Talk:Main Page/archive5

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Did you know section

I don't feel like creating an account to edit it, but could one of you cool dudes add "...That Jimi Hendrix sublimated?" with the link to the jimi hendrix page. I believe I have made what may be the only funny section of that page.

No, why are you too lazy to create an account? It takes about 10 seconds and you don't even need an email address. --GAMESPOT=666 04:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC)


Shouldn't Uncycloversity be in the sister projects section?-- 07:20, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

I edited Rachael Ray's page

Just to let you all know, I added some of her award-winning cookbooks. If I missed any, feel free to add some. --MDupont 8:13, 19 December 2006

Generally a better idea to add these kind of comments on the article talk page itself, rather than the actual Main Page talk. But thanks for contributing anyhow, and merry Christmas! :) -- 15:55, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Another typo on main page

Thingy at the top about "donating to the gift of humor" - it's actually meant to be spelt humour. Apalling. Go and see the principal. And don't be rude to him, either! --QXZ 04:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Acctaully, what we have here is a case of American vs. British (and Canadian) spellings. I spell humour with a u, the Americans spell it without. Same with colour. --Sir Zombiebaron 18:40, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Yeh. The way they spell metre, however... YOu can't distinguish it from the parking meter, which is such a menace in inner city Newcastle (the Australian one) at the moment.--QXZ 01:02, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia too damn rude

Bursting with rudeness.

Uncyclopedia is too rude. You get swearwords/obscene images/violent video clips on almost every page!! I guess that's what comes of too many patriotic and/or naughty Poms and Yanks editing (we beat the Poms at cricket, anyway, so they shouldn't be so damn pro patria). Y'know, it could make a good site if it wasn't so inconsistent and poorly maintained. Plus, some people should learn how to spell things such moustache, colour, flavour, neighbourhood, manoeuvre, marvellous, arse, axe and exfernophomenaquintification. @!##$$%^$%^^&&^**(*(*^&%^%##!!!!!! Now I've had my rave. Thankyou for reading this. --QXZ 23:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC) P.S. Just in case I have a severe mood swing and decide to leave, could someone please tell me how to terminate my own account?

The best way to terminate your account is to make a stupid comment on Talk:Main Page. 07:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Acctaully, an even better way is to replace The Grand Lord of the Stick's Userpage with your request to have your account terminated. Oh, and I left a note about American vs. Commonwealth spelling above. --Sir Zombiebaron 18:43, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Thankyou. --QXZ 00:53, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


I've noticed the "rudeness" ... but violent video clips? haven't noticed too many of those

Exploding-head.gif Mewhenreadingstupidstuff.gif except for those two, which totally ROCK cause thsy're so funny --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 17:13, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Typo on main page

"To" instead of "too." Shocking. See me after school.

COuld someone fix it, since this is a protectedd page? Tis in the 'On this day' section, under 2006, "I look up and there's a flying penis..." Ta. 15:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

It's actually stored at Uncyclopedia:Anniversaries/December 15 and it's not protected, I think I've fixed it.--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM [email protected] (Petition) 17:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

New main page

i think the new main page layout is crap, what does everyone else think? The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs)

This layout is terrible. Sloppy looking, hard to navigate, just terrible. --GAMESPOT=666 22:16, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
It's still in beta. Give it a few weeks. —rc (t) 23:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

thats better81.5.168.24 14:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia 2.0

The Uncyclomedia Corporation would like to thank Sikon for developing our new look. We hope you enjoy the next generation of Uncyclopedia. —rc (t) 07:35, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

NUCAC 7 - The tags at the top of the main page need to be laid out in a more easily read format. other than that... nice work. 09:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Damn you Sikon, it's all your fault!!! --—Braydie 13:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
But where is the AJAX? You can't have a Web 2.0 page without unnecessary AJAX! - Nonymous 00:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

i wana kitten

dont huff it



we need to put up Eat the turkey.png!!

Making Templates...

I have a question, and it is: How do I make my own templates? --Paulrun 02:27, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

You go to a page called Template:<name> then edit it. Like "Template:Dumb Userbox". Of course then you'll probably want to learn how to make boxes. And colours. Well. Just do a div. Of course then you'll need to learn CSS. Oh dear this could turn into a book. Just check source of another template. Or a page with a colorfull box on it. --Dandin1 19:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

What is it about?

