Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 3

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
20052006 (part 1)2006 (part 2)2007 (part 1)2007 (part 2)2008 (part 1)2008 (part 2)2009 (part 1)2009 (part 2)2010 (part 1)2010 (part 2)2011 (part 1) 2011 (part 2) 2012 (part 1) 2012 (part 2)

For winners from the second half of 2006, see below.

Writer of the Month[edit]

July 2006[edit]

The Vote Tompkins campaign finally worked, as Tompkins edged out Hardwick Fuddlebuggy.

Tompkins (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +13
  • Nomination and For - Because last months decision was too tough — both candidates were highly deserving of this. Tompkins has the five excellent featured articles that were mentioned (The Keep Your Finger In The Box Game, Don't be Stupid, Teenagers, Vote Fish Penis and Distraction), not to mention a fine collection of other non-featured but still hysterical and well-written articles, two of my favs being The Door and Anti-Cliché. Since he seems to be big on bestowing glory upon others through nominations and voting for the other guy, and the rules stipulate he cannot nominate himself, I figured I'd go right ahead and nom him this month. I just hope it means as much coming from a bastard like me. -- Imrealized 18:07, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I don't normally vote so early in the month, but Ptompkins IV, Lord of the Upper Kingdoms, is most deserving. -- User:Mhaille/sig 18:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I'm not saying he don't deserve dis, I'm just gonna point out that when I pointed out that we could move last month's votes to this month, and get a head start, through the same process by witch Keitei gave me the month of May while still keeping her votes, and thus winning in June (see UotM archives). Tompkins declined, and stated that he did not feel that he deserved WotM, due to his lack of writing in recent memory, due to being an active admin. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 18:42, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, oh yah, and I wanna vote for him anyway. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 18:42, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For content & honest-to-goodness Helper of the Poor--Shandon 06:39, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I like Vote Fish Penis and Distraction very much.--User:Rataube/sig 01:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Still For. (though Hardwick's award is certainly coming soon, I can only vote once...) ~ T. (talk) 01:47, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I'm sorry Hardwick, it's just that Tompkins helped me out once! I think! --User:VodkaTabako/sig. 03:27, 15 July 2006 (UTC) 04:29, 15 July 2006 (GMT)
  • Comment Really? I do not recall, I usually try to just stay in the corner and yell at anyone who walks through my yard. User:Tompkins/sig 05:36, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Hardwick Fundlebuggy (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +10
  • Nomination. He's made some really great featured articles, see: Ernest Hemingway's Cookery Corner, Banana Skin Joke, Citizen Kong; and other hilarious ones that are currently nominated: Pop Bomb, The Swedish Orienteering And Firing A Rat From A Cannon Championships. This former NOTM deserves it, but my vote is suspended until later, because Tompkins is also deserving. In any case, Hardwick needed to be nommed, because he is deserving, and we need some competition. User:Sir Cornbread/sig --19:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Aw, to heck with it. Unless someone comes along and writes an absolutely earth-shatteringly funny article (which ain't gonna happen), I'm unlikely to change my vote. Sorry again, Tompkins, but I just really like Hardwick's writing style too much not to vote for him. Not only has he got four features, but he has some relatively unrecognised gems such as The Dice Man and Good cop/Bad cop, not to mention the brilliant Capybara Bomb. On top of all this, he is a great guy: he is curteous, always happy to help people out at Pee Review and lend a hand to help decruddify other peoples' articles. All within four months. All of which means I'm voting against. Erm, I mean for. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 10:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For As much as Tompkins deserves it, Hardwick just writes some asoundingly good articles. Bouncy Castle is just one of the best articles I've read. --User:ENeGMA/sig 17:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. After seeing The Dice Man, I've made up my mind. If you read the fine print this award is also for who has written the best articles recently, and that clearly describes Hardwick. User:Sir Cornbread/sig --23:38, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. He may be an ass, but he's funnier than me. --Joe!/TALK/CONTRIBS/[email protected] 02:14, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For He may be an ass, but he's funnier than Joe. Modusoperandi 04:17, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Ouch. --Joe!/TALK/CONTRIBS/[email protected] 14:07, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
      • Zing! Technically, since Mr. Fundlebuggy is really funny, you could be almost really funny, Joe. Or you can get all huffy and storm out of the room. It's all good. But that's off topic. At least until you get nom'd for this. Then the gloves are off with the zinging. Modusoperandi 15:05, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For as HF is a wholly deserving candidate and as such I award him with this imaginary pie, because I'm a bit pie-crazy at the moment. The Invading Genius Yuri the Vaguely Octagonal [WORSHUP ME] [MUN] [YvJP] 10:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I wasn't sure who to support of these two, but the work he did helping me out on Gonzo Journalism tipped the balance for me. TheMono 12:05, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For- Here Here! That Gonzo article is quite funny!--User:Claudius Prime/sig 15:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For two reasons: Hardwick is hilarious and tompkins needs to get off his lazy bum and write some more.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 14:52, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • for This was a tough one, I like both candidates so much... so I tossed a coin.... well, not really, It was tough, though. User:Zim ulator/sig 00:26, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

August 2006[edit]

After six recounts and a lawsuit, Hardwick Fundlebuggy emerged triumphant.

Hardwick Fundlebuggy (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Hardmum.jpg Mrs. Fundlebuggy gives pie to all voters!

Thanks to anyone mad enough to vote for my son. These little things seem to mean so much to him. While, on the outside, he looks like an unruffled danger-loving pilot of a nuclear submarine, on the inside he's a jangling wreck of nerves. So your vote might even prevent a nuclear war! And ... speaking as a mother ... I think that nuclear war is a very bad thing, with unnecessarily large fireballs that can really cause havoc with the curtains.
  • Nomination and For. I think it's been said before... and I don't really feel like writing it all again. SO go ahead, vote for Hardwick already! User:Tompkins/sig 07:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For! I nommed him last month, and touche Tompkins, you beat me to this one. Hardwick is hilarious. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 07:41, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For continually raising the bar, thereby highlighting our own painful, tepid mediocrity. Modusoperandi 08:03, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Another early vote for excellence in the comedic field. -- User:Imrealized/sig 08:04, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Hear hear!--Procopius 12:07, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For where would we be without bouncy castles?--Shandon 12:14, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Hardwick must win this before he departs for greater things. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 12:30, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, if only to completely destroy the urge to nominate anyone else this month.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 14:29, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For In addition to all that's been said, he has the best username I've yet seen. --User:ENeGMA/sig 20:26, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: No Contest. Literally. There Is No Contest. At least until someone else is nominated, that is, at which point I'll cast my vote. (Probably for this guy after all, but I want to see who he's running against. Compare/contrast, and all that.) --User:King In Yellow/sig 14:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --User:Rataube/sig 21:16, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For because he gave me a pie! --em|c|! Icons-flag-us.png 02:17, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Fantastic pop bombs. --Sbluen 21:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For he deserves it more than anyone who hasn't already been awarded. --§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφƏΣßÐÆØΞΩųhttp://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/images/3/3d/Talk%C2%A7.gifhttp://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/images/3/34/Mini%C2%A7.gif 04:51, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • ROAR OF APPROVAL I can't spell --User:Zombiebaron/sig 19:16, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For What?...how did I get here? Charlies!!! Ten o'clock!!! --SigCommunist.pngPremier Tom MayfairTalkRedPhone.jpgF@HSucrose b.gifMale-UN.jpg 01:51, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For-Good Show--User:Claudius Prime/sig 14:10, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For the fast break, to an easy layup and another two points... no, no, wait, he's taking off.... it's a slam dunk! Spectacular moves from Fundlebuggy, and the crowd goes wild. ~ T. (talk) 10:27, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For --User:Severian/sig 04:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For I always wanted a bouncy castle, but I have to pay off my Lexus first. --General Insineratehymn 16:36, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Kinda moot at this point, but... eh. --User:Kalir/sig 17:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • for This dude is hilarious, and has written more than a few really funny articles. Yah! User:Zim ulator/sig 21:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The man is funny--Wit (tawk) 19:45, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Let's hope this isn't the peak or your Forte, keep on going - WE NEED YOU! (and all the other users, otherwise we'd be another "The site that doesn't need mentioning".) --User:02barryc/Signature 11:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


September 2006[edit]

Imrealized for t3h w1n.

