From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Not hot[edit]

The bottom right one is not hot. None of them particularly are.


The idea of the article is for everyone to take the piss... if it's some random feminists only then it should be changed. Besides, God said "I can do better"? Sorry but God does not fail when he sets out to do something, so that's a mistake right there.

Hmm.. not nice to say :-) .. won't be funny if it sounds political. How about this:
  • In the begining God wanted to create a sexy blonde blue eye feminist creature but Satan advised against absolute power, and so God created someone with a dick. As the fairer partner, woman was endowed with great speaking as well as eating ability that drives the others out of the cave into the wilderness. Soon women helped bring all the human race into existence without any further sperm donors. She also faked multiple orgasms to bring all the men back to protect the home. (I could go on, but i am not a woman) - Red1 23:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Do women have souls? Best regards Søren

Not sure, but it could be argued (referencing from personal experience, here) that women have no hearts. --Boxtop 18:47, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Ah!! Someone needs a tissue! Nobody gives a flying fuck about your past trauma, you emo! --Prussian Kabuto 08:28, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
I thought the emos went extinct a few years ago? Also, you're making fun of a guy that probably hasn't been here since the day he made that edit. You didn't sign up just to do the same now did you? --Roman Dog Bird 08:55, February 25, 2011 (UTC)


omfg... what sexist bullfuck. Women are defined as being objects created by our lord Jesus Christ for the express purposes of entertaining, sexually gratifying, and feeding men. There is definitely another side to this, so this article needs to be opened up to the billions of men in the world.

I am impressed. Didn't know women could write. --PantsMacKenzie 21:15, 12 Jan 2005 (EST)

Lies! Lies all of them! Ihavenolife

I concur. Harrumph. Getalife

Great article! NOT! --PoorNUnknown 10:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)


oyfg... what sexist bullfuck. yes the same at the top but jesus christ a lord he was high and said some bull shit anyway this over sexist.

Thank you! This needs a f*cking rewrite. I hate this sexist *hit.

Yeah F**k this ******* **** ** ***** ***** ******* i meen **** seriosuly *** man *** Stop censoring faggit


Thank you, Pants

yeah thats stupid

Did nobody spot it?![edit]

Didn't anyone spot the IRONY? GUYS? Link to Intelligent Men is dead... there's nothing. Ha. Pure Self-Irony. Excuses most of my slips in style and content, don't you think? (' am covering me in ashes in advance just in case anyone comes back at this and proves the opposite)

I broke it...[edit]

Could someone figure out why exactly editing the "Germany" Section caused the article to cut off? I'm staring at a blank here.
--Sanfam 03:39, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC) (A.k.a.

Followup: Someone had commented out a chunk, and I guess it never really processed until I edited the section where it began...or something. I'm not sure. Anyway, it works again. False Alarm. --Sanfam 03:43, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Flawed equation[edit]

Time + Money =/= Time x Money IQ 21:23, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Don't be a little nerd, the equation wouldn't work if it was like that. You'd be left at time+money without being able to advance into any further simplification. *Duh!* --DiZ 21:09, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
"Time and money" is Time x Money. If both are true (T and T = T) this can be represented by multiplication (1 x 1 = 1). Same for only one true (T and F = F, 1 x 0 = 0) and neither true. (F and F = F, 0 x 0 = 0). "Time or money" would be represented as "Time + Money". Duh. --Monika 21:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Well, look who thinks they're sooo smart! You're just trying to confuse everyone because you're insecure about yourself.--DiZ 17:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes, exactly. --Monika 17:02, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Is that sarcasm? Oh my, how clever. When I am King, you shall be first to burn.--DiZ 17:15, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
The other flaw is that the love of money is the root of all evil, not just money itself. Alas, nobody cates. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
(Cates? Did you mean "care"?) Anyway, I beg to differ. Money inspires evil acts, therefore, it is the "root", i.e. the origin, of evil.--DiZ 17:15, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

If you really wanna be nerdy, you can argue that the square root of something squared is not itself but infact the absolute of itself, which yields that women aren't just evil, but absolute evil. Hah, I crack myself up. RZ 05:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

I think the equation should be corrected at the end:

women = absolute evil 05:19, June 17, 2010 (UTC)


Tungsten dioxide?

i am a woman!!! --STEVEN CHEN

... ... ..... .. .. NOBODY CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!