I'm currently new to Uncylopedia, what is it about? Is it like Wikipedia?

It's better than wikipedia, because all entries are automatically checked to make sure they are factual. Wikipedia lets anyone edit. We only let experts edit here. 11/12 01:12

Main page got hacked?

Does anyone want to explain how this happened? --Micoolio101 (whinevandalism) 03:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Naw, it just got unprotected (probably by Spang, but I'm not sure) --Sir Zombiebaron 19:54, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Lies! Tompkins deleted the main page, and deleted pages can't be protected, so when he restored it shortly after, it lost its protection. I was just the one who protected it again. That or it was ghosts. Spang talk 04:45, 18 Nov 2006


Link to the Clean Uncyclopedia

Hey guys, I'm working on this project (A clean uncyclopedia) and I was hoping you guys would help. Thanks [1] Right now I just need a bunch of stock pages, too work on.. PLEASE HELP! Thank you! ...Paul

This idea intruigues me. Clean of what? The cursing, the porn, the humor? All of the above? What is and isn't kosher should probably be decided beforehand. So, anyway, lemme know what you're thinking.--<<>> 22:45, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
I'd suggest moving too wikia (who run our hosting), for one thing you could more easily move pages using the Special:export and reimport them into your wiki via Special:Import (or ask someone at wikia to copy the Database entires directly), this would also preserve the authour history which technically you need under the terms of the licence that uncyclopedia content is rfeleased under. Anyway good Luck!--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM [email protected] (Petition) 23:50, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

I think he prolly means clean as in safe for kids to read. No cussing, for example. Like, the radio edit of a song. -- 04:45, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Ah, so like the kiddie version of kitten huffing, then.--<<>> 05:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Sorry if this came across overly sarcastic. I had looked into this earlier, then became frustrated by exactly how difficult it became. I didn't realize until going back over what I'd written here that it was rather snarky.--<<>> 20:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

A clean uncyclopedia? Please. We have strict guidelines against shock, gore, pornography, etc. Most good articles are PG-13 at worst. Any X-rated articles typically aren't funny and are shot on sight. The only thing we allow is cursing, but those are just little words, and are used sparingly except where the use of the word is vital to the joke. In which case a clean version would make no sense and be totally unfunny. So basically, Paul, you're wasting your time. Go work for the AFA. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 17:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC) Never mind.. I changed my mind.. if u clean it nobody wants 2 c the site

Link to the Brazilian/Portuguese uncyclopedia

Hello there. I noticed you guys forgot to put a link to the brazilian uncyclopedia in the "other languages bar". The brazilian uncyclopedia(desciclopédia) is bigger than most of the uncyclopedias listed there(around 1900 articles), so i´m quite sure you guys just forgot it... Anyway the adress is:

-- 19:21, 1 October 2006 (UTC)(Kohl, from the desciclopédia)

No man, "Our" brazilian uncyclopedia is listed as Portuguese uncyclopedia ye?

== Satan is awful == y????

  • "I just reached level 60 with my Night-Elve! leave me be," ~ Oscar Wilde on God Destroying WoW...ow, and the rest

'nuff said.

Full Purge

To:      All participants
From:    God
Subject: Full Purge
Date:    September 23, 2006
Time:    20:05 GMT
   I am displeased with all my worlds.
Many mobiles refuse to answer my call.
Therefore, I will delete all participants and
begin again. Full purge will commence at
21:00 GMT.
   Prepare to have your characters perma-
nently deleted. You will not recieve another

The Colossus of Barbie... utterly HILARIOUS. it had me and my whole my family in splits tonight. wow! i say -- mowgli 16:41, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


This has got to be one of the best reskins ever!-- Sir Severian Severian1.jpg CUN.png (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut.png 09:38, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. --Icons-flag-us.png SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 14:18, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Me also - and particularly timely for me, since I found a 5ish inch floppy with Syd Meyers Civilisation just yesterday and now have my 7 year old playing a 20 year old game. --SubPOP talk [email protected] 17:10, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, that's pretty rad.