Imrealized (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +19

Nomination and For. Three featured articles, two of them within the past month, all really intelectual and stuff. Some other great ones as well... sounds good to me! User:Tompkins/sig 03:21, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 03:21, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

  • For, although everyone knows he's really a sockpuppet of Tompkins (j/k).--User:Bradaphraser/sig 03:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Psh, my sockpuppet would be alot cooler than this square :) User:Tompkins/sig 23:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 23:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For --User:Electrified mocha chinchilla/sig 20:34, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. He's a scholar & a gentleman.-- Premier Tom Mayfair 11:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For--big ideas & a good help to n00bs--Shandon 05:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For, even though he's probably funnier than I am. User:Some user/sig 03:12, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For, even though there's been quite a lack of competition the past few months. User:Spang/Sig 03:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Like, For, man... The dude abides. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • That wanker? For -- User:Mhaille/sig 13:50, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Even if the only thing he'd written in the past year had been Smells Like Teen Spirit, it'd still be a resounding For from me. -- User:Codeine/sig 01:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. scholar, gentleman & good at potatochopping: deadly combination. --User:Mowgli/sig 08:46, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For Indeed.--User:Severian/sig 13:06, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- I don't usually vote, but this guy's going places. --User:DiZ/sig 19:58, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - Wow. Just wow. I'm honoured. And kinda speechless. Gimme a second... <takes moment to catch breath> Nope, still pretty much speechless. Thanks, all. -- User:Imrealized/sig 08:05, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For-I will not be outdone by the chivalry of Imrealized, if he is going to vote for me than I will vote for him!! I've had no time to write this month, yet. I will have a few things ready before the end, but lets face it, Imrealized deserves it this month. I will show up stronger for October.--User:Claudius Prime/sig 17:26, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Need I say more? --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 06:08, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. -- Hindleyite 17:23, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --General Insineratehymn 14:22, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I like his articles and I helped him with the HTML on his user page. --2nd_Lt Orion Blastar (talk) 03:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
  • FeeuhOR.Wiffout a dowt.--Wit (tawk) 03:43, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For --User:Severian/sig 02:03, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. If I remember right, when he was up for n00b of the month he somehow lost to nobody. Go figure... --So So 06:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Claudius Prime (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +4
  • Nom Okay, he hasn't been active yet in September, but he's been a runner-up in both Poo Lit Surprises with Renaissance and William Wordsworth (and is the only person, I believe, to place in both competitions), and seems to have an appreciation for collaborative writing that I think has yet to be really exploited to its full potential on Uncyc. User:Rcmurphy/sig 05:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For, he takes literate subjects and makes them speak in a way that my mind can understand.--User:Modusoperandi/sig 07:52, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For I'll go ahead and actually toss in a vote this month too. Catherine the Great, from the first PLS, is another good one by Claudius. User:Rcmurphy/sig 05:51, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. As much as I enjoy the work of the other nominated comedic specialists, I must cast my vote for Claudius, whose work was among my early favourites. Existence, Purgatory, Virgil, Kerouac, LAPD... I could go on, but why not just check out his user page? Excellent, cerebral work. -- User:Imrealized/sig 08:20, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Since Immy has this in a walk (Paradise Lost alone would be worth it), I'll cast my vote for this other deserving member. He's a very discriminating writer, and when he votes for an article on VFH, you know it's good.--Procopius 18:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Slackerboy (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +1 inactive user
  • Nom and For I realize that this month he won't win, but I just realized that he hasn't won, and he deserves it alot. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 22:21, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
uhhh...who cares? He was one of the funniest writers to grace this wiki. How active he is currently doesn't enter into it. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 12:04, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
It completely does...read this. Nominate the member who has written the funniest, highest-quality stuff in the past month. Notice the past month part. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 03:44, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
I'm still gonna nominte him every month till he wins :P. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 18:05, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


October 2006[edit]

But soft! What light through yonder window breaks? It is the east, and Procopius is the Writer of the Month.

Slackerboy (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +1
  • Nomination and For I can't belive Slacky hasn't won this. Granted he hasn't writtend anything in a long time, he did write some of the best articles I have ever read. He deserves a "post humos" inception into the ranks of Writer of the Month. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 21:25, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment -Yet again, I wont vote against, but "THE WRITER WHO HAS WRITTEN THE BEST THINGS RECENTLY" is what this is for. Not contributing since April isnt deserving in my opinion, as he probably will never find out that he won this award. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 05:10, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Procopius (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +16
  • N+F with a couple of recent features, UnNews:Diogenes searches world for honest mechanic + HowTo:Write A Cover Letter he is, by my count, just one behind that Hardwick guy, a recent recipient of WotM, for recently featured articles that were featured recently and tied, recently, with that Modus bastard. But his stuff, recently, is funnier, recently. Did you get that, ZB? The recent bit, I mean?.--User:Modusoperandi/sig 06:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Porpoise knows his stuff, and apparently is just behind me, so I had better be careful what I type. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I did enjoy that honest mechanic article quite a lot. And his name is confusing and hard to say or spell, or both. Isn't that alone enough? --Anyone 16:12, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For I enjoy his articles twice nightly, more if I can manage. Holy shit I'm turning into Mhaille. --User:ENeGMA/sig 21:49, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • He could win every award on Uncyclopedia; he won the Poo Lit Surprise, the Noob of the Month, and now he's nommed for this (and he should be nominated for the Foolitzer Prize). This guy's unbelievable and extremely talented. For. --User:Electrified mocha chinchilla/sig 01:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
    I'm pretty sure that he's a robot writer from the future, sent back to our time to weaken humanity somehow. Probably via an insidious plot to win all of our awards.--User:Modusoperandi/sig 02:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
    I better tell you now: 2011 is gonna be a bitch.--Procopius 13:47, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
    Thanks. Way to go. You should annotate your post with "Spoiler Alert" when you give away the ending, at least.--User:Modusoperandi/sig 14:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes, absolutely.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 15:21, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Hells Yes, Sir!I absolutely loved HowTo:Write A Cover Letter! I am in favour of his election as president, or whatever this ballot is for... I don't quite understand this thing. Maybe I should live in Florida, or Quebec. --Theo 06:30, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Excellent work recently, considering that he was a n00b like me not long ago. --User:Cs1987/sig 16:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strongest Conceivable For meant to nom 'im meself, I dids, I dids. User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig 01:39, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For and thank the lord, he didn't get an award for far too long! (two weeks?)--User:Mordillo/sig 14:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For Premier Tom Mayfair 17:46, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Casual For- It's obvious he's gonna win without my vote, but i wanted to show my deep respect, admiration, blah blah blarr, he's an excellent writer. --User:DiZ/sig 15:51, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, Although he has it locked up. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 20:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
    Deja vu, room spinning...so, Mister Cornbread...how many times are you planning to vote on this page this month? Only two? But that's only half as much as you want to and twice as much as you're supposed to...walls pushing in...oatmeal a little lumpy...--User:Modusoperandi/sig 20:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Just please tell me you're not a weeta bicks or whatever it's called fan! --User:Mordillo/sig 08:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Wasn't Weeta Bicks in the cantina band in Star Wars?--User:Modusoperandi/sig 10:18, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Awesome stuff. --User:Armando/sig 12:55, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For --General Insineratehymn 15:18, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Ultimate For. -- Hindleyite 13:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Never even met the man, but he's a damn good writer. User:Tompkins/sig 21:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 21:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For...pulled into the gravitational field...--Shandon 23:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

PF4Eva (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 0
  • N+F Created Halloween (film) and separate article for the sequels, although they are quite short I did get a chuckle from them, besides, the month is still young Mr. Briggs Inc. 21:53, 6 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • Strong Against. Usually wouldnt vote against, but this has to be a joke. Other candidates, even Slackerboy in inactivity are far more deserving. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 05:53, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment Again, the month is still young and he has been working on them a lot. Mr. Briggs Inc. 13:00, 7 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Except the only thing hes written isnt even funny. Its a giant list. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 18:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Monika (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +3
  • Nomination While I cannot vote twice, I can nominate this user due to thier great articles (no matter how few their may be). --User:Zombiebaron/sig 18:37, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • !!! Um... Okay... ::scratch head:: For? (Procopius is going to kick my ass.) --monika 22:29, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
    Comment. Um, what has she written, exactly??? --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 03:49, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Stuff you're strongly against anyway. (I be good) --monika 04:01, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey! Don't make me separate you two. Japan-france, Mr. Sandman, Bleach, License Note & the featured Super Smash Bros: Xtreme Beach Volleyball. This is why users have userpages; so that they can list that which they have wrought.--User:Modusoperandi/sig 04:04, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Well in that case, I'm not gonna be a dick and vote against, but I didn't like any of those articles. Its probably cuz I hate anime shit with a passion. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 04:16, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
The good news: I'm seeing you two in a remake of "Moonlighting". The bad: only one of you can be Bruce Willis.--User:Modusoperandi/sig 04:19, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Dibs. --monika 04:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. Way too overprotective of articles on a goddamn wiki, reverting all my edits to SSBX. --User:Nintendorulez/sig2 20:46, 18 October 2006 (UTC)*For to cancel out Nin's vote and because Nin needs to lighten up a bit.
  • For to cancel out Nin's vote and because Nin needs to lighten up a bit. WereitajokemorepeopleknewaboutI'dbewillingtoletitstay User:Hinoa4/sig8
  • Comment I would have voted for you but, alas, Procopius's appeal is too strong. User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig 04:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For - even if Monika doesn't win, the standard of writing gets my vote. -- User:Mhaille/sig 20:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because she's a damn fine writer. Also, I wanted to cancel out Squiggle's comment or something. -- User:Imrealized/sig 05:04, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks to much to everyone who voted for me or would have under other circumstances or was nice enough to withstand his urge to vote against me, and a big congratulations to Procopius for totally kicking my ass. You do good work ::nodnod::. Hopefully one of these future months I'll again have the right combination of inspiration and free time to write another two or so articles. :) --monika 09:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

November 2006[edit]

That §ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ won.

