# Writer of the Month

## January 2006

David Gerard beat out down Charles Dickens for the win.

### David_Gerard (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

• For I vote for him cause he's thr first in the list. --User:csaba
• Not only is David friendly and appreciative — two traits that should get him kicked off the admin list — he is also the author of one of my favorite articles, Fountainhead Earth, and can go from page creation to Featured status in under a week. Because of this I hereby nominate him for WotM and cast my vote as well. --User:Isra1337/sig 22:36, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For - I know it's only December 28, but I've got to agree with Isra's sentiments. He gave me some good comments on one of my early works. Huzzah, and all that. Jlove1982 03:43, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Positootley. Even though you're really married to Wikipedia, and only just fool around with Sophia when you're bored or stressed. :) -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 01:37, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• According to wikipediareview, you can tell much more about me from my Unc contributions than my wp contributions. Gosh! etc - David Gerard 15:08, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• For --Xiao Li 04:20, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For I must get this new voice chat for cellphones invention. --Rataube 03:12, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For Voice chat was brilliant.--Bradaphraser 03:21, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. Nice name too. Kakun 07:05, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Fork. §§ Mandaliet 11:15, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• I lend Royal Support to David_Gerard, and not just because I voted against all of his opponents.

--His Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the Great 20:36, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

### Charles Dickens

Underwire support ~ In retrospect, A Sale of Two Titties wasn't the worst book I ever read. It was rather good, really. And yes, I know he's run against David before, but it was a stalemate then too. I need lift and separation resolution. -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 15:47, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Against Anybody's better than this hack. Even David Gerard. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 18:20, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Get to the point already. ← Mandaliet 07:20, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. As a fellow Pompey boy I feel honour bound to support him. "It is a far, far better better thing I do than I have ever done before". -- User:Codeine/sig 12:24, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against. For taking my brains and raping them in a slow, painful, overly-described, verbose, long manner. --User:Keitei/sig 12:29, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against. In 5 years, nobody will have even heard of this guy. Mark my words.--Bradaphraser 20:47, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I've seen both the Christmas Carol and the Grinch on TV too many times. --User:Ogopogo/sig 05:30, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Now if it was Charles Dickkens (the well-known Dutch author,) it would have been a different story. --User:King In Yellow/sig 15:13, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

### One-eyed_Jack (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

• Nominate and vote. Oh my goodness, OEJ has written so much and all of it is hilarious. I couldn't live with myself if I didn't nominate him. Underappreciated and all that rot. --User:Keitei/sig 21:36, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. Yes, oh, yes. --User:Volte/sig 21:47, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Against simply because he misspells too many things --Simulacrum Caputosis 19:08, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Not bad. Weak for. --User:Lugiatm/sig 20:45, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For because [[insert witty comment here]]. --User:Gwax/sig 19:46, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• Absolutively FOR this raving nutter(!). DWIII 23:41, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• As much as I consider those with pirate names brethren, I cannot in good concious vote any way besides Against. His short, pointless edits couple with terrible grammer to create his own abomination of the English language. Furthermore, it is far from "piratesque", the only variation he could have an excuse to use. --His Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the Great 20:27, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

## February 2006

Two richly deserving writers battled it out this month, with Todd Lyons snatching victory after an end-of-the-month surge past Slackerboy. I don't even know if Anidnmeno has written anything.

### Xiao_Li (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +1

I hereby nominate user:Xiao Li --astadt 20:20, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

I nominated him last month, so that'll be a for from me, and a for from him. --80.195.22.150 08:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Bah... I need to login to vote >_< - for.

### Slackerboy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +9

With five featured articles under his belt, including The Oldest Trick in the Book and the brilliantly un-PC satire Niggers, this boy is no slacker. After losing the race for WotM last June with the flip of a coin, Slack deserves another another shot at the title. But watch out, astadt nominated his competition that month too. Nominated and voted for --User:Isra1337/sig 22:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

### Todd_Lyons (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +13
• Nomination and Vote. Besides his formerly featured articles Fecal E. Coli and The Night After Christmas, he has other two CURRENTLY making their way through VFH. Both Xiao and Slackerboy is a good writer, but is he ACTIVE these days? Todd is.--Rataube 17:05, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Comment ~ In Slack and Xiao's defense I must say that they are both still writing. They just don't post publically as often as I do, so it's easier to overlook their presence and valuable contributions. But thank you. I accept the nomination, but am withholding my vote until near the end of the month. There are certainly more talented writers than myself. :) User:Todd Lyons/sig 17:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• For Todd Lyons knows Funny, and Todd- Funny says she doesn't except bills larger than \$20, next time your on Sunset Blvd bring some change!--Claudius Prime 16:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• For him wholeheartedly. User:Rangeley/sig 19:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• FOR!!! I just love his colourful humour! Definitely one of my favourites! --User:Mahroww/sig 23:52, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. I quite enjoyed Richard M. Stallman (also featured), and was amused read on your user page that OCD was dismissed from the front page minutes after it was added. It too was an enjoyable read.--Winston 14:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Toddbot2000 gets lots of kudos for his crudhuffing skills but not enough for his excellent writing. -- Mhaillle 16:28, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• For Partly for his featured articles, but much more so for the articles that I cited when voting for him for Uncyclopedian of the Month - those which are now part of the People with distinguished names article. --User:Naughtyned/sig 21:11, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• For He actually made an article I read all the way through!! No offence to the others, though... I'm just not really a reader. Remind me again what I'm doing here? --User:MoneySign/sig 23:29, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Richard M. Stallman. Featured. Should I say more? - User:Guest/sig 13:04, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. His articles are really funny and he gives good advice. --User:Orion Blastar/sig 19:05, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• 4...umm...he's funny? --User:Clorox/sig 21:15, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• *less blatantly for* OCD... hmm the page isn't white enough...(almost forgot to sign)--TimeStopper 20:29, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Deserves it. --Algorithm (talk) 13:59, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

### Isra1337 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +3

I was really surprised when I saw that Isra had not already won WotM. So I'm nominating him. I'm sure you all agree that he has written alot of high-quality stuff, I'd post the names but I'm too lazy, there all on his userpage anyway. So yeah... Nomination and For. User:Tompkins/sig 17:39, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

### Anidnmeno (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Nomination and For I nominate anidn here because its too late to nominate him for noob of the month. I do this because hes been around for a while and has been sitting around in the corner unloved by most admins. That, and he made my poor excuse for a sig. User:Xerodagujin/sig 09:26, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

## March 2006

Doug wins. I voted for Badnarik.

Score: +8

Score: +4

### Some_user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups) (withdrawn)

Score: +4
• Nomination ~ Some user has the talent, plus a nice-sized catalogue of original works (articles and graphics), including many great additions to others' articles. ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 13:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. I was actually coming here to nominate him myself, when I just found myself VFHing another of his articles - David Gerard 15:47, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - Humility was featured, and I liked Multiple Online Personality Management as well. - User:Guest/sig 07:05, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• For: I've come across more than a few top-notch articles written by some user and I think he deserves the credit. --User:Gwax/sig 16:50, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - Afraid that my vote here would lead to charges that Some user bribed me with niceties and poundcake upon my arrival to Uncyclopedia, I've abstained from voting for a couple days but can no longer be silenced by non-existent protestation. I have no idea if this goes by just this months entries or everything leading up to this point in Unhistory, but for this month there's Humility and MOPM which are two very strong pieces, and overall I'm a huge fan of Sir Alec (I find it more challenging to invent a character that interests people as opposed to one with instant recognition, and he exceeds expectations there) and Cthulhu, amongst others. Plus there's QuoteUnquote, which I believe Some user is largely responsible for...there are other things (a stable of great pics and he's always helping people out, leaving one to wonder "where does he find the meth"?) but this is a Writer's Award...either way, this guy isn't just any user, he's Some user. And that's infinitely better. --Imrealized 06:01, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• For --GOD! 19:01, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against - And for the last time, stop nominating me for these "Wanker of the Month" awards. From now on, anyone who nominates me for a personal award of this nature is on my "permanent list." And FYI, I keep that list on a piece of paper next to the computer, just in case you were thinking of trying to feature that too. User:Some user/sig 06:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Nomination withdrawn per nominee and nominator consensus. ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 03:58, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

## April 2006

Mhaille won because he had the competition killed.

### Mhaille (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +18
• Nomination and For Mhaille deserves this alot. No kidding. He does lots of kick ass article writing, and no one seems to notice. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 20:38, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
• For......He....deserves....this.....right.... No.. bribes... involved... officer... I swear....... --User:Keitei/newsig 22:09, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
• For . Notice? What? Who am I voting for again? --User:Mindsunwound/sig 19:01, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• For-Mhaille knows his Anus--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 20:00, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. If only because he's the only literate Liverpool fan I've ever met. ;P -- Sir Codeine KUN VFP Bur. MDA NS UotM CM +S (Harangue) 16:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. User:Hinoa4/sig 16:23, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• When there are no other options, how can you vote for anyone else? For. Oh yes, I love the British poking at each-other. Weird culture you have there. 19:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Enthusiastic For. It was great chatting with you this morning. See you on Monday. ~ T. (talk) 19:50, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• For I guess...I don't know if he actually writes stuff though. User:Rcmurphy/sig 22:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. User:Rangeley/sig 23:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• For, because I've finally given up on winning this award this month.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 19:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• For, For reasons stated above--Witt E, 02:18, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• For, He's written some awesome articles and some of the modifications he's made to others have been awesome. Wholly deserving.~~User:Yuri von Juan/sig
• For. I keep on forgetting to do this... along with alot of other things. User:Tompkins/sig 01:02, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Voting seems rather pointless, but I may as well do it anyway! User:Spang/Sig 16:29, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Great Writer. --User:02barryc/Signature 20:49, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Jtaylor1 06:40, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• For--Rataube 22:02, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

## May 2006

Hindleyite won very good time. Him the writer!

