Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/archive3

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search


Do something As you can see the article is called Decepticon , where as the article topic is about Deception. T_T --Nytrospawn 00:27, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Ok, I've moved it to Deception - I didn't author this originally, and read the body, not the title :P. It's a pretty funny concept, the opposite of conception, so shall we remove the vote for deletion since the title is appropriate now :) --Badmicrophone 00:31, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Yes Ill be crossing it out, I just felt disheartened that no one could come up with a Decepticon article--Nytrospawn 01:34, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)


Keeping it
Delete We already have 1 Oscar Wilde article, another one isnt needed. --Nytrospawn 18:23, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete see above comment. -- 20:52, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep Different topic. --Chronarion 00:33, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep What Chronarion said-- 06:54, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep See above --Elvis 09:17, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep its funny and even though we already have an Oscar Wilde article, this article doesn't break consistancy. --Paulgb Talk 09:31, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep And not just cause I wrote it. It's intended to make fun of those idiots who send ANNOYING HATE MAIL IN ALL CAPS heh heh. Initially I wanted to link to the original Oscar Wilde, but then went ahead and wrote the page, but delete if you must...(sigh) User:slackerboy

Nonce Pie


Delete --Uvula Donor 15:07, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Can't go anywhere. Deletable - David Gerard 15:24, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Rcmurphy 18:28, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Machinecurse 20:41, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)


Rewrite if possible I'd like to see someone take a crack at rewriting this. There are some funny ideas in this article that currently aren't going anywhere. --Uvula Donor 10:20, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite it has hope, but needs work -- 15:04, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite/Expand Has potential. --Rcmurphy 18:29, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite Has a lot of potential. -- 20:53, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewritten --Uvula Donor 13:26, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)


Delete Meh. --Uvula Donor 09:28, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)

As funny as people who quote Monty Python at the pub - David Gerard 10:25, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete too factual to be here. -- 13:17, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)


Delete There's amusing political incorrectness, and then there's this horribly unfunny trash. I hope it's a misguided attempt at hyperbole, but that's not how it reads. --Cap'n Ben 05:58, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Delete I agree wholeheartedly. Unfunny trash. --Lomedae 08:59, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Deleted Yeah, I know I didn't wait for a lot of votes, but I don't tolerate bigoted bullshit. If someone manages to write a funny article for "Niggers", cool, we'll keep it (and it can be done, just get ahold of Chris Rock's "Black People vs. Niggers" for an example.) --Uvula Donor 09:16, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Lirath Q. Pynnor

I have no idea who this is. A google search leads straight back here.-- 13:50, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Update: Looking at the other search results, it looks like this is the name of a very active wikipedia troll with a 1 year ban.-- 13:53, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Don't we have enough US presidents already? --Rcmurphy 14:05, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete We got another one called Phineas Q. Bedknobs. Thats not good either --Nytrospawn 15:03, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete. There is no Phineas Q. Bedknobs. We have always been at war with Eastasia. [heh heh] --Uvula Donor 19:02, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete. Did he write it himself? (Added vfd tag.) - David Gerard 10:25, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)



Delete Just seems like an excuse to link to a bunch of Maddox pages. --Rcmurphy 14:16, 8 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Wow that page sucks --Paulgb Talk 14:53, 8 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete if you think that's bad, I wouldn't go checking out the author's other works... --Machinecurse 18:13, 8 Apr 2005 (EDT)

You shouldn't have pointed that out, I feel sick now. Actually, he has written some funny stuff, and although he appears to have an agenda, he seems to make fun of everything. BTW, Is that (first draft) thing from wikipedia or what? --Paulgb Talk 22:00, 8 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete tragic waste of electrons. --Famine 19:08, 8 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Wow, my schizoaffective disorder must have acted up when I wrote that. I removed the Maddox links, and added a bit more content. There is no agenda I follow, everyone is fair game for me to make fun of. --Orion Blastar 00:16, 9 Apr 2005 (CST)