Composure1 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +3
  • Nom Just look at that list of UnNews articles. I know Composure's already won the Foolitzer, but I think any writer, regardless of speciality, should be a candidate for WotM because it's the most presitigous award. User:Rcmurphy/sig 06:44, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For We need more writers like ComputerBlue...err...Composure1. --User:ENeGMA/sig 03:24, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For User:Rangeley/sig 03:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Two things, the hat and Annyang The Bear. 'Nuff said. For. -- User:Mhaille/sig 17:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Modusoperandi (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +9
  • Nom and For. Because of American Fundie Magazine, Suburban homeboy, the (should be featured soon) Bureaucracy Channel, a featured image or two -- the output shames me and sends me into a corner, contemplating my toenails as my only truly creative act.--Procopius 21:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. i particularly liked "suburban homeboy." modusoperandi is a bit of a perfectionist and moody too. also eccentric - strips himself naked before sitting down to compose (that reminds me of kafka - he'd drink only non pasteurized milk and, no surprise, it eventually killed him). --User:Mowgli/sig 10:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - He cracks me up. --Micoolio101 (whinevandalism) 09:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Me an' Modusoperandi R homeboys G! this suburban homeboy articles strongly appeals 2 my gangsta heritage C, G? An' another thing I tell U somthin 'dem Fundies remind me of the peepz back in my youth center, dey take me off da streetz gimme a good meal an' teach me how to straighten' up n' fly right! But don' think that don't mean I ain't still a straight brotha' 4 life. Lemme tell you who don' deserve dis' award; Famine. He from da' wrong side o' town an' always be callin' da' po-po on me an' my dawgz, but Modusoperandi, he alwayz welcome on my turf. CYA playaz, my H.O.N.K.E.E.Z. an' I got work to do. Mr. Briggs Inc. 23:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC) Yo!
  • For. Let me start off by saying that yes, I probably should of voted for Squiggle. Modus can't write very well, like Squiggle. He's a douchehat, unlike squiggle. Squiggle is an active contributor to uncyc; always polite and respectful, whereas Modus is always a complete jerk and/or ass. Squiggle is all-around everything that Modus is not. But that's why I can't vote for him. Modus is the guy that always ends up with the hot chick. And although I may or may not be a hot chick, or a chick at all, he's stolen my heart. He also leaves funny comments all over the place, which is a plus. --Anyone 19:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
    sniff That's the best backhanded compliment I've had since I last spoke with my parents...beautiful, man.--User:Modusoperandi/sig 21:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For per Anyone. We need more of this guy's eccentricity. User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig 07:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR BENSON agrees with Squiggles. We need more of his electricity. Also, his writing skills are almost as good as his electric powers. Benson 22:40, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For- It's good stuff.--User:Witt E,/sig 02:31, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Fo' shizzle. Sorry Mr. Squiggle, but it seems like you're gonna win this month anyway. -- User:Hindleyite/sig 21:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Forrr. --User:Flyingfeline/sig 21:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Funny, he is. --User:AAA!/sig 11:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
    Thanks for the vote. Sadly, November is over...All hail Squiggle!--User:Modusoperandi/sig 11:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +19 random characters that I can't decode
  • Nom and For. Ha ha. Just to make the voting more chaotic. And cause he probably deserves it. And cause he gave me a ninja star. And cause I'm a happy drunk. Someone go ahead and fix it so the above actually links to his user page. --So So 14:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. he makes me glad to be gay User:Jack mort/sig 02:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment First of all, you can only vote for one candidate, mowgli. Secondly, I was going to nominate Squiggle... next month. After he'd racked up some awards, but you jus had to go and ruin it for me... Anyway, I figure I'll hold my vote for now, probably cast it later this month. User:Tompkins/sig 02:19, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment sorry? i think i've cast only 1 vote so far, for modusoperandi. my only other post here is a comment. i did not nominate squiggle. *slightly confused* --User:Mowgli/sig 05:22, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
      • Heh heh, sorry, your's and Jack's signatures are quite similar. User:Tompkins/sig 22:23, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For I loved Water Polo... With Sharks!. Plus, he let me grab his ass this one time... --User:DiZ/sig 18:05, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For --User:Cs1987/sig 14:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For water polo with sharks is what brought me to this site --User:Braydie/sig 14:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For sdfhklasalskjd. :D User:Toratoritore/sig 21:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For He putts from the rough. Premier Tom Mayfair 21:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Yo momma is proud, sonnieboy. --UnJetamo 21:59, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Hindleyite said it was the honorable thing to do to vote for myself. Blame him for me being vain. User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig 22:02, 11 November 2006 (UTC) I've chosen NOT to vote for myself, 'twas a half-assed, if not quarter-assed, thing to do. User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig 00:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
It was a joke, honest. -- Hindleyite 22:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Well, it's too late now; You've warped and perverted my fragile mind! I hope you can sleep at night. User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig 23:39, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I pity him. --User:Electrified mocha chinchilla/sig 22:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Your $100 bribe to vote for you was pointless because I would have voted for you anyway Sir Squiggle. --Composure1 16:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. MO is deserving as well, but Squiggle takes the cake. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 02:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For it would appear the Squiggle has come into his own. Still, what with the voting for himself and all, I'll be his sponsor when his head inevitably gets too big to fit through doorways and he reluctantly joins our little Divanon program. --User:Modusoperandi/sig 05:05, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Not only is he a great writer, but he has a friggin awesome name. --User:Nintendorulez/sig2 00:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. So he can vote for me for my WOTM. And he is a shredder. \m/ !!! User:Gneomi/sig 07:09, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • ForHardeehar 14:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • ƒø®. User:Hinoa4/sig1
  • For. It is unfortunate you have rejected any possibility of becoming an administrator, you would make a great addition. User:Tompkins/sig 21:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Okay I've voted, now tell me if is this the Athen's northwestern Kwik-E-Mart? I need to get some milk for my wife. Pronto, Luigi! Feureau 02:39, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, because I take voting seriously, and want to have my voice heard in this, the closest of elections.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 01:16, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Prettiestpretty (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +5 Female Candidates
  • NomFor. ~ A number of users with the same number of featured articles (or fewer) have already won WotM. It's only my opinion, but the fact that she's been a bit quiet lately in no way invalidates the significance of her contributions here. ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 15:12, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Comment i'll vote for her if she's nom'd again next month, if only for See Dick (despite her "mother henish" protectiveness over that "wiki" page article's contents) & the hilarious Colossus of Barbie. --User:Mowgli/sig 17:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--User:Rataube/sig 00:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For I once had a very indepth conversation with Prettiestpretty about an image that she made, that won both my respect for her and my vote for her. --User:Zombiebaron/sig3 23:01, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Her work on See Dick is very funny. I couldn't write them any funnier than she can. I could learn a lot about funny writing from her works. --User:Orion Blastar/sig 01:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - David Gerard 13:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

One-eyed Jack (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +3
  • NomiFo. Despite having one useless socket, this user consistently turns out quality burbles. His work has all the hysteria of a nuclear power station while retaining the gravity and wit of a mouse on crack. It never ceases to amaze me, when most things do cease to amaze me, at least after a while. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 19:29, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I realise it's almost immaterial now that squiggle's got this in the bag, but just browsing through OEJ's article list is an experience to make any aspiring writer give up hope of ever being any good by comparison. --User:Jamtrousers/Sig 17:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For- One-eye liked my Pablo Neruda article, and he's a class act.--User:Claudius Prime/sig 14:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. My vote is taken for this month. Someone nominate him again next month. --So So 17:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Tooltroll (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +1.5

December 2006[edit]

ENeGMA won it.