Score: +7

Score: +12

## June 2006

Brad won because, well, his competition was Tompkins...

### Bradaphraser (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +22
• Nomination - a much underrated writer, Brad is the author of such classics as Yahoo!, the "brains" behind UnNews:Ask_Cthulhu and the "genius" behind Do NOT click any links!. Nuff said. -- User:Mhaille/sig
• For. How did you slip past this one for such a long time... --Olipro Anchor CUN (Harass) 18:01, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Although the competition is fierce, I'm gonna have to go with you, Brad. It's a good thing I'm paranoid! --User:Keitei/min 20:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Brad is the wind beneath my wings and other such positive votes. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 16:43, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Forgone conclusion. -- Boothman 19:28, 3 June 2006 (UTC).
• For There's no way Boothman would vote for unless he's nominating someone random. Ah well, kudos to you! --Kalir, Novice Burninator (offer instruction) 21:16, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Formost importance. --User:02barryc/Signature 08:44, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Phwar!....just HAD to give you one.... -- User:Mhaille/sig 18:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• heh. For.--Witt E, 02:57, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• For - [Insert witty praise for Bradaphraser here] --Composure1 03:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For sure. --Sir Cornbread 03:11, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• For He's a good man in a tight corner. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 14:18, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• For s'worth it just for Cthulhu. May his evil noodly appendages touch you...no, wait, that's something else entirely. Well, enough about me, For. Modusoperandi 02:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Four He's done a lot of good work around here. That's the kind of spirit we strive for. User:DiZ/sig 16:22, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. User:Hinoa4/sig4 06:36, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. --User:SonicChao/sig 13:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Sbluen 01:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Jesus, I picked a tough month to start voting here. In the end, I 'spose it's the audacity to speak for a Lovecraft character that puts Brad ahead. - Imrealized 08:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Look Ma! I conformed! User:Tompkins/sig 18:48, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Sorry, Tompkins, but I really liked Yahoo! and Ask Cthulhu is great, in my opinion. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Reefer Desk - Use it | Converse 14:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Good writing, smells like mint. User:Zim ulator/sig 19:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• For, because I'm not worthy. -- 23:21, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• For To My Biggest Fan, From Your Pal, Strong Rad 02:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: +8

# Noob of the Month

## January 2006

MoneySign got a lot of votes. Suresh was banned indefinitely for voter fraud.

### Simulacrum Caputosis

SimulacrumCaputosis (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Nominate and vote. I really like Simmy's articles on the Ark of the Covenant and Hay. i had to remember that Lech Wałęsa was made up to keep me from crying; it was soo funny and soo sad at once. Plus, anyone who writes an article on Giggles should be NotM. --Flourentina 04:27, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

### Lord Chutney

Lord Chutney (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Nominated - Frankly Vegetable Photographer of the Year and The Great Colour Robbery are works of art. --DrCamel --DrCamel 00:05, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)

### MoneySign

MoneySign (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Nominated. --User:Keitei/sig 04:28, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Undoubtedly, this noob is one of the noobiest noobs of all noobs, and is very worthy of the noobish trophy of the nooby noob of the month. For. Noob. User:Lugiatm/sig 18:23, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• One of the best photoshopping n00bs we've had in a while. For User:Dawg/sig 21:09, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• One for the Money --EvilZak 23:29, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. Based on who has voted so far, he must be good. Plus he's one of Dawg's favorite users. --User:Savethemooses/sig 00:07, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. He does some mighty fine photo shop, indeed he does. User:Tompkins/sig 03:03, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. He made me. Help. TomF006 19:06, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Ford. ££ Mandaliet 11:20, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• Is it still January? --User:Gwax/sig 19:45, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• For, with my blessing. --GOD! 20:13, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• For, MoneySign is the next stage in the evolution of the N00B. -- MonkeyUncle 23:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

### Electrostatic

Electrostatic (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Nomination --User:Keitei/sig 04:28, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• For because I like doing things that no one else is doing. ↓ Mandaliet 08:55, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Nomination -- I nominated him last month, but he is still a noob. --The Pancake Man 19:05, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For -- I think he's funny and he has made even more funny articles recently.--The Pancake Man 19:05, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• ForForFor --- Cos hes a big man --User:Whywhywhy/sig.css 06:19, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For -- A vote for me, by me. --Sir Cornbread 09:05, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

### Suresh

Suresh (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

• Nomination and vote. Last month's runner-up is still within the n00b window, but even more deserving now than when he was orignally nominated. -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 00:14, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Quick.....vote for Suresh, before its too late...... -- User:Mhaille/sig
• For I am so immensly proud for the work the guys in the campaign organisation are doing that I even consider start campaigning myself. Though I fear ending up as an Academy Award eternal loser Peter O'Toole - or Arnold Schwarzenegger at the Razzies.--Suresh 14:33, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• FOR because this user is poised, witty and humble. Prettiestpretty 21:43, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional FOR. If an admin can verify a Suresh Signting on IRC, I will be pleased. Good writer, sane, intelligent individual. Likely destined for Adminship if the wind blows int he right direction.--User:Flammable/sig 03:03, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Condition fulfilled--Suresh 11:09, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. He truely deserves it, far much better than any other candidate. --Rataube 05:44, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC) Feel for a vice presi n00bidency?--Suresh 11:09, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For He's ok!.--John Doe 19:20, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• For I agree.--John Doe's brother 19:20, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• For He is truly a gifted writer. Nobel Prize next.--Horace Engdahl 20:20, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• We are amused. And he is a friend of that lovely Rataube.--Victoria, Royal Princess of Sweden 20:25, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• 1 Vote for Suresh, And two votes against Savethemooses votes!--The Swedish Moose Hunting Society 20:25, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• I just love him. . And he writes articles too!--Angelina Jolie 20:45, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• I can't lie. He's my guy! --Jack Abramoff 22:45, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• He is Fair, I am for--Nicolai Ceausescu 23:45, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Para Suresh MoneySign es un representant vil para la economía imperialista del capitalista y contra la revolución socialista y la gente de Cuba--Fidel Castro 23:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• I rule Florida vote Suresh--Judge N. Sanders 23:45, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
• A true Poet Such a shame we have to destroy the planet!--Prostetnic Vogon Jelt 23:45, 31 January 2056 (UTC)

### Rataube

Rataube (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Nomination Only He congratulated me on Writer of the Month. Congrats to you, Rataube, your ass-kissery has worked! But I'm holding off my vote for a bit. --User:Savethemooses/sig 23:16, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Todd Lyons wrote to some guy who wanted your post to be political and i took the advise for myself. But, 1 I do sincerely congratulate u for being Writer of the Month, it is an honor that not anyone can get. I hope some day i can join the club. 2 I expect uncyclopedians to vote me couse they value my contributions. 3 I would apreciate any comment you have on my work. --Rataube 23:27, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Wait!! I didn't even post my lousy begginer's imitation of a template asking to vote me at your page. I just congratulated you. --Rataube 23:39, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Where the fuck am I? For. Kakun 00:02, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• I vote for myself. --Rataube 00:19, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Not so sure User:Tompkins/sig 00:25, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Don't say i am problably a good writer. Read me!! (Jewish History, Miguel de Cervantes, Faery Kingdom)
Upon much further consideration I'm rescinding my vote, and electing to abstain from this nomination. --User:Volte/sig 18:39, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. Pictures will come soon.--Rataube 02:44, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• I'm game. He/she/it is certainly on top of this nomination. Prettiestpretty 01:53, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I'm changing my vote to Against. I'm annoyed by the electioneering which seems desperate to me. Prettiestpretty 21:40, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I trully am. As you've noticed i am doing a vote for me campaign. But you still have to vote me or you'll eaten by a grue as i've previously warned you. And after the grue throws u up, I will ask User:Tompkins/sig to send Chuck Norris to kick your face. And you wouldn't like that, would you?? Peace and Love--Rataube 02:40, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
This last message is contrary to my campaign purpose. I started it by admitting my weakness, that Im promoting myself. Then I remarked the negative side of the campaing, its violence. I even used negatively connotated words such as campaign that make me look as a filthy politician. I've done all the basic marketing mistakes. --Rataube 02:57, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
This last message is even worst. --Rataube 02:57, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Read the previous messege. --Rataube 02:57, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• A noob if I ever saw one. Almost... too nooby... against. User:Lugiatm/sig 18:26, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• I'm gonna go for no. Also annoying. Sorry. User:Keitei/sig 18:34, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Sorry, but your inability to type three letters is your downfall. Against User:Dawg/sig 21:05, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I pull out. --Rataube 05:36, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)

....as the Vicar said to the Nun. Sadly folk, we have our first fall at the first hurdle with half the race to go. I'd like to thank Rataube for his "contribution" to this months race. -- User:Mhaille/sig What about a vice n00bidency?--Suresh 09:19, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Thanx Suresh, but the boat has sunk and the captain sinks with it. Thanks to you to Mhaile. Now go and get moneysign. --Rataube 15:13, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)

## February 2006

The Count of Monkey Crisco took home the pacifier after Mahroww honorably withdrew, being slightly past the Nooblet stage.