I didn't mean to say you had an agenda, I reworded that sentance so it makes more sense. What I meant was that you have some very political pages but you make fun of everything rather than choosing sides. I found some of your pages pretty funny, I remember exactly what they were, but I think one was Anarchists. --Paulgb Talk 09:30, 9 Apr 2005 (EDT)
People joke about politics every day, pollitical cartoonists put their cartoons in newspapers and the Internet, and nobody says they have an agenda. Thanks that you think some of mine are funny. Maddox is a bust, but maybe God-Fearing Republicans will do better? How about Missouri, If it is on the Internet it must be true, Ultra Jesus, or Social security? ;)--Orion Blastar 13:54, 9 Apr 2005 (CST)
Are there any plans to get any of those past first draft? It's a bit hard to tell whether something will become good before it happens.
I would like to, but I am not aware of all the Wiki editing that needs to be done. Mostly I fix typos and spelling errors I made, bad links, etc, before a second draft is made. I'd like to edit Maddox to second draft, but it has already been marked for deletion. It seems, I do not know what I am doing yet, so it is hard to say. --Orion Blastar 12:28, 10 Apr 2005 (CST)

Delete ...Dont like it in the least. --Johnfn 12:18, 9 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Although some of your stuff is pretty funny, Orion, this one ain't. -- 19:03, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Yeah, it just seems like a collection of links. Unless anyone says to keep it, Ill be deleting it --Nytrospawn 13:31, 11 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete I'm prejudiced against maddox. --stillwaters/Talk 14:36, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Phylicia Rashad From Quick VFD (April 6)

Keep I Moved these from QuickVFD because I quite liked em --Elvis 06:51, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete/Rewrite --Uvula Donor 09:12, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Rcmurphy 13:17, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite There's a funny idea in there somewhere, but it's not that funny right now. -- 13:31, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep --Keebler 09:18, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT) The name "Phylicia" really does sound like a genus of plant and would be funnier if the Family were "Cosbii". Wait---let me go do that.



Not funny-- 01:02, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete No, not at all. This should probably be in Quick VFD. --Rcmurphy 01:24, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Does the pope shit in the woods?

What happened to this page? Why is there no history to undo? I can't find anything in the logs to indicate what happened to it or when. --Uvula Donor 19:26, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Thats weird. For me it works if I access it at www.uncyclopedia.org but not at uncyclopedia.org. It also shows up in the search as normal. I changed it to what it should be, but whatever is going on is really strange. --Paulgb Talk 20:34, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Where did my original article go, anyway? Not that it matters---Paulgb's is better anyway. BTW WikiMedia has issues with question marks in topic names, so the proper title should be Does the pope shit in the woods. --Keebler 20:47, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Well, my mystery is solved---WikiMedia is also case-sensitive: Does the pope shit in the woods (which someone else wrote) is different than Does the Pope shit in the woods (which I wrote). --Keebler 20:54, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Thanks for the fix, Paulgb. Keebler, thanks for redirecting your page over to the more developed article. I did think your one-liner was pretty funny, but I'm glad to see the original back. --Uvula Donor 21:07, 10 Apr 2005 (EDT)


DESTROYED Don't post things about people who are not famous people. --PantsMacKenzie 13:19, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Not funny, just an excuse for an external link --Goomball 10:15, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Delete Horrible. My eyes, my EYES! --Lomedae 10:30, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Delete Man, is that awful. --Uvula Donor 12:17, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)


Delete/Rewrite I dont know how the poster of this found it funny --Nytrospawn 22:54, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete / Rewrite Needs some body of text or burial at sea. Head, shoulders, knees, and toes below the funny mark--bdanials 02:14, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Meh. --Rcmurphy 02:57, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Deleted Better suited for Quick VFD; it was only an external bandwidth-stealing pic link so I axed it along with most of the other cruft that poster pulled out of his ass created. --Uvula Donor 08:40, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)

I actually found spleen kinda funny, but eh, it's ok. --Chronarion 09:02, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Just about everything by

Cud, Republic of Pop Music, Mutant Chickens, Wimbledon, Don,Superbeatles, Poontangalang, Mingeflaps, Punani, Fanjita, Fadge, Box, Yoyoist, Myself, and, above all else, Good make up 345% of your daily recommended allowance of crap. --UnholySauce 22:18, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Hmm. I knew that IP sounded familiar. (See below) --Uvula Donor 22:26, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

