User talk:Sycamore/Archive7

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
Ya wee bastards, quit messin wi me categories!


You posted to my IP, criticizing my edits. I haven't edited anything here recently. If you actually do have a criticism of my edits, be specific. Unlike your generic complaints, I actually put thought into anything I edit. Perhaps you posted a message to my IP by mistake. But I won't assume that. Yes, I know about the four-tilda policy.

I have not posted anything to your IP (that I can see). I asssure you that anything I do post is specific. Perhaps you are using a differet computer or IP at the moment. If possible could you leave a link to the message here so I can help there.:)--Sycamore (Talk) 12:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


Saw your naked talk page and couldn't help myself. Sorry. ~ 09:50, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

That was quick...--Sycamore (Talk) 09:52, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


oletko jo tehnyt iltarukouksesi adfille? Sankari 13:51, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

I have no idea what that means?--Sycamore (Talk) 13:54, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

no opettele saatana suomea niin tiedät. i speak finnish!!!!!!!!!1111 Sankari 14:01, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

You may want to try this - they speak Finnish there and do whatever crazy stuff you do in Finland - is this an idea?:)--Sycamore (Talk) 14:05, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Why was the fake category box on the Classic Oscar Wilde Page Deleted

Is there a reason why the fake category box was deleted?--Mnbvcxz 23:38, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

The reason to have categories is to categorize - This is needed to keep the place running smoother and some of the maintenence jobs to be done - it would be preferable if you left this aspect of things alone, thanks.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Is there a reason why the page can't have a fact category box?--Mnbvcxz 00:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Add any further "Real" categories to that superb article you feel like - I ask that you keep the "Article subpage" category:)--Sycamore (Talk) 15:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

It's a good thing

...That that ridiculous Lazytown page was finally deleted and redirected.-- 00:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

...dude, seriously, lay off. I don't know why you keep doing this. Trying to pretend you're a different person, or a different user? Actually, I'm not even sure if you're trying. Also, by the way, I put the VFD tag on that page. Mostly because of the way you're acting, but also because there was a better page out there. Come back when your ban is over and try again. --Mr. Monkey Sockmonkey.gif Pant-hoot here. 02:12, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
As Mr Monkey says - go be interesting somewhere else.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Articles by noobs

I've put construction templates onto UnNews:JD from scrubs gets stricken off medical record. It might have potential if the author bothers to come back and add more interesting content. How should I treat such stuff in future? Codeine gave me a Ninja Star. I try to live up to it and take a peek at Recent Changes from time to time. The trouble is I'm still a bit noobish. I don't know what to do with stuff that needs work to get it up to Uncyclopedia standard. Proxima Centauri 17:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

I would not put constuction templates on pages (thats generally speaking for the authors to do), I use ICUs - these are added like this {{ICU|~~~~~|sub=option}} with options like {{ICU|~~~~~|sub=encyclopedic}} for instance. However the article should ideall be tagged on the day of creation (although yo can tag within seven days, I have never done that though). For artices that are older you can use ones like {{Fix}}, {{Expand}} or {{Idea}}.

It is better to try and ICU though, and categorize if the article survives as once tagged otherwise poor articles tend to sit around (which is bad). Nice revert work by the way - I've seen you take down some real tossers. There is loads of stuff here (though you'll have to sift through until you find the stuff you want) UN:CP - you'll find loads of stuff you can do to help with the boring stuff. Hope this helps:)--Sycamore (Talk) 17:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

You briefly tickled the ivories, sir

Of the bastion of good taste that is BBC Radio 4. I know you are a fellow of refinement and I appreciate your improvements. If your bone is tickled then I am not so unself-centred and wary of the word "article-whore" to request a tiny tick in the appropriate VFH box. Yes, I'm really pleased with this, but there are a lot of Brit-centric, or even Brit-middle-class-centric gags in it, so it needs a bit of polish and support from fine upstanding citizens such as yourself. Asahatter (annoy) 23:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

I cantz do that...--Sycamore (Talk) 14:19, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Muchas gracias

As Manuel would say! I am humbled that you considered me for the WoTM; I really should get around to writing for Uncyclopedia again soon!....thanks again. --Knucmo2 23:17, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

No probs, probably save the muchas gracias for Manuels daughter though;)--Sycamore (Talk) 08:36, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

What part of "On vacation" do you not understand?