### Bonzodog (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +3
• Super awesome. --User:Keitei/sig 01:36, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Genuinely funny newcomer.....I see great things coming from him. -- User:Mhaille/sig 12:11, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bonus for being a Linux Geek. ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 04:59, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

### Deathz0r (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +3

Nomination and For. On a recent noob hunt I was lucky enough to fine this nice gentlemen. Although I've never met him, nor had any indirect contact with him whatsoever. I do enjoy his work, especially Justice. While he is still a noob, and could make some writing improvements, I think he's just as qualified as any other noob, if not more so. Besides just writing articles he also votes on VFH and such, and consistently makes the right choice. Oh and by the way, Deathz0r could totally kick Mahroww's ass. User:Tompkins/sig 02:24, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: Hey, no fair! Mommy, Tompkins is resorting to negative attack advertising... More importantly, what exactly happens on a "noob hunt"? Can others join in? --Some user 03:43, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• I never have actually came into contact with Deathz0r, but I know the name and therefore he is notable so weak for. --User:Lugiatm/sig 09:00, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• For per Lugiatm. Knowing how to use IRC is quite an achievement. - User:Guest/sig 13:08, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

### Mahroww (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +6

(disqualified: joined 9 December 2005)

Nominated (and for). Smart, low-key, doesn't vote much, and in general not a glory-hound... but makes some good, constructive edits, helps out a lot on RadicalX's Corner, and what's more, clearly likes polar bears. Also the only person (so far) to add any new anagrams to Sir Alec Dow, Anagrammatist, and good anagrams take a lot of strenuous mental effort. I say we need more users like Mahroww! --Some user 01:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Comment, he's also the author of Image:rms.jpg--Rataube 14:10, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Why not? Mahroww is a very happy helpful chap who needs to start using IRC. Foooor. --User:Lugiatm/sig 08:59, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• For citing RadicalX's Corner. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 01:08, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Crisko is pretty good. But Mharoww seems to be far more active. Great wok at RadX's, helps others a lot, including me.--Rataube 22:38, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• (sigh) A great photoshopper (and fast!), a great person, a great addition to this website... and, unfortunately, a couple of months past his noob expiration date. ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 16:32, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. I'm pretty sure I can vote for more than one. He's definately deserving it. User:Tompkins/sig 20:00, 25 February 2006 (UTC) If I could vote again, it'd be for. User:Tompkins/sig 20:53, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment--A deserving chap indeed, but has he written an article yet? And (just to be a really wet blanket), the rules above state "you may vote ONCE". Sorry. ^_^.--Winston 20:45, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• For Nice work. --User:Clorox/sig 21:17, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Us photoshopping n00bs must stick together. --User:MoneySign/sig 21:22, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Hey, thanks everyone. Your votes are/were all the reward I need. Plus the very few rules we have here SHOULD apply in EVERY situation. --User:Mahroww/sig 06:09, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

hopefully I at least earned the right to put this ugly ass thing here! HI TODD

### Count_of_Monkey_Crisco (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +6
• Nomination. Children are afraid of him since he is the creator of the Evil Cookie Monster, which is also my favourite highlighted image. An he has an alleged article at VFH too!!--Rataube 14:06, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• For I found cookie monster searching through the cruft in new image gallery. Good show!--User:Bradaphraser/sig 19:19, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Extremely Strong For An incomparably superior human being. Also just built a Mick Foley article from the ground up.--Count of Monkey Crisco 17:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Midget Cockpunching Terrorists would have swung it alone, even without all the other edits and the groovy images. -- User:Codeine/sig 11:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. The name alone gives him a few points, but the articles and the Evil Cookie Monster make him maybe the best candidate on here. --User:Hinoa4/sig 16:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very funny stuff and doesn't use copyrighted materials as some others have. Neoliminal 08:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. I say for simply because the your name gives me a little chuckle. *chuckle. User:Xerodagujin/sig 09:17, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

## March 2006

There was no Noob of the Month for March. The race was long, but ultimately underwhelming.

### Villahj_Ideeut (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +2

Nomination and For. He's a good guy, started off kinda slow on IRC, but eventually got less noobish. Writes some pretty good articles, and also has begun patrolling the Recent Changes Area. Basically, just an all-around good guy. (I think Guy...) User:Tompkins/sig 02:02, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

• Wait, hasn't he been around for longer than the allowed time? Oh well, definate for if not...--User:Bradaphraser/sig 05:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment: First edit February 23, so.. I'm pretty sure that makes the cut. User:Tompkins/sig 15:10, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• ${\displaystyle x=\log _{x}{2^{2x}}}$ - User:Guest/sig 18:16, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. Hes a really sweet guy once you get to know him. -- User:Villahj Ideeut/sig 00:20, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against He is not sweet, in fact he is more annoying then me (in my opinion), always wanting to know "What is ZB nomiated for this month so I can vote against him?"...well Villahj, looks like you and me have one thing in common. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 12:42, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Neutral He bribed me with a cookie. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 17:51, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment: Both of you... how old are u? 5? Uncy is not the playground for silly childish fights. Grow up.--Rataube 14:06, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment: This is neither childish or trivial behavior Rataube, it is a vendetta, and when it comes to such important things awards nothing is more important then childish fights vendettas. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 14:22, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment: If you seriously care that much about votes for awards then by all means vote against me if it makes you feel better. I obviously don't vote against you on spot, I said that because I know very well you have an ego that takes several 18 wheeler trucks to carry around. -- User:Villahj Ideeut/sig 17:23, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Fjord Seems interesting, or something. May or may not make puppies cry. Jlove1982 03:53, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against Sucks. User:Dawg/sig 02:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against User:Mahroww/sig 07:24, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against I voted for the Other Guy. Yendor33 23:45, 24 March 2006 (UTC) Retracted. Unfair to vote FOR someone and against everyone else. Yendor33 02:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For I like his style. --User:SimulacrumCaputosis/sig201:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. HE would fit in ED.--Rataube 12:40, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. lol what a nub --User:Joe857/sig 12:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. There's not one nominee I'd like to vote for, so I decided to vote against my least "favourite". --User:MoneySign/sig 18:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Forgetaboutit, Against User:Kakun/sig 12:48, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against as per above. --User:Isra1337/sig 21:17, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Extreme lesbian maybe. Not too sure about VI... --User:Lugiatm/sig 20:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Extreme lesbian maybe? does that mean I have to do some sort of lesbian act to get you to vote For? -- User:Villahj Ideeut/sig 01:28, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

### Dzugavili (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +2

Nomination. Although this n00b has been around for less then a week (as of this nomination) he (?) has created 4 funny articles (see his userpage for a list) uploaded 3 decent pictures (I enjoyed his V for Vendetta picture myself) and helped out on a few pages, done reverts, and has created a template. I look forward to seeing more of Dzugavili's work, and think that he deserves this award already, and may deserve it more later on in the month. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 17:57, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Comment He also apperantly comes on IRC. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 22:17, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment: Eww..... -- User:Mhaille/sig
Comment Yah Mhaille I totally said "cum" didn't I...--User:Zombiebaron/sig 04:04, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment: Damn, he nominated my John Aaron article for NRV within a couple of minutes of me adding it - Actually he could be right, I'm a n00b myself, but I thought it was over the top to NRV it myself. Guinness2702 02:22, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment: That article was seriously boring (not to mention short). Also, John Aaron is probably not famous enough to deserve it. Have you considered ripping off the Wikipedia article on him?Dzugavili 02:26, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment: Acctually Guiness, having looked at the old edit to witch the NRV was added, it appears that Dzugavili was completely justified. Aswell it is good to see that this n00b, only a few days old, has started patrolling either the recentchanges or the newpages, and is adding NRVs where nesscassary. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 12:39, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. He reverted vandalism in one of my articles.--Rataube 14:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC). Withdrawn for Tompd comment.--Rataube 16:26, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Because I no longer have a vote tied up with Village Idiot. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 18:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• For: Because if I didn't, I'd be a fool. A real "Village Idiot". Muahahaha. Dzugavili 04:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. I like his work. --Hobelhouse 01:46, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Umm... Dzugavili's last edit was on March 9th... if you don't believe me check his contributions... I think we at least need a noob that is active... User:Tompkins/sig 04:52, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

*Conditional against. If this user doesn't return, he's not active, and therefore not worthy of an award.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 08:07, 24 March 2006 (UTC)He has returned!--User:Bradaphraser/sig 06:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

• Against. He's not here... ever. And even when he was it was very limited. User:Tompkins/sig 16:16, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against I voted for the Other Guy. Yendor33 23:45, 24 March 2006 (UTC) Retracted. Unfair to vote FOR someone and against everyone else. Yendor33 02:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

### Imrealized (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +1

Nomination and for. This person's only been here two days (unlike my last nominee, sorry about that), but has already posted three top-quality (IMHO) pieces - Sith Vicious, The Dearth Star, and the brilliant WWJJD?. Doesn't even have a user page yet (as of 3/11), but if he keeps this up, well... Let's just say I'm impressed as all get-out. User:Some user/sig 19:28, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