DON'T CLICK ON "GOOD" unless you want to see a nasty maggoty wound. Delete --Rcmurphy 22:28, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Dp Delete/Rewrite I didn't just whack this one out of hand because it has the germ of a good idea. But I am just getting sick of the constant barrage of potty jokes. --Uvula Donor 22:08, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

All Deleted None of the stuff was worth waiting for votes, and the maggot picture was the limit for me. --Uvula Donor 22:39, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)



Rewrite nothing against it per se, but it's totally fucking with the categories, making it near-impossible to recategorise stuff. The joke isn't quite funny enough to justify the sheer irritation of finding it cropping up in every damn category we're got.--Machinecurse 20:41, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite - how about faking the categories? You could probably "view source" on the current page, copy the html for the category table, and paste it in? --Acousvnt 21:00, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite I agree... fake it. -- 21:03, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Fake Well, you're ECMS, so it's your call. --Chronarion 22:49, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite I've made a start, but the catgegories at the bottom still need to be re-written in the same manner as those at the top. For future reference, the way to link to a category without adding the present article to it is to put a colon before the word Category in the link, i.e. [[:Category:Food|Food]] will link thus: Food. --Bonalaw 07:17, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite It was my fault actually, I conceived that thin but nevertheless funny IMHO joke to put it in all categories, only to realise that the haggle was more than the gain. Sorry for the inconvenience :P I'll pull my weight in added the categories new-style. --Lomedae 10:35, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Done The only thing that I don't get is why Zork insists on going to its own new line at the bottom. Oh well. --Acousvnt 12:07, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Phenomena From Quick VFD (April 6)


Keep I Moved these from QuickVFD because I quite liked em --Elvis 06:51, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Doh? I don't get this one. Is it a reference to a song or something? --Goomball 07:06, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Meh. It's a reference from a Muppet song, "Mahna Mahna". You can see a flash animation with the song as a soundtrack here: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view.php?id=17231 (click on the Watch this movie link on that page). The original video as performed on the Muppet Show in the 70's is funnier than the video in a minimalist way. Oh yeah, Delete; the entry doesn't belong here and isn't that funny out of context. --Uvula Donor09:10, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Keep I don't get it, but provide the context and it would be okay. --Chronarion 11:05, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Keep There are more "in" jokes around, IMHO this one is pretty good. /me likes. - --Lomedae 11:08, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Delete I eat muppets. --Rcmurphy 13:16, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep It's actually quite funny, my wife and I make this exact joke every time we see a reference to the word Phenomenon. Maybe someone finding a pic of the Muppet skit would help? --MitchO 13:19, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep The picture r0x0rs. --Acousvnt 21:06, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keep keep the article but change the title. The article could be funny in context under another title, such as 'mahna mahna'. The article Phenomena could be written to be better --Heavenlybubbles 21:19, 6 Apr 2005 (EST)

If it's going to stay, I think it should stay as "Phenomena," because the humor comes from finding out that "Mahna Mahna" is the actual intention. Putting in the picture does help; my attitude towards this article is softened somewhat. --Uvula Donor 22:11, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)
I'd just like to observe that the Muppets actually did the "Phenomena" gag themselves in Muppets Tonight with (if memory serves) Sandra Bullock. --Bonalaw 07:17, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)

How many Lightyears?

Lightyear or Light-year or Light year

Rewrite Some content needs to go though --Pantsonhead 06:04, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite/merge --Elvis 08:40, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Merged I merged all three articles to Light year, then redirected the other pages. --Uvula Donor 09:21, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

AM and Alphaman

I think it's cool Gnasip insane, butt cool! Delete This stuff should stay on his user page --Paulgb Talk 10:35, 5 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Not sure if it was necessary to put it here on VFD. Both entries should be cut and pasted onto his user page and then deleted. And that's being very generous since it's easier to just delete it all. --Uvula Donor 10:48, 5 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete Do what Uvula suggested. --Elvis 11:52, 5 Apr 2005 (EDT)

ditto --Machinecurse 16:53, 5 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Agreed.. Except I'm not an admin. Damnit, Chron. Make me an admin! I'll sweep the site to pay for your slot in the apartment. --Flammable 17:04, 5 Apr 2005 (EDT)