Sheesh! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Thats what paying attention in labs does to you...--Sycamore (Talk) 10:53, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
So, while you're on this vacation that is so vacationy, will you have a spare minute to do some paperboy work, or do I have to go shout at Manticore or someone? --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 13:06, Nov 3
I had a bit of a brain fry delivering thr last two - I thinks is a bots job:)--Sycamore (Talk) 14:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Was wondering if you had a bot style script set up to do it - by hand, I understand, I wouldn't even attempt it myself! --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 14:27, Nov 3
Seeing as its about eighty, you could maybe set up system for 2/4 people to do it manually - though there are three users with bots, it seems a little doo lally to have users do this?--Sycamore (Talk) 14:32, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Indeed - bugger the by-hand option. If I can't find a bot, I'll leave it. Cheers. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 14:40, Nov 3

a few questions

hello sycamore,

i was wondering have you ever had any hassle with the fellows from wikipedia, about any copyright crap. the most of them seem to be highly opinionated and love blocking anything thats not mainstream they cant seem to give good reasons for this . have you ever put any of these sorry pricks down afew pegs ?? well done for an exellent page and ill be telling my good mates here in suoth africa all about my new find regards robert schmidt --Dwnndog 19:33, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, I have not really found the folks at wikipedia to be too awful, Copyright laws are usually disregarded here - though your writing should be your own:)--Sycamore (Talk) 19:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost: 3-ish November 2008

Shoved through the letterbox for the one and only time by UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 11:35, Nov 6

"Bugger the by-hand option" he says... Pain in the arse doing it this way, isn't it? --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 11:35, Nov 6
It is! - Next time tell me when and hopfully I'll be able to take down half which should be less painful:)--Sycamore (Talk) 13:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

um problem

ive got to improve my page 'how to be a racist' as you said "This page seems to be lacking in humor or satire" i need some help with it because ill be going home today so if you dont mind can you ask some people to help out or something like that.

cheers. Dolubasao Jabangway 15:05, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

OK - it needs a little more work, now the best way to improve an article is to get an idea of what a good one is, and find out ways to improve your stuff. Have a read of these, Beginner's Guide, HTBFANJS and Uncyclopedia:Best of. These should hopfully help out and you should be able to improve your article a great deal. If theres a specific problem, just come by again:)--Sycamore (Talk) 15:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
k thanks man, ill have a look if i cant complete it by 17th ill just improve it offline then put it on when finished cheers Dolubasao Jabangway 15:33, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
You can also create User:Dolubasao Jabangway/HowTo:Be a Racist - this means you can complete it in your own time, and then move it over whan its done.:)--Sycamore (Talk) 15:36, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

France pic?

You mind if I add this to the France article?

As scientists delve deeper into France, they find more and more new and amazing this deep-Seine blow-fish.

It's stupid but I like it --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent OZ! Noobaward.jpg Wotm.jpg Unbooks mousepad.PNG GUN.png 04:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

I like it myself:) - having had a look over the article again, I don't persoanally think it would not fit too well (three looks right at this length) - I realize that this is a big title (having lots of links to it and revsions, indicatign popularity - also featured) however I feel that this version of France is pretty good - its focused and coherent unlike the the last one. Obviously it is extremely bad of me to try and run a monopoly - if you really like it I guess you can:)--Sycamore (Talk) 09:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Yeah I see, that's why I didn't just jump straight in :D --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent OZ! Noobaward.jpg Wotm.jpg Unbooks mousepad.PNG GUN.png 09:58, 8 November 2008 (UTC)


Hey, This is wise guy responding to your complaint about my quotes. I really don't see what is so bad about them. They're just stating the opinion of a wise guy (aka jerk) on a topic. Personally i've seen some worse quotes everywhere and was wondering what the problem was.

Quotes = bad, quotes that referecne yourself = really bad. Write an article, don't add shitty edits/quotes to many articles.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Ok I agree to stop but I want to clear stuff up. I wasn't referencing myself, I was referencing a "wise guy". I admit that I use it as my username but that was just because it was the approach I was taking. What was said is not what I believe or anything. But what really got me was the hate!!! Were they all really that bad? I thougt my crusade quote was rather good. Oh well wouldn't be the first time someone didn't like my sense of humor.--User:Wise Guy/sig 8:32, 11 November 2008 (CT)
For the people who maintain the site quotes are something trully despised - not you - don't take it bad. I have no doubt that you meant no harm with them and I hope you stick around, have fun:)--Sycamore (Talk) 14:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)


Alright, the dead bodies of US soldiers isn't funny, and uneeded. I tried tagging the article with a Offend tag, but it was baleeted. Uncyclopedia is for the lulz, dancing on peoples graves isn't lulz. Very clear. Im going to revert it in a few days unless you have a better point.