• Against for... uhm, reasons. Although I'm not a member of the cabal, it does have reasons. - User:Guest/sig 18:27, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• O_o ... "it" has reasons? Wow, that's conspiratorial-sounding. I admit, I'm curious, but it's not my nature to pry. --User:King In Yellow/sig 21:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - Is Im the underdog here? Is there a reason I haven't voted yet for noob of the month? I'm here to amend those situations - with violence. User:Wild Weasel/sig 11:44, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! I like 'im, even if he is a PA-THE-TIC-CAR-BON-SACK! Plus, Imrealized has shown some dazzling wit with WWJJD?. We need to encourage him (my, I'm presuming a lot on the gender front) to continue, and I'm all too happy to do so by voting in his favor. --User:King In Yellow/sig 20:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - What the hell? Might as well vote for me, I guess. Hmm... what did I do to warrant this vote? Oh yeah, that's right. --Imrealized 01:13, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
You forgot that you also added pics to Tom Cruise, Timothy Leary and Brothers Grimm that kinda spruced 'em up. --Imrealized 01:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Against User:Dawg/sig 02:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. If we're going to be subjected to another dramatized progression of wikipsychosis, I'd rather just skip to the last step ASAP. ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 03:07, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I'm not important enough for him to talk to me on IRC.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 05:29, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• it turns out this was a misunderstanding. I withdraw my against.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 06:03, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Here for such a short period and with such numerous superb articles. All politics aside, it's talent that counts, write? Yendor33 23:47, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. He left.. not active, against.. User:Tompkins/sig 23:48, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• He's back... However, I reserve the right to vote Against whoever I want, and I'd like that to be clear. User:Tompkins/sig 01:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Againstish... To read his talkpage, or his userpage, or really anything of his, you'd think he was some kind of asshole asshole asshole bitter, maladjusted person or something. --Guffawing Crow 11:56, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Forchristsake I'm so Against! User:Kakun/sig 12:51, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• For: I find his contributions and votes to be high quality and in line with the Uncyclopedia ethos. There's enough potential in this play-dough to make a good Uncyclopedian. --User:Gwax/sig 20:04, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Due to the choices this month, I am following Moneysign's lead and voting against my least favourite.--Winston 20:36, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Clearly the most talented candidate. --User:So So 29 March 2006
• For Very funny, I cant wait to see more. --Thenonprophet 03:12, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

### Angrypeasant (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 0

Nomination and for. Okay guys, first of all, he's my friend and that's why i'm nominating him. He's been here merely a week, but he wrote (started) four articles, one language, and two user templates (scientologist and guitarist) and one picture.. i especially like Tom Cruise's inventions, think they're pretty funny. The Tool (band) article is also not bad, but I think that unfortunatelly, only fans of this band will "get the point" since most of the "jokes" there are closely related to something Tool did.. - User:Paganistic 11:17, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

• For. I don't even think I should really count, seeing as I am the biggest newb this site has ever seen, but I read the Tool article a while ago, and found it hilarious, so I thought I had to vote.I hope I've done this properly... --Maxiwelli 17:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. I find myself to be very funny and I really enjoy my own company. :))) -- User:Angrypeasant 11:21, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Against Lame nomination. User:Dawg/sig 02:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 03:09, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• NEG-A-TIVE. Not enough on-site presence. Never even seen a single edit by the gent. --User:King In Yellow/sig 13:09, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against I voted for the Other Guy. Yendor33 23:45, 24 March 2006 (UTC) Retracted. Unfair to vote FOR someone and against everyone else. Yendor33 02:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Forgive me for being so Against User:Kakun/sig 12:49, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Beccause I laughed so hard at Fart filter I almost peed myself. Flourentina 00:26, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

### alia_kenobi (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +3

Nomination. My vote is already tied up for VI this month, but alia's actually done a pretty good job in the stort time she's been here. Internet pillaging, free, and HowTo:Cook Children are actually very entertaining, and she's done some more besides. If she doesn't win this month, I'll re-nom her next, because I really think she's doing a great job here for a beginner.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 23:09, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

• For- Jules: "I wouldn't go so far as to call a Noob filthy but they're definitely dirty. But, a Noob's got personality. Personality goes a long way." This Noob has got personality!--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 19:46, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - Have to say its been a tough choice this month to pick from the candidates. -- User:Mhaille/sig 21:00, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: I like her, and I support her nomination... although not officially. User:Tompkins/sig 22:14, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. Good luck in your editing future. User:Hinoa4/sig 18:58, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional for. Only if we must have a n00b of the month every single month. Couse I think we should just skip it this month.--Rataube 13:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: If I werent obligated to vote for myself I would vote for her. -- User:Villahj Ideeut/sig 22:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

## April 2006

Alia kenobi put up a stiff fight, but Spang edged her out by one vote.

### Smerdis_of_Tlön (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 0

A damn fine writer and I'm glad to have done what I can to lure him in. St. Ides, Zucchini, North Sea Archipelago - the last is LOL material. It's so nice to see a 'Merkin who can actually do dry wit - David Gerard 18:33, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

• For, of course - David Gerard 18:35, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Not noob material. Read the Rules above.--Jtaylor1 06:45, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

### Bear (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +0

Nomination It's too bad he was overlooked until now... User:Tompkins/sig 21:06, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

For. --So So 07:44, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Against. - I really don't feel entitled to this award. Please don't waste a vote here when there are other deserving candidates. But thanks for noticing me. That's the bit that is meaningful to me. --Bear 16:31, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

### Mindsunwound (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +2

Nomination Absolutely no qualities whatsoever. Not one. Not a single little teeny tiny one. None. User:Tompkins/sig 20:50, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

• I am sooooo voting FOR myself... over and over and over... Oh yeah baby... I know how I like it! --User:Mindsunwound/sig 15:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against, for voting against every single entry on VFH. --User:Isra1337/sig 21:31, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Actually that isn't true... the ones I did vote for were removed... --User:Mindsunwound/sig 21:59, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

### Spang (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +8

Nomination.....excellent start to his/her/whatever Uncyclopedian career. Keep the great work up. -- User:Mhaille/sig 13:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

• For At least so far, this is the best candidate. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 22:27, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. I was going to hold off from voting until I was sure he wouldn't make a 180, but what the hell! Take a chance. --User:MoneySign/sig 19:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I've done a 180. For, make that a 360. Or a 0! Yeah. User:Spang/Sig 04:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Definately an up and coming member here. User:Rangeley/sig 20:37, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Probably insane, but still a nice guy. --Kaizer the Bjorn[MUN] [TALK] NS CM [email protected] 01:50, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• For I'm impressed with his writing and he does maintenance stuff as well. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 02:03, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• (Move log); 11:54 . . Spang (Talk | contribs | block) (moved Jews to Concentration camps). I'm very tempted to vote against, I'm sick of this kind of humour around uncy. I know, I know, Nobody cares...--Rataube 16:40, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
It wasn't my idea, I just happened to be the one to volunteered to do it for the one day that reskin was up. It's definitely not the favouritest of all the edits I've made - the IRC club just decided it would be appropriate for the reskin :) User:Spang/Sig 16:55, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Almost worst possible answer in this context. Reminds me of Eichmann's trial--Rataube 17:15, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Harsh. User:Spang/Sig 17:23, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Awwww, Rataube... I agree that it's crap-humour, this nazi stuff... I was against the Hitler reskin all the time... But in context of A) the reskin, and B) the goddamn cabal (which this n00b doesn't know well yet), can Spang not be forgiven? Just this once? --User:MoneySign/sig 17:26, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Trying to excuse it arguing conformity to A) the mainstreem and B) an authority, is worse than the joke itself. Those were the same excuses given by the people who helped to carry the final solution plan, including the topest Nazi officers. I was only tempted to vote against until he tried to excuse himself in such a way. I removed my vote, but Spang, please read Wikipedia:en:Milgram experiment, ok?.--Rataube 18:44, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
In light of the situation, this Jew forgives him. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 17:28, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Nobody Cares Sorry, Rataube, I disagree. IMHO Uncyc is more about humor and less about worrying about insulting certain people or groups of people. Humor exposes the stupidity of humans more powerfully than this kind of stuff.
I doubt so. But let me remind you that humor also exposes the stupidity of both the author and the reader. I'm not against offensive humor, but against highlighting it and expanding it all over uncy at the expense of the quality stuff we have.--Rataube 16:45, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Difficult for me to choose this month, a lot of good n00bs, many whom I nommed, but I think Spang just shades it. -- User:Mhaille/sig 18:10, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• For because I'm a conformist. --User:Savethemooses/sig 17:40, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

### RobertoW (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +1

Nomination.....excellent start to his/her/whatever Uncyclopedian career. Keep the great work up. -- User:Mhaille/sig 13:26, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

• For Screw you all, I love cheese and I'll vote for myself if I want to. Just cause I got no friends, mutter mutter gits mutter. --RobertoW 00:50, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

### Zim_ulator (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +0

Nomination -- I have to nom someone.. cuz... Yeah. Zim's good, he votes, his articles are about 5 times the size of my head, and he fears MoneySign. User:Tompkins/sig 00:08, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

### alia_kenobi (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +7

Nomination and For. Alia is an excellent n00b. I stand by my nomination from last month.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 21:24, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

for well if i dont vote for me who will.... (ill come up with something better to say later)--Alia kenobi 21:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

### Seamus_Mahoney (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 1

Nomination.....excellent start to his/her/whatever Uncyclopedian career. Keep the great work up. -- User:Mhaille/sig 22:35, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

• For. His last name is similar to mine, and I like this guys stuff. --PiOfFive 17:00, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

## May 2006

It was kind of an embarrassing month for everyone except Hardwick Fundlebuggy. Let's just leave it at that.