Wow! It's just how I remember - even down to the 199 for A-Z and the rubbish ads at the bottom! -- 20:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Front page vandalism

Someone undo it please - and huff the person involved..

Unfunny, puts some of us off signing in, doing "useful" things to Uncyclopedia etc.

Sadly, it isn't vandalism, its the featured article as voted by you, the viewing public. Personally, I take no responsibility whatsoever.... -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb.png (talk to me)
I recommend clicking the part that says "read more", which will bring you to the real article, an artistic critism of the work (and a great satirical piece, thereby).--<<>> 02:53, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

I find it totally unfunny - and likely to get Uncyclopedia fall foul of library internet blocking policy.

I did not vote for it.

Yoi or Moans or mom ore SLdk Got it good.Yes, DESUing is for people with no intellect or wit. All it is is saying stupid random crap like SHOOP DA WHOOP and POOL'S CLOSED. Our random crap at least isn't stupid!

Who are you, and what are you talking about, exactly?--<<>> 13:38, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
They're talking about one of the past featured articles. Mhaille thought that it was vandalism. But it just turned out to be just a misunderstanding. Read the full article here. --lEoN2323 22:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Black Background

I remember, few days ago you had all the background in your front page in black color. How did you do it? 06:36, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

why don't you answer? 16:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Used a piece of css coding pinched from Emopedia. -- Hindleyite 16:27, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Did you know? suggestion

Somebody should add something about how all Wikipedians drive and love Simcas, since those stupid things seem to be all the rage on Wikipedia's Did you Know? section lately. lol

Do it yourself. Go to 'Suggest new entries' and add it. And BTW, don't put lol after your own joke. --Rice80 21:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC)



How about porn pic of the day how is that for a idea? Djf2014 15:45, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

How about crap image of Jimbo Wales of the day how is that for a idea? Csm.grfD(Native american laughing) 09:53, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Article numbers

As Uncyclopedia is slowly working its way towards 20 000 articles can a Un-recruitment drive be initiated? Jackiespeel 21:13, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Interlink to Japanese Main Page

Please add to an interlink for Japanese Main page ja:メインページ --Kasuga 12:18, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Done. Spang talk 18:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks! --Kasuga 18:21, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Link to tomorrow's anniversary

Would anyone be opposed to adding a link to tomorrow's anniversary day, next to the "more anniversaries" one? It would make it slightly easier to edit them, a day in advance, which may improve the average anniversary quality somewhat. Perhaps. Not a big deal, really, but I thought I'd ask first. Spang talk 09:36, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Do it. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 14:32, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
The route to the aniversairs was actualy deliberatly made slightly longer because we found that the quality went down in big way if it was too easy to edit.--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM [email protected] (Petition) 14:55, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
I will second Elvis - the easier it was to get to the anniversaries, the worse they were. At the moment, a couple of ambitious people seem to be producing pretty darn good reskins. And the easier they are to find, the less a surprise they are. I know one can watch recent changes and all, but there are a lot of users who don't, and for them, it is fairly novel to find a completely different main page once in a while. 23:53, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Wait...I thought we were talking about the "On This Day" type of anniversaries. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 23:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Sure. I'd agree there too. 00:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
I was talking about the "on this day"s. And Elvis, it's only tomorrow's anniversary that'd be linked to, so they would all be checked out by whoever's watching recent changes before anything actually got to the main page. So it'd probably be ok. Spang talk 06:06, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Link to the Norweigan uncyclopedia

The url is: --Knutimus 00:55, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Wow, I clicked that link and then clicked what I figured was the "Random Page" button. Now I know all about Tilfeldig Sex. --Sir Zombiebaron 16:24, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Yankee go home!

Unsahklopeeedia es weay tue Eamearrrikean. Seee tha peages un cahmoonesm orrr un EAAAAAAAAAA!, forrr ensteance. Tha wrahterrrs jost eassoome theat tha reeederrr es ean Eamearikean perrrson. Bloody empeeerialests! Ah'm un tha brenk uf meaking ean Ahstreeeleeean verrrsion uf Unsahklopeeedia (Recyclopedia, perrheaps?), orrr eat leeest a verrrsion whech Eamerikeans kean't adit. Surry forrr beeeeng so eantah-Eamearikean, but Ah'm jost gatteng seck uf thes bias. Eany quastions? Theankyoo.

