# Forum:Count to a million/archive3

### 602

- Don Leddy the Crunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 00:36, May 23

# Everything's interesting about 609 and now it plans to show that off as it triumphantly rides in on a Level 1 header

- 16:53 25 May User:YesTimeToEdit/sig2

# 610 is so balling, it rides on a Level One html header. GO 610!

Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 20:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

• 611 --THE 20:18, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

## 612 is a slightly less awesome level two header

### 613 just sucks

#### What the fuck why are you so bad, 614

##### Fuck you, 615

- Don Leddy the Crunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 20:58, May 25

616 fucks fucking fucker's shitty crap. - User:Enzo Aquarius/sig 02:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
###### =618 wonders if there is a level 7 header=

Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 04:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

• k (alt+619)  nyp 06:16, 27 May 2008
• 620 -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
• 1001101101  nyp 02:06, 28 May 2008
• I'm interested to know how a 250 year old clarinet concerto is supposedly "copyrighted material". *Mozart's ghost arises from the tomb, DMCA notice in hand*
-- User:Codeine/sig 10:33, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
###### ==626 defeats 618's weak header==

User:VGDictator/sig 23:09, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

# Yoooouuu're so vaaaain

you probably

think

647

User:Flumpa/sig [04:47] Jun 2, 2008 04:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

# VII ZERO 8

Classical modernity... - User:YesTimeToEdit/sig5 [15:12 29 June]

## 1,000,000!

• Nah just kidding. It's really 713 --User:Gert5/sig 15:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
• 714. You really had me fooled there, Gert! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:45, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
• 715 Maybe. I don't remember--User:MNM5150/sig 17:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
• Get on the 716 train User:The Woodburninator/sig 19:22, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
• 717 is better then that. He is smarted and better looking then you. --Elassint 00:27, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
• I add 718 now, yet I know that this will never really get anywhere. Are you sure we can't just skip all the way to 1,000,000? That would be great, but not epic, really. --User:Gert5/sig 09:41, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
• 719 Me again, should we start archiving this somehow? It smells like the right thing to do. --User:Gert5/sig 09:41, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
• 720 The internet will probably be gone by the time this thing is finished. Most of us will anyways. - 11:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
• 721 Unless we are invincible. Someone get on this. User:The Woodburninator/sig 14:03, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
• 7x + 2y + 2z = 722 Archiving sounds like an idea. And if we get more recruits, we'll reach 1 million (dollars HAHAHAA!) in no time. Well, not EXACTLY no time, thats like, impossible, but you know what I mean. Danr 17:57, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
• 723 - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:16, Jul 9
• 724 - 11:11, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
• 726 Anonymous Person 4:24pm, 14 July 2008 (BST)

## For the love of God archive!

err..OK, but since this is the first time in a long time I forgot to sign something, I think I can count on his forgiveness for that.--User:Naughtyned/sig 17:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
I was joking, sorry. Seriously though, thanks for the archive. Now my computer doesn't freeze every time I go here.The preceding unsigned comment was added by The Woodburninator (talk • contribs)
• 734 User:Roman Dog Bird/sig 18:10, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
• 735 You're welcome, Woodburninator. Was the irony of you not signing your last comment intentional? --User:Naughtyned/sig 18:30, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
• 736 It was part of my appollogy...or however you spell it. Whatever, We are almost to 4/5 of the way to 1/1000 of the way to our goal!!.!..!.... Shit. This is pointless isn't it? User:The Woodburninator/sig 18:45, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
• 737 No need to apologize. I didn't take it that hard, just felt like commenting. As for our goal 737 in 147 days is a little over 5 per day. If we get up to 771 today we'll be just under 5.25/day. At that rate it should take about 190,500 days or just under 522 years. Of course, if it goes geometrically or exponentially it could be faster. I'll leave it to someone else to figure out the numbers on that, though. --User:Naughtyned/sig 19:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
• 738--User:Rataube/sig 20:06, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
• 739 Yes, but edits have been tapering off lately, so, perhaps a little longer. User:The Woodburninator/sig 20:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
• 740 I'm game User:EugeneKay/Zig
• 741 Congrats with the archiving Danr 23:25, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
• 742 This thing is awesome. I'm surprised we got this far.--User:MNM5150/sig 18:21, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
• 743----(Talk) 18:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
• 744 We are so awesome, only 522 more years to go. WooHoo! User:The Woodburninator/sig 18:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
• 745 The Time people have dinner. User:DotJasperDotNot/sig 23:09, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
• 746 The time telemarketers call you. User:The Woodburninator/sig 04:39, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
• 747 Big old jet airliner. Yes, I know the song mentions a 707[1], but since 707 came and went without an airplane reference I figured I should put those words here.--User:Naughtyned/sig 14:03, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
• 748 - the names Shickamore Sher Shikamore, now wheres Moneypenny--(Talk) 14:44, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
• DCCIL. --User:Gerrycheevers/sig 19:25, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
• 750 Mr. 750 is the winnerz. User:The Woodburninator/sig 19:42, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
• 751 --User:MNM5150/sig 02:03, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
• 752 - 02:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
• 753 Why didn't we decide to use the (#) for numbers again? Might make this easier. Then Again, I'm horribly lazy. User:The Woodburninator/sig 02:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
• 754 -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:52, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
• 755 times people bothered to write shit on this page... yarp that thar is some quality quantity shite. --User:DJ Irreverent/sig 13:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
• Pillz-E Reads 756 as 765 Can we do something else? like the Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto? User:DotJasperDotNot/sig
• 757 - 758 - 759 - 760 - 761 - 762 - 763 - 764 - 765 - 766 Sorry, I had to list those. After all, we want this to be a legitimate list, don't we? - 10:53, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

## 767, The entertaining plane on American Airlines

Yes, It is true. Sore for the double-post and skipping 11 numbers. User:DotJasperDotNot/sig

# But so does 802

Prety much. User:DotJasperDotNot/sig2

803 needs a picture! User:Orian57/sig4 04:44 2 August 2008

Fix'd.

# Break at 8:37

 NOT SAFE FOR WORK!! The article you are looking at may not be work safe!...Although, since you're already here it's kind of too late for this warning to actually be useful. If a boss or coworker sees this article, claim that it was spam and blame the IT guys. Otherwise, continue to read it until your lewd urges are satisfied.

Because I care--User:Sawblade5/sig 10:48, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

For those without comedic tastes, the so-called experts at Wikipedia have an article about 846.

User:Regret Tenenbaum/sig 06:32, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

User:Orian57/sig4 12:49 15 August 2008
and thus begins the porn wars User:Orian57/sig4 00:30 17 August 2008
one of my favorits for 880 User:Orian57/sig4 14:24 17 August 2008

8======D