### Boothman (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: 0
• For. This person is really, really good. -- Somebody other than Boothman 12:52, 10 May 2006 (UTC).
Retracted. -- Boothman 09:11, 17 May 2006 (UTC).
• Comment You don't have to retract your own vote. It's a time-honored Uncyc tradition to vote for oneself. User:Rcmurphy/sig 19:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Retracted. User:Tompkins/sig 01:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

*Against until this user withdraws his against-vote on other candidate(s). --User:MoneySign/sig 00:52, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Good lad. ^_^ --User:MoneySign/sig 19:09, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

### Hardwick_Fundlebuggy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +17

Nomination (Before it's too late). He writes good and seems like a nice person. Bouncy Castle is particularly brilliant. An all round good n00b in my opinion. User:Spang/Sig 13:37, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

• For the castle. --{{User:Suresh/sig}} 07:31, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For-Good writer, good guy.--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 15:58, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Since I can't vote for alia again, I'll go with HF.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 15:02, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Voting time has come. User:Spang/Sig 16:31, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - Like Janet Jackson, he is an inspiration to n00bs everywhere. Should be showered with fruit. --Vivifica 10:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I have found no good reason to ban this user. 01:14, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, have to admit, this guy's good. -- Boothman 09:11, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Rescinded -- Boothman 19:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC).
• For. Janet Jackson also gives me hope. I pray that, one day, that I too will get to the point where I can expose my tackle at a Superbowl. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 03:02, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Rescinded --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 03:02, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Unrescinded --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 03:02, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
No, no, wait a minute - I changed my mind again. I rescind the unrescinded rescindation.--Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 03:02, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Aw heck - since he's here and breathing (just), I suppose I'd better vote for the demented crack-addict--Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 03:02, 19 May 2006 (UTC).
Go Janet! Spin, puppet, spin! --Vivifica 10:46, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Cause he's a nice man, and a good pianist. --User:Zombiebaron/sig2 22:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Alas, 'tis too late for me, and Bouncy Castle was sheer genius. Demonbob 11:47, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, because he is the only one on this page I've heard of. ~ 17:24, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For It's a bit foregone, but anyone who knows about the Departure of Fun has to be a decent fellow. --Kalir, Savant of Utter Foolishness! (yell at me) 04:26, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. User:Hinoa4/sig 18:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. 1. Because I can. 2. Because HF is cool. User:Yuri von Juan/sig
• For. I was gonna vote for the Emo Paul Chuckle dude, but changed my mind. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 21:01, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I wish i could be as funny a noob as him. --Usewho'sname? 09:36, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Queen and Country! -- User:Mhaille/sig 13:40, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. As much as my support for NotM seems to be the kiss of death to most candidates, it's doubtful that Hardwick will crash from this altitude. Unless we're hit unexpectedly by a missle volley of No votes. ~ T. (talk) 15:53, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I'm cool too... right? Guys?!?! HEY! I'M COOL TOO!!! RIGHT?!?!! User:Tompkins/sig 23:40, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I like this guy even more than TOMPKINS! lol, just kidding. --User:Kaizer the Bjorn/sig 03:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

### jrolee (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +1
• Gets my nomination for his brilliant emo_paul_chuckle and picture. Very funny. User:leedaflea
• For - better than Hardwick Funglebuddy and Boobman put together. -- Boothman 19:12, 18 May 2006 (UTC).
• I hate to be the party pooper, but against. The only article I've seen that he's worked on is one that's based on the ages-old Bangkok joke (which sadly still makes me chuckle). Sorry. User:Hinoa4/sig 19:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Comment, ommm, boo hiss boo, you're not allowed to vote against someone because then you DIE!!!!! -- Booooothman 19:40, 18 May 2006 (UTC).

## June 2006

Nydas scored the win. I know - Nydas? I don't know who he is either.

Score: +6

### Nydas (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +12
• Nomination. Several really good articles, particularly the Adventure gamebook. User:Tompkins/sig 19:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Loved the adventure gamebook. Hated the accursed sister. --User:Mordillo/sig 23:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Laughed my ass off on the adventure gamebook. Bananas21ca 14:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Reminds me of a childhood I never had --Nytrospawn 01:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Me gusta mucho. Adventure gamebook is as funny as a fat kid. 'Nuff said. --Sir Cornbread 05:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• For--User:Rataube/sig 23:29, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For per nom -- Boothman 09:38, 17 June 2006 (UTC).
• For Some good noobs here, but Nydas, he got da featured article in da bag. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 10:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• The Fabulous Four and the Secret Passage -- User:Mhaille/sig 11:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• For ~User:SimulacrumCaputosis/sig615:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! Sadly enough, I actually owned the books pictured. Yay, I'm a ragin' dork! --User:King In Yellow/sig 13:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. User:Hinoa4/sig4 06:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• For because I own Lair of the Lich, and anyone who includes it in an article is a god good person to vote for. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 15:02, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. I was going to vote for CScott, because he seems like such a decent fellow, but then I realized that Adventure gamebook was awesome and not giving this award to the author would be a crime against humanity. ...stupid Geneva Convention...--User:Bradaphraser/sig 01:48, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

### Snerlin (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: -1
• Nomination. An obvious underdog, but I really like his/her style, and enjoyed reading his article and his pictures are pretty good and I like his/her name and... User:Tompkins/sig 19:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Rubbish at klik. -- Boothman 23:02, 10 June 2006 (UTC).

### Usewho'sname? (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +4
• Nomination and For I saw them doing stuff, and they say they started added to Handgun, so why nut? --Kalir, Novice Burninator (offer instruction) 16:31, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• For, certainly. ~ 16:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• ooooo I feel all warm and fuzzy inside now:), I'd just like to thank.....ummmmm..... well who ever it was that posted about this site on which ever random other site i was reading at the time so as to bring me here to this random site. Also my heartfelt thanks go out to Kalir for his insanity thoughtfulness in such an stupid excellent nomination.--Usewho'sname? 01:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• thats a For by the way.--Usewho'sname? 01:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• and so is This, does that mean i get awarded another point?--Usewho'sname? 01:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• 4how about if I do it not signed in? is that yet another point for me?--80.195.7.191 01:23, 2 June 2006 (UTC) ummm that's me as is me and someone totally NOT ummMMMM user what's his name again?
• Against, blatent POV. -- Boothman 12:29, 2 June 2006 (UTC).
• Comment Wouldst thou care to elaborate on that? And given your history, it had best be a good explanation, or else I nullify your vote probably breaking quite a few rules while doing so in a justified manner. --Kalir, Novice Burninator (offer instruction) 04:46, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Has he answered your query yet? Just wondering because i want to change from being a blatant Pope On Viagra ( that is what it means isn't it? or is it Popeye On Valium?).--Usewho'sname? 23:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• No, POV stands for Packer of Vudge. In other words, you're a fudge packer. -- Boothman 16:09, 5 June 2006 (UTC).
• How did you guess? Although I have to admit that you are several weeks out of date, I got moved to the toffee packing production line at my request. Better pay, more overtime and less stupid innuendo from people who found out what I did for work.... hang on a sec... was THAT what you meant? WOW that was witty of you!--Usewho'sname? 23:46, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• The debate gods are unsatisfied. Your vote gets nullified. --Kalir, Novice Burninator (offer instruction) 17:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• I like this guy. He's obviously crazy and isn't afraid of showing it in public, even though the police will be after him. A resounding for. User:Yuri von Juan/sig 13:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against, no reason has to be given. -- Boothman 18:57, 5 June 2006 (UTC).
• Comment You had your chance, and you blew it miserably. You can only vote once for a n00b, as the rules say. Keep it up and you can give Tompkins grounds to ban you. --Kalir, Novice Burninator (offer instruction) 00:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against, umm no, that's not how a poll works. If you keep striking through my votes they are rescinded and thus I get another vote. Is this a good enough reason then; "I don't think he's very funny". -- Boothman 19:53, 6 June 2006 (UTC).
Comment If you two don't quit fucking about with the vote tally, neither of you gets a vote. Especially Boothman. -- User:Codeine/sig 00:00, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Apology Sorry, but Boothman's getting really irritating with his devil-may-care attitude towards these awards. I don't want my vote incinerated though, my vote's the nomination. --Kalir, Savant of Utter Foolishness! (yell at me) 04:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Lol. I didn't care much before, but the above debate warrants voteage. Boothman=served. Demonbob 22:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

### Sliferjam (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: -0
• Nomination and For He badgered me into nomming him, so I suppose I must vote 4. He's done some stuff, so why not? User:Zim ulator/sig 17:38, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Well, everybody votes for themselves... You should vote. For me, if at all possible. Look at my stuff. I deserve this, or so I am told. Your mom would vote for me. And Jesus would vote for me. So why don't you? Sliferjam 22:11, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• For I vote for sliferjam. I am not sliferjam. I just resemble him. olipro
• For I vote for sliferjam. I am not sliferjam. I just resemble him. caitai
• For. He writes good and is conserveative, get it? User:Jack mort/sig00:44, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• For I vote for HUGGING sliferjam, not for noob of the month. jsonitsac
• For I vote for sliferjam. I am not sliferjam. I just resemble him. Villahj Ideeut
• For I vote for sliferjam. I am not sliferjam. I just resemble him. Tayor
Crossed out fake votes made by nominee. --User:MoneySign/sig 00:54, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• for we had wild AOLer sex on IRC --User:Kaizer the Bjorn/sig 01:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against Making fake votes is a horrible thing. --User:Suresh/sig 09:05, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against Agreed. --Algorithm 05:26, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against Treats Template: namespace as his vanity. --User:Splaka/sig 05:30, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against because he made fake votes (and not very convincing, at that). I would expect such an undemocratic thing like that from a Wikipedian; but from one of our own, it's a shame. --DiZ 19:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against This'll teach you to make up fake votes! --User:Zombiebaron/sig 14:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

# Uncyclopedian of the Month

## January 2006

After a twelve-year dominance by Americans, Codeine the Brit finally breaks the European UotM losing streak.