ENeGMA (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +19

Modusoperandi (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +14
  • Nom and for. I said it before and I'll say it again: Suburban homeboy, The Bureaucracy Channel, American Fundie Magazine -- Kneel before Mod!--Procopius 16:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For Modusoperandi is a very funny chap with a good sense of up and down. --User:Zombiebaron/sig3 17:07, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For He made me laugh on my talk page (and clogged it aswell). He should be an admin. --User:AAA!/sig 08:57, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Fourth! - And let's not forget that time we were all in hypersleep, and the ship caught a meteor. If it wasn't for Modus, that bitch of a pilot would've jettisoned us to a fiery death.User:Tooltroll/sig 10:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Some of you may wonder, "Why vote for Modusoasdfperasdfdsefaandi?" His name is stupid and hard to pronounce. His facial features make little babies cry. He has an offensive odor that easily induces vomitting. He's often drunk and/or urinating in public. So to answer your question, I have no idea why Anyone would vote for Modus. --Anyone 15:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For I thoroughly enjoyed his articles. --Composure1 21:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For - So he can vote for me in the future. Seriously - User:Gneomi/sig 05:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For. My favourate Wahabist prima dona. --User:Mordillo/sig 13:27, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Tie game. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 04:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For A good egg and a great writer. --Super90 01:05, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Shandon 22:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Man, why ModusOperandi never get no respec'? He be comin' in second all da' time an I say it be my homeyz time 2 shine. I tell you who not be deservin' a' 'dis award, Famine. He been gettin' da' girlz and da' glory 4 years now but ModusOperandi gonna change that C dawg? I vote For 4 MO! Mr. Briggs Inc. 23:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • For. --User:Mowgli/sig 09:25, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I thought I'd never vote for him, but the whoring is under control and his work is only getting better. The noir article is one of my favorites.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 16:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

One-eyed Jack (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +7
  • Nom & For ~ The most underrated writer on Uncyclopedia, bar none. We should be ashamed of ourselves. ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig3 17:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For- Todd is right.--User:Claudius Prime/sig 14:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For - He won't win it, and he won't want to - which is kind of the point. OEJ takes Samuel Johnson's dictum on writers and shoves it up a nutpipe - and he does it with style. User:Hardwick Fundlebuggy/sig 21:37, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For Patrick Henry did it for me. I know when I'm bested, and this is clearly the case. --User:ENeGMA/sig 01:50, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For He's funny enough to make the frontrunner vote for him. --Jedravent 22:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For. In certain poker circles, this cat is wild. Hangs out with deuces and some dude with an axe. Has a keen profile. What he's got he's got in spades. Or hearts. It's kinda hard to tell. -- User:Imrealized/sig 06:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For I have no witty comment to make. --User:Cainad/sig 20:04, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Composure1 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +5

Noob of the Month[edit]

July 2006[edit]

Shandon won it.

Shandon (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +11
  • Nomination - I particularly enjoy Vincent Van Gogh's Things To Do on a Rainy Afternoon and his article on Night Court. He's written a fair amount of good content in a short amount of time, and holds a good word with some well-known contributors. All of their articles have a very relzxed tone, which is one of the things I enjoy most about them. So, in conclusion, this is a new user with new ideas, and I think that makes them a great candidate for NotM. User:Tompkins/sig 19:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. He actually had a meaningful conversation with me. --Sbluen 22:04, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. He is definitly a noob. He even thought I was an admin in this section of my talk page, even though my userpage said that I wasn't. --Sbluen 07:11, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Strongest Possible For. After reading the above linked article on van Gogh, I knew I could do one of two things — figure out a way to steal the credit for this n00bs genius work, or vote for said n00b. You're lucky this was easier. -- Imrealized 08:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. I like the cut of his/her/its jib. --User:King In Yellow/sig 16:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • for Because he/she came to my attention. Oh, and that excellent idea for a news article,UnNews:David Bowie to Meet Martian Delegation, and saying nice things about the way I screwed with it. Give it up for Shandon! User:Zim ulator/sig 22:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For based on the Van Gogh article as being a parody of a parody. Dame http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/b2/PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:34, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I'll change my vote a 3rd time, as this n00b is clearly the best and biggest contributor. User:Sir Cornbread/sig --05:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Following the crowd, because I can't think for myself.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 13:00, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. 'UnBooks needs people writing for it. Shandon is one of the few who answered that call, and he is good! Uncyclopedian 21:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I agree with Uncyclopedian. He writes good. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 10:16, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For and I want to take all the credit for nurturing his early talent as seen in Vincent Van Gogh's Things To Do on a Rainy Afternoon. Because I can. -- User:Mhaille/sig
  • The guy keeps himself busy with cruft that wasn't his to begin with... Asks questions when advisable... Has the perfect Uncyclopedia and wiki-mentality... Clear for from me! --User:MoneySign/sig 10:52, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

TheMono (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +2
  • Nomination - I came accross this one awhile ago, as is usually the case with my NotM noms. At that time my favorite article of theirs was Foot in Mouth. But then, they wrote Santaism and that was quite good as well, now my favorite is Gonzo Journalism, their most recent. As you can tell, this is a writer that gets better over time, like a fine wine, and is therefore a good candidate for NotM. User:Tompkins/sig 19:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm flattered - thanks for the nom. (It says loads that I originally forgot to sign this lol) - further, I just noticed you can vote for yourself, so For, I'm awesome lol. TheMono 03:51, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR. Tough competition this month, but he deserves it. User:Sir Cornbread/sig --06:58, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For-The Gonzo article was bad ass--User:Claudius Prime/sig 15:03, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
I appreciate the intention behind the futile vote lol TheMono 09:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Bluto (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +1
Comment: Hey, uh... sorry to burst your bubble, but you get one vote. So, pick one, or the other, or the other other, or neither. User:Tompkins/sig 23:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment. Doesnt say that anywhere, but I'll stick go with this guy Shandon. I like them both all, but Bluto Shandon has more the most contribs. User:Sir Cornbread/sig --01:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
"You may vote ONCE for your favorite noob." Under the Nomination and voting process section. User:Tompkins/sig 22:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment. I've been had! lol. TheMono 02:02, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Ah, now I see it... User:Sir Cornbread/sig --23:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

August 2006[edit]

Procopius gets the freakin' W. A big fat tick in the winner's column.

Procopius (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

  • Nomination. Have to nominate him today or his eligibility is up. He's made great articles: Snopes, Dark Ages, in his short time here. He also frequently writes for UnNews. He is clearly the best choice for NOTM as of right now, but because it is so early, I'm abstaining for now. No matter what, he'll certainly be a candidate, though. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 05:52, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment: Is that a for vote as well there, Corny? --User:MoneySign/sig 14:08, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment: Did you actually read his comment? It says right there, "... because it is so early, I'm abstaining for now.". Just thought i'd say... User:Spang/Sig 16:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment: My god, you're right... Sweet jesus, I'm going vote-blind! *cheer* Sorry about that... Must have been the lack of bold that I've grown so acustomed to... So, in short, no, I didn't actually read his comment... :( --User:MoneySign/sig 00:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
    • For and Comment.Just to save MoneySign, and because I should anyway. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 01:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For voting early for such an excellent contributor. Also for Diogenes. Hey... that's three votes, right? -- User:Imrealized/sig 06:14, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I was gonna nom him, you beat me to him... dammit. User:Tompkins/sig 06:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For! especially for the snopes bit but for being a decent fella all together... --User:Mordillo/sig 15:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For snopes. User:Uncyclopedian/sig
  • For the precocious porpoise with a purpose poised for the purple. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Snopes was hilarious. User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig21:23, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Snopes and the Battle of Gettysburg. Keep that shit up. --User:ENeGMA/sig 02:11, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For- Gettysburg never smelled so good--User:Claudius Prime/sig 20:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Already well on his way to having three featured articles... --User:MoneySign/sig 14:06, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because. User:Spang/Sig 16:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, 'cuz I loved the Snopes article. Plus, he saved my baby from a burning building. --em|c|! Icons-flag-us.png 19:28, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Good Lord, this is a tough choice.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 21:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Love your work.--SigCommunist.pngPremier Tom MayfairTalkRedPhone.jpgF@HSucrose b.gifMale-UN.jpg 21:12, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • for It's a pleasure to read his articles for audio. User:Zim ulator/sig 22:40, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Gettysburg will never be the same...--Shandon 15:38, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Not only does he make a lot of new articles, but he clearly puts a lot of effort into them. --Composure1 02:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For because he is the bomb! Stan Lather 05:21, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For So notable that I not only noticed the writing, but also due to the PLS. User:Dawg/sig 03:44, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For - If it were possible, I'd give him one vote for Washington AND another for Lafayette.--Rljenk 02:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- Hindleyite 11:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • for this dude has written some really excellent UnNews, and other stuff, and he doesn't piss me off, so that's good too. User:Zim ulator/sig 21:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, his consistently good writing makes the rest of us look like crap. Thanks a lot for going and raising the bar, Procopius...--User:Modusoperandi/sig 01:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


September 2006[edit]

Okay, so Quira didn't have any competition at all, but his maintenance work rocked the Nooblies this month.