Cheers. Dacheatcode 21:00, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Dictating content is not your place, I assume you mean the America article - keep vandalising the article you will be reverted an ultimaly banned for some time.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Please submit comments to my talk page, it saves me time. Anyway, your comment confuses me; are you implying that only Mods can modify pictures/artwork that really doesn't belong there? There wouldn't be much of a community then, now would there? There have been some remarks from other people on the picture.
As for my apparent "vandalism," i assure you that this was not. Vandalism is adding to the article with pointless crap such as blanking, or the LOLOLTEHMONEKYELOLOL. These were hopefully constructive edits. The first time, I added an offend tag, as it was offending. Then i del33ted the contreversial picture. However, if you still thought that was vandalism, you could use the edit summary. Thanks. Dacheatcode 01:07, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Oh dear--Sycamore (Talk) 13:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost: 13th November 2008

MrN9001 12:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Just passing

You might want to check the guidelines for using {{fix}} here. I think that means that if it's a notable subject (and the article is not total crap) it gets a rewrite rather than a fix. I noticed that RAHB recently kept Scouts after the WIP has expired, and you slapped fix on quickly afterwards. Not sure... Anyway it's probably not fair to through this back to the huff master wielding admins as it's escaped so recently... Have fun. MrN Icons-flag-gb.png 23:11, Nov 15

Yea, anyway... Sorry to nag. I added some pics and a few more links and it's fine now. Probably does not need any sort of template on it. You might have added {{AAP}}... MrN Icons-flag-gb.png 23:22, Nov 15
As you know I will aim to save more than I put up for deletion. I felt this one was pretty mediocre/obscure in potetial and poorly done - now the Fix one does not mean that an op has to delete it, but it does mean that new users think that it will. I prefer not to put articles in rewrite, it's the famous cry at the moment and theres now so many in the category. It makes sense to me to give plenty of time, but be a more keen to see improvemt in new pages?--Sycamore (Talk) 09:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Yea, I hear ya. Thing is, some admins are more deletion oriented than others. While say Led or Modus would keep it for sure, others might not. RAHB had the opportunity to huff it when the WIP expired and he choose to keep it too... I think of {{fix}} this way: If the article were put on VFD would it be deleted? If I don't think it would, I don't add a fix tag. Scouts probably would survive a VFD (that's only my guess obviously), so what's the point of sending it around the system again? Also as Scouts is a well know subject it's likely to get a fair amount of attention, and so will probably improve. If it were an article about a made up subject which only the author is probably going to edit then maybe it's a different story. Anyway... That's just my view. I'm sure ya know what you are doing. ;-) Oh, feel free to purge things from rewrite which should not be there. I did a pit of a purge of the category a while back, but it probably needs doing again.MrN Icons-flag-gb.png 01:34, Nov 17
Cool, I'll be a little easer going with the Fix template - with Rewrite, I'll see if theres anything I can do with it:)--Sycamore (Talk) 13:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

a n00b i am

yes i'm brand new to uncyclopedia, but i adore sattire and get great grades at english, so would love to contribute. anyway, hello person and have a nice day!

Cool, have fun:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:44, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


Any constructive criticism of my crap would be appreciated. I was rather proud of vortex because I thought the underlying theme was followable and I'm wondering how many heads I'm swooping over or if it's not "simple" enough.--DrStrange 14:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I thought that was a fabby article. You've had a dire review, I would suggest re submitting it. I may e able to get rund to it for you, or someone more 'respectable' than that guy Meth will review it. I hope you have not been put off, you've been doing some great stuff:)-- Sycamore talk 15:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost: 20th November2008

MrN9001 20:50, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


Spelt wrong (probably) to boot! :P SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag.jpg RotM 11:17 23 November 2008

Noooo!:)--Sycamore (Talk) 11:18, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Tis tradition. and besides you don't want an empty tal page. If you did then the other kids would think you were weird and it'd stay empty forever, like the barren soul of a hermit. SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag.jpg RotM 11:20 23 November 2008
This talkpage would struggle to stay empty - I'm far too useful and I piss too many people off:)--Sycamore (Talk) 11:26, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Wow beatch what you tryin to say?SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag.jpg RotM 11:45 23 November 2008
For shizzle beatch I get lots of Jihadists. "Beatch" - that is so cool:P--Sycamore (Talk) 11:57, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Was it something I said?