Pee.eaS. Unsahklopeeedia es ahlso sumtahms encradebly rood eand premeteve en et's hoomourrr. Jost beeecahse yoo've enclooded so meany saxooal jokes eand sweearrrworrrds, theat doosn't ahtomeatecally meeen tha sahte beeecomes fonny - en feact, uften quahte tha ahpposete.

Uf courrrse, Ah racognahse theat meany peages arrre eactooally quaht gude (ee.gee. un axferrrnophahmaneaquentefekeation) - but therrre arrren't eanough uf those peages eas ahpposed tue tha rood orrr stooped peages.

I typed this in this accent so that you can understand it. Of course, that was completely unnecessary, because you are probably intelligent enough to understand it like this. However, that wouldn't have been fonny!

But really, a worldwide website should not automatically assume that the reader is necessarily an American and will understand what you're talking about. Of course, countries such as the UK, Australia and even Ukraine are now been heavily dominated by American culture, but that doesn't mean they automatically become part of the Stars and Stripes empire. (Getting damn near it, though...)

I finally would like to emphasise, again, that I do not hate America, nor do I love any other country, but PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE remember that Uncyclopedia is NOT meant to be 100% American.

So help me, God.

Amen. 09:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

uncylopedia succks

The preceding unasked for gibberish was spewed forth in an effervescent pool of filth by none other than (talk • contribs)

this site sucks go to wikipedia you tards

You suck. --Micoolio101 (whinevandalism)
I'll say! I just went to Wikipedia, and when I came back, this site looked exactly the same. And not only that, I learned that Wikipedia sucks too! What's this world coming to, anyway?  c • > • cunwapquc? 03:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
I once heard a terrible yet true reversal. In Soviet Russia, Uncyclopedia sucks YOU!! Premier Tom Mayfair 03:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, but whoever wrote the "Uncyclopedia Sucks" thing probably dates his mom. Ooooh, dis! --Belugaperson 23:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Learn to spell, first! Uncylopedia succks, indeed! 09:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

content boosting game?

i have an idea of how we can make uncyclopedia better. go to wikipedia and click random page. copy that page. post it here. edit it so it's funny.

Uncyclopedia via the roundabout on a unicycle

If Uncyclopedia is blocked on your computer.

Go to Wikipedia Uncyclopedia article: click on one of the foreign languague versions.

Then click to the English version.

Link to Finnish uncyclopedia

The link is wrong, this is the right link to Finnish Uncyclopedia (Hikipedia) (at least it has more articles)

Link to Yiddish uncyclopedia

Can someone please add it to the list? Because I couldn't. Keinziklopedie -- VFP Eincyc (talk) 02:18, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Oh yeah, the word Yiddish in Yiddish is יידיש

-- VFP Eincyc (talk) 02:21, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Which list, the one on the side of the page, or the one at the bottom. Because I think you'd have to talk to Wikia to get the side list edited. HOMESTAR ME!!! TURTLE ME!!! t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 02:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
OK,will do. Do the bottom in the meantime.-- VFP Eincyc (talk) 02:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
I'll do my best, in the meantime fix your sig, man. HOMESTAR ME!!! TURTLE ME!!! t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 02:32, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Way to ruin my fun. I had my ban-stick all polished, then you go and politely request it. Guess I'll have to let him read this before any further admin harassment. 11/28 02:39

We NEED this picture here!

wiki picture that we NEED

I do not understand your point. --Sir Zombiebaron 18:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Me neither. oTHErONE (Contribs) 06:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

You're an idiot. Whats the point?--Paco 04:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

i think we need more fun stuff im bored as effin hell here

whoever you are, you cannot spell. if you are bored, hit random page, or something. Add content if you want it, somebody might, but they wont do it just for you. oh and sig is four of these. ~ ONX 17:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Horney Caveman

How do people make templates? I don't know... I was thinking of making a funny random template that could say "This article has been approved by the horney caveman." How could I make a template?

Cheddar Cheesia 17:27, 17 December 2006 (UTC) search template: Hornycaveman, and create the template yourself. ONX 17:31, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, but how do I create the picture?