Quira (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +12
  • Nominate. Great contributions, especially in curbing the tide of shite that floods the site. User:Mhaille/sig 22:39, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Agreed that these are great contributions.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 22:38, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For, I guess Really weak this month... --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 01:43, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • We've got a tide of shite? Sounds like Jersey beaches. If this user combats the Crap Stream, I'm all for them. -- User:Imrealized/sig 07:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For, good contributations. User:Spang/Sig 08:32, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For from me. I like the work and a cool person on #Uncyclopedia. My cycnicism temporarily defeated, I am forced to give the thumbs-up. The Freed Mind Sutoth Indar the Black Mage [MUN] [YvJP] [SI|PWHISIR] 09:31, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Against I couldn't find an article that they've written. Isn't that one of the requirements for eligibility? 15Mickey20 17:15, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment... Wait, he brings up a valid point. NOTMs have to have written "at least one full article". Hmmmmmm.... --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 06:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
      • Just means I've to try to get one out by ... 7 days? Brainstorm time! --Quira 06:07, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For--User:Elvis/sig 12:25, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- Hindleyite 17:20, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For And I don't care if he's written anything. Some people contribute their wit, and others do the real work. ;) User:Rcmurphy/sig 21:44, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Quira occasionally lost, but all good.--Wit (tawk) 04:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For because there are only 5 days left and he's the only one nominated... also because I haven't voted before and this one seemed the least life-threatening place to start... User:Soul101/sig
  • For --User:Mordillo/sig 00:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For --User:Severian/sig 02:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For Premier Tom Mayfair 15:39, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For A very good service-person. --User:ENeGMA/sig 19:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


October 2006[edit]

We actually had a bit of a race this month, but the people have spoken: Anyone is better than Kwakerjak.

Kwakerjak (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +7
Oh, yeah...I forgot...I voted already...good call, Sir Cornybread. --User:Electrified mocha chinchilla/sig 00:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  • The best choice for sure. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 00:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --User:Ogopogo/sig 17:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because we've been tied for far too many seconds, and I liked that article he did right much. --Anyone 21:40, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Abstain. I'd like to be as selfless as Anyone and return the favor, I really would. But I'm so new here, I couldn't recognize quality maintenance if it bit me in the ass. --Kwakerjak 03:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Anyone (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +11
  • Nom for now. Much like Quira, doing yeoman's work on maintenance.--Procopius 15:46, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I'm liking this umm..."person". --User:Electrified mocha chinchilla/sig 20:38, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Against - Has the worst voting reasons on VFH, and completely contradicts himself half the time as well.--User:Witt E,/sig 23:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment A) If we're being graded on consistency, we'll all be in class on Independence Day; B) If you don't like a nominee, withhold your vote; C) Your vote against appears to be based wholly on Anyone's VFH votes, and not on the excellent maintenance he/she has done.--Procopius 23:50, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Oh...wow...worst huh? A lot of emphasis on that, what with the italics and all. But I am appaulled that you would say that I contradict myself half the time...I've never half assed anything and I'm not about to start now. Let the record show that I contradict myself all the time (Also, please note the emphasis). On a side note, I graciously thank you for your rebuttal Procopius. --Anyone 13:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment So procopius, should emc have his vote rescinded because of his liking of Anyone? He's obviously biased. And yes, although I have based my vote on anyones vfh decisions, that doesn't mean that I have to vote for just because of the good job with maintenance work he has been doing. Spending time with that cruft is tedious and helpful, so I'll give it a weak against. And Anyone, you have contradicted yourself "half of the time on VFH", not "all" of the time. Sometimes you give a sensible reason after voting, sometimes not, and I never said you half-assed things either. I'm appalled you would vote against articles that you have commented on being "funny "or "liking".--User:Witt E,/sig 00:37, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. No, my saying that you said I did things half-assed was merely tom-foolery; not that you actually said that. Also, I'm glad you're open of your dislike for my VFH voting record because I like to hear all sides, although I honestly I never would vote against an article I thought was funny enough to be VFH'd, so I'm not sure I know what you're talking about...but feel free to elaborate. Thanks. --Anyone 03:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Well as long as you are open to hearing all sides, and c'mon, you were typing it, and you did contradict yourself at least once or twice. Bah. We're overloading here on colon use, how about I give you a cookie and we'll call this argument off.--User:Witt E,/sig 05:02, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Done --Anyone 13:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Doing some great maintenance work so I don't have to. -- Hindleyite 18:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For Amount of maintenance work is making us (lazY) admins look bad, quick op him to put a stop to it!!--User:Elvis/sig 21:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Tough call on some eminently worthy candidates this month. With a nod to Kwakerjack's excellent writing, it's hard to resist a person whose cleaning efforts match those of administrators.--Procopius 16:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Anyone, who can take on the Tennessee Board of Education, is alright with me. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For He's a jolly good fellow. --User:Zombiebaron/sig3 17:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • VFD For. --User:Mordillo/sig 09:02, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. it was obvious he/she/it was a good uncyclopedian, doing maintainance work, but i was holding my vote until i could see the quality of His/Her/Its writing User:Jack mort/sig 12:29, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For Premier Tom Mayfair 15:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Has done some nice work. --User:Gnome/sig 16:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, I don't like him, and he probably sucks, and spends too long hanging around IRC for my liking, and so on and so forth. -- User:Mhaille/sig 20:14, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- now Mhaille, that is just not fair: I've seen him quit IRC many a time. I don't like him either though--Shandon 23:30, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 21:40, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Thematrixeatsyou (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +1
  • Nom. Lots of valuable contributions, frequently helping with UnNews and maintainence, always suggesting new ideas to help Uncyc. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 23:20, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For Great unnewser, has "The Matrix" in his name. --User:Soul101/sig 13:28, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

November 2006[edit]

In a closely fought battle Braydie pushed to the front of the crowd to win this months NOTM award.

Braydie (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +13.5
Comment. Let me start by saying you are entitled to vote however you want. With that said, I politely suggest you vote for the n00b you want to win, instead of against a n00b who's one article you don't like. Vote's are powerful things so be careful when using them. Also, don't forget to adjust the score for your vote. Thanks! --Anyone 15:13, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Comment. I try, I really do. It's just hard sometimes, ya know? One second you're heterosexual, the next...well, you wake up after a night of drunkeness next to that fetching bartender. Oh God...did I just say fetching? --Anyone 15:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Comment. I found your pants. They were in my car. --User:Modusoperandi/sig 20:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Copper Stooler (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +1

Just Nom for now. A bit of a rebel this one, hasn't even created a user page yet. Something about destroying the establishment. Still, he created what will most certainly go down as one of the greatest articles of all time. --Anyone 21:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Update:I'm pretty sure he's dead, so yeah. --Anyone 21:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Updated Update: HE HATH RISEN FROM THE DEAD AND IS ALIIIIVE! So yeah. --Anyone 15:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Gneomi (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +10
  • Nom I've already spent my one vote, but I'm still nomming this guy because he's pretty cool and has done some great stuff for his short time here. User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig 08:17, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I liked that color-blindness picture.--Procopius 16:38, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Ditto. --User:Cap'n Ben/sig 14:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Nothing against Braydie, but Gneomi is churning out some high-quality stuff.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 15:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. He kept saying something about his nub on IRC, then I saw his name here. User:Tompkins/sig 07:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For He did some of the grunt work for my color blind article. Always a good thing. --Electrostatic 07:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. He's making serious effort to produce high quality pictures. Can't wait to see what other good things will come from him. :) ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig3 07:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For per Todd, and I'm especially impressed that he took the time to improve an image according to criticism it received on VFP. User:Rcmurphy/sig 04:19, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, though the other two rate votes too really - David Gerard 13:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 05:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Sure. A permanent IRC participant. - User:Guest/sig 14:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

December 2006[edit]

Gneomi, where ever he is, won it.

Gneomi (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +17
Yeah.. I don't know where he has gone.. User:Braydie/sig1 at 19:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Ok update.. If you look here, you can see he's retired from editing wikipedia, whether or not that's here as well.. User:Braydie/sig1 at 20:04, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Citrusmirakel (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +3

The_Bard (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +6

Uncyclopedian of the Month[edit]

July 2006[edit]

It was the month of the Bastard Admins as MoneySign eked out Famine for the coveted Uncyclopedian of the Month award. Bradaphraser was a noncontender.