  • (diff) (hist) . . User talk:Spore.Addict‎; 14:55 . . (-36) . . Sycamore (Talk | contribs) (←Replaced page with '{{subst:welcome}}--~~~~')
  • (QVFD) (hist) . . Nm User talk:Spore.Addict‎; 14:54 . . (+2,601) . . Under user (Talk | contribs) (welcome)

I didn't realise the slut list meant that much to you! ;-) --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 14:58, Nov 26

Yeah thats creepy, I did not do that intentionally I assure you:) - I think it happens when you use the JS and someone does it manually.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:00, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
No worries. Incidentally, this cunning distraction allowed me to beat you to Mordillo's talk page defilement. It's an ill wind... --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 15:01, Nov 26
You sneaky bastard:)--Sycamore (Talk) 15:02, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Perverts. ~ 15:03, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Well its not like Isreal here, its a long winter, you've got to think about something you know...--Sycamore (Talk) 15:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
You say it like that's a bad thing. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 15:09, Nov 26
The problem is that lifes all about doing, I've been sat here 24 hours a-day for months waiting to ravish Mordillo's talkpage. Just as I was about to make penetration, I was delayed by a freak whoring accident. Thats not a good thing, thats sad--Sycamore (Talk) 15:13, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Tell you what, I'll give you a heads up before I archive next time :) ~ 15:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost: 27th November2008

MrN9001 21:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC)


07-07-24-andy-rooney-lexus-rx-300.jpg Thank you...
I've always found it to be polite to thank people for the things they have done for you, especially when it is a vote for a fine literary work. People don't say "thank you" that much anymore. Instead, they say "thanks" or "tyvm". That frustrates me, because I don't know what "tyvm" is even supposed to mean.
Thanks for voting.

sir @ 17:10 Nov 28

No probs, that was a very tidy article:)--Sycamore (Talk) 17:11, 28 November 2008 (UTC)


Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBooks:Hot Japanese Girls - Colourblind or Unable to Speak English? - very unlike you to tag and then leave - were you leaving the expiry thing to do its work, or did you intend to go back to that one? If not, I may take a look myself shortly. Also: morning feller, hope it's a good one for you. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 09:18, Nov 29

Whoops, I'd forgotten that one, yeah remove it and let it get a review. Yeah, I'm cool also good morning to you:)--Sycamore (Talk) 09:21, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Total Drama Island (The First Reality Show Without Reality)

PsychotypeD 05:42, 30 November 2008 (UTC) You apparently stuck an ugly label on this article, so tell me what's wrong with it? C'mon don't feel shy.

Its badly written and poorly formatted. Its also pretty random in bad way. It won't be deleted for a while, so have a read of this and maybe see if you can get a review here. Hope this helps:)--Sycamore (Talk) 09:30, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

PsychotypeD 19:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC) Yeah, now that you mention it... I look at it and it seems to be trying to do too many parodies at once. I will admit that this was my very first article and I was a bit nervous about getting things going. I'll see if I can get it going again (depending on if my brain can come back to it).

No probs - remember that time = good stuff. My first efforts were pretty awful and I find that any good articles I do still take a bit of time to get right:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

I cannot tell if that is serious or not....

I might write one more article, and then i will be off, and if they are all deleted... i'll have gotten some good information. thanks! :) Emesee 09:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

It is very serious, quit creating crap that someone else has to clean up. This ain't nursery stud.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:32, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


Please stop removing the Things Jesus Would Do category from the incest article as I am really bitchy this time of the month and getting tired of reverting it. Hugs! Dame PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:55, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

mmm - I'm not the most diplomatic with women, so I'll just be honest. I don't really like wanted categorys being filled up, neither do I like categories of this kind - they complicate a system that should be simple - articles should be funny not categories (ideally, and you've only reverted it once). It would be very preferable and helpful to me if you could get back to me on this soon (when you're feeling better). thanks:)--Sycamore (Talk) 18:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
somehow, that doesn't surprise me. BTW, quit douching up the artemis fowl page! 19:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


Can you hop over when you have the time? ~ Mordillo 16:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm there now:)--Sycamore (Talk) 17:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


...You're quick with the ICU! I was going to give him a minute or so to see if he added to it and then QVFD the bugger. Crap article, but gives me ideas for images. RabbiTechno 18:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

New article

Hi...umm ive just finished my first article (Hyperdimension Sandwich Maker) and i was wondering if u could proof read/suggest improvements/give advice for future articles? id be really grateful if you could find time to do that. thanks.... ...Flare. Flare 19:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Article's looking good. :-) RabbiTechno 19:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, looking good, you can submit it here and get a review and some tips. I've tweaked it a bit for now though:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:00, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Might I suggest you add some images? RabbiTechno 20:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your help ill try to find a few pics and then ill submit it. Thank you Flare 19:20, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
No probs, you can also request a picture here: UN:PIC (you might have to wait a bit though):)--Sycamore (Talk) 19:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


December 2008

Information.svg Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Uncyclopedia, as you did to The Metal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. -- Doctapeppaman 18:16, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