### Codeine (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

• Nomination and vote. ~ From rollbacks to rangeblocks, I really do think Cody "spends 99% of (his) time on Uncyclopedia reverting fucking vandalism."™ He's fun on IRC, is still working on articles despite the admin "moratorium" (I was too chicken to make the "bandwidth infidel / online jihad" thing fly, and still am, but he hasn't given up), and is overall a great Uncyclopedian that I (and many others) owe a lot to. Cheers. :) -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 13:55, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Agreed. User:Lugiatm/sig 18:30, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Cheerfully Accepted. - Provided I don't have to put any gay dinosaurs in my sig if I win. -- User:Codeine/sig 12:03, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• A gentleman and a scholar. For. User:Mhaille/sig 12:06, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For why not --User:Whywhywhy/sig.css 11:16, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. Good admin, and makes good/funny articles. --Sir Cornbread 05:43, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For for sure. --User:Ogopogo/sig 06:10, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• GO GO CODY POWAR!! --User:Keitei/sig 11:33, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For I guess He's all right. I mean, he's nothing special, but whatever. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 01:11, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• A definite for. --User:Volte/sig 01:19, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For He's the best of the one candidates available.--Bradaphraser 04:58, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• For User:Rangeley/sig 16:26, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• Far --User:Zombiebaron/sig 17:41, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
• Oh Ja! He makes the crap go boom, and therefore merits my full, unadulterated support. --King In Yellow 17:58, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Jock Strap User:Dawg/sig 18:56, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• If the DAWG and Sir Todd Lyons think so, then he must be swell.--Claudius 16:38, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• For & Mazal Tov --User:Kakun/sig 09:55, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
1. For--User:Elvis/sig 16:29, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

### Some_user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

• Nomination and vote ~ I'm sticking my neck out here but I am nominating User: Some user because I feel that he (at least I think he's a he) is not only deserving for his body of work on the Wikipedia series (Wikipedophiles Veil of Smoke and Mirrors et. al.), and because his images are so damn funny that they almost make me pee, but also because he has been incredibly gracious and supportive to newbies like me on this site. I understand that theres something to be said for inner circle favorites, but how Wikipedialike is that? Codeine is a very worthy person as well, and I admire his body work and wish to God that I could be so great at things. But I just feel that Some user makes Uncyclopedia a better place, and that he's made it a better place for me as well. FOR Prettiestpretty 00:53, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
While it's very kind and gratifying, I'd like to politely withdraw my name from consideration on this page, if that's OK with everyone. Please note, however, that this should not be interpreted as a suggestion on my part that I'm not wholly deserving of every signal honor and/or award ever invented, including the Nobel Prize for Being a Really Swell Guy. Thank you, and we now return you to your regularly-scheduled wiki. --Some user 04:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

### Xiao_Li (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Nominated for saving me a heeluva lot of time with those userboxes. --User:Lugiatm/sig 11:12, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

• For just because. ΞΞ Mandaliet 11:24, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

## February 2006

Algorithm and Gwax unambiguously won. Zombiebaron, well, the jury is still out but I had to archive this stuff.

### Algorithm (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Nomination and Vote ~ Between the introduction of the NRV tag (which we're now all hooked on like crack) and his hard work on overhauling all the templates to integrate time stamping, deletion, and/or new MediaWiki functions, I think he's kicked some serious ass around here lately in helping us all to keep this dump organized. --User:Todd Lyons/sig 05:40, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• Well, what can I say? For. --User:Lugiatm/sig 06:17, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• For Zork buddy! Long overdue. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 06:19, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Definitely for. --User:Volte/sig 06:22, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• {{t|1=for|1{{{1}}}=}} --User:Splaka/sig 06:26, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Yes. Niiiiice. --Joe857 16:16, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• For --User:Elvis/sig 16:37, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Algoooooooooo. --User:Keitei/sig 16:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Rataube 16:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• For - The NRV work is effing brilliant. 03:39, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Carlb 04:42, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Either of the other two is eminently voteworthy, but inventing NRV deserves recognition - David Gerard 20:37, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Fo'shizzle --User:Zombiebaron/sig 22:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against. For obvious reasons. :) --205.188.116.69 22:42, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. - User:Guest/sig 02:03, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• For - I was going to stick with just voting for Gwax, but I've been seeing a lot of impressive stuff by this guy lately, and hey, if you can vote twice... User:Some user/sig
• For: The amazingness that Al has perpetrated is truly breathtaking; he is a template God. --User:Gwax/sig 06:01, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• For: Yes. By the way, this week's Forum setup endeavours by Algorithm are no mean feat either.--User:Ogopogo/sig 07:10, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. His wiki-skillz have impressed me quite a bit and he's an overall good guy. --User:MoneySign/sig 08:13, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Winston 14:40, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. User:Rangeley/sig 17:03, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• For because he invented the Internets.—User:Mandaliet/sig 05:15, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• For If only for the forums, but also because hes NOT Zombie :D -- User:Villahj Ideeut/sig 01:57, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

### Zombiebaron (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Nominated. He's deserved this for quite a while. --User:Lugiatm/sig 16:07, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

• For because it is completely plausible that I beat Algorithim because apperently three people a month can win this --User:Zombiebaron/sig 16:10, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Comment: You don't have to beat him, several user can win each month.
• Comment. Shouldn't you say some things he's done to deserve it? --User:Volte/sig 16:19, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
I wrote all the reasons on a nice yellow background here in a response to ZB. --User:Lugiatm/sig 17:29, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• For: feared by some, lusted afer by all, Zombiebaron is truly the reincarnation of jesus.70.30.183.72 20:19, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• For: oh yeah, I can vote for more than one - David Gerard 20:50, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I just don't like you, you're an arse on IRC. --User:Joe857/sig 22:42, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• For: Since he was so nice to me right before he asked me to vote for him on IRC. lol User:DaBlade/sig 09:40, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Acctually I said "DaBlade, did you know I'm nominated for UotM?"..."feel free to vote, Blade" --User:Zombiebaron/sig 09:46, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. my bad this guy is better Unsigned. ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 04:16, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

*For Zombiebaron is a real zombie... in bed!142.151.166.66 01:29, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

• For Zombiebaron, the fantastical homosexual, who makes fantastical sex with fantastical animals, much in the same style as the Fantastical Four: Homoerotica, Necrophilia, Pedophilia and Homopedailurophilia. I should mention that he's also a sodomite.142.151.166.217 01:34, 16 February 2006 (UTC) Sockpuppets. ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 04:16, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Maybe another month, but I dislike that you're trying to drum up votes from personal friends/non-Uncyc users who don't know how the site works or what the award is for. If your edit history warrants the award, the votes will come without needing to solicit them from outsiders. ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 13:32, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Next month, stay away from the autofellatio acts in IRC and I'll consider it. -User:Villahj Ideeut/sig 01:55, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Against Not because I don't like him, and not because he isn't worthy of some award, but his campaign wasn't entertaining enough. Pull a General Specific next time, and I may be forced to. User:Dawg/sig 02:07, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

### Gwax (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Nomination. He has been taking care of VFD. He is constantly thinking of how to deal with the crap. I could go on with the details, but the best proof to his extreem diligency is the special template that has to be made, just to protect articles from him.--Rataube 16:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

• For Algo is a cool behind-the-scenes working man, but Gwax is more obviously doing things. I won't be upset if either wins, but my vote goes here.User:Bradaphraser/sig17:11, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• For, I suppose. --User:Lugiatm/sig 17:29, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• For, absolutely --Some user 00:17, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• An Enthusiastic For. Gwax's routine carpet bombings of crap have made him an ally in my eyes, and he has my full support in his endeavors. --User:King In Yellow/sig 13:44, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• For: BURNINATE BABY BURNINATE! KITTEN INFERNO! - David Gerard 20:50, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• For Cause he would do the same for me --User:Zombiebaron/sig 21:36, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because gwax is gbest. --Skyscraper 19:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. He made my sig what it is today, what else can I say. User:Tompkins/sig 23:38, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Keep on taking out the trash, Gwax. \m/(o.o)\m/ --User:Hinoa4/sig 07:02, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. wat can i say other then woo hooo Unsigned. ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 04:16, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

*For Gwax, while you may be a complete homosexual, making passionate love to the manhand that is your right, I like you. I like you alot.142.151.166.66 01:38, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

• For It is my honest opinion that you might be a homosexual, as the previous poster has implied. But I saw you with my girlfriend, so I am going to kill you. I'm going to kill you really hard. 142.151.166.217 01:41, 16 February 2006 (UTC) Sockpuppets. ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 04:16, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Can I vote for those two IP peons for UGotM? --User:Hinoa4/sig 01:46, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
"Those two IP peons" are my friends...I guess that sorta makes 'em sockpuppets...told them to make a couple contribs so they wouldn't be classified as sockpuppets...meh --User:Zombiebaron/sig 23:32, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. Keep manning those trenches! --Algorithm (talk) 07:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. He's great at giving positive feedback, despite his apparent huffer-happiness. --User:MoneySign/sig 08:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. He's got The Right Stuff™. -- User:Codeine/sig 11:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. - User:Guest/sig 13:07, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• For. I nominated him for SysOp and he has gone above and beyond in his duties there. Deserved award. -- User:Mhaille/sig 14:38, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• What everyone else said because all else bodies (above) suck. --TimeStopper 21:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

### Mhaille (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Nomination and Phore Because he rocks and does lotsa cool stuff, like make UGotM. He is also forgien, witch makes him a minority. BLACK POWER --User:Zombiebaron/sig 23:29, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

## March 2006

Mhaille and Tompkins both put up impressive numbers...because people felt sorry for them.

