Oh my God the amount of facts on this page is horrendous
It's going on the to do list... --James-sibley 20:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- I think not. Read the article before you start butchering it by inserting random things that are not remotely funny, or at all fitting with the theme. ~Sir Rangeley GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 22:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Erm... Slight bias?
I have a funny feeling many facts from this article are made up or from some uncomfirmed sources. Racooon 13:24, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
This isn't wikipedia! Racooon 13:24, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I like the style of this article as it lulls the readers brain into a false set of complacency before it starts spreading the crazyness. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 18.104.22.168 (talk • contribs)
I was looking for information on burma's regime, so I thought I was on Wikipedia... Silly of me... Racooon 13:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Too many facts
This page has too many facts 22.214.171.124 05:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
:Bursts into the room:
I'll take the case!
- And, instead of reading into what your talking about as far as 'Facts,' Im going to do my to
- be Funny! And not stupid anymore. Like my User page.
Invasion of the Wikipedia Freaks
This article has been either vandalised by Wikipedia freaks, or by censors and the propaganda board of Myanmar.
Anyway, I'm cleaning it up, and adding that 'wikipedia invasion' template Ldude893 02:15, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia is so much better than Wikipedia
Look how Wikipedia still calls the country Burma. Plus, their policy requires CONSENSUS, because Wikipedia is not a democracy, so they spend eons discussing it instead of actually getting something done. The Linkifier!!!!!? 21:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)