Message Box[edit]

Who took out the message box that linked to Bitch slap? Frankly, I don't care who; just tell me why? I'm putting it back on unless someone wishes to give me a good reason not to. --DiZ 14:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)


Bits of it are funny, but it's mostly just 'Look at me, I'm making fun of women! Look at me! That's always funny! Are there any cliches I haven't used yet?!? Oh yeah, women suck! Oh, how I slay me.'

Wait... you mean this isn't supposed to be factual? Well no wonder this isn't funny then... --Grandmother Chaos 06:09, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
I Totally agree. There has to be a funnier way to make jokes about women. A more original way...--Normloman 03:37, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Well, I liked it. In fact, I've put it on VFH. RabbiTechno 18:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

For what it's worth, in other societies men are as addicted to chocolate as women are in the US MissHoyden 00:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

other guy[edit]

yeah... this article sucks right now, but when it'll be back on it's feet can someone add a quote? I can't edit it, I'm not sure if I need an account or whatever. I just came up with an ideea so I'll just get to it.

“It's ok to lie to women, they're not people, like us”

~ Peter Griffin's little devil guy on women

“Hey, where's the other guy?”

~ Peter Griffin on the other guy

Shit shit shit a woman is using the site[edit]

 I think we have a woman using the site look at the origin part of this!

add these quotes from the article 'woman'[edit]

“Who's Joe Bloggs?”

~ Women on Joe Bloggs

“Women aren't objects! Their bodies are”
~ Oscar Wilde on women

“Fucking up the unfuckupable since the Garden of Eden”

~ Ezekiel 25:17 on women

“Woman who wear running shoes to bed wants marathon session.”

~ Confucious on women

“I don't trust something that bleeds for six days and doesn't die.”

~ Mr. Garrison on women


~ God on women

“Eeeevil woman!”

I added 3 of my own quotes already, but we men truly love women, we just can't hate them or whatever the feminists say about us men. What's the matter MS. ALPHAFEMME? You aren't pretty enough or something? Good luck in finding the man of your dreams to marry you! HA! + PotatoSmut 15:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Did you read the article? These quotes are TOTALLY out of place given the text that we have in this article. Read the article first, then think if the quotes fix with what the rest of the article is doing. Take a look at Girls. These quotes (or similar) might work great in girls, but not here. Enjoy. MrN Icons-flag-gb.png 16:53, Jul 6

double standards[edit]

so the page is semi-protected due to "misogyny," but rampant man-hating misandry is somehow acceptable?

no wonder no one takes feminism seriously anymore... The preceding unsigned comment was added by Room429 (talk • contribs)

Articles are allowed to exhibit a point of view. This is a comedy website, so you shouldn't take such points of view seriously or take them personally. You certainly don't need to provide a detailed counter-argument to every statement you disagree with.
This page used to feature the normal anti-women stuff. This wasn't necessarily a problem in terms of discrimination, it was more that it was bloody obvious. Anyone could write it. It also wasn't particularly funny. The featured version, takes a diferent, less overplayed, point of view and is generally subtler and funnier. All the other edits took the opposite approach and created continuity problems, so I've reverted to its featured state.
If you want to write from the other pov, try girls. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  15:43, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

Proof sexism is wrong![edit]

As a woman, I would say that I'm more mature and smarter than most of the "men" that visit this page. I'm not sexist, just according to many of the pages here, which include sexual jokes, profound mammary fetish, and sexism. In fact many of you aren't mature enough to be "men". You are actually boys. I don't focus on shopping, shoes, etc. I don't spend all my time in a kitchen. Majority of my time is spent at work. You boys are so sexist. Also, your brain is mostly composed of sexism, breasts, sex, and watching sports on TV. I've met other males who are mature and have good personalities. No wonder why you don't have a girlfriend. --GLaDOS 02:35, April 25, 2011

Erm, this was written by a girl. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:55, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
This is uncyclopediait is supposed to be insulting to every thing that isn't related to heavy metal.True sexism is wrong but here it is right so stop wining.

The preceding unsigned comment was added by OMNOM YERAY (talk • contribs)

WINNING! -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 23:33, September 23, 2012 (UTC)