Uncyclopedia:Ban Patrol/archive44

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

L0r3nz0 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) Created 2 one-liner unfunny pages today. (TalkContribs (del)Block (rem-lst-all)WhoisCityProxy?WP Edits) - Recreating deleted content. --User:Lollipop/sig - 18:05, 14 June 2011 (TalkContribs (del)Block (rem-lst-all)WhoisCityProxy?WP Edits) FAGGOT ON MY IP soz caps User:Fudgemobile/sig1 05:00, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

I don't mean to be too forward, but why exactly did you report a person whose last edit (and the one to which you're likely referring) was almost two weeks ago?~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 05:08, June 14, 2011 (UTC
Long story and I CBF explaining User:Fudgemobile/sig1 06:20, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
Then we CBF banning them. --ChiefjusticeDS 07:59, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

Vhincego (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) - Makes stupid pages. User:Cat the Colourful/sig sig 2

Which you saw TKF huff. He would have blocked them if he had felt it necessary. MrN Icons-flag-gb.png http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/4/4e/HalIcon.png http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/e/e1/Goldboobs_Improved.jpg 21:27, Jun 8
I put the user on ban patrol right after he created the second one, and before it was huffed again. --User:Lollipop/sig3 21:32, 8 June 2011
I'm not that bothered about that. If he does something worth a ban, try again. MrN Icons-flag-gb.png http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/4/4e/HalIcon.png http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/e/e1/Goldboobs_Improved.jpg 10:26, Jun 3
Please do not report IPs with only one edit. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 06:11, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
Was going to put an OhDear template on there, but this user does not appear to be registered. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 01:42, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
I meant this. --User:Magic man/sig 01:45, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
I think my script messed it up... >.< This could be a problem... ~ Isarra *shifty eyes* 02:47, 19 May 2011
I'd also like to mention this is an active user on ED --User:Frosty/sig 22:44, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
Lollipop make sure you add the correct user name on ban patrol as you missed part of that one off. Frosty, people could be active users anywhere and it won't factor into a ban decision, in my case at least. Cheers for helping out. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:55, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
Gee, thanks. That was my first major rollback. --User:Lollipop/sig - 23:01, 14 May 2011
I just felt the need to point it out, ED users have a habit of being here just to annoy. Just saying. --User:Frosty/sig 23:38, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Cat the Colourful apologises for forgetting to sign his name. Farewell, till next time. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz Zzz...morning? 11:11, 12 May, 2011 (UTC)
I don't think this is cyberbullying , rather QVFD. --User:Frosty/sig 08:40, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
Two pages is not a spree, 10 pages and above is a spree. One page of spam does not equal a spambot. Try to keep these reasons a bit more proportionate to the offences. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:21, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
Did you at least talk to him about it? Creating unfunny pages by itself is not reason enough for a block. I say this because I know ChiefjusticeDS has already pointed it out a lot of times. --Scofield 12:16, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
Those pages should go to QVFD and you should point the user towards UN:BEST and HTBFANJS. If they persist then consider BP. --ChiefjusticeDS 17:55, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
Deleted it. No need to report users to BPC just for creating vanity one time, unless they're creating a glut of pages. -- |c|o|d|e|i|n|e| 01:17, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
Alright, you got me! Made with the prior permission of the guy who I hope delivers the death blow. Damn, didn't even last a day. --Scofield 08:19, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
As part of our illicit gentlemen's agreement, I give this sock the right to live. At least from my hands. Zombiebaron's? You never know with that guy. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 08:58, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
That isn't a reason for a ban. When/if they do something damaging bring them back. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:09, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
Not really, consider the pages in context, he's making minor changes, yes they aren't brilliant but neither was what was there before. I'd say he was making an effort to be funny, just because he hasn't succeeded doesn't mean he is a vandal. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:09, April 8, 2011 (UTC)