### Some_user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +2

Nomination. Oh I cant stand it anymore, he is one of my favourite writers but I can't vote for him in WotM becouse of Doug's Humbert Humbert. Luckily he happens to deserve this price too, for what he did we the quoteunquote section. So I can vote for him here at least.--Rataube 11:18, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

• For - Some user is an asset to this organization. --Imrealized 05:07, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against - Asset my ass. Some user is the worst of a bad lot, the absolute nadir, the single most disgraceful and despicable "contributor" on this website. Everything he touches turns to crap, his quality standards are atrocious, and his opinion of everyone else here clearly reflects his utter contempt for all that this wiki stands for, and everyone involved in it, especially you. Anyone voting for this person — for anything — should be banned immediately and permanently, and all their material deleted. (Oh, and they should also be character-assassinated, just for good measure.) User:Some user/sig 06:18, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• For all the above reasons. -- User:Mhaille/sig 08:24, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Oh, I'd forgotten the QuoteUnquote thing. For here for that too. And all the reasons Some user gives - David Gerard 15:02, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Though he asked not be be nominated for any "Wanker of the Month" awards, I guess it's not my place to withdraw this one, seeing as I wasn't the original nominator. I will say that any user who holds Uncyclopedia at ransom by withdrawing their contributions, except for the protection of their own articles, until they get their way from the admins is not deserving of this award, or any other one here. ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 04:06, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

### Tompkins (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +15

Nomination and vote. He is a true crusader, NRV-crusades, Noob-crusade, Banpatrol-crusade. He's also fun and friendly. I held his family captive, but I got this f*****g syndrome and now i really like them. Tomps can I marry your sister?--Rataube 13:36, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

• For Tomp is the best turtle ever. Plus, he liked my Euroipods Crusade article so much, he copied it! ;p What's not to love?--User:Bradaphraser/sig 20:31, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• For I'm only voting twice this month because both these guys deserve it richly. Tompkins can write, he helps us maintain some sense of goodness with his NRV sprees and other quality control stuff, and he's an all-around good guy. Funny on IRC too, especially for a reptile. Tomps, can I marry you? --User:Rcmurphy/sig 22:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Comments: No Rataube, for the bajillionth time, you may not marry my sister. And yes Rc, I'd gladly marry you... Anything is better than my last relationship. User:Tompkins/sig 22:49, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

• For. If you want someone to lighten your mood, here he comes. - User:Guest/sig 11:34, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. Regular on IRC, NRV King and serial vandalisation reverter. I'm pretty sure he must write articles and stuff too? :) -- User:Mhaille/sig 18:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• For he's fun to battle on IRC --User:Zombiebaron/sig 12:45, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• For --User:Filmcom/sig 20:35, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. YES! *nods* good -- JackMort 00:30, 10 March 2006 (GMT)
• For. I like the UOTM page, 'cause I can vote for everyone. </communist> -- User:Codeine/sig 16:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. I'm giving a potential pity vote, just in case Iowa loses to Northwestern State this week, which could happen. If not, I'd probably vote for him anyways Jlove1982 00:58, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. This user has demonstrated all the Uncyclopediatic characteristics a non-sysops can (including the "I'm not in the mood")!!! --User:MoneySign/sig 00:51, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. A tireless worker and all-around nice guy. Score! ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 01:38, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• For-o-licious!. --- User:Villahj Ideeut/sig 05:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• For When you have found where Tompkins isn't, then you have found enlightenment. --User:02barryc/Signature 22:33, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Then enlightenment must be f***ing hard to attain. Vote for Tompkins! User:Hinoa4/sig 19:00, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Invisible and Illigal Votes because he deserves it as much as Mhaille, which is alot. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 01:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

### Mhaille (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +19

Nomination and Vote. If you haven't been around long enough to be schooled on the man that is Mhaille, I strongly recommend that you examine his edit history in its entirety, as well as his talk page archives. He's a model administrator, an expert noob coddler, a fine writer, and a prize-winning artist who I'm fortunate to have on many of my articles since almost the day I started here. His encouragement of my writing is much of the reason that this site swallowed me whole, and I've watched him help the other noobs that have come after me. I don't need a whole month to decide on this vote. Here it is. Thanks, mate. :) ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 21:30, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

• For Another awesome candidate.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 21:47, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Mhaille pretty much does everything, and aside from his short-lived recording career, he does it well. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 22:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. Noob coddler indeed. I swear, everytime I see a new User Talk Page, Mhaille was the one that created it. User:Tompkins/sig 22:45, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. He was nice to me when others condemned my initial noobish rentlessness.--Rataube 00:27, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Although I did nominate him first, on the second last day of Febraury, meaning that I love him more then all of y'all. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 01:18, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. A really hard-working admin, and almost always present on IRC. - User:Guest/sig 11:34, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• For--astadt 04:32, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• For He's helped me some. --User:Filmcom/sig 20:41, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
• For YES! He can make things with his hands and is an English. --JackMort 00:37, 10 March 2006 (GMT)
• For We Englishmen pull together, you know. (insert wanking joke here) -- User:Codeine/sig 16:03, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• For--User:Suresh/sig 00:22, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• For i hail Mhaille --User:Whywhywhy/sig.css 05:17, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• For He made me feel welcome as a n00b today, and is also British. Double score! Dan uk 19:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• For of course... dude helped me out and was patient with my technological idiocy... very cool. --Imrealized 11:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• For-His work on Anaïs Nin was wonderful--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 22:19, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• For-He helped me out greatly with my Incoherence article and is generally awesome to hang around with in the chatroom.--User:Yuri von Juan/sig
• For--Winston 20:42, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• For nice to have someone around from my timezone. --User:02barryc/Signature 12:55, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

## April 2006

Agonizing! One IP vote separated the winner Isra1337 with another fine admin, Keitei.

### Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +0
• Nomination and For Because, even though I was planning to nom him next month, as you can see by the "Rc_the_Scrivener" nomination below, Rc seems to want to be nominationed on this already overly crowded month. Anywho, he deserves it as much if not more then anyone else this month. (I SAID AS MUCH IF NOT MORE) --User:Zombiebaron/sig 00:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. He's won already. Let the others have a turn. User:Hinoa4/sig 00:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Hin, I only nominated him because he nominated him...--User:Zombiebaron/sig 00:03, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against The Scrivener is much more worthy and hasn't won yet. User:Rcmurphy/sig 00:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Nomination not approved by The Party --The Party 01:35, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

### Rc_the_Scrivener (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: -1
• Nomination and For I don't know who this guy is but he's awesome at testing the Mediawiki Move limits. A vote for Rc the Scrivener is a vote that could have been used for a legitimate candidate! User:Rcmurphy/sig 22:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against, you vain bastard. User:Hinoa4/sig 22:17, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against ...I nominated the real you...now go vote for yourself...both of you...--User:Zombiebaron/sig 00:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Isra's just a lame duck compared to this guy. User:Tompkins/sig 01:12, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against I may have supported Zombie's nomination, but this one sucks.--Rataube 02:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against all sockpuppets. According to a Pat Robertson, they're all burning in Hell, anyway.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 02:25, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

### Famine (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +4

Nomination and For Although it seems a little late to be nominating someone else, as those already nominated have high vote counts, I belive that Famine deserves this award aswell. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 18:34, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

### Keitei (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +19

Nomination and For As one of Uncyclopedia's most promenant females, she has deserved this award ever since she first visited our humble home. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 22:25, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

• For I'm a big fan User:Kakun/sig 22:26, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Damn. Two days into the month and already UotM is a highly contested battle. For as I'm apparently one of her adopted newbies and because she's just flat-out awesome. User:Hinoa4/sig 01:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. IRC queen... User:Tompkins/sig 01:30, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. --User:Isra1337/sig 16:28, 3 April 2006 (PDT)
• 1/Quarter YEI KEITEI --User:Roger The Bum/sig 23:42, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• FOR. ye! ye! ye! User:Jack mort/sig
• For. Extremely well-qualified candidate.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 02:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• for--Rataube 19:34, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• A hitlerbear-ing, head asploding, PMSing, nobody cares-ing For. -- User:Codeine/sig 23:45, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Spin 00:04, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Heh, psyche! for policing the crap, I think, meh, hitlerbear reminded me to focus on quality --Olipro (Harass) 05:22, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• For the love of Jeebus. -- User:Mhaille/sig 19:49, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
• For what most of the above said --Alia kenobi 01:16, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• For, though I did expect some love thrown in my direction, given her apparent affections for bears. Still... Maybe I've kept too low a profile here. Yeah. Probably. So here's some love from me before I go into hibernation. --Bear 18:52, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• For My favorite thing about keitei is, "I kill people who hit on me." Bannination of pervo sex trolls on Uncyc, or anywhere else in the Internet is a worthy cause, and I support worthy causes. --User:Zim ulator/sig 14:06, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• For 19:24, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

### Dawg (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)(Goes by Wolf on IRC)

Score: +7

Nomination and For Has deserved this award for a long time. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 22:25, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

### Isra1337 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +19.5

Nomination and vote. Very helpful uncyclopedian, always thinking of ways to improve the site. Great Reskiner. We owe him Apple's Anniversary reskin.--Rataube 17:49, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

• Mmmhm. User:Tompkins/sig 17:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
• For even handed Administrator and excellent contributor. -- User:Mhaille/sig
• For good work this past month. User:Rangeley/sig 04:49, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• 1+3=-3+7 It's pure math...--User:Suresh/sig 20:22, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• For! Of all the candidates isra is definitely the most otm. *nod* User:Jack mort/sig
• For. Probably the most well-qualified of the three (after his iHumor reskin), though they're ALL great.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 02:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• For: He just lost my goat. --User:Gwax/sig 04:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• For--User:Nappy The Quarryman/signature 00:52, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. If I vote for all three, it doesn't really mean anything, does it? Oh well. --Spin 00:08, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• For That iHumor was just sheer brilliance, and the time taken too... well deserving in my humble opinion --Olipro (Harass) 05:20, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• For --User:Zombiebaron/sig 18:36, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• For - Nonymous 20:46, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. User:Spang/Sig 17:32, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• For - One of these things is not like the others; one of these things just doesn't belong. Isra is helpful, witty and approachable and therefore truly deserves this award. --Imrealized 07:11, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• For General all-round hard worker. --User:02barryc/Signature 18:40, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• For --EvilZak 18:43, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Amazing reskin! Kikimora 23:39, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• For I can't believe it's not butter! --Stewie 00:23, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• For 69.30.153.191 06:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

## May 2006

Zombiebaron won in a close ra-no wait, nobody else was nominated.

