). I'm just curious as to whether I'm either reverting incorrectly or whether there is something specific I need to do to change the message. It isn't essential to my wellbeing or anything.... honest. Thanks muchly. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:13, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Don't worry. You're reverting correctly. "Reverted edit(s) of ..." is the common edit summary when using "rollback", which is basically just a faster way of reverting than the regular undoing. You don't have that option because you only have autoconfirmed user rights. To enable the rollback function, you need to ask an admin to do it for you. —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk)
KUN SotM UotM 20:11, 9 September 2009
[edit] Thank you from the trainyards
Isaac The Tank Engine Thank you template is currently unavailable.
Our thank you template is currently deceased, however it is due to be back in 3 days.
We apologise for any inconvenience.
Puppy/Radio VOTE POOF!
[edit] I win.
“History is a lie agreed upon.”
Oscar Wilde also said, "The great masses of the people will more easily fall victims to a big lie than to a small one." But you know, it wouldn't have mattered if there were a feature yesterday (which there wasn't, I remind you), because there wasn't a feature on the same day in 2008 so Template:FFA/include simply went back a day. --C:\syndrome\_ 02:25, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- I congratulate you on your glorious victory. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 14:19, 10 September 2009
[edit] Thanks for fixing Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Awful comedian demands third Bush term
I was just checking it to see what I did wrong with the formatting, and you already fixed it. Cool. WHY??? 19:51, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
[edit] hey
For The Durability of Kelly's Indirect Immunoperoxidase Test Paper should I change it to something like "Here are the results of my extensive analysis, after setting it on fire: [image of paper burning] It appears the paper is not fire-proof, and it wasn't semen-proof either, and the original text has become completely unreadable. Interestingly enough though, semen isn't flammable. We had a good laugh over it. --Docile hippopotamus 07:07, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