I copied the pages onto his user page, but I forgot to post it up here. I just finished deleting them. --Paulgb Talk 17:27, 5 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Ariel Sharon

Delete big time agenda --Pnorf 19:15, 4 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Instead of deleting the article and canceling the POV, we should try editing the articles to reverse the bias. Just an idea of how to piss people off, I will think about how it could be done for this article, so far I 'got nuttin'. If it cant be done, big time delete --Talk 20:58, 4 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewritten I took another look at it and replaced some words to reverse the POV, it may still suck but the agenda is gone. --Paulgb Talk 20:58, 4 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Not really "redeemed", but Paulgb has gotten rid of the bias, so we can put this one to bed. --Uvula Donor 08:58, 5 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Darth Doofus

Delete Not funny, and seems to be pushinga an agenda. Anyways, the name of the article doesnt help much in getting it rewritten --Nytrospawn 16:18, 2 Apr 2005 (EST)

Calling George Bush a doofus isn't really pushing a political agenda, it's just making fun of the president. I found the article funny, the only thing that would make me vote delete is that there is already at least one other good article about George Bush and not much links to it (when somthing is that bizzare, some continuity between articles could help) --Paulgb Talk 16:48, 2 Apr 2005 (EST)

I am defeated yes, disregard my ramblings --Nytrospawn 17:08, 2 Apr 2005 (EST)

I found it funny, too, and I liked the picture caption. I'd like to see it incorporated into the main Bush article somehow though, so it doesn't get lost in the shuffle. --Uvula Donor 23:10, 3 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete The caption is ganked from the bush article! --Chronarion 10:07, 5 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Yeah, has some kind of twisted potential, given the right care and attention --Pnorf 14:27, 4 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Deleted As Chrono said, the caption and pic were ganked from the main article, and the Sith references appear there, too, so there's no reason to keep this one. --Uvula Donor 13:26, 5 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Keanu Reeves

Delete or at least rewrite--starts out slightly promising but deteriorates and is never redeemed --Pnorf 23:40, 30 Mar 2005 (EST)

Delete/Rewrite Not much going for it once the "OMG I HATE KEANU HE DA SUXX0R" is removed. --Uvula Donor 13:11, 31 Mar 2005 (EST)

Delete/Rewrite Dude! That page, it fucking... it fuck... it ... --Gadgeophile 20:57, 31 Mar 2005 (EST)

Neutral Some Berk changed Hootie and the Blowfish to Hootie and the Blowjob! --iMacThere4iAm

Delete/Rewrite I guess delete it, until someone with some tact and grace decides that they need to recreate it. Or leave it, and hope someone takes mercy upon it and fixes it. --Famine 17:56, 1 Apr 2005 (EST)

Deleted --Uvula Donor 21:43, 5 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Augusto Pinochet

rewrite/delete - I think this might be a pretty factual entry, In any case, it's not funny in the least, and it seems to be rather trollish. --JHarr 15:46, 26 Mar 2005 (EST)

rewrite/delete No, wait! It's not factual, it's satire! Technically, it's funny. You just don't get it. Or maybe you do. --Uvula Donor 20:43, 27 Mar 2005 (EST)

rewrite I added to it a bit, but I'm not really sure where to go. I definitely think it should stay, but it needs a little work. --RadicalX 12:06, 29 Mar 2005 (EST)

Rewrite To be true satire it has to be even less funny. --Fazookus 20:43, 30 Mar 2005 (EST)

Delete He killed so many people... Yay!!! ...funny... HAHA... ha. --Oobie 05:05, 1 Apr 2005 (EST)

Rewritten RadicalX added a bio and I edited the original article. There is still a long way to go on this one, but we can take it out of VfD for now. --Uvula Donor 08:55, 5 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Bill of Wrongs

Definitely an agenda... not really very funny either. And it's "shalt", not "shall". --Savethemooses 11:26, 22 Mar 2005 (EST)

Balete!!! --Pnorf 12:56, 22 Mar 2005 (EST)

Rewrite Eh, it has some potential, if it were written with more dry sarcasm and less stupid. --Chronarion 19:48, 22 Mar 2005 (EST)

Delete/rewrite Stupid can be funny, too, but I like my stupid painted with a much broader brush. --Uvula Donor 21:18, 22 Mar 2005 (EST)