Bradaphraser (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: -2
  • Self Nomination and For Let's see...what doesn't Brad do? He's an up and coming opera star, and that alone should win him this award, maybe not this month, but some time. Oh, and I thought there wasn't enough deserving people nominated this month. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 00:32, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Just won an award, and the other people on this page are very deserving (thanks for thinking of me, though:) ).--User:Bradaphraser/sig 14:52, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Self-nom? Whatever, I think Brad deserves it, but if he wants I'll wait til next month to vote for him. User:Tompkins/sig 17:51, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
It's a joke...so is the opera thing...I hope. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 20:24, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. He didn't give creative ban reasons, even when he had the chance. I expected more than just "blankings (shock)" for Deleter. --Sbluen 01:29, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Friendly Against I don't have anything against Brad, really, but if he doesn't want the award, give it to someone else. --User:DiZ/sig 17:07, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Famine (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +14
  • Nomination and For He has deserved this award for quite some time now. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 19:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, has deserved it forever, but has a bad rep because he does his job well.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 02:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Bad rep? You mean that whole crack thing? Well, it doesn't matter anyway, all of that's in the past. User:Tompkins/sig 02:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. He deleted a whole bunch of those terrible articles. --Sbluen 04:29, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For the little Famine we all have inside of us.--User:Rataube/sig 09:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Frontline infantry in the War Against Stupidity. -- User:Codeine/sig 16:51, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For because I understand his harshness in dealing with matters. He has Uncyclopedia at heart. And I, for one, salute it. --User:MoneySign/sig 20:48, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, just don't let it go to Famine's head. The consequences would be disastrous. Modusoperandi 21:52, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Famine -- it's what's for dinner. --User:King In Yellow/sig 14:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Irritable prick, makes Mhaille God do far more work than he should have to. 01:05, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. He banned me and so clearly has only uncyclopedia's best interests at heart. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | [email protected] - 23:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ~ T. (talk) 06:46, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Looooong overdue. His block log entries alone make him deserving of this award. User:Hinoa4/sig1 06:20, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because out of the candidates who've voted against themselves, this one wants it more. Oh, and he's been here the longest (I think?), he's far better than User:Pestilence and I hope to one day be banned by him. -- Imrealized 02:12, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For--User:Claudius Prime/sig 14:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - This award is long overdue for Famine. --User:Ogopogo/sig 22:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. -- Sir Cornbread The Great America...Fuck Yeah!!!! [SHOUT] [MUN] ~RAP~ [GET IT FEATURED!] 00:50, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

MoneySign (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +19 dollars sigged
  • Nomination and For Does alot of stuff, I can't name it all. Is very helpful as an IRCop as well. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 19:33, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Another worthy candidate that has a bad rep because he's very good at what he does.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 02:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I really have no idea why I'm doing this. MoneySign deserves no such accolades... User:Tompkins/sig 02:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For--User:Rataube/sig 09:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For actually making the recent changes/delete & ban log humourous! --User:02barryc/Signature 16:36, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Famine seems to have an... air... about him... ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:55, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For having the guts to protect an article of mine that a lot of people wanted deleted. --So So 05:13, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Ummm, can't think of any reason whatsoever. Ah well. User:Spang/Sig 06:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. For being such a dear. --User:VodkaTabako/sig. 03:31, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For because people like me don't need a reason, merely an excuse. The Invading Genius Yuri the Vaguely Octagonal [WORSHUP ME] [MUN] [YvJP] 11:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For He's an a**hole and called my Template ugly, but I have to admit that he does do a lot to help Uncyclopedia, which is what this award is really about. --User:DiZ/sig 01:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • How do you choose between people who work so tirelessly for the betterment of Uncyclopedia? I guess you use your vote to tie the score. :) For! -- User:Mhaille/sig 08:00, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This was, as Mhaille mentioned, a difficult decision. However, $ gets my vote this month because he seems like a good guy to me. -- Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 10:21, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For because I talk to him sometimes, and also he made me into a pickle.—User:Mandaliet/sig 11:02, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • FFFffforrrr as Piglet would say, not that I have anything against FFFffffaaaminne, but MoneySign went beyond the call of duty in creating a pic for an article he could have otherwise ignored with infamy...and Sir Brad, well, Brad just doesn't seem to want it this month.--Shandon 11:09, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because he's MoneySign -- User:Sannse/Sig 18:10, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because he's been helpful, and all Famine did for me was block me once. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 18:30, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment: You ask MoneySign to block you and see who did it best for you. Thats the only way you'll know. -- User:Mhaille/sig
  • for ...because I'm afraid... heh heh... User:Zim ulator/sig 00:22, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. he's consistent (consistently deletes all my garbage and you are grateful for it -- i dig the only attention i get), is accesible & prompt to reply; dishes out "speaking" orders (an order with lots of reasoning in legalese), and, of course, he's funny. --User:Mowgli/sig 05:10, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


August 2006[edit]

Famine just wanted it more, you know? He was hungry for the win.

Flammable (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +2

Sbluen (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +2

N+F Okay, I know I said I'd stay away from these [EXPLETIVE] award pages, but it's high time this one went to a non-admin (technically ZB is an admin on unmeta, so he doesn't count), and I can think of nobody here who's more helpful, conscientious, discerning, and meticulous than this guy. (Of course, he might be and probably should be an admin before the month is over, but at least I tried.) User:Some user/sig 21:10, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Comment "he doesn't count", eh? "ZB is an admin on unmeta", eh? Well I'll have you know that all I've done as admin on UnMeta is delete worthful pages, ban Tompkins, and ban Ghaela. Oh, and all I needed to do was ask keitei to op me. I don't think this nomination holds up to a complete investigation, eh major? --User:Zombiebaron/sig 13:18, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment I didn't mean you don't count in general, ZB, just that technically you shouldn't count as a non-admin for historical purposes. Admins have a huge advantage over non-admins for this award because they can ban people and delete pages (obviously). Sbluen doesn't have those advantages, but he still works at it, does a fantastic job of it given the limited tools he has, and from what I can tell he stays low-key and never complains, either. Besides, I'm not a Major — I'm a Lieutenant Colonel in the Nauru Air Force (you send them $39.95, and they send back a certificate and a baseball cap - not a bad deal really). User:Some user/sig 05:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Just to let you know, I've done lots of work on Ban Patrol, where I reported at least 50 vandals and I filled up the Ban Patrol Archive 5. If you looked at my userpage, you would notice that I have actually been nominated for admin at Forum:Two new sysops, and no one opposed me. --Sbluen 08:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Famine (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +20
  • Nom and For. Last month's runner up. He may be a bastard admin, but thats just his rep because he does the job well. His huff and block logs are unchallenged. Very deserving. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 21:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I stand by my vote from last month.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 00:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, I suppose.—User:Mandaliet/sig 06:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because Famine kicks ass. User:Hinoa4/sig1 06:37, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--User:Rataube/sig 14:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, as not to spoil the pattern. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:23, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For (standing by my vote for last month). --User:Ogopogo/sig 16:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Famine's still what we're having for dinner. --User:King In Yellow/sig 16:02, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For banning User:Feast after that VFD debacle. -- User:Imrealized/sig 02:39, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
  • The bastard blocked me for a whole day on article-and-image-feature day! Officially it was because I forgot to delete a talk page after deleting its corresponding article, but we all know it was really because he had lost UotM... So officially, I vote FOR, but really I'm voting... well... for... --User:MoneySign/sig 02:50, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For saving VFD from a flash flood. He deserves it much more than me this month. --Sbluen 02:55, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For I agree that he was last month's runner up. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 19:18, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For! Because if I don't, he'll ban me!----Shandon 00:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Just because I love his banning remarks --User:Mordillo/sig 13:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, even though his favorite activity is banning me. XD --User:SonicChao/sig 13:52, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, He is my kind of bastard.--User:Claudius Prime/sig 14:14, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. A scholar & a gentle man. Such soft hands.--SigCommunist.pngPremier Tom MayfairTalkRedPhone.jpgF@HSucrose b.gifMale-UN.jpg 19:13, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • for He can't ban me for voting for him and his huffing habits. --Parinoid 06:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Fart. ~ T. (talk) 10:30, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Can't write a poem worth shit. 22:56, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I've always liked Famine, well... not always, but for awhile at least. He designed my userpage, and claims to have done several others, he's a good man. And he bans people. User:Tompkins/sig 23:00, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment:I didn't design his current userpage...I may be mad-deleting ban-nazi, but I'm not fucking blind. Well, not yet. But if I keep looking at that page... 23:14, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • for Works really hard here, and pretends to have high standards <heh heh>; you have to respect that. User:Zim ulator/sig 21:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For because the bastard had the good sense to ban me on two separate occasions when my britches got too small for whatever it is that britches are normally able to contain.--User:Modusoperandi/sig 01:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

September 2006[edit]

Flammable won, but only just, thanks to Hinoa retracting his vote for Flammable and voting for himself instead. That's sportsmanship, folks.