### Zombiebaron (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +11
• Nomination: Guess who kidnapped my daughter and is holding her ransom? You guessed it. That god-damned Zombie Baron. It's got to be the third damn time. Well, you win this time, Zombie Baron, but next time, I'm totally kicking your ass. I suppose I should explain why he deserves it. He promises to be very good. Infact, he's going to buy me a cookie. That's right, your broke ass is buying me a cookie. Dzugavili 01:42, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I'm morally obligated to vote for him for giving me a terrific pic for Yahoo!], which he swears was totally unrelated to his coincidental nomination for UotM the same day. Also, I'm sure he does other things that make him worthy of this award, but I'm too drunk to think of them right now.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 01:58, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I swear Brad, when I made that picture I had no clue this was gonna happen. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 04:45, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• For on the condition he does what I say for 30 days. Good slave. --User:Splaka/sig 06:57, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against, non-notable. -- Boothman 15:58, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
...? User:Tompkins/sig 18:13, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Comment Kindly sir, I seem to belive the wrong thing, that is that I am (at least) somewhat noteable, or atleast so much so that I was kindly nominated here. However since you seem to belive the opposite, could you please show me some proof of your claim? You must excuse my ignorance, but since you are ever so noteable, could you please show me the light? --User:Zombiebaron/sig 00:45, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Rataube 18:25, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• For fun on IRC! --User:02barryc/Signature 12:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. User:Spang/Sig 16:32, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. See? Good work speaks for itself. :) ~ T. (talk) 00:29, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Oh, and this vote officially overrides that one guy's against vote... User:Tompkins/sig 01:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Doing a sterling job sorting those templates and being a general all-round good egg. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 18:49, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. No good reason, really, just a for. User:Hinoa4/sig 15:45, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. User:Rangeley/sig 02:57, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For.....he's worked hard for this..... -- User:Mhaille/sig 13:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Vote. Thought I'd repay the favour :P that and since you're the only candidate, you can't lose! --Olipro Anchor (Harass) 15:44, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

## June 2006

Scoring an unprecedented -1 vote, Hemmendorff lost to Keitei. By a lot.

### Keitei (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +22
• Nomination and For. Long overdue. --Algorithm 02:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Whore --User:Splaka/sig 04:02, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Wasn't she the joint winner last month with Isra? I believe they ended up with the same number of votes? -- User:Mhaille/sig
• Comment: thanks ever so much for nomination, but it's a few days until the end of the month, ZB has been whoring for this since I can remember, and my birthday's in June anyhow, so I'm pushing this down a month. I'll have to work extra hard to earn it now, huh. --User:Keitei/min 11:07, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For The above comment alone would make me want to vote for her, but then when you add the rest of the stuff she does, its a sure thing --User:Zombiebaron/sig2 11:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For--Rataube 13:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose, wears a bag on his/her head. Tastes like pork. -- Boothman 15:21, 25 May 2006 (UTC).
• Komment Dear "Zombiebaron" (snigger), I do not really care if it is bad form, for this is Uncyclopedia. If you can't fuck things up on purpose on here, where can you! What I did/am doing is entirely within the rules. Is this Uncyclopedia, or is it a slightly funny version of Wikipedia? You lot remind me of the people on this page (ie gays). -- Boothman 11:55, 26 May 2006 (UTC).
• Uncy maxims: 1. Be funny and 2 Don´t be a dick. You accomplish neither of them.--Rataube 15:45, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I agree with Algo: long overdue.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 15:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I agree with Boothman. User:Tompkins/sig 21:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Extreme Lesbian For. Seriously, she has done sooooooooo much work around here. --User:Isra1337/sig 21:45, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• I'm down, yo. She hasn't called me a jackass, and that's enough to merit a vote from me. --Kalir, Savant of Utter Foolishness! (yell at me) 18:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• For! Every day keitei is my favorite uncyclopedian! ♥ http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/images/3/37/Dawg_sig_2.gif 07:52, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Whatever. ~ 15:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Yesh, she's a good one. She made me a shirt. User:Rcmurphy/sig 17:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• This now being June, I can now vote without my internal Nag Alarm™ saying "It's not June yet! You can't vote!" Anycase, FOR. User:Hinoa4/sig 21:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• For I like her even when she ignores me. She does lots of stuff I'm way too lazy to do, talks dirty to her piggy, has a well-developed sense of humor, spells well, points me to great pr0n sites, and exhibits WC (Wikily Correct) behavior. Oh, and she's nice to me, and helps noobs who aren't total dicks. User:Zim ulator/sig 13:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• For as she is the only one on this page that I have seen the works of. And the 'works' are good. User:Yuri von Juan/sig 08:00, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Sorry, I wasn't logged in for th eabove for. User:Yuri von Juan/sig 08:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Unconditionally for her love of genocides and moods that can swing IRC into IRL. --User:Suresh/sig 08:47, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• For ~User:SimulacrumCaputosis/sig615:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• For - Because there's really no other way to vote... top notch! --Olipro Anchor CUN (Harass) 15:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• For the KTs -- User:Mhaille/sig 1:00, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Real. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 07:01, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Wow! 18 votes! I definitly have to agree with the crowd. --Sbluen 07:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• SPLO-DEY!!! ... ... Umm... what was the question? Ginantonix? Turkeesammich? Beeeeeenz? Oh right, daKeiteiovdamonf.
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! --User:King In Yellow/sig 13:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• I ♥ KT. ~ T. (talk) 20:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

### Hemmendorff (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: -1
• Nomination and For. Long overdue. -- Boothman 15:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC).
• Comment: i really, truly, dislike you. Serisouly... wtf? User:Tompkins/sig 05:04, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Tomp, does the above comment refer to Hemmendorff or Boothman? --User:Zombiebaron/sig2 15:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Probably both... but mostly Boothman. User:Tompkins/sig
• Against. WTF? Even I have more contribs than him/her/it/blob. --User:02barryc/Signature 19:32, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against inferior candidates, and the idiot users who nominate them. ~ T. (talk) 19:52, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

### Ogopogo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)

Score: +2
• Nom and For. I had never even heard of this guy/gal before, and looking at the contribs, I had not realised how much this person has been working, out of the limelight, diligently. --User:02barryc/Signature 12:41, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Right. I have been silently stalking Ogopogo and have realized this same thing.--Witt E, 05:09, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

# Uncyclopedian of the Year

## 2004

This guy named Chronarion won. You may have heard of him. Or maybe not.

### Chronarion

Chronarion (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

• For possibly having conceived of it sometime during the calendar year of 2004. --User:Splaka/sig 03:58, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For. The best absent dictator ever, qualities that were present long before Uncyclopedia. User:Keitei/sig 04:05, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• CAN'T TOUCH HIM ---Kakun 23:50, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For because he invented this thing and all. --User:Gwax/sig 04:39, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For: --User:Ogopogo/sig 04:51, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For reasons already given by others.--Bradaphraser 05:16, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For I found out Sophia was cheating on me. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 06:24, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• For User:Dawg/sig 06:51, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Stop! It's For Time --User:Zombiebaron/sig 00:40, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

### Sophia

Sophia (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

## 2005

Is there no God at all? Rc won because Ralph Nader split the Smart Party vote.

• Nomination because une image vaut mille mots and a picture is worth a thousand words. --Carlb 23:35, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

### Carlb

Carlb (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Nomination. ~ Look at his edit history, or the wikistats. It's like War and Peace. -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 11:40, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Vote ~ For carrying a huge load of the unglamourous but essential trench slogging duty on top of his article and template work. I'm in awe. Can I buy you a beer, or a Subaru, or something? :) -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 00:57, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

### Rcmurphy

Rcmurphy (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

• Nomation and vote No one has done more for Uncyclopedia than Rcmurphy, well, except for deletions, bans, protects, moves, reverts. But Rc has selflessly handled the thankless crappy tasks of VFH, VFP, VFS, VFD, and VFVF for months. Maybe a bribe will make him stay longer. --User:Splaka/sig 23:30, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Because FPSPPs stick together... --User:MoneySign/sig 00:18, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Conditional For Only if you can get the smell of ham out of your clothes.--User:Flammable/sig 04:37, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Here here, rc totally deserves my vote and the award. --User:Gwax/sig 04:10, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For: --User:Ogopogo/sig 04:50, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• ForThe reasons are already listed by others.--Bradaphraser 05:14, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. --User:Isra1337/sig 22:41, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. Murph and Uncyclopedia are synonymous in my mind, and I'm sure in many others. -- User:Codeine/sig 22:46, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. On behalf of all of the preschoolers in the world. User:Tompkins/sig 00:40, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Forrety for. --User:Keitei/sig 00:43, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

### Splaka

Splaka (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

• For, There is no God but Splaka. There is no God but Splaka. There is no God but Splaka. There is no God but Splaka. - Nonymous 04:06, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For And not just because he voted for me, oh no. Even as a regular user (before he was adminned) he did more for the site than many admins have done - I'm looking at you, RC - and he's done even more since his deflowering sysopping. Aside from the deletions, bannings, etc., he's introduced a lot of coding tricks and has organized or helped organize some very useful stuff (MTU, NRV, and so on). --User:Rcmurphy/sig 02:43, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. While rc trudged through crap in VFH for months on end...at most 4 times a week...Splaka reads and handles recent changes almost constantly. Nobody is more committed to the quality of uncyclopedia's articles. User:Dawg/sig 06:51, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• For What's not to love about (Insert name of candidate here)? --User:Zombiebaron/sig 00:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)