Delete/rewrite Agreed. It eiher needs a side order of extra stupid, or a good coating of hot'n'spicy wit. --Gadgeophile 23:58, 28 Mar 2005 (EST)

Rewritten --Uvula Donor 10:32, 5 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Nti and Ntg

A rewrite has been requested on these, but I don't think they are redeemable. Both exist because of an edit to Nth by User: Nti and Ntg were created by User: and User: The IPs are similar enough that I think the addition to Nti, Ntg and the edit to Nth were all made by the same person. Without the cruft Nth edit, I don't think these articles would be needed.-- 12:03, 2 Apr 2005 (EST)

I reverted the edit on Nth because it just contradicted the other information in the article and wasnt funny. --Paulgb Talk 14:03, 2 Apr 2005 (EST)

Delete Screw the rewrites, these stupid cruft entries should be deleted. They're not funny and they're not necessary. --Uvula Donor 23:14, 3 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Spay and Neuter Give them the Darwin. --bdanials 01:34, 4 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete them all with a clawhammer --Goomball 07:18, 4 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Deleted --Uvula Donor 21:26, 4 Apr 2005 (EDT)


This one is from QuickVFD, I brought it over here because I wasn't sure if it should be kept or not. I would not mind seeing this article gone but my vote would probably be keep. --Paulgb Talk 10:07, 2 Apr 2005 (EST)

Shrug, keep - It's okay. flamebait is ok. --Chronarion 14:26, 2 Apr 2005 (EST)

Keep I think its kinda funny. --bdanials 18:54, 2 Apr 2005 (EST)

Fine, fine, I submit. For the record, I have no particular interest in Michigan college sports. --Rcmurphy 19:32, 2 Apr 2005 (EST)

Keep ...until it gets rewritten with something better. Like, if a good article were written for it, a revert wouldn't be needed, hmm? --Uvula Donor 23:16, 3 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Redeemed Bdanials' minor edit makes the page acceptable. --Uvula Donor 08:11, 4 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Farkers and UFIA

Delete One Fark page is enough, say I. --Rcmurphy 23:19, 1 Apr 2005 (EST)

Delete One might be too many at that. No added values to the project whatsoever. --Lomedae 04:06, 3 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete There's already more than one Fark-referring page; they seemed to be everywhere last week. --Uvula Donor 23:18, 3 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Burninate Agree with above comments --Pnorf 14:28, 4 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Bye! Deleted. --Uvula Donor 21:44, 4 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Terri Schiavo

New one.

Delete I don't mean to be harsh, but this is AWFUL! The only part with a remote possibility to be funny is the haikus--Diabloman8890 21:48, 31 Mar 2005 (EST)

When I saw it, it was only Haikus. What was added?--Abc 01:31, 1 Apr 2005 (EST)

Delete A delete version had some haikus and a paragraph, and was deleted by PantsMacKenzie because of agendas and disrespect. I havn't looked in the VFD archives for it, but I have a feeling it skipped VFD. --Paulgb Talk 14:07, 2 Apr 2005 (EST)

I liked the haikus, but the paragraph that was there made me feel unclean. Whatever your views are on the matter, I think she's been in the spotlight for too long. I think it would be best if her name slipped into history and whatever remaining dignity she has/had be left where it is. --PantsMacKenzie 17:05, 2 Apr 2005 (EST)
Out of curiosity, what paragraph are we talking about? What did it say? When I saw it, there were only haikus.--Abc 00:43, 4 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Rcmurphy 14:26, 2 Apr 2005 (EST)

Delete What in the name of John Carmack ? --Nytrospawn 16:20, 2 Apr 2005 (EST)

Keep new one I would think after some major expansion, it would become a good article, as long as it doesn't mention anything related to the real Terri Schiavo. --Darkdan 16:46, 2 Apr 2005 (EST)

Delete Its still unfunny crapola.--bdanials 01:37, 4 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Deleted As a final gift to humankind, Pope John Paul II chose to die only a couple days later, thus completely removing Ms. Schiavo from the front pages of newspapers everywhere. Thank you, Your Holiness. May both of you rest in peace. --Uvula Donor 14:20, 4 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Paddington Bear

Keep/Expand Just a stub so far, but it could be expanded into somthing funny --Paulgb Talk 16:38, 28 Mar 2005 (EST)
Keep I say we keep it stubbed until someone gets around to expanding it. As it is, it's a "sketchbook" entry - an undeveloped good idea. --Uvula Donor 17:53, 28 Mar 2005 (EST)
Keep It's the germ of what could be a good entry someday. --Rcmurphy 23:49, 28 Mar 2005 (EST)

Trying too hard to make an acronym fit a pre-chosen word

Partially redeemed.