Cheddar Cheesia 18:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Erm GIMP, Paint Shop Pro, Photoshop, MS Paint, Steal from tinternet?--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM [email protected] (Petition) 18:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll do it later.

Cheddar Cheesia 18:44, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

RSS Feed for Featured articles.

I've had it subscribed for a while but maybe someone wants to add it to the main page.

Enjoy Tt22 17:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Using Wikimedia's bandwidth

The image that you're using on your main page to parody Wikimedia's fundraising efforts (meter.png) is hosted on Wikimedia's servers. Please remove it. Thank you. —David Levy 08:23, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, but... are you authorized to speak for Wikimedia Foundation? And if it's a polite request, why are you accusing us of "stealing" someone's bandwidth? - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 08:39, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
1. No, I'm not speaking in any official capacity.
2. I didn't intend to offend, but using someone else's bandwidth without permission is stealing. Nonetheless, I've toned down the section title. —David Levy 09:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
David, you do realise that the banner links to a page where we encourage people to donate to Wikimedia, and give all the links for them to do so? I should see Mindspillage (Wikimedia Board) or Jimbo later today, I'll check with one of them on the bandwidth issue. -- sannse esnnas 08:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
1. Yes, and that's kind of you to do, but this is a pet peeve of mine. I have a sense of humor (and fully support your right to parody Wikipedia), but I don't see why it's necessary to display image files hosted by Wikimedia.
2. I'm certain that the amount of bandwidth consumed is negligible. It's the principle of the matter. Doing a nice thing doesn't give you the right to do something not-so-nice. Of course, if Jimbo or Kat gives you permission, that's a different story. —David Levy 09:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Incidentally, mightn't it be funnier to create a fake graphic depicting an absurdly small monetary sum (e.g. CA$16.37)? —David Levy 16:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree that that would indeed be funnier, but I have not 1337 skillz, so I can't pull that off, sadly.--<<>> 17:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
It could also be quite humorous of that was really close to either being all the way there, or almost inperceptably just barely above zero.--<<>> 17:40, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
How's this?
Donation meter.png
David Levy 21:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Mindspillage's reply was "I would be inclined to say yes, myself. Ask brion if it's a big deal...", but I quite like the tiny-amount-to-target idea too -- sannse esnnas 22:27, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

I prefer David Levy's meter as well, although we might want to update it periodically if we're going to leave it on the front page for a while yet. —rc (t) 23:16, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, we could have it go down and have a note by the side saying "Due to checks bouncing, and people wanting their money back."Braydie at 19:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

I think the amount should be "lots" with the green bar barely there. HOMESTAR ME!!! TURTLE ME!!! t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:46, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

LOL THIS IS SO RETARDED if Wikimedia doesn't want our money then screw them --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 17:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Total copy of Wikipedia

Hehehey, Its a total copy of Wikipedia, but I like it. Sushant gupta 08:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Teh what? oTHErONE (Contribs) 13:23, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
You have it the wrong way around.~ PHDrillSergeant...§ 06:18, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Idea: DO IT NOW! link

The text "DO IT NOW!" on the main page should be hyperlinked to

April Fool's Day Idea

How about on April Fool's Day we give the main page factual information?--Mister Nosey 22:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


Seeing as the Main Page has colored tables, I think that


should be placed around the whole page. This makes images nicer to look at. Just replace {MAIN PAGE GOES HERE} with the rest of the page. --User no longer exists 20:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Featured Picture

I think we need to find more pictures to feature. It seems that we recycle the same five pictures. (Dace48 18:56, 13 January 2007 (UTC))

There are actually over a hundred images in the rotation (see Uncyclopedia:PFP, Uncyclopedia:PFP/001, Uncyclopedia:PFP/002 and Uncyclopedia:PFP/003), but yes, we always need people to nominate and vote for featured images. And make them, of course. —rc (t) 19:25, 13 January 2007 (UTC)



Hmm... it was never unprotected... I dunno why it's unprotecting itself, but whatever. It's protected again now.--<<>> 21:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I deleted the Main Page today. However, protections are not restored along with page restoration, so they need to be re-applied. --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 23:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
We need a bot so when some admin unprotects the main page it will reprotect instantly.--Scott 01:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)