Flammable (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: We all love his +12 Flaming Sword of n00b cauterizing
  • Nom and For. For being a a good admin, but mainly for the role in the epic struggle with SU182.--Procopius 13:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. He's a scholar & a gentleman. -- Premier Tom Mayfair 13:50, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --User:Ogopogo/sig 15:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Even though Flam picked me last for the Uncyc softball team. The Su182 incident will go down in geek history; as history!--User:Modusoperandi/sig 17:02, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Against He's already won this before. WHAT? He hasn't?!?!? Why the Hell not? FOR!!--User:Bradaphraser/sig 17:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For as per Brad. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For--User:Rataube/sig 17:51, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Against I was "for" until you brought up SU182. In this case, I have to call Famine, FTW. 23:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
    Comment. Yes other admins and users did play a role in the incident. Sarinzero and myself tried to talk him down from the ledge. Dawg even offered to sacrifice himself in SU182's place after he got permaban'd. There were others too, that he'd contacted on their talkpages. Yes, you did deliver the coup de grace. You've also already received UotM; so have Tompkins and Flammable (the two other admins that blocked him). <Pats on the back>, good work all.--User:Modusoperandi/sig 07:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment. I'll add that I was keenly aware of the roles other admins played the struggle, which is why I tried to limit my description to "the role," as in one role of many. I personally see this nom as battle pay.--Procopius 13:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For, now that I have changed the criteria to allow for an affirimative vote. 02:24, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Huge For He is like a blimp in a world of cheap dollor store balloon users. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 00:01, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. User:Hinoa4/sig3 00:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC) Don't take it personally, I still like you. I just want to be able to vote for myself. User:Hinoa4/sig2
  • For. My hero. -- User:Codeine/sig 10:50, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Look! I'm all against elitism, but this time I'm going to make it an exception because Flammable has the gayest signature ever! -- User:Col.swordman/sig 10:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --User:ENeGMA/sig 19:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Hinoa4 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +10
  • Nom Because I've noticed Hin doing a lot of "stuff," because he hasn't won this "award" yet, because a little "competition" is always good, and because this nom will at least guarantee he "wins" next month (you know how it goes). User:Rcmurphy/sig 05:32, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Yup, I'm willing to bet he'll win next month. Heck, I'll vote for him next month. But not this month, cause I've already voted. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 19:46, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
You racist pig! --User:Zombiebaron/sig 01:25, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - This user blocks people for very little reason, such as accidentally creating double redirects and forgetting to sign their name. --Micoolio101 08:15, 22 September 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101
Comment. Double Redirects Are The Absolute Biggest NO-NO!!!-- Premier Tom Mayfair 11:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
I have one word for you, InCoolio101. "Famine." User:Hinoa4/sig7
That's Micoolio101. And if you ask me, the biggest no-no would probably be this. And I am so bored, I'm going to vandalise wikipedia. --Micoolio101 01:59, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101
Rule #7 in the handbook of "How to Draw the Ire of Uncyclopedians": talk about vandalizing a wiki...--User:Modusoperandi/sig 02:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
I meant what I said and I said what I meant. And I hope your ass gets banned at WP. User:Hinoa4/sig5
Hmmm...seems this month that there are alot of Boothman Fan Club Members making stupid Against votes. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 22:48, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

I'd like to note that in an edit summary, Micoolio101 retracted his vote by blanking this entire section above. That's not how it's done. This is. Oh well, live and learn, right? User:Hinoa4/sig2

  • For. Not banning me to death.--Wit (tawk) 03:54, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
  • 4. --User:Mordillo/sig 00:08, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For finally huffing Auto-destructive art, something all other admins failed at. I appreciate it! User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig 01:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For He wears his shit-wading galoshes with pride and does a good job. So do all most some of the other admins, but Hinoa has the prettiest userpage. Wizstaff2.JPGThe Freed Mind Sutoth Indar the Black MageWizstaff.jpg [MUN] [YvJP]Icons-flag-gb.png 12:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For Making my laugh at his block reasons,and the amount of shit he has to deal with. I respect him and his dorm room dedication to Uncyc.--User:Severian/sig 02:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For - For fixing one of my templates (and using them). I am a n00b, and have gotten off on a bad start. Screw my other vote. --Micoolio101 06:36, 29 September 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101
  • For doing lots of stuff. --Sbluen 01:46, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- Hindleyite 15:47, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Sir Cornbread (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +2
  • Nom Seems to be everywhere recently, in a good way. User:Rcmurphy/sig 05:38, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Have to vote for myself. Thanks a lot, I'm flattered. Flam will probably win anyway, so I dont feel bad about the self vote. Glad my edits are valued. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 04:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I wish I could vote for all three, but I hate to see a baseless against on an awards page, and must fight to counteract that. Plus, Cornbread has been everywhere. Like God or Santa, but with less hate and presents, respectively. -- User:Imrealized/sig 08:29, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For - We get along better now... (retracting my vote and placing it on Hinoa4.) --Micoolio101 02:51, 22 September 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101


October 2006[edit]

A rare tie this month betwixt Orion Blastar and Hindleyite.

Orion Blastar (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +17 Orions Blasted
  • Nom & For. - LOL! almost every page this guy has started has been expanded by other users into full fledged articles (never mind that he started some of these pages more than a year ago - still no mean feat). he's the perfect uncyclopedian. he has done a lot of cleaning, contributing to foreign pages & helping new users. good community spirit. yet he still considers himself a misfit?///??? he's too perfect. too much of a a paragon of humility. he has to be tarnished. his userpage has to be mauled. he deserves this award. he is ridiculously goofy; consistently goofy. this recognition is longggg due to him. this award is his nemesis. --User:Mowgli/sig 19:18, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Went way out of his way to help me every time I asked for it. Moreover, he has done so after merely a brief encounter on a talk page. You'd think he's gay or something...--Medvedev (scream) 20:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For Who else am I going to vote for anyway? I mean really. Thanks for the above support and any support posted below. --Off Des Orion Blastar (talk) 21:07, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Sure, he's too anti-liberal for any of us to be especially comfortable with quite a bit of his material, but this award isn't about politics. So, who was there when the "Wikipedia is Good" vandal came around a while back? OB, that's who. Same thing with the [[Talk:UnBooks:See Dick|talk page]] for UnBooks:See Dick... And when a certain Mr. Devonshire sporked one of my articles over at Wikipedia and wouldn't properly cite it at first? OB was the only one here to post a comment on his WP talk page about it (though admittedly, Flammable and Mindspillage also sent him a personal note or two). And I could think of at least a dozen other instances where OB has helped out in problem situations. He's proven to me that right-wing users can actually be nice, helpful, and valuable to the site, which I probably would never have thought possible when I first got here (seeing as how I'm so, you know, anti-right wing). Anyway, he deserves a UotM. Why not. User:Some user/sig 01:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. -- Hindleyite 19:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. User:Alexjohnc3/sig 23:58, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Fire!--User:Witt E,/sig 04:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. And I thought we could only vote once, Mowgli. :) ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 01:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
lol, this is explained on my talk page. if i nom a person, it's obligatory that i vote for the person. my vote for hindleyite was an afterthought. my afterthought became a determination when hindleyite exhausted his vote by voting for orion. since i could not withdraw my vote without withdrawing the nom, the only way i could turn neutral was by cancelling out my vote. a bit convoluted & faulty, my thinking, i know, but what the heck. i'm still canvassing for orion if it isn't obvious already. :) if admins desire, they can delete my votes without affecting the nom. --User:Mowgli/sig 05:34, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Sorry Hindleyite, Orion has been around forever (I actually expected him to be nominated for Adminhood ahead of me, way back when) and this award is long overdue. FOR. -- User:Mhaille/sig 9:11, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For Premier Tom Mayfair 17:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I was going to talk like someone from the hood, but I figured it'd be very un-PC of me, and I do have a reputation to uphold. User:Tompkins/sig 01:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Tompkins has a reputation? News to me! User:Hinoa4/sig
  • For. They're both REALLY good choices, but what with his unbelievable patience with slashy, I have to give it to Orion.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 17:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, even though I know it is sort of pointless to vote for both. --User:Isra1337/sig 03:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, because I'm hopping on the bandwagon. --General Insineratehymn 10:45, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Eh... FOR.--Winston 23:21, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Orion is an excellent writer with a patient temper, two very good traits. Mr. Briggs Inc. 00:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • The prodigal user returns to cast a tie (for now). Both these fellows are unbelievable Uncyclopedians, but Orion nudged ahead with his knowledgeable and selfless help on my userpage. -- User:Imrealized/sig 04:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC) *Wow, it has been a while... I also meant to say For. -- User:Imrealized/sig 04:57, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Hindleyite (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +17 butt laws decreed by the Emir of Hind
  • Nom and vote: seems like everywhere I go I seem to see Hindleyite cleaning up the place and making actual improvements to articles that need it. --User:Isra1337/sig 18:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Yup.--User:Mordillo/sig 19:20, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For - --User:Mowgli/sig 19:24, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 00:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For--User:Rataube/sig 16:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For, Hindleyite is one of the good guys, as the many wordy and long-winded comments above attest.--User:Modusoperandi/sig 17:31, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For It just seems like its only admins who get this award. Anyway, Hindleyite has a very interesting user names. --User:Zombiebaron/sig 02:01, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Before I met Hindleyite, my life was a wasteland of confusion, drugs and alcohol. Now it's exactly the same, except I met Hindleyite at some point. Can't quite remember when. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 02:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. To really understand why he deserves this, just look at his name. Let's analyze it. First we have "Hind," or rear, so in other words butt. Next we have "ley," which everyone knows is spanish for "law." Finally, we have "ite," which is a suffix for "to make." Put it all together and you get "he makes butt laws," which is of course, spot on. --Anyone 03:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Now I hate to piss on anyone's barbecue, much less Anyone's barbecue, but in my amateur etymology book a hind is a kind of deer and a ley is probably some kind of geographical feature, and an "ite" is someone who likes that sort of stuff. So I reckon Hindleyite's ancestors probberly used to hang around where the deer hung around, and he probably inherited their property. In which case the venison steaks are on him. As well as the beer. --User:Armando/sig 08:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
      • That's correct, Armando. 'Hindley' derives from 'Hind' (deer) and 'ley/leigh' (woodland). Not a clue what 'ite' means, though. And, I've never seen a deer round here in all my life, just pies. So yeah. -- Hindleyite 11:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
        • Yeah but someone who makes butt laws is so much cooler. You can live with your deer all you want, but guys who make the butt laws GET the butt! (or something) --Anyone 13:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For an UnBooks creator. User:Uncyclopedian/sig
  • For I seem to remember, vaguely, some time or another Hindleyite did something that pleased me, I think. This is apparently all it takes to garner a vote from me... --User:ENeGMA/sig 00:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Why not even if he is from Wigan--User:Elvis/sig 10:07, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For --User:Electrified mocha chinchilla/sig 19:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • yes. He writes a lot of stuff, and it's very funny and never not good. He also does the voting stuff, and isn't a cock User:Jack mort/sig 18:15, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Taking nothing away from Orion, I can't say it better than Jack_mort.--Procopius 21:06, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --User:Armando/sig 12:53, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • For Perhaps the best author to be found here.--User:Czar Yah/sig 03:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

November 2006[edit]

Hinoa4 won it.

