Forum:Pee REview

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Pee REview
Note: This topic has been unedited for 4620 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

has any one noticee how long it takes for an article to get revioewed. pennywise trhe clown has been up there 4 ages. i put my own article up a while ago as a test. it hasn't been reviewed yet (probly cos it sucks) but pennywise is funny? wat gives. don't make a comment about my spelling, i am fucking tired--FREDD 03:44, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Pee Review is the worst! --Andorin Kato 03:46, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
While everyone can submit articles to Pee Review, only a fraction of Uncyc's users critique on Pee Review. Personally, I'm rarely in the correct state of mind to review; it's hard, and I'm soft. Also, just because the interweb is a superhighway of some sort doesn't mean that the people on it move any faster than usual. Have patience, Grasshopper. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:58, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah i get what you mean, but poor Pennywise. --FREDD 07:03, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I reviewed it for you, Internet Pal! -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 07:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
I, too, reviewed it. Mine lacks the full-frontal nudity of Stm's review, but I make up for it by cursing, dagnabit. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


i know its a shit article, thats not why i put it up there Unda Construction was my first real article, so i didn't do it to well.


unda construction is going to die. i know it deserves it but that doesn't make me feel better--FREDD 06:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

If you want it preserved, have an admin put it in User:TheNewYarkov/Unda Construction. --Andorin Kato 06:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

nah, it's not worth keeping realy. i'll get over it. as long as no-one touches the badlands ill be right. dont. fucking. touch. it.--FREDD 06:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Brb, VFD --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 16:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
lol --Andorin Kato 17:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
/me touches badlands. Ewwww! They're all sticky and gross! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:21, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Now why the BOLLOCKS did you do that for--FREDD 06:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Probably because enough people voted for it to be deleted. You could check the VFD archives, if you were really curious. --Andorin Kato 06:11, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
its not there --FREDD 06:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes, it is. --Andorin Kato 06:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
not that the Stratford Badlands is dead too. and it didn't deserve it. and its not there--FREDD 06:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes, it is. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 06:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
oh well. i fucking give up. screw uncyclopedia im done here--FREDD 06:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Don't get all pouty, Mister Pouty. It takes time and experience to write real good-like. Start a page under your userpage, make it perfect, then move it out to mainspace. Dying is easy, writing comedy on a wiki is hard. Abraham Lincoln said that. Smart guy. Wrote the Declaration of Independence, I hear. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:04, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
how?--ETLCh X4Ch ChTLG GTLCh 07:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
A page under your userpage? Go to your userpage, then add "/heylookimadeapage" onto the end of teh internet address. It's the same as starting a new page out in mainspace, but it's hiding under your userpage instead (at least until it's done). Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
wats the internet address. sombody mentioned that before, but i dont know wat it is.

i jhust typed it into the search bar--ETLCh X4Ch ChTLG GTLCh 07:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

The thing at the top that says when you're on your userpage. Change it to, or something. Then click "edit", edit, and save. Ta da! It's like magic, but without those damn prissy elves. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Inappropriate Pee Requests

I've noticed some articles put on Pee that just don't seem to belong there. An anonymous IP put Estonia up for review, for example, and the IP in question is not an author of the article and had nothing to say about why he/she asked for the review. And Estonia has many, many edits, is well-established, has been front-page featured...what POSSIBLE purpose would a review have? And now Sweden is up there too, posted by another anonymous IP who has never worked on the article. These things just clog up the Pee, and then Uncyc's urethra gets inflamed and our bladder swells to the size of the Goodyear Blimp. I tell you, it just toasts my poptarts! It flames my marshmallows! It wets my diapers! It dissolves my tooth enamel! Can we have a method for flagging inappropriate Pee requests so they can be removed from the To Do list? Or should we just ignore them? ----OEJ 01:40, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

I reviewed Estonia yesterday. It had no reason to be on there. I felt it was stupid for me to review. The fact that it had already been featured and the fact that it had only gotten better since then should have been enough to know that this had no reason to have been up there. Oh well... --Dexter111344 08:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Oh, and I just reviewed Sweden. I didn't see why it was up for Pee Review, either. Whatever... --Dexter111344 08:42, 31 May 2007 (UTC)