Talk:Liberals

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search


new guy[edit]

this shit is not funny. should be redone to be made funny. no agenda bullshit. 98.160.179.75 23:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Who’s whining like a crybaby here?[edit]

Edits by Quadzilla99 :

also that it's a person's duty to whine like a little sniveling bitch about everything they think is wrong with the world.
Liberals love to whine like little crybabies and little pussies about every little thing.
liberals at the time were also strong advocates of complaining and whining about how ruthless the world

Whining like a little crybaby? Is that irony, hypocrisy, or both? I don’t have my dictionary with me right now. Weri long wang 18:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm not a conservative at all as a matter of fact (not even close) as I told you on my and your talk pages. They're generally greedy people who don't give a shit about anybody but themselves and have built up a whole philosophy to rationalize it so they don't have to pay taxes and can try to turn the clock back to 1950 with their ridiculous social policies. I'm also not a liberal: I think they're colossal whiny pussies who are incessantly whiny and soft and they ain't taking my gun away (no chance). I just think the article should rip liberals that would make it much more funny. Before it was ripping conservatives which made no sense (if you want to rip conservatives go to their article) That's why the Anne Coulter article is so funny because it just tears her selfish ass a new one.
If you want to know my political views here they are: I feel that minimum wage should be higher (a lot higher as a matter of fact), the rich should be taxed a lot, I'm against the Irag War completely, and am against the death penalty in the event an innocent person could get executed. However I'm also for gun ownership big time and against all the whiny environmentalist GreenPeace Yuppie types so many Liberals are, also basically most liberals completely blame society for every underdeveloped social group's problems: Women, minorities, gays so I'm pretty much down the middle. Quadzilla99 19:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Well I suppose that one point of view you have Liberals whining, I am thinking of the Morton Downey Jr. point of view that called Liberals as Pablum Puking Liberals on his show. That was before Rush Limbaugh. Pablum Puking Liberals meant that they were acting like babies, and whined and cried like babies. I mean it was funny when Morton did it, and chain smoked while saying it on his show. I think Morton staged his arguments and the people he argued with to get more ratings for his show. Still is this article supposed to make fun of Liberals or Conservatives? We cannot make fun of both. I think if it was written in the Deadpan style of humor like the George W. Bush article is written in, it might be funnier. Base the whole thing on Liberal blogs on what Liberals are. Make it so over the top, that it is unbelievable like the Bush article here, and thus funny. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 20:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
I personally find the article on Anne Coulter hilarious and it's very anti-conservative. I'll leave out the "whining like a pussy and bitch" terms and tone it down a bit maybe that will improve it. Quadzilla99 20:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Now the "whining like a pussy and bitch" has beenn removed it is funny. I just think it undermines your message by accusing the liberals of being whiney (which they often are) but appearing to whine while saying it. It is a bit more subtle now and funnier again.
Maybe we should switch to making fun of political stereotypes from foreign countries now? I would suggest France, but that’s probably too easy. Weri long wang 21:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Typical French Stereotype: Ho ho ho, we French are the bravest in the world and also the most cultured. (Automobile backfires with a giant bang noise) We surrender, let me pull down my pants and bend over so I can be sodomized by our new overlords. You are a Muslim, no? Please allow me and my family to convert over to your religion and culture. Excuse my French accent, I wish to learn your language and accent so that you won't hurt me. :) --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 02:01, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Too one-sided[edit]

This page needs to be a little less one-sided in favor of conservatives. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.188.88.133 (talk • contribs)

Well it is written by a liberal about liberals originally, I think some neocons got in and changed things a bit. I tried to make a few edits to make the humor less biased and more funny. But then most political pages here make fun of the conservatives and are one-sided in favor the liberals. If I get some time, I'll try to make it less in favor of the conservatives, or maybe Weri can do that instead? --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 23:54, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Ok I countered a lot of the pro-conservative stuff with things about the liberals that make them look better like all the social programs, unions, weekends, liberty etc that Liberals brought from FDR to the present and I bashed the conservatives a bit calling them dicks or tyrants. I hope that evens out the article a bit. I even posted that Hitler caption from Liberal media and made references to how Hitler helped bring about the EU and cited that article a bit so things are more constant between the Liberal media, EU, and Liberal articles by direction of the HTBFANJS in which if you cannot make something factual, make it consistent between articles. If this doesn't help balance the article out a bit, please feel free to make corrections so that it is funnier. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 03:14, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
I thought the purpose of the article is to be funny, not objective. Most of the articles here in Uncyclopedia make fun of their main topic anyway, why should this be any different?? Most of the comments are just satiring typical conservative views of liberals. Ohh well, to each their own. I read the article and found nothing wrong with it, just a typical uncyclopedia article--FunPie 22:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


Ohhhh, so if it is liberal biased that is ok but not the other way around. This is why no one likes liberals. Because you are all for allowing people to do what they want as long as it agrees with your agenda. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.23.111.178 (talk • contribs)

It is ironically why we don't like conservatives either, they too allow people to do what they want as long as it agrees with their agenda. I am a Moderate Libertarian like Penn Jillette, which is kind of like being a "Classic Liberal" with a goatee. As opposed to the "Modern Liberals" or "American liberals" in this article that are being mocked. Libertarianism is almost like anarchy, so we allow anyone to do whatever the hell they want to, even if it disagrees with our agenda, that is if we had an agenda. Just as long as no innocent people die, the economy doesn't go bad, and the world doesn't end, then we have to stop letting people do whatever the hell they want because it just become stupid and not just funny. Ow yeah what is up with the anonymous IPs criticizing these articles but not adding funny stuff to them? Read HTBFANJS please Anon IPs. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 03:39, November 25, 2009 (UTC)