Hinoa4 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +16
  • Nom and For. I'm actually kind of surprised he hasn't got this already. Shame on you all. --Anyone 20:17, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Definitely deserves this. I was thinking of nominating Codeine's Mum for working tirelessly to remove vanity, but I think Hinoa deserves it more. --User:Cs1987/sig 14:31, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • My sentiments exactly, but I don't think that Codeine's mum has an Uncyc account. Yeah, whatever, for. User:Hinoa4/sig
  • For In the absense of Codeine's mum. User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig 21:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I'm sure he would do the same for me - maybe... User:Tompkins/sig 23:20, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, One time he gave me a kidney. I didn't need it, and I'm pretty sure that it wasn't his. But still...--User:Modusoperandi/sig 23:29, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, Hinoa is a nice guy when you get past his rough extirior, mood swings, violent temperment, and harsh banstick. --User:Zombiebaron/sig3 23:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For But this vote buys me at least six more months' worth of Hinoa-bashing. User:Rcmurphy/sig 04:21, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For, ^_^ Premier Tom Mayfair 21:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For He deleted my articles, demoted me, promoted me, but I respect him and he is a very good admin. He gets rid of the crufty articles and deserves an UoTM award like I got in October. --User:Orion Blastar/sig 01:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For I must say I've never heard of the guy/gal, never even seen the guy/gal, and this is the first time I've ever seen his name written anywhere. But I'm desperately wanting to become Uncyclopedian of the Month that I hope by voting for him/her, S/He'll nominate and win me an Uncyclopedian of the Month award after s/he wins. And I'll remember you, Heinouas4! You better deliver!!! Feureau 02:36, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
    Comment Not that I disagree with your vote, but your reason sounds suspect. Your insidious plot will fail, IMO. --User:Modusoperandi/sig 03:11, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For Did a nice thing, and he didn't yell at me this month, but did threaten me. BRRR-R-R-RR-RRR-RR-R-R-R-IIIIIIING.--User:Witt E,/sig 02:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
(throws down phone) Goddammit, that's the third prank call this week! User:Hinoa4/sig
  • For. --User:Flyingfeline/sig 17:11, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Ok, it's finally late enough in the month for me not to feel awkward voting for the person who has deserved it all along.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 21:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. -- User:Hindleyite/sig 21:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For - His block log summaries crack me up. --User:AAA!/sig 08:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Comment, yeah, and Modus' block log summaries stink. Oh wait...--User:Bradaphraser/sig 12:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Modusoperandi (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +8

Nom & For - If I was gay I'd go out with him in a second. But I'm not, so there. --Micoolio101 (whinevandalism) 04:48, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

  • For, purely for the wealth of amusingly inane comments dotted around talk pages and forum topics. --User:Jamtrousers/Sig 17:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • FORHardeehar 07:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR You cool dawg.--Mr. Bob 15:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It's a close call, but the numbers say it all. Voting for your competition is always a classy move, too. :) ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig3 15:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Hard as hell choosing between the two nominees this month, in the end I'm giving my FOR vote to MO due to the quality of some of his recent creations. Still, its a close call. -- User:Mhaille/sig
    Warning: You are about to witness an uncyclopedianite and recovering diva shoot myself in the foot. Thanks for your confidence (on an award that I'm pretty sure I don't deserve) but...isn't that more of a WotM reason?--User:Modusoperandi/sig 02:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR Me a' ModusOperandi r' brothaz got it? I tell you we alwayz got eachothers backs, C, G? I'll tell y'all who don' deserve 'dis award, Famine. He alwayz be h8'n on me an' my homeboyz, a' trashin' our sweet rhymes. He needs 2 srsly learn 2 stop h8'n an' stop snitchin'. Fo' now, 'da big MO is where it's all at Mr. Briggs Inc. 16:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC) Yo?
  • FOUR - Apparently there is no word. User:Gneomi/sig 13:29, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

December 2006[edit]

Bradaphraser won.

Drama (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +nowt taken out
  • Nom For Special:Contributions/Drama plus the thought of any user getting UGotM AND UotM at the same time is rather amusing.--User:Elvis/sig 09:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Pseudo-Against; Doesn't count for anything, as I've already voted. However, this user is not just probably, but definitely a sockpuppet, albeit for good intent. Also, has a bad influence on the young and warp-able minds of Uncyclopedians. Lastly, Klaus Nomi is pants-crappingly frightening and visually reminds me of a far more surreal and German version of Marilyn Manson. User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig 06:37, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Braydie (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +Tendie
  • Nom & For Braydie is one of the best newbies that I've ever encountered. He makes veterans look like gobshites & Braydie has only been here for a short while. I think he deserves this. Keep up the great work, comrade. Premier Tom Mayfair 20:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For totally. User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig 01:48, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For Inside the large abyss of black cold hell they call my heart located somewhere near the left is a small atrium just for Braydie. :] User:Toratoritore/sig 00:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For He has made some really helpful contributions and I like the articles he has written as well. --General Insineratehymn 18:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For He's a brother. Plus, he's got great contributions. --User:DiZ/sig 23:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Everybody else has pretty much said it all. I want him to have my babies. --User:Electrified mocha chinchilla/sig 14:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For He is an amazing Uncyclopedian. --User:J. Fuckin Kyle/signature 01:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For Because, well... why not? --JohnQ.Public 20:45, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For Because I stole his sig! --User:Tt22/sig 10:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For a great new user who has taken ownership of the site and does great work that puts some of us to shame.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 16:47, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Bradaphraser (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +Nineteenaphraser
  • Nom and For - consistant contributor, ALWAYS helpful and considered in his responses both on the site and in IRC, a lot of his work goes unnoticed. Even if he DOES vote against ALL of my articles, this is long overdue for a GREAT Uncyclopedian. -- User:Mhaille/sig
  • For. I gave him a personal award recently for all these reasons (and especially for voting against Mhaille's articles) no no nonononono. Brad does a lot of necessary but unglamourous gruntwork around here, and that's what this award is intended to recognize. ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig3 17:17, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Really? He hasn't won this yet? Sheesh, talk about injustice in the world. Brad rules. -- User:Codeine/sig 18:41, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I could swear we've already given this to him... twice. User:Tompkins/sig 18:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Brad does great work, great, great, work. --User:ENeGMA/sig 01:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes. --User:Sir Cornbread/sig 21:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For Brads supercool--User:Witt E,/sig 00:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For --User:Cs1987/sig 13:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For Good man in a tight corner. User:Hardwick Fundlebuggy/sig 16:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For Normally I wait until the end of the month to vote, but Brad should've gotten this already. User:Rcmurphy/sig 18:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For--User:Rataube/sig 00:33, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
  • ForUser:Rangeley/sig 00:55, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For Brad cannot be described in a simple vote summary, for all the things that he does are great an unimaginable. --User:Zombiebaron/sig3 13:31, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For. As much as I like Braydie (and I do champ!), UotM is about the unglamourous gruntwork like the late Todd said. Although I guess getting an award for unglamourous grunt work adds some glamour to the mix. Regardless, yay Brad. --Anyone 15:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The enemy of the ally of my enemy is my friend. You figure it out. POIUYTREWQ!!! --User:Goshzilla/sig 16:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Still for. Because Braydie told me to. Next month, I'm voting for him. User:Goshzilla/sig 02:40, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --User:Mordillo/sig 14:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  • For all he does. And has done. Seriously, the guy is a symphony that drowns out a traffic jam and a bright exit sign in a smoke-filled room. Brad gains respect the old-fashioned way - he earns it. And he makes way less than minimum wage for it all. That's commitment. Or insanity. We're not really sure. -- User:Imrealized/sig 07:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Fuer --User:Severian/sig 20:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
  • (chanting) Brad. Brad. Brad. User:Hinoa/sig1