::Neutral I thought it was funny, just because its true with so many things. But, it is a long page name and so far it doesn't fit into the encyclopedia-style of uncyclopedia. --Paulgb Talk 16:38, 28 Mar 2005 (EST)

Delete/Rewrite I like it, too, but like you said, Paul, it doesn't fit as is. --Uvula Donor 17:53, 28 Mar 2005 (EST)
Rewrite / Delete This is not funny. It could be funny with a significant rewrite. --bdanials 21:08, 28 Mar 2005 (EST)
Keep I thought it was funny :-P --Chronarion 22:12, 28 Mar 2005 (EST)
Delete/Rewrite I think it should either be expanded, or just added to the Patriot Act page itself. --Rcmurphy 23:49, 28 Mar 2005 (EST)
Rewrite I'm sure there are a few more real-life examples that would make it funnier --Gadgeophile 23:42, 31 Mar 2005 (EST)
In fact, I've just kicked it off with a good example... --Gadgeophile 23:48, 31 Mar 2005 (EST)


Delete What is this? Does anyone with wikipedia experience find it funny? --Paulgb Talk 16:38, 28 Mar 2005 (EST)
Delete Thanks for bringing that one over here. I whacked the entries that shared that line, but didn't know what to do with 3RR. It isn't funny. Maybe the user who entered it was trying to leave us a message. --Uvula Donor 17:53, 28 Mar 2005 (EST)
Delete --Rcmurphy 23:49, 28 Mar 2005 (EST)
Deleted --Uvula Donor 08:36, 30 Mar 2005 (EST)


I HAVE FLUSHED IT DOWN THE CHRONOJOHN (time toilet) --Chronarion 22:15, 28 Mar 2005 (EST)

Does that mean it never happened? --PantsMacKenzie 10:18, 29 Mar 2005 (EST)

Maybe it means that next week it'll show up again --Uvula Donor 10:32, 29 Mar 2005 (EST)

ChronoJohn sounds interesting though. -- iMacThere4iAm

JLenn bEll

Deleted --Paulgb Talk 14:12, 2 Apr 2005 (EST)

Delete Am I missing something? This looks like a fricking stream-of-consciousness Xanga entry. --Rcmurphy 21:57, 27 Mar 2005 (EST)

delete eventually but check out L.O.V.E first. This guy likes llamas and nachos. --Uvula Donor 22:02, 27 Mar 2005 (EST)

Delete Entry makes no sense in a non-funny immature way --Lomedae 17:15, 29 Mar 2005 (CET)

JLenn bEll is code for Delete not quite sure if this is supposed to be funny or posing as funny.--bdanials 02:31, 31 Mar 2005 (EST)

Delete I can see promise here, but I'm not sure who is insane enough to spend the time making this worth reading. --Famine 17:58, 1 Apr 2005 (EST)

Feudal system

Redeemed. --Uvula Donor 14:23, 4 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite Germ of a good idea, but poorly executed. Needs rewrite, tidy, maybe expand a bit? --Goomball 11:31, 21 Mar 2005 (EST)

Delete/Rewrite Lame as-is. --Uvula Donor 14:39, 21 Mar 2005 (EST)

Delete --Rcmurphy 17:31, 21 Mar 2005 (EST)

Rewrite There's a corking good article in there somewhere. --The Lad Himself 17:56, 21 Mar 2005 (EST)

Rewrite It has some potential, but needs to be seriously rewritten and expanded. --bdanials 21:02, 21 Mar 2005 (EST)

I've rewritten this one, making it a joke about IBM mainframes. What do people think? (Weirdly, I can only see my rewritten version via "history". Why is this?) --CrunchyCapsicum 02:36, 1 Apr 2005 (EST)