I guess that works. --Doctapeppaman 18:21, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
UN:ABF...--Sycamore (Talk) 18:35, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost: 4th December 2008 (yea, we know it's late)

MrN9001 19:09, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Edits reverted on IB article

Hey Sycamore, why were my edits reverted on the IB article? You didn't give any reasons and I'm not doing anything wrong. For now I will put my edits on again. --Crazy george 02:43, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

If I revert I'll proabably have a good reason - In this case case you're adding what we call cruft, or crap: Quotes, lists etc - these are not our aims. As a second comment reverting like that is very bad. Before adding anymore stuff have a read of these: HTBFANJS, Beginner's Guide, UN:LIST. Hope this help:)--Sycamore (Talk) 08:56, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Might be a good idea for everyone involved to put edit summaries when they revert. ~ Mordillo 11:57, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
No. You're not the boss of us. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 11:58, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
OK Modus, let's go over this again: when you get up, the first pill you take is on the left box. The left box. The side where you carry a watch. If you don't carry a watch, it's where your heart is. And in case you misplaced your heart again, it's on the side of the shoulder I kept poking you on that last field trip we did. Then, and only then you take the one on the right side, which is the complete opposite of the description I wrote just then. ~ Mordillo 12:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
But one pill makes me larger, while the other makes me small! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 12:44, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Revert summeries for edits of this kind are hardly justifiable. If there is an issuie with reverts that are uncalled for, obviously a much tighter system of scrutiny should be the course. I am gonna have to disagree there - summeriries for this kind of eidt would be a waste of time and takje up my time on paperwork. If there is a revert that is questioned, the best way to leave a note and I'll either explain that this is kosher or I'll revert back if I have made an error.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:01, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Plus rollback doesn't tend to leave meaningful edit summaries, and a lot of vandalism reverting uses rollback for ease. Actually, that's how I remember it - all reverts that I consider vandalism have the standard rollback summary, anything else I tend to put an explanatory summary on. But then, I don't seem to get half the number of accusatory fuckwits that Syc does. Anyway, I'm just driving by here, making comments where none were asked for. Carry on. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 11:08, Dec 7
But that's exactly the point. This guy was NOT a vandal. He added quotes in what seems to be done in good faith. Reverting vandalism? Sure, don't bother making edit summaries. Removing unnecessary content that was placed in good faith by a noob? A completely different issue. Take the extra two minutes to undo rather than rolling back and write down why it was reverted. Non of our time is more expensive than acquiring a new writer rather than scaring him off. ~ Mordillo 12:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
On the plus side, both versions of the page kind of suck. Lists of more than six things are bad. On the other hand, lists of more than six things are bad. This isn't an absolute, by any means, but it's generally true, absolutely. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 12:35, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Okay, that's messed up

I did a search on that page for "archive", and it said "not found". Excuse my uncompetence. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 11:16, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Looks like you messed it up - the stuff I did links fine? Whats the deal?--Sycamore (Talk) 11:23, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
You put it there. I didn't see it. I searched. It didn't find it. I added it. Then you edited it...and I saw that it was there the whole time. It's like a ghost story, but nerdy. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 11:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
I love it when you talk dirty:)--Sycamore (Talk) 11:33, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
So, you love it whenever I speak. Noted. That's why I use my sexy voice when I do an audio. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 11:35, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Why have I not given you this yet?

UUpartay.jpg Woo!
Yay, go you! Under User has decided that you are "quite a decent sort",
which is apparently one of his highest terms of praise!
This is therefore a good thing, and in accordance with this,
he's throwing a party down the manhole to celebrate. Look at him go!

You're not invited though. Don't take it personally.

Let's rectify that appalling oversight right now. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 11:10, Dec 7

Thanks man!:)--Sycamore (Talk) 11:15, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Cheers, matey...

..for 'Ban Patrolling' IP I was just en route to do the same, you saved me the effort. :-) RabbiTechno 17:25, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

No probs, may Sophia be with you:)--Sycamore (Talk) 17:33, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Consider this your spelling intervention

You know that I love you like a brother, man, but seriously, get Firefox. It's got a built in spellythingy. Since I have FF, I know that "spellythingy" isn't technically a proper word. Bask in the glorious light of my knowingness! That's not a real word, either. Pity. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 11:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Also love here, I've shifted over to my mac which has a built in spellchecker - so there should be slightly less typos. As a side note do you think all the images look better when they are all moved to 200px?:)--Sycamore (Talk) 14:34, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Whatever works, man. I think that pics works best when shrunk to 1px. You have to make the reader work for it, I say. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:44, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


Please see User talk:RabbiTechno. 15:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC)