Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 8

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
20052006 (part 1)2006 (part 2)2007 (part 1)2007 (part 2)2008 (part 1)2008 (part 2)2009 (part 1)2009 (part 2)2010 (part 1)2010 (part 2)2011 (part 1) 2011 (part 2) 2012 (part 1) 2012 (part 2)

Writer of the Year[edit]

Cajek (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +9
  • Nom. Cajek is crazy. Cajek is the craziest loon on this site, and has written more articles this year than Saturn's rings have little pieces of rock. He never writes the same way twice, and has executed some of the wackiest, most hilarious first-person monologues that I've ever read. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 01:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Um Downright one of the best people on the site - a great writer and even more a great person who really made this a great place to be. He probably deserves this for that Japanese opera thing alone buuuuuut I can't decide between hiiiim aaaaannddd... --User:DJ Irreverent/sig 14:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For per above. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig2 21:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For Fuck you TKF for nomming him before me. Cajek has been the living example of an Uncyclopedian writer this entire year, but I don't think we should hold that against him. My mind was made up months ago on this, and he still kept producing quality. -RAHB 03:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • I think WotY is the hardest thing to vote for on Uncyclopedia. Hell, choosing a President wasn't this hard. Cajek is one of my favorite writers on this site. I've seen every aspect of his freakish talent, both on this site and off of it. He's smart. He's talented. Most of all, he's fucking hilarious. Never does the man cease to make me laugh. His wit is that of one you could only find on a site like this. And yet...I'm not voting for Cajek. Every single nominee thus far deserves this award, and yet I can only cast one vote. Cajek, if you decide to come back to Uncyc and read this, know that I love you, buddy. In the butt, that is. User:SysRq/sig3 03:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • ...shit. SysRq's right, this is a tough choice. Mhaille, Modus, So So, the Cap'n, so many of these guys are amazing writers. This year, though, has belonged to Cajek right from the start. He's consistently hilarious, every time he writes, and despite being on a bit of a hiatus right now, he deserves this. For. - T.L.B. Baloon.gif WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 14:14, Jan 2
  • For As per TKF - Amy Rose 22:43, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • 'For All of his article made me laugh so hard that urine came out my nose. User:Readmesoon/sig3 18:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For Cajek is my far one of the most creative, brilliant users I've ever seen on my extremely procrastinative (is that even a word?) life on this site. Oh, and also, literally everything SysRq said I could also say in equal measures. Except the not voting part. User:Fag/sig5 11:38, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. What thekillerfroggy said. --Docile hippopotamus 00:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
  • As much as I'd love to vote for that Mhaille guy, or even MO, or the superslick writing machine that is PP, Cajek has been a busy boy this year. He was one of my nomination for UOTY, the fact that he is still in the running for WOTY as well shows his worth and his talent. For. -- User:Mhaille/sig
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. EVERYONE BOW DOWN!!! --User:Sonic80/sig3 18:34, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

TheLedBalloon (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 1
  • Nom. Here's the man whose taught several fantastic writers, including one directly above him, everything he knew, and in the process created talented monsters. Not only is he an incredible writer whose written three of my all-time top five favorite articles, but he has a knack for spreading his love to his dedicated wing of protégés, too. Aside from fantastic writing, the most important characteristic of a fantastic writer is his influence, and TLB's influence is widespread and evident. Plus, he's a fantastic writer. He gets a nod from me. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 01:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Speech No. 2: TLB is easily among my favorite writers. I'll admit that I was nervous when he was opped, fearful that perhaps this unstoppable deluge of hilarious articles would subside and eventually dry up, as seems to happen with many good writers that are given bansteeqs. This was not the case with my funny, inflatable friend. Instead, he has mastered both parts of himself, and has become something more. It was an honor writing with him, and through that experience I learned more about just what kind of writer he is: a great writer. I'm not voting for Leddy, although it pains me not to. I love you, brah. In the butt. User:SysRq/sig3 03:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For I recognise his name, therefore he must have been in the edit history of an article I like --Veggieburgerfish 23:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Mhaille (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +18
  • Nom. Ever classy, ever prolific Mhaille. He's been the top banana on this site for three years, both as a writer and as an Uncyclopedian, and in this time he's hardly ever let up. Some people may excel at being crazy or unusual, but Mhaille's wit rarely falls down into the gutter. Even when he's writing his patented tasteless articles, his articles still exude a thick air of classiness, and executes the tastelessness in the most clever way you've ever seen. He's funny, highly versatile, and going strong since 2005. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 01:10, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
    • Eh... hate to be a jerk, but I'm changing my vote to for Mhaille, seeing as TLB's pretty much a lost cause, and if not him, I'd like to see Mhaille win this instead. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 22:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For the longest time, I was a stand-off observer of Mr. Mhaille. A bit of a secret admirer, if you will. I saw that this great force on Uncyclopedia that has carried this site for so long truly deserved everything he had earned. This is the personification of passion: Mhaille's full of it, and he shows us this in his writing. Recently, I have gotten to know Mhaille a little better through random encounters and whatnot. This has only furthered my view of him as both a strong pillar for the community, and an unstoppable force as a humorist. He's got it all. Mhaille's a great guy, a great op, and a great writer. I'm not voting for Mhaille. But if I'm writing nice little speeches for Cajek and Leddy, then Mhaille is just as deserving of my respect. I love you, man. Butt. User:SysRq/sig3 03:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. - Writes good stuffs, most features etc. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 10:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. 'Cos he promised me £10 if I did. User:RabbiTechno/sig 12:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. He deserves this award. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • If I could, I'd split my vote 50/50 between him and Modus, I would. And then I'd still have to give serious consideration to Cajek and Led. As I can't, however, after several minutes thought on the subject, I figured that Mhaille's articles consistently made me laugh more than anyone else's have done. Just. Add in the fact he's been going as long as anyone, and I'm going to have to vote for Mhaille. It's a ridiculously close race though. User:Heerenveen/sig3
  • I seriously thought he won this award years ago. I was a bit amused that he was up for it again - deserving as he still is of it - until I just realized that he had never won it in the first place. Anyway, that should be changed forthwith, as Mhaille has not only been writing good articles and whatnot all year, but also last year, and the year before, and the year before, and the year before, and the year before. -- User:Zombiebaron/sig 23:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For --User:Sabrown100/sig 22:06, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Parsat (talk / contribs) 04:08, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For Although others write well, Mhaille contributes to a very large and diverse number of different articles especially at new pages. Mhaille has created many articles, but he has had an influence on many. For that, he gets my vote. MrN Icons-flag-gb.png http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/4/4e/HalIcon.png http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/e/e1/Goldboobs_Improved.jpg 16:05, Jan 9
  • For - Mhaille's distinct style of writing, and even more distinct sense of humour makes for fantastic articles User:Bonner/Sig Jan 13, 18:41
  • For - His writing is fantastic, and when he helps me with mine, it makes mine better.--User:Claudius Prime/sig 05:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. It's Mhaille. It's always Mhaille. Even when I don't "get" his pages, because their all foreign 'n' shit, I know that they don't suck...because it's Mhaille. Everybody here deserves a vote, but only one of these people is Mhaille. User:Modusoperandi/sig 16:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Dig. - Brilliant. Go on, my son. --User:The Thinker/sig 01:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes - --Knucmo2 14:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For when I say his name, I wonder if I have a cold. Am I saying his name right? OMG! AM I DYING????? --Kenvalyi 01:42, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. He has touched me and countless others in places we never thought we would be touched. -- User:Olipro/sig 00:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For? --User:Lugiatm/sig2 18:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • 4'. User:DjGentoo/Sig 21:07, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Cap'n Ben (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 1
  • Nom. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 01:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Er Cap'n Ben, whom has been producing hilarious articles since nigh on the creation of time itself and managed to step up even more this year to fill the void left by users such as me who have been too busy/lazy/writers blocked to write any more stuff. I'll try to form a list of what he's written... --User:DJ Irreverent/sig 14:47, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Funny, highly versatile, and going strong since 2005. Who else can you say that about on this site? FOR--User:So So/sig 22:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Touche, TKF, but seriously, the Cap'n kicked so much ass in this year of lazy writers. I thought he would be a lock for this... --User:So So/sig 01:18, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Modusoperandi (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +20
  • Nom & For. He's probably the most consistently funny person on the site, writing real quality articles and chucklesome one-liners all over the place. Tends to brighten my day whenever I see him, although that could be the light reflecting off his gleaming naked body. --User:Under user/sig3 10:37, Jan 1
  • PHWHORE As per above. User:Colin "All your base" Heaney/sig 02:24, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg F☭R Premier Tom Mayfair 02:58, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • I know, this is getting real old (unless you have tl;dr'd my other speeches) for y'all, but there are just so many great nominees this year. However, this is my man. Modus is forever a symbol of genius in my mind. Everything from his talk page banter to his most recent articles and images demonstrates just how fucking funny this silly Canadian is. Modus is just one of those users that has always been here, has always been writing comedic gold, and is just fine with or without recognition. I've never seen him tire, I've never seen the quality of his works slip in the least. He's consistent. He just never runs out. Of the three other nominees I have taken the time to recognize, two have been ops. What Modus has in common with those ops is that they all are great at everything that they do. Modus gets things done, and still has time to write. He's a powerhouse, and is my ideal Uncyclopedian that I someday hope to be. I think we all aspire to be Modus in some form. As a writer, he is unstoppable, and it is for that reason that he has my vote. I love your butt. User:SysRq/sig3 03:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For Per above, even though Cajek almost got my vote here. User:Sawblade5/sig 07:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Darn, but this was close. However, unlike the rest of the candidates, Modus is Modus. No one can compare to his seemingly limitless supply of jokes, be they one-liners, high-hat satires, side-splitting parodies, et cetera. The defense rests, your honor. User:Necropaxx/sig 19:58, Jan 2
  • I vote for this guy. -- Template:Adjective Ape (dance) (Riot Porn) 21:09, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. IronLung 22:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. This man is made of God and win. --User:Bomb/sig 15:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg Against. Because I'm confused how this works, exactly. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bradaphraser (talk • contribs) diff
  • For - I probably shouldn't be voting here, since I haven't really existed very much for the past six months or so. Though I suspected this hasn't been Modus's most prolific year, I have read some of his new stuff and it is great. He deserves this. User:Cs1987/sig 08:43, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. I never would have thought that casting a vote would be so painful as this, but it is. Not that Modus isn't great, he is, but everyone on this page (except moi) is terrific and deserves this award. Still, Modus' star is just that much brighter, because he makes it look so damn easy. And Canada deserves at least one major award for producing something of merit in 2008. Dame http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/b2/PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:46, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
But what about the Toronto Maple Leafs? --Kenvalyi 01:44, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Duh. --User:Savethemooses/sig 08:06, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
  • The choice is clear! User:Squiggle/sig 22:50, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Really tough choice, but For --User:Cap'n Ben/sig 23:18, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For - For the 1 1/2 years I've been on this site, I've seen a large amount of featured articles. You don't always know what you'll get on the magical world of VFH, but if I see the author is good ol' Modus, I always know I'll love it, without exception. This year's candidates are incredibly hard to choose from, but basing this on consistency, I think Modus has it. Also, his Village Dump posts are always good for a chuckle. User:The UnIdiot/sig 02:26, Jan 15
  • For - There are a lot of good writers here: shit. I thought about who I should vote for, and Modus's name kept coming up. I wish I had this guy's mind, because it's probably delicious. Definitely Modus... or Mhaille... or Led. [note: Thank you for nominating and voting for me, guys! Makes me feel good.] User:Cajek/sig2

Link title

  • For User:Frenchfried
  • For. Modus is like maple syrup. On the outside he's all golden, sweet and sticky. On the inside however, he's all golden, sweet and sticky. This has nothing to do with the vote though. I just like pancakes. And Modus is the pancake of my life. Did I say that out loud? User:Mordillo/sig3 15:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For As many great writers there are to choose from today, i think modus takes the cake... I wonder if a pancake is considered a cake... I want pancakes. Wait, I want pancakes. /me goes to get pancakes. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 15:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Procopius (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 1.5
  • Nom Even though he has been dead for a good majority of the year - coming back periodically to write a few newses and devour brains - I still believe he deserves this for being the most talented individual to ever grace this site. Because I'll never decide between Cajek and Cap'n Ben I'm going to vote for Procopius on principle. --User:DJ Irreverent/sig 14:52, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • 1/2 For on behalf of an IP. This is a totally illegal vote, and strike it if you feel you must, but I think it's clear at Talk:The white guy in All-4-One that Tony Borowiak, the white guy in All-4-One, editing as IP 12.88.49.178, would like to throw in his lot for Procopius. http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/bf/Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 22:53, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

15Mickey20 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 1
  • Nom I am a fan. Has done great work all year, especially on the tennis articles, and deserves, at the very least, a nom. User:The Woodburninator/sig 17:25, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • gah I strongly urge you all to vote for Mickey as he is without doubt one of the funniest people to ever grace this site, and has even stepped up in the last year making even more hilarious articles. However I am just too stuck to vote for Mickey over Cajek and Cap'n Ben. --User:DJ Irreverent/sig 06:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • & For No one makes me laugh as consistantly, or as hard as Mickey does. User:The Woodburninator/sig 07:12, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

So So (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 2

Hyperbole (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 5

Prettiestpretty (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 1

Uncyclopedian of the Year[edit]

Cajek (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 6
  • Nomination - Aside from his obvious qualities as a writer Cajek doesn't get the respect he deserves for the work he does on Uncyclopedia. Always helpful to other writers both established and newcomers Cajek has been one of the real workhorses that has seen Uncyclopedia go from strength to strength this year. -- User:Mhaille/sig
  • For. Cajek doesn't just improve the site; he has a knack for encouraging others to get behind him and... oh, dear, that's turning into a sexual innuendo. http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/bf/Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 21:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg F☭R Premier Tom Mayfair 03:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg Very Strong For Cajek makes this site very fun. He deserves very strong bannination it! User:Sawblade5/sig 07:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For What they said. --User:Cap'n Ben/sig 23:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For Only limited action by me lately, but I've seen him hard at work helping others.--User:Claudius Prime/sig 05:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • This is not an easy year to vote. There are quite a few here that I admire for what they did this year...in a non sexual way...or such. But I think that Cajek has initiated the Pee Review revolution which revitalized a part of the site that was dormant for...well...forever! I think Cajek injected us with new energies (as well as sexually transmitted diseases) which managed to make us look, if only for a short while as not being the worst. Unlike the majority of us Cajek cared. User:Mordillo/sig3 13:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
    • You guys are awesome: I love this place, sexually speaking. User:Cajek/sig2

TheLedBalloon (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 8
  • Nomination - Bloody funny, generous with his time, much as with Cajek so much goes unnoticed, I am going to struggle to choose between them. -- User:Mhaille/sig
    • Wuv 10 years from now, I'll still remember my adopter's username. And his home address. Because I'm kinda weird. User:Cajek/sig2
  • For. IronLung 02:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. An ever present, ever friendly, ever helpful admin, and great all-around guy too. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 03:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. I love this man. Goddamn if I ever met leddy in a bathroom goddamn some shit would happen. Goddamn. - User:Kingkitty/Sig
  • For. He fixes things when I broked them. --User:So So/sig 03:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For Pretty much per TKF. Nothing else to say on that one. User:The Woodburninator/sig 07:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For Looks like Mordillo is going to win (which I agree with), but I would like to make special mention of Led. Led's style of handling the crap, whilst not getting upset by assholes yet still continuing to write quality articles shows what a awesome dude this guy is. Another thing about Led... When he has made a mistake, he admits it. Twice in over a year I think it was. ;) MrN Icons-flag-gb.png http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/4/4e/HalIcon.png http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/e/e1/Goldboobs_Improved.jpg 16:12, Jan 9
  • For There's nothing that Led can't do. Really. Try him. User:Syndrome/sig 22:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

84.194.239.31 (TalkContribs (del)Block (rem-lst-all)WhoisCityProxy?WP Edits)[edit]

Score: 1 + 1 vote for the institution of IPotY
The hamsters will always remember us of his greatness.
  • Nomination - 84.194.239.31 was the one that prophecy had spoken of, the one who would bring balance to the wiki. The awesome 84.194.239.31 was always there to state the obvious, out-grammar anyone and talk existentially. Maybe he's still there, lurking in the shadows, ready to act, to do what is necessary. 84.194.239.31, he was the coolest IP of 2008. He said "nobody has to worry about what happened to me" but still I wonder what happened to him. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 01:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For - I know I'm trowing my vote away, but I can't stand 84.194.239.31 not getting some of the credit he deserves. I wouldn't be able to decide who else to vote for anyway. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For the creation of IP of the Year and this guy being the first. 84.194.239.31 is a stellar chap, killing a rather pesky troll for us and being exceptionally helpful before vanishing off into the distance, preferring the anonymity of his searchable, easily identifiable IP address. This award should be saved for an actual Uncyclopedian, which means that the user must be a MUN at least, in my book anyways. However, this guy still deserves some recognition. (I mean it, IPotY would be awesome, can we make that happen?) User:SysRq/sig3 21:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
    Do you seriously believe that the almighty 84.194.239.31 can be traced by such simple mechanisms? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:45, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
    I don't know what it was that I was trying to say. Don't call me on this shit, I'm making it up as I go, man. User:SysRq/sig3 22:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

MrN9000 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 2
  • Nom & for - A real workhorse, and he's everywhere - encouraging new writers, smithing, reverting, formatting, fixing, helping out and being a real gent. --User:Under user/sig3 09:24, Jan 1
  • Near-woot The only reason I'm not voting for Pants is because that other guy from England, the one that lives under the ground and controls my thoughts, has been around longer, and helped me navigate this crazy website. GO N! User:Cajek/sig2
  • Comment. I just want to express my gratitude to MrN for being one of the most effective and essential Uncyclopedians to the site for the past year or so. Had Mordillo not been as awesome as he is, my vote would go here. I hold MrN in high regard as being one of the members who sparked a good chain reaction of users doing maintenance and helping to keep the site going, and think he was quite possibly the single most important user in that particular "revolution", as it were. As such, he deserves at the very least, this statement of praise. -RAHB 18:55, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For - hard choice for me to make this year, some fine contributors. His finer points are detailed by others above. The only thing I would add to this is that the work he does has been achieved without the "benefit" of admin rights, which speaks for itself. -- User:Mhaille/sig

Sycamore (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 2
  • Nom - Another absolute Trojan - a recent changes monster, reverter of shite, fixer of vandalism, fighter of fires and wearer of a stylish sporran. Probably does more work than you. --User:Under user/sig3 09:24, Jan 1
  • For per above. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig2 21:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Since nobody will make him an admin. Harumph! User:Modusoperandi/sig 04:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Mordillo (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +21
  • Nom - He's the admin I see about the place the most, making the bans that need to be made, doing the big bad wolf stuff to keep fuckwits at bay, and generally being the controlling zionist influence on this wiki. --User:Under user/sig3 09:24, Jan 1
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. - He's good, plus a good admin too. Makes good articles. I fear that I'll be blocked if I don't vote for him. 800px-Flag of the Philippines svg.png | King Joseph® GiratinaOriginForme.png | Contact Goa Tse Clan Priest | Goa Tse Clan Sign Up | Rouge.gif | 02:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • PHWHORE And stuffs. User:Colin "All your base" Heaney/sig 02:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Diplomatic, a work horse, responsible, and as I've said time and time again, and will continue to say until the day the Earth stands still, he simply knows how to get shit done. -RAHB 03:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Tough call this year, but I'm voting Mordillo, per RAHB. 'Dillo's the man. - T.L.B. Baloon.gif WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 14:06, Jan 2
  • And I thought WotY was hard. Of the nine current noms, there are seven more than deserving candidates here (I'll let you guys work out who that is), and there's an argument to be made for every one of them. I've thought especially hard about voting for UU, then MrN, then Sycamore. Then I noticed a common thread among them - who is it that they all look up to in a way, and who they ask for help in a firefight? Mordillo. He's been on fire all year pretty much, and overall, I feel I have to vote for him. User:Heerenveen/sig3
  • For. Hard working, friendly, effective. Did I forget to mention Jewish? User:RabbiTechno/sig 18:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Four as per him being awesome. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 19:12, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Yeah, he's cool. User:Roman Dog Bird/sig 19:47, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For despite the whole Gaza thing... -- Template:Adjective Ape (dance) (Riot Porn) 21:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For, BECAUSE of the Gaza thing. Yes. What? Oh, I'm sorry I misunderstood. For anyway.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 00:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For Sure. Gramps earns it. It's now or never, considering how old he already is... User:Luvvy/sig2 16:37, 7 Jan
  • For. One of the best. And apparently his wife is cute too -- User:Sannse/Sig 21:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Mordillo pwns spammers, and is an all around nice guy. --Meganew POST NOW!!! 23:22, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Always the guy who lays down the law and gets stuff done, without being too serious about it. User:The UnIdiot/sig 00:42, Jan 11
  • W♥v. Hebrew boner. Level headed. Role model. Mediator. More dildos. Only one of these terms refers to Mordillo. And yes, it is "role model." Wait, all of those describe Mordillo perfectly. I think Hv did it for me, made me realize that everyone comes to one person time after time for advice and a little tough love. I don't know who that person is, so I'm basing my vote on userpage vandalism. Mordillo's page has seen more action than...er...Codeine's mum. Oh, and he's a Jew that controls the internet, something you don't see too much these days and therefore needs to be rewarded and recognized. Good work, Mordillo. User:SysRq/sig3 02:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes. He has shiny shoes. - [13:41 12 January] User:YesTimeToEdit/sig7
  • Bandwagon --User:Electrified mocha chinchilla/sig 02:12, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment restored Boobs after it had accidentally been deleted for whatever reason.--User:Mnbvcxz/sig2 15:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
No agenda here, I just love boobs. User:Mordillo/sig3 16:03, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Dig I love this man. To the point that his girlfriend is seriously distraught by it. Could I be more subtle about it? Absolutely. Will I be more subtle about it? I think you know the answer to that question. You think I care what that bitch thinks? ;) --User:The Thinker/sig 01:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
That's my wife you're talking about! O_O User:Mordillo/sig3 10:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For he's pure gold and have you looked at the price of Au lately? Let's mine this bastard! --Kenvalyi 01:39, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Why not? User:Regret Tenenbaum/sig 00:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. Woo! Mord! go mord! Woo! woo... I'm going home User:Sonic80/sig3 18:35, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Under user (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 9
  • Nom - One word - awesome — Sir Sycamore (talk) 14:25, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For Can I vote more than once? How does this thing work? What does this button do? Oh sh- User:Cajek/sig2
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:49, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Backed me all the way in numerous parts of the site in the past few months. --Nachlader 18:07, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. He's like OnStar: always there. (groan) User:Necropaxx/sig 19:51, Jan 2
  • For. Parsat (talk / contribs) 04:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For - It's about time a non-sysop like myself got this award. User:Cs1987/sig 08:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Damn right UU has kept this site running all year. --User:DJ Irreverent/sig 10:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For helping out around the site and constantly peeing. --Docile hippopotamus 00:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Devoted enough to not only do my job for a year, but then take the title to go with it. Good people. User:Boomer/sig/2 01:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Modusoperandi (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 2

Heerenveen (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 0
  • Nom I just don't think he gets enough credit for all the stuff he does around here. Deserves at least a nom. User:The Woodburninator/sig 17:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
A nomination just for the sake of nomination? --User:Electrified mocha chinchilla/sig 02:14, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
No, a nomination for the sake of everyone saying, "Oh yeah! Heerenveen totally deserves this award. Seeing him here makes me want to vote for him, and whomever nominated him is a sexy, manly, awesome guy!" That's what I was generally going for. User:The Woodburninator/sig 06:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

SysRq (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 1
  • Nom&For I don't even know if Sys would approve of me nominating and for-ing him but I'm going to do it anyway. In my opinion he is one of the brightest lights on uncyclopedia : always funny, always friendly and compassionate as well as passionate (the speeches on WotY demonstrate that) and although my opinion probably doesn't count for much because I keep procrastinating myself on and off the site to the point where I'm shit at everything Uncyclopedia-wise, I still feel strongly that this guy deserves this award. User:Fag/sig5 11:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Man, fuck you. Thanks buddy, I appreciate the kind words. To say thank you, I am going to make a simple comment without bitching about you voting for me. User:SysRq/sig3 20:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009[edit]

NotM[edit]

Tagstit (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +12 tits (or tags, if you're into that sort of thing)
  • That actually brings up a good point. Tagstit (whom I have adopted only after seeing that there is no way he could go wrong) shouldn't just win this because there is no other competition. I hope that fact doesn't cheapen the award for him, because he has certainly earned it, being one of the most stellar noobs I have seen since Template:U. Also, he's a freak in the sack. (Not to mention a freaky sack. Weird.) This isn't like my WotM speech, by the way, he should certainly win this. tl;dr version: He's earned it, even though he's the only nominee. User:SysRq/sig3 16:22, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +1 of Tagstit's fiercest competitors
  1. For. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 00:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Invalid nom, been on the site since March 2005. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig2 17:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

“Be a MEMBER of no more than 30±3 days membership (Unless you are Rcmurphy)”

~ them rules up there

- [20:51 20 January 2009] User:YesTimeToEdit/sig10

Kit paddle (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +0
  • Nom. Competition for Tagstit, you say? Well, Kit here has also made a good start - friendly, helpful, done a couple of good reviews, started writing, seems to be settling well. Tagstit still gets my vote, but Kit deserves a nod for starting off in the right way. --User:Under user/sig3 18:44, Jan 17

UotM[edit]

Benson (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 1 USERS WHO IS NOT BENSON!
  • Comment: This is 2009. Not 2006. User:Roman Dog Bird/sig 00:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment: I know, and Benson is still Benson. --Docile hippopotamus 05:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment Tired, old in-jokes are tired and old. User:Colin "All your base" Heaney/sig 17:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg Strongest Possible For Because Their is No Alternative. For the love of Oscar Wilde, somebody make a real nomination! But on a serious note, if there isn't anyone who deserves this award, I think it should go to Benson, he did alot of work for the site, and deserves to be recognized. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig2 17:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
    • Frankly I find this nomination insulting to all these who work day and night to keep this place working. This is as bad as nominating Cow go poo for PotM. I think we had enough of Benson. 17:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
      • These joke nominations do get actual nominations made. I could easily think of half a dozen users who deserve this award, but all of them already won it. Seriously, tho, this nomination was made on the 17th! If its insulting to nominate Benson, then its also insulting to nominate no one at all. At least nominating Benson gets someone's attention. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig2 06:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
        • Better not nominate at all then to nominate someone for the sake of it. I'm sure that if the nominator looked harder he would find a plethora of people to nominate. User:Mordillo/sig3 09:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
          • In his defense, it is the 21st, and we have but one other nomination. This joke nomination did get the attention of others and we have a real candidate safely ahead of joke one. If the joke nomination would not have been made, this award would probably have gone idle this year. There are alot of other joke nominations going on to. For example, they are throwing the UGoTY award away on a fake "Wikia" username. At least give it to a person like Jimbo Wales! --User:Mnbvcxz/sig2 18:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol against vote.svg Against. - fuck off--Sycamore (Talk) 17:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • One user, one vote. Both of your votes had the same date/time group, so I'm crossing them both off. User:Modusoperandi/sig 07:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Did you know that your the only one still voting for Benson? --User:Mnbvcxz/sig2 17:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Did you know that Benson was over in 2006? User:SysRq/sig3 16:45, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Benson is never "over". --Docile hippopotamus 12:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

sannse (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 4
  • N+F. I think it's time that Sannse get some recognition for her work around here. Sure, she's a member of minitrue and that staff hat doesn't really fit her eyes, but all in all over the years I think she's done more than enough to help the site and support it. Now if we can only get her to resign that organization who shall not be named and form a new one who will be called....errr...Likia or Quickia, we will all be happy. User:Mordillo/sig3 17:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. - Per last time--Sycamore (Talk) 17:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • One user, one vote. Both of your votes had the same date/time group, so I'm crossing them both off. User:Modusoperandi/sig 07:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Oh, you're not allowed to do that?User:The-Real-Syko/sig 23:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Mnbvcxz (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 9 Backward bottom rows of your keyboard

WotM[edit]

An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 11
  • Symbol for vote.svg Nom + For Sir Sycamore (talk) 18:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg for per above. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig2 18:19, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
  • W♥v. Got friggin' robbed last month. User:SysRq/sig3 19:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Ape is brilliant. He's one of those writers who seem to stay under the radar, then you visit their userpage and realise just how many good articles they've written, and therefore how many times the've made you laugh. --User:Under user/sig3 19:15, Jan 8
  • Per SysRq Yeah! Some Asshole beat him last month. It was awful! Actually, Sys is a pretty great author as well, and deserved it.... not that he can ever know I think that. And now to insult him more... Whomever beat him sucks. User:The Woodburninator/sig 19:34, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For as per last month, and the year before that, and the year before that... User:Necropaxx/sig 17:07, Jan 13
  • For As per pretty much everything he's ever written. User:Colin "All your base" Heaney/sig 19:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Despite the whole Gaza thing. User:Mordillo/sig3 17:32, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Before I forget to vote for him. --User:So So/sig 13:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For Hesitant due to his lack of recent activity, but he is deserving of getting this. -RAHB 09:44, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
  • As Before --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 18:45, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
  • For User:Tagstit/sig 06:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

IronLung (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 1
  • Holy crab cakes! I'm honoured and surprised to even get a mention. IronLung 22:31, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Spiritual For. I've already voted, but when you nomm'd next month, you've got my vote. : ) User:Necropaxx/sig 16:41, Jan 20

February 2009[edit]

WotM[edit]

DrStrange (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 10 strange fans

Sycamore (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 4
  • Nom & For. Syc rocks in so many ways, but among those is that way he rocks as an author. As well as fixing up and keeping an eye on pretty much every Scottish article to stop them being total shite, he's written quality, articles, by, the, crate, load, and has been doing so for a good while now. Time to recognise that. --User:Under user/sig3 09:46, Feb 2
  • For. DrStrange is really good too, but Syc's been doing this consistently for ages. To be honest, I thought he'd already won it, but since he hasn't, my vote must go here. User:Heerenveen/sig3
  • For. Indeed, Dr Strange is great but so is Syc and, as its already been said, he's done this for quite a while. --Kit talk 12:57 23 February 22px-Flag of Sweden.png
  • For doing an awful lot of small, inglorious work that requires solid writing nonetheless. Every morning I wake up here in the states (at a godawful early hour) and Syc's ID is like a rash across the "recent changes" page.--User:DrStrange/sig 13:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
    • How pathetic--Sycamore (Talk) 17:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
      • Just accept the bloody compliment, it's sincere. Your service is an additional consideration on top your writing skills and a valid reason to vote for you. My values hold that I vote for one of my opponents and you get the nod. Tough Noogies--User:DrStrange/sig 23:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Cap'n Ben (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 9
  • Nom & For. Yes, Ben's won this before, more than three years ago. But he's been so fucking hilarious for the last few months that I think he deserves seconds. Sloppy seconds, if you will. http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/bf/Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 18:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Got totally dicked on WotY, completely deserves this thingy again. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 22:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Writer of the Month is a different beast to what it was three years ago. User:15Mickey20/sig 20:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Holla. --User:So So/sig 10:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • for. i subscribe to the school of thought which claims that cap'n ben deserves this award again. i also subscribe to Gigantic Asses, but i'm not sure that's relevant. User:Gerrycheevers/sig 20:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • for. --Docile hippopotamus 04:58, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For Per the above. Seems the Captain is our earliest WotM who's still writing actively, and even that in itself is an accomplishment. -RAHB 07:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • I did the longest audio I ever managed for this schmuck and he never even said thank you. User:Mordillo/sig3 17:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. - Some of the best work on the site is by the Cap.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

UotM[edit]

Mordillo (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +9 admins who takes way to much flak
  • N+F, he's everywhere, and despite winning this award already (as well as UOTY), he continues to do the things that need to be done, but aren't being done by other people because every other user is a lazy drunk. There. I said it. You all are lazy drunks. Mordillo may be a drunk, but at least he's a motivated drunk. User:Modusoperandi/sig 21:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. There is no cabal. TYATU does not say that there is a cabal. Muganez knows nothing about the nonexistant cabal. User:Uncyclopedian/sig 21:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. - The Zionist conspiracy can sap and impurify all my bodily fluids...--Sycamore (Talk) 16:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For Whatever it was 'dillo did to win this last time, he's been accomplishing ten-fold as of late, and been one of the main driving forces in the maintaining of what little redeeming value we allegedly have left. Oh, who am I kidding. Uncyclopedia never had any redeeming value.. -RAHB 22:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For --Docile hippopotamus 05:28, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • A relative is as close as I'm going to get to this award. - [17:00 9 February 2009] User:YesTimeToEdit/sig10
  • Moar Dildos plz k thx. - User:Enzo Aquarius/sig 17:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. I write an article and it gets fixed seconds after, first I thought it was automated :P that guy is amazing. Besides he lives just across the border (bur don't count on me to cross) ChadiW
  • 4 - T.L.B. Baloon.gif WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 22:00, Feb 20

RAHB (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 2 obsessed admirers
  • Symbol for vote.svg RAHB is a relentless greeting party for shitty articles. Last month he performed valuable functions such as protecting his own user page, featuring his own article, and barely mentioning his own penis. Legend. IronLung 07:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
    • I have been a little behind on my penis quota lately, I suppose... -RAHB 22:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For, reminds me of a young me. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 22:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
    Please. Yung Mi was a hack compared to this guy. I am unable to resist. --User:Under user/sig3 11:11, Feb 11

Sannse (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +10 minions of Wikia that aren't evil
  • Symbol for vote.svg Nom + 4 per last month, hasn't won the award yet. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig3 15:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For - Girls FTW! ^_^ User:Luvvy/sig2 16:41, 7 Feb
  • For. I'd vote for all the entrants this month, but if Mnbvcxz is right and Sannse hasn't won this yet then something is seriously wrong with the world. User:RabbiTechno/sig 16:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • As before. User:Mordillo/sig3 17:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg Hell yes --User:Charitwo/sig 08:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Per my odd policy of wanting to give awards to people who are deserving but haven't won them yet ahead of people who are ace but have already won the damn award (see also WotM and Cap'n Ben v Syc). Mordillo's great, but he's already got this and UotY. That's tons of recognition. Sannse does plenty of helpful stuff and deserves this. --User:Under user/sig3 11:09, Feb 11
  • For. Because I can =) (and other reasons that make sense but are too long too list.. blah) --kit 09:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For per UU. Also, grammar, damnit. User:Heerenveen/sig3
  • STRONG FOR Per UU. We seriously haven't given Sannse this yet? I'm slightly disappointed in you, <insert name here>. What the hell's your problem? -User:Optimuschris/sig22:56, 25 Feb
    • sannse should have won a few months ago in my opinion, I was little "disappointed" myself - Mordillo deserves some serious kudos this month - he's has carried a lot in the past while. It is my understanding that this award is often dodgy in the order of winners and hopefully normal service will resume:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
  • W♥v, just to make y'all shut the fuck up about sannse. The preceding unsigned comment was added by SysRq (talk • contribs)
    • Sig yourself, person who I assume to be SysRq >:| --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 20:35, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
      • Fine, just to make y'all shut the fuck up about four tildes. User:SysRq/sig3 21:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 5 Sockpuppet voters
Like I said, the guy has real class... MrN Icons-flag-gb.png http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/4/4e/HalIcon.png http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/e/e1/Goldboobs_Improved.jpg 16:43, Feb 7
It feels good to be great. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:24, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

SysRq (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 5 systems that meet Uncyclopedia's requirements
  • Nom - I've been impressed with a number of thing about Sys, and I feel that hes stepped up the plate in recent months to be a really worthwhile contender for this. I've been exceptionally impressed with the contribuions to colonization - its green shoots at the moment, but its the kind of effort which I beleive will make the place nicer in a much more meaningful way. I'm going to stick with Mordillo as I think that a bit of firworks is deserved, but next month I think Sys should be the winner of this award.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:11, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. BECAUSE NOBODY ELSE WILL. --http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/a/a7/SoIwastolazytolearnGermanic.jpg-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 22:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. He peed on my work and generally abuses me! Definatly a worthy contender for UotM ^^ ...Flare 22:22, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. For taking up the mantle of Imperial Colonization. I'm mean, fuck, that's a fairly major thing alone, and he does other things on top of that, so yeah. --Guildensternenstein 03:25, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For sure! I am surprised he hasn't won this! I couldn't ask for a better UnDaddy because of his help and positive criticism which is grounds enough alone to vote for him. He write hilarious and quality stuff. He is fun to talk to. And he even started The Imperial Colonization! He is an example of an Uncyclopedia Man (rip off of Renaissance Man for those less historically gifted) and although other's are going to win it this month, he deserves it for next month hands down. User:Tagstit/sig 03:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
  • for. for stealing my idea, and by 'stealing' i mean 'doing better than i ever could have'. User:Gerrycheevers/sig 21:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Oh Jesus Christ. If there are any more votes making my original sympathy vote sound irrelevant, I'm going home. --User:Nachlader/sig 14:50, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

NotM[edit]

CheddarBBQ (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +3 Triangular Snackfoods
  • Nom+For The AFI article. Made me laugh my ass off. Can't believe he's a n00b.--The Limon Killer 21:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For I love that guy.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 21:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For Fucking AFI! YEAAAAAAAAAAAHHH!!!!!! (I like AFI)--Davey Havok 21:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Sockpuppetry. I checked the contribs of these other two voters and their only edits have been these votes. I'm not absolutely certain, but I'm certain enough to strike out this nom and be corrected later. User:SysRq/sig3 21:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Guildensternenstein (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +10 Stern guilded steiner, sterns...
  • Nom+For From what I can see there is great potential to mold this Noob-User, and he follows instructions about the importance of signing his posts. So I'm cutting him some slack and nomming him. Dame http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/b2/PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. A fine humorist of the top-notchest sort. Even though you clean-swept my Mars Volta article, calling it "not very good" and falsely accusing it of being listed for deletion. At least you replaced it with a slightly amusing piece, so I don't hate all of your guts. TPLN 02:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Vote change. I don't really like vote changers, but Metal Gear Solid was brilliant, along with UnBooks:The Lost Introduction to Walden, and I haven't really seen Kit paddle around for a while. So there. User:Necropaxx/sig 22:30, Feb 21
  • Symbol for vote.svg For.. I fucking hate vote changing. It says to people, "I am indecisive and my constitution is weak, and I have the internal fortitude of a meringue". However, as these folks will only be eligible for the award once, I wanted to make sure it went to the absolute best candidate. Guildensternenstein is absolutely that best candidate. IronLung 03:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Sold me with Walden --User:DrStrange/sig 03:49, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For I am not just following a pattern here. Although I found Guildensternenstein with a rough first week with rather empty reviews and such, I see now that the improvement of this guy is unmatched! With a great mind, as proven in Metal Gear Solid, and a strong satirical talent, as proven in his new unbook, he is on the way to becoming an amazing writer. He also has improved in his reviews drastically. I think Kit is still a good guy, but you don't see him around as much anymore and since this is the last month for Guildensternstein to be awarded this, he should definitely have it. Keep up the good work! User:Tagstit/sig 01:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Stealth for. --User:So So/sig 06:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. - I love his work, a really great addition to the site.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Wow, Metal Gear Solid was written by a noob? Well, Fuckin' A. http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/bf/Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 21:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • W♥v. It took me all month, but I came up with Gildy as my Noob of the Month. He's probably the most impressive writer of the bunch (as impressive as all of them are) and is also turning out to be quite the Uncyclopedian. Good job, buddy. This was probably the hardest NotM I've ever voted on. User:SysRq/sig3 21:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Kit paddle (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +4 Paddles
Maybe I havent been writing my own stuff for a week or so but Ive been around editing and peeing. I understand though why some would rather go with one that writes more. No hard feelings =) Im not here to get awards anyway, just hang out and have a good time. Cheers! --Kit talk 07:35 23 February 22px-Flag of Sweden.png
I don't care if my votes never amount to anything. You're noob of the month in my eyes. --http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/a/a7/SoIwastolazytolearnGermanic.jpg-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 00:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Apage (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +1 votes on a page

ThomasPynchonsLeftNut (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +4 People who just noticed the genital references
HeHe. Unfortunately, tis one vote per user. MrN Icons-flag-gb.png http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/4/4e/HalIcon.png http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/e/e1/Goldboobs_Improved.jpg 04:24, Feb 5
Just stuffing the ballot box in my favor, per longstanding democratic principles. Oh, hey, and how about you go visit my horoscopes contribution and vote for (or against) me based solely on that? Hmmmm?--TPLN 00:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For I reviewed two of his articles, and found them both fairly entertaining. I also re-wrote his Mars Volta article that I didn't know was his, so I'm more-or-less obligated to make up for that. Anyway, TPLN is sick because he, like I, like Pynchon, TMV, Coach Dungy, and who knows what else. I think I've found a soul mate. Well, not really. And now I've rambled on for a good long time without actually saying anything or being funny. Anyway, he's my pick. --Guildensternenstein 04:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For Tough choice this month. Very happy to see the influx in good new editors coming in, we've been devoid of that extra boost for far too long it seems. -RAHB 07:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • You too can be James Bond and/or Roger Moore. - [17:09 11 February 2009] User:YesTimeToEdit/sig10
  • Comment. TPLN is my runner up. He's up on my list because he's becoming a great Uncyclopedian as well. However, I only get one vote per month. Boo. User:SysRq/sig3 21:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm with you, SysRq. TPLN is my runner-up also. But, as per my still standing vote Guildenboob is still my choice unless he changes his vote to himself. -- TPLN 22:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

ChadiW (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +4
  • N+F Good noob, contributing nice Unnews articles. We like this kind of noobs. He is also, as far as I know, the only Lebanese Uncyclopedian we have. So instead of bombing him, I nominate him. O_O User:Mordillo/sig3 13:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
  • For. I don't vote here often, but this guy stands out - he's very good. User:RabbiTechno/sig 13:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Sympathy For, in the wake of just seeing Waltz with Bashir. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 18:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
You know that an Israeli movie. User:Mordillo/sig3 19:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, but it was about the horrors of the war in Lebanon. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 20:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +3
  • Who honestly thought we were going to go a month without an RC nomination? User:Spang/Sig 22:38, 16 Feb 2009
    • Okay, NOW this race just got tight. User:SysRq/sig3 15:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
  • +1 To be honest, so few on that years, two of the only thing I've reading that has made sense is Spang. User:Braydie/sig2 22:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Seriously this time he really deserves it. Plus I've never heard of those other guys. -User:Optimuschris/sig22:50, 25 Feb
    • Oh yeah? Well Rc has never heard of you. Whatcha gonna do now? User:SysRq/sig3 15:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
      • Build him a shrine in my closet and shoot a random celebrity to get his attention? -User:Optimuschris/sig21:46, 26 Feb

March 2009[edit]

WotM[edit]

Sycamore (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +10 tartan scribes

Asahatter (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +9 Mad headgear enthusiasts
  • Nom & for. Every so often, one comes across an article which really makes you sit up and take notice of an up-and-coming writer. For Mr Hatter, that article was the brilliant Printer Ink. User:15Mickey20/sig 11:45, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
  • W♥v. Syc's good, damn good. But Printer Ink was brilliant satire and was a shining example of what I think this site is (or should be) all about. Asahatter has exhibited tremendous writing talent and a lot of potential. He's already been putting out other great works, and for that he is my Writer of the Month. This month's Dramatic SysRq Speechvote is brought to you by the letter K and the number 4. User:SysRq/sig3 20:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For Cool, made me giggle, just a little, very apt, you thought of me--Aitch1968 23:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Über-for. Every single one of his articles has forced me into fits of mirth. Love this guy's work. User:Necropaxx/sig 16:03, Mar 2
  • For Mostly just because I like his username. -User:Optimuschris/sig17:31, 4 Mar
  • Yeah! - T.L.B. Baloon.gif WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 05:10, Mar 6
  • For. --Docile hippopotamus 03:14, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Actually made me bother to come back and leave again. Thanks a lot, bastard. --User:DJ Irreverent/sig 14:49, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Printer Ink, mother fuckers. User:Guildensternenstein/sig 03:39, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Nachlader (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +4 tasteful characters

Cap'n_Ben (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +9 Again (Again)
  • Again -RAHB 03:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Again again again --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 03:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. Because he didn't get it last month. User:Zana Dark/sig 22:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. - Looking over the noms it looks like Asahatter will win, however I kind of feel that the Cap has produced a far greater portfolio of work, despite winning this award few years ago. As per last month.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:54, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Er no. I'm a spasmodic contributor. Happy for Sycamore or Cap'n Ben to win for their consistency & longevity. See where my vote lies, but thanks to those who've voted for me - watch this space. --User:Asahatter/sig 00:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Docile hippopotamus (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

I'm not even nomming this guy. I have no idea who he is, or his other works. All I know is that HowTo:Become RAHB made me laugh very hard. True, it's the only article I've read in over a month, and I have no idea if he's even written anything else, but whatever. I have schoolwork to be busy with. And I broke my nose. That sucked. But none of that is important now because I laughed at what this guy wrote, and I don't know where else to give him credit. But he deserves credit. And I don't even know what credit is, but he gets a lot of it from me. That is if it is a boy. If it isn't I apologize to you, Ma'am, for getting your gender wrong. You see, we don't get many lady-types around these parts, and I'm generalizing. Sorry if you were at all offended. And, as a side note, shouldn't this page be updated???1?1? Whatever, its really late, and I'm going to bed. But this article ruled. YEAH! User:The Woodburninator/sig 09:06, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

  1. This may be better suited for [[Talk:HowTo:Become RAHB]]
  2. We know you broke your nose
  3. ????
  4. Profit!
User:SysRq/sig3 00:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
P.S. Shaw. Better suited, phhhh. No one looks at those pages. Who gets credit from people on discussion pages? Here is the place to be. For all the cool kids. And this guy is cool, and I'm talking about him here. Power to the little guys who I know nothing about, but made me laugh. User:The Woodburninator/sig 02:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

No one knows why RAHB listens to Frank Zappa, not even RAHB. The man speaks volumes of truth. -RAHB 01:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

UotM[edit]

SysRq (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +15

Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 9 registered users using a sockpuppet

NotM[edit]

ThomasPynchonsLeftNut (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 1 testicle(s) of a reclusive writer

*Nom & For. As every bit as funny as I am (*is humble*), and a HELL of a lot more prolific. I mean, hell, the guy's written well over twice the number of articles I have, including the first IC effort Al Gore. This shouldn't even be a contest, really. Although I guess sort of it is. Anyway...--Guildensternenstein 02:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Ineligible. Misses the age limit by a good half a month. You're right, it was no contest. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 03:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
I don't feel like a noob anyway. The gesture is sweet. --TPLN 04:59, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Oh...hell...well, nevermind then. --Guildensternenstein 05:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
And I'm deleting my vote for future voting-for-this-award purposes. --Guildensternenstein 05:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Sonje (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 14 photoshop pros
  • Nom+for. So have we ever had a nomination for NotM based on images alone? Sonje has been here some two or three weeks, has yet to write an article... But no matter. Uncyclopedia has 700 writers for every one user who can manipulate the hardy mistress of the sea that is potatochop with immense skill, right? Plus, she has made some pretty good images, including the latter being a current VFP nomination. Also, she's a female. You're not gonna go vote on gender prejudice, are you? --User:Nachlader/sig 11:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For per above. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For Even though the rules say she technically has to write an article first. But I AM ADMIN! I SCOFF AT YOUR RULES! -RAHB 03:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • That's a stuuuuupid rule anyway. When I won the NotM, I got my next-door neighbour to write my articles. --User:Nachlader/sig 16:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • I think that rule can be ignored so long as the noob in question uses proper English and does not use numbers to replace words...ahem. User:SysRq/sig3 19:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • You can't vote both "for" and "against" in the same month. That would be voting twice, you see. http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/bf/Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 22:49, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • I also hate to be a stickler for rules, but you can't vote twice. Same goes for the below. I'm going to cancel out the ill-will against votes, though if you wish to keep them and cancel your For votes instead that's fine with me. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 23:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol against vote.svg Against. I agree with Zana yeah your pics are cool, but you should write something. Why doesn't someone nominate for potatochopper of the month instead?--User:StonedJeff/sig 00:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Dude, that's two votes. You, like, totally only get one. Hippy. User:Modusoperandi/sig 05:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

*Against This kid is perfect for Photoshopper of the month. But rules are rules. I don't even think he should be considered here. Good pictures are great, but I need to see some writing. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tagstit (talk • contribs) diff

  • Sorry! I didn't even see the rules changed recently, making this guy/girl an obvious for! I can't even do close to that good photoshop. No hard feelings I hope! User:Tagstit/sig 16:19, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Please sign your vote, or else it won't count. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig4 04:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Oops, sorry, I was almost sure I did. User:Tagstit/sig 21:17, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For any idiot can write an article, and the rules don't even say it has to be a good article. And, the rules have been changed. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig4 04:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Emphatic for. Showing up and improving the art on established articles is, like, the most useful thing anyone's ever done here since Benson of the Month. We already have quite a few good writers; good artists are hard to come by. http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/bf/Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 22:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • For. She has talent. And she doesn't make a fuss unlike some other people in this month's vote. User:Mordillo/sig3 10:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

*You win Half way, through the month and already ten votes, it's no contest.--User:CheddarBBQ/sig 19:33, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

You probably do win, but I just found out I was nominated, and although this will make me look like a dick, I have to give myself that tiny bit of hope--User:CheddarBBQ/sig
No hard feelings, thanks anyway. Congrats on the nom and may the best n00b win. --Dame http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/b/bb/Sonjesig.pnghttp://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/7/70/Cherry-blossom.gif 20:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
You will. (Unless 7 random people decide to simultaneously create accounts and vote me NotM as their first Uncyclopedian acts of course, fingers crossed)--User:CheddarBBQ/sig

StonedJeff (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 4
  • Nom and for. StonedJeff has written the great HowTo:Take a Dump and as of my nominating is working on this, this and this. --Docile hippopotamus 23:42, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. Not bad at all, for a noob User:Zana Dark/sig 03:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. thanks for the nom hippo man...and zana thanks for all your help with my articles they would be hurtful to the eye without you--StonedJeff 20:52, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. This guy is funnyFresh meat 01:43, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • yo your a fuckin dork how about i come knock your dick in the dirt?--User:StonedJeff/sig 22:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Conversing with you is problematic, as it appears that we are using two different languages. User:Modusoperandi/sig 00:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
So there I was
sitting on the fucking couch, doing my Stoned Jeff thing with bong and the dogs, right? Like, pothead nerd shit.
and fucking Modusoperandi
comes into the forum, musk all over the place, and instead of going for the bong, he makes an unsignedline straight for me
so I grabbed for his
dick and tried to knock it in the dirt, and he tries to ban me! WTF?
I barely got away with an eternal reputation for general faggotry and a severed brachialis radial.
Unsigned story. Doesn't count. User:Modusoperandi/sig 00:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
In Russia, Comments unsign you!--User:DrStrange/sig 00:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

CheddarBBQ (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 6 Triangular Snackfoods
  • Nom & For. He's improved a lot since first joining, and his recent articles have been quite good. He pesters me on my talk page a lot, but only because he's a dedicated Uncyclopedian commited to whatever admittedly ill-defined standards of excellence we carry. User:Guildensternenstein/sig 04:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Glad to see you appreciate my pestering. I'll be sure to keep it up.--User:CheddarBBQ/sig
Beautiful. User:Guildensternenstein/sig 02:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 1
  • For. Phew, almost missed it. Pretty sure he's still in with a chance though. User:Spang/Sig 22:23, 29 Mar 2009

April 2009[edit]

WotM[edit]

Nachlader (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 4

RabbiTechno (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +3
  1. Symbol for vote.svg nom + for - Writes good stuffs--Sycamore (Talk) 11:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  2. Floor Rough Pubs was inspired --User:DJ Irreverent/sig 13:13, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  3. Symbol for vote.svg For. Like Sycamore said, writes good stuff. Gotta love the anarchist sparrows and and Nazi cows. ImNotASunbeam 22:54, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Cap'n Ben (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 6

Guildensternenstein (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 14

Asahatter (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +1

Modusoperandi (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 2
  • Symbol for vote.svg Nom and For. Modus is a genius, and because he'll never win writer of the year again, we should make him Writer of the Month at least twelve times. IronLung 01:06, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For For For Good idea. User:Zheliel/sigz 12:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

UotM[edit]

Guildensternenstein (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 1
  • Symbol for vote.svg NOMFOR Pretty obvious reasons. List not necessary.--User:CheddarBBQ/sig 22:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • A would-be self against... ...but I voted for Dexter just a second ago. I can see getting WotM, but I in no way deserve this. I mean, I'm not an admin, I don't photoshop my own images (props to my friend Lee for doing that for me), and I just got slapped on the wrist by TKF for a not-so-great Pee I gave of the most recent Colonization. Although, to be fair, he nominated it well before I had a chance to review it, and so should have caught said mistakes himself. But in any event, I don't deserve this. And seeing as I'm 12 votes down, I'm not going to get it. So yeah. User:Guildensternenstein/sig 22:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Dexter111344 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 17
  • Yes yes yes yes. I wanted to do this. I really wanted to. Dexter should have gotten this months ago, yet for some reason he seems to be just under the radar with every coming vote. Despite this, he's always worked tirelessly and consistently since 2007. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 19:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • And this is like my... 4th or 5th time being nominated. --User:Dexter111344/sig 19:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I don't pay attention ever okay I just think you're awesome deal with it. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 03:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 3

Saberwolf116 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 2
  • Give me 100 Jews and the power to huff and the site would be gold. --User:Dexter111344/sig 00:13, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. A cruft detector. Excellent. --Romartus 19:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
    One man, one vote. Commie. User:Modusoperandi/sig 12:14, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg Aww, you shouldn't have! Saberwolf116 20:18, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Benson (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 1
  • Symbol for vote.svg NOM+FOR! BENSON ONLY TALKS IN CAPS AND HE RULES! Actually the imposter rules. User:Zheliel/sigz2 11:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

NotM[edit]

Mahm00shA (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 3
  • Symbol for vote.svg Nomination - I think that my adoson has shown great progress since starting. Maybe he can win the award his adopapa sadly failed to win last month.--User:CheddarBBQ/sig
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Saving my vote for now, but I would like to say that Mahmoosha has been an exceptional noob over at IC, and I see tremendous promise in this one. However, pussy that I am, I want to see how things play out before casting my vote. User:SysRq/sig3 01:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. Thank you CBBQ! User:Mahm00shA/Sig 04:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg Yay! User:Zheliel/sigz 11:52, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment I haven't checked the dates very carefully, but I believe that MahmOOshA is over the time limit for NotM. User:Mordillo/sig3 11:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Nope. 18:50, 15 February 2009. To old. He's driving his own car and everything guys! MrN Icons-flag-gb.png http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/4/4e/HalIcon.png http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/e/e1/Goldboobs_Improved.jpg 12:14, Apr 2
holy fuck! :( User:Mahm00shA/Sig 12:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Sorry adoson, I thought you still qualified.--User:CheddarBBQ/sig

Jrubio (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 2
changing vote due to lack of activity. nom stands. User:Gerrycheevers/sig 16:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 4.6
  • Nom+for. So this guy has come in, written some articles, even some images, cleaned up the place a teeny bit, even started his own TV show. I think this guy has it all coming for him. NotY confirmed. --User:Nachlader/sig 22:04, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg lol. User:Zheliel/sigz 12:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Why the fuck not? User:Guildensternenstein/sig 22:52, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • 3/5ths for. User:Spang/Sig 07:09, 22 Apr 2009
  • Yea Verily this boy is fit to rule the realm --User:Leoispotter/sig 03:08, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Rogue ball of tumbleweed (TalkContribs (del) • EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all) • LogsGroupsCheckuser)[edit]

Score: Sexual Thunder

Tumbleweed01.gif

I'm changin my vote. He lacks true skills.--User:CheddarBBQ/sig 21:12, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Sexual Thunder my butt. YKWTMM is much better. User:Necropaxx/sig 15:03, Apr 23

YouKnowWhatTheMusicMeans (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 15
you only get one vote, mr. doritos bag man! choose or perish! User:Gerrycheevers/sig 20:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
I know that. For doubting my infinite knowledge, you are henceforth shunned.--User:CheddarBBQ/sig 11:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
  • You're all too kind. If the previous is true, than I've got some great ideas for this site. We should start a big music band! I know this guy, Mr. Harold Hill, Who'll get all the users marching and playing for only 7 easy payments of $9.99.....99. Oh, and Self For. -- You know what the music means... Our time is up. 20:17, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
A Music Man reference? God damn, this kid is cultured! I like this. I also hate that play, but that's an entirely different story. User:Guildensternenstein/sig 23:11, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Well, since I am a band geek, that musical has always had a special place in my heart, especially since my first band teacher had us watch it when I was 12 after Florida-mandated standardized testing was done. Plus, The Simpsons' parody of it was great. "The name's Lanley, Lyle Lanely."-- You know what the music means... Our time is up. 23:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
One should always have a full repertoire of potential references to the great American musicals of bygone days. Shipoopi on the Da-woopie. Eh? --User:DrStrange/sig 00:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Ohhh, shipoopi! Shipoopi! Bah dah dah dah dah dah... User:Necropaxx/sig 15:01, Apr 23
Yeah, one of the years I was in pit orchestra in high school we did that show (I play the cello), and I fucking loathed having to play most of the music. Still gives me nightmares. User:Guildensternenstein/sig 01:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
nah, that handome fellow learnt the code and made his sig by himself... Honest, yea ;) User:Mahm00shA/sig3 10:52, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Mahmoosha, I like the new sig. Therefore, I will vote f♥r. User:SysRq/sig3 13:39, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong For. I feel kind of good pushing him to make an account. Look at what he's done! Music, you interested in adoption? User:Necropaxx/sig 15:01, Apr 23
Sure, why the hell not? I might be a bit Cousin-Oliveresque, though. -- You know what the music means... Our time is up. 01:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Nikau (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 1
  • Nom and For. Not too long ago, I came across what I thought was an abondoned article called Tradesmen. There was something about it which made me think, "No - I'm not going to QVFD this one, I'm going to talk to the author and see what gives." A couple of days ago Nikau told me the article was complete, so I took a quick look. And what an absolute belter it is too! Undoubtedly one of the funniest articles I've read in a while, and the funniest by a noob ever, IMO. It's on VFH now and doing well for itself, too. Nikau, a man of few words but enormous talent, has been with us for nearly 30 days, so take a look at his work and vote for him quickly - this guy is going to be one of the Uncyc greats. User:RabbiTechno/sig 15:18, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol comment vote.svg Comment.. Is Nikau eligible next month? Tradesmen was very, very good. User:Necropaxx/sig 15:40, Apr 23
  • I say we bend the rules and nom. him anyway. We did that with Sonje, after all. It's better the award go to someone deserving than someone who gets it by default due to some stupid self-imposed technicality. User:Guildensternenstein/sig 19:12, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I think this is just a case where either Nikau or YKWTMM can win, but not both. Hell, I've been here less than a year myself, I've written like 20 features in that time, and I flat-out lost NotM to that Cheapinitreal guy who don't come around here no more. And now it's the one award I will never, ever be able to win. http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/bf/Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 19:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Actually, YKwhatever became a member on April 17. --User:DJ Irreverent/sig 16:35, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Hehehehe.... The one thing I have over the mighty Hyperbole. Of course, I showed up a month after you, and they were about to give it to that one guy we don't name...NXWave under the username Qua and kind of won by default after that. And the three features I have were all written in my first month. So, you had a one-month head-start, and have 17 more features than me.... Whelp, I won NotM, so, I guess we're even. User:The Woodburninator/sig2 19:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't really need the award if it causes that much trouble, as long as people find my work funny I'm happy. :) --Nikau 14:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

I like this guy already. Let's keep him. -User:Optimuschris/sig14:22, 25 Apr

Symbol for vote.svg For. Birth of a Tradesman. --Romartus 21:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

May 2009[edit]

WotM[edit]

RabbiTechno (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: +23 beat mitzvahs
  1. Symbol for vote.svg nom + for - Top notch writer.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
  2. For Thought he had this already for some reason... -RAHB 11:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
  3. He won the Foolitzer Prize twice. Now it's time for a WotM. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 11:31, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
  4. SheikhMetal Ankh smite.png blesses RabbiTechno as a writer for May 2009 User:Mahm00shA/sig3 11:39, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
  5. Symbol for vote.svg For. The RabbiTechno deserves this honour. A Vote For. --Romartus 15:16, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
    Massive thanks to all of the above and anyone else who votes for me. I don't pay a lot of attention to the various awards and I've had UotM (Jan 08) as well as, as Socky says, Foolitzer twice - but this is the one I've always wanted to win. Oh, and by the way - I don't eat ice cream, so if I win you can all share it amongst yourselves. :-) User:RabbiTechno/sig 15:21, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
    YAY, ICE CREAM FOR FREE!! This way I might vote RabbiTechno for president :þ User:Mahm00shA/sig3 15:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
  6. Symbol for vote.svg For. per above--User:Mnbvcxz/sig4 00:00, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
  7. Yes. --Nikau 05:17, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
  8. For. Look at the guy's userpage, he has been contributing serious quality for aaaaages now. Plus I forgot how much I like Rough Pubs. His time is now. --User:Under user/sig3 08:45, May 2
  9. For! Writes the stuff that I dream of writing in UnNews. --User:Nachlader/sig 23:51, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
  10. Newsical, as well as some good mainspacers. Plus he gave me a nice mechanical thing on my talk page. User:Necropaxx/sig 16:21, May 5
  11. For. You had me at ice cream. --Dame http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/b/bb/Sonjesig.pnghttp://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/7/70/Cherry-blossom.gif 16:27, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
  12. Yup. Saberwolf116 22:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
  13. Symbol for vote.svg For. History of Google. Case closed. IronLung 22:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
  14. Can't go wrong with a man endorsed my Mountain Dew. User:JackOfSpades/sig 02:57, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
  15. Symbol for vote.svg Killz User:Zana Dark/sig 18:44, 14 May 2009
  16. For, although I was sure that he'd already won this. I distinctly remember sending a stripper over to his house in celebration of said achievement. User:Modusoperandi/sig 19:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
  17. Late to the party|For He writes good things. 'Nuff said. User:Colin "All your base" Heaney/sig 21:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
  18. For User:Cs1987/sig 11:43, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
  19. Yes User:Cajek/sig2
  20. Symbol for vote.svg For. I don't pay much attention and so I'm not sure if the voting is over. If it is just pay me in Karma.ImNotASunbeam 13:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
  21. Symbol for vote.svg For. Very Awesome! --Iwillkillyou333 05:07, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  22. Ankh smite.png GAH, with the bandwagon or something... User:Zheliel/sigz2 09:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  23. Symbol for vote.svg For. Zionist dominance and vegan blinches. User:Mordillo/sig3 15:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
  24. Symbol for vote.svg For. - don't even try to make me confess why. --User:Multiliteralist/sig 16:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
  25. 4 - T.L.B. Baloon.gif WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 20:28, May 30

Cap'n Ben (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 3

GlobalTourniquet (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 2
  • Nom & For. Yes, I know he hasn't been around in a while, but he's written five features, and may very well be on his way to a sixth. Oh, he also won best article in PLS. Yeah. Besides, both nominees have won the award already. User:Guildensternenstein/sig 23:44, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Uh, when did the Rabbi win this? --User:Under user/sig3 08:40, May 2
I...don't know. That's actually a really massive "my bad" on my part. My bad. User:Guildensternenstein/sig 02:59, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Your not forgiven. User:Tagstit/sig 04:58, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
So I dub thee Unforgiven User:Mahm00shA/sig3 06:26, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Damn. User:Guildensternenstein/sig 14:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
  • For. I've determined that his articles are quite superior. ~ 05:14, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Zoidberg (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Zoidberg.gif

Score: 2 broken slinkys

Symbol for vote.svg Nomination Come on, give the lobster a break. Saberwolf116 22:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Ankh smite.png For. Bless Zoidberg User:Zheliel/sigz2 10:41, 9 May 2009 (UTC) UnValid nomination. We don't serve "their kind" here. User:Modusoperandi/sig 19:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Seperate but Equal, right Modus? Saberwolf116 12:10, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Cartoons aren't people. Soylent Green, now that's people. User:Modusoperandi/sig 14:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Cartoonophobic bigot. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig4 17:16, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Obviously. User:Modusoperandi/sig 20:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Hurray for the Soylent Green referrence! User:Guildensternenstein/sig2 13:39, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Orian57 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 4 sprirtual FORs and 6 ACTUAL ONEs (Aparently)
  • Nom Since my for is a bit useless at this point with so many people voting for Rabbi this month, I am just nominating. He has written a ton this past month and has gotten two features in a short time (about to be three). He definitely deserves this next month. User:Tagstit/sig2 14:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Spiritual For I already voted for Rabbi, and Orian57 is gay. No, seriously, he is a admitted homosexual. I bet none of you knew that. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig4 15:10, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm left-handed. I bet none of you knew that. Saberwolf116 17:46, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
You know I read somewhere that left handed men are 33% more likely to be gay than right handed men. Although I'm right handed and 33% really proves nothing. User:Orian57/sig7 20:31 14 May 2009
You can only get to heaven if you're a rightie. --User:Nachlader/sig 09:14, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
100% true http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/2/2c/JackOfSpadessig.jpg (talk) 09:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Bah, you righties and your anti-lefty crap. You just wait. When you get to Heaven, i'll be right at the gate saying "What now?" You just wait... Saberwolf116 12:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
anyone religious here? User:Mahm00shA/sig4 12:39, May, 15 '9
Is anyone here actually gonna vote for me? User:Orian57/sig7 12:43 15 May 2009
No. Fucking homophobes, the whole lot of them.. Here is a spiritual Ankh smite.png blessing anyway. User:Mahm00shA/sig4 13:06, May, 15 '9
Awww, thank you. /blushes User:Orian57/sig7 13:07 15 May 2009
It's my pleasure ;) User:Mahm00shA/sig4 13:40, May, 15 '9
  1. For. Where's my blowjob? -User:Optimuschris/sig21:01, 15 May
  2. Symbol for vote.svg Something spiritual. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 21:05, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
  3. For the way he's been writing, there's no way he shouldn't win this. Staircase CUNt 19:30, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
  4. Spiritual For. I too have already voted for the good Rabbi, but Orian has been award-worthy this month too. --Dame http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/b/bb/Sonjesig.pnghttp://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/7/70/Cherry-blossom.gif 23:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
  5. Actual For. His writing is awesome, no way he doesnt deserve this. - - - Atom.gif Silly Angel Atom.gifSpeak Atom.gif Contribs Atom.gif 20:24, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
  6. Actual For. I like both these guys, but Orian is... y'know... a special guy. Plus, he's getting his ass handed to him here. ;) --User:Todd Lyons/sig 21:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
  7. Gotta say yes. Guy adopted me. --LongLiverh3 23:03, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
  8. Real For. He deserves it. He's not gonna get it, because there's an uber-popular Rabbi around, but still. =) --Nameable ((talk?)) 10:12, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

May[edit]

Optimuschris (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 3
  • Symbol for vote.svg Nomination - Been doing a lot of good things.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:33, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Is this a bad time to mention that I hate you all? -User:Optimuschris/sig15:31, 9 May
Me too? Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 15:32, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
All of you except Socky. -User:Optimuschris/sig15:34, 9 May
Woohoo! Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 15:40, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. If he has a big enough chest - then add a medal or two. --Romartus 22:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
All of you except Socky and Romartus. -User:Optimuschris/sig17:41, 15 May
All of you except Romartus and TKF. I've decided I hate Socky after all. -User:Optimuschris/sig20:42, 19 May
But... Why? *sob* Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 20:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Because Billy told me that Bobby told him that Timmy said Johnny heard you say that stuff you said about me. -User:Optimuschris/sig20:52, 19 May
You hate me because I said you rule? Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 15:07, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
How dare you insinuate I don't support democracy? -User:Optimuschris/sig18:43, 20 May
Okay then. You suck. Happy now? Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 22:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm less miserable, does that count? -User:Optimuschris/sig14:26, 21 May
Sure. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 14:35, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Woohoo! -User:Optimuschris/sig14:52, 21 May
what now? Are you a warewolf? User:Mahm00shA/sig4 21:23 May 21 '09

Simsilikesims (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

  • Symbol for vote.svg Nomination - Also been doing a lot of good things for ages without much thanks, time for some recognition.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:35, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 26

4.252.99.182 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 1 Writers of our time

Symbol for vote.svg Nomination because i'd like to see an injoke other than Benson put on UOTM. Saberwolf116 00:34, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Alright seriously. That's the second person in as many days to reference writing as some sort of lone requirement for this award. You're probably thinking of WRITER of the month. Yeah, writing can factor into this award, but it's usually not the main factor. End rant. -RAHB 21:51, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
But the difference is his writing actually shaped the foundation of all of the work of an Uncyclopedian of the Month (QVFD, VFD, Ban Patrol, helping noobs, etc.) User:Dexter111344/sig 22:32, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
RAHB, it's a joke, so why is it important? Saberwolf116 00:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Cause Nachlader nominated Socky on the basis of his writing, then you nominated Mr. Fisher Price on his "writing". He's just trying to remind people this isn't WotM, that writing awesome things isn't what qualifies someone to get this. User:Dexter111344/sig 00:55, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
In other words, ignore RAHB. --User:Dexter111344/sig 01:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Socky does do alot of maintenance work too. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig4 04:38, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Right. I think most people voted for him because of that. Also, ignore RAHB. -RAHB 10:51, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

NotM[edit]

Mhaille (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 3 Brits allowed

Nikau (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 3
  1. Ankh smite.png Nom and Bless Per Tradesmen User:Mahm00shA/sig3 22:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
    Note: By my count, he's been here 35 days, putting him about two days over the eligibility threshold. So, the question is: Does anyone care? http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/bf/Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 22:23, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
    They will bend the rules, as they did with sonje User:Mahm00shA/sig3 22:26, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
    Rule bending lol. It will never happen, though I like your thinking. Not many bend rules around here. User:The Woodburninator/sig2 23:31, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
    Rules are never bent around here. They are changed mid-process and retroactively by admin decree. Lean the difference. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig4 23:46, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
    Gods can change rules, too, as Ra has just done User:Mahm00shA/sig3 23:50, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
    Yes, perhaps my difference leaning is not as good as usual. Still, I've tried to get some rules changed. I usually run into a wild Modusoperandi who uses his stupid Logic and knowledge to show me what is what. I've never won a battle, but I'll try dammit. I'll try. User:The Woodburninator/sig2 00:10, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
  2. For. Screw the rules. Two days making someone illegible is just stupid. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 23:37, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
    Thing is, it's a bending of the original rules that +3 days is eligible. The reason we stick to the rules is that eventually, +5 becomes eligible, then +10, then 2 months, and before you know it, Noob of the Month becomes Noob of the Year. It's not as much a matter of 5 days over a month making any difference whatsoever, it's a matter of the slow turn into the rules becoming more and more relaxed. I realize that 99% of people don't see the negative connotation of that, so please, go about your business, as you were. -RAHB 23:45, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
    Thing is, there'll still be people around who remember the original rule who can judge when the leniency is going too far. I'd say adding another two days is far from being too lenient. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 00:01, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
    As I said, I quite agree with you. Another two days is nothing here nor there. The matter to deal with is the future of the rule, and people overtime saying "well, adding another two days seems fine to me", every couple of months, which will just add more and more days to eligibility. I don't have any problem bending the rules to accommodate this chap, but I don't think changing the official rules is very wise. -RAHB 21:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
    I agree with Socky, in that I think it should way more than two days to make something impossible to read. - T.L.B. Baloon.gif WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 20:27, May 30
  3. For. It's not like rule bending is going to become a regular thing. It should only be used when someone clearly deserves the award. Sonje, and now Nikau, are case and point. User:Guildensternenstein/sig 23:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
    Rule-bending has always been a regular thing, particularly on this award, and that's how we got to the current state of the rules. Nice thing is though, I don't see any problem with continuously bending the +3 rule. It's changing it all over again to a +5 rules that bothers me. Because then that rules will be bent, changed, bent again, changed again, etcetera, etcetera.-RAHB 22:00, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
  4. For maybe invalid, but I don't care. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig4 23:52, 1 May 2009 (UTC) changed vote. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig4 03:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  5. For can't wait to see what he has in store for us next.-- You know what the music means... Our time is up. 23:57, 1 May 2009 (UTC)Changed my vote.--User:YouKnowWhatTheMusicMeans/sig 00:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
  6. Symbol for vote.svg For. Great start. --Romartus 10:26, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for being the town's schmuck but no. This is mainly to encourage new users. As Nikau got recognized already as a very good writer with a first feature, I hope that will encourage him to write further. There are some very good noobs around that are eligible under the rules. Also, I encourage certain worshipers of Ra to avoid changing the rules in the future. User:Mordillo/sig3 22:08, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

:-) the worshiper of Ra didn't do it. Ra did it himself, you blasphemer. User:Mahm00shA/sig3 04:05, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Score. I should be a psychic. User:The Woodburninator/sig2 23:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Silly Angel (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 1
  1. Nom+for. Bored mostly. --User:Nachlader/sig 17:27, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment ~ Is there an article from this user in the mainspace yet? Maybe I missed it.. --User:Todd Lyons/sig 17:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Fahrenheit (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 2
  1. Nom / For ~ For trudging through vandalism, crappy spelling and other editorial and cleanup work. Plus he's written his required article. I'm probably biased, seeing as he's my adoptee, but damn you if you don't vote for him anyway. :) --User:Todd Lyons/sig 21:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

#For per above. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig4 03:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

  1. For. --Docile hippopotamus 06:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Clemens177 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 16
  1. Nom & for. Fact: Clemens177 is a noob. Fact: Clemens177 has written a bunch of stuff, none of which is crap. Fact: Clemens177 has yet to annoy me. Fact: Clemens177 will turn out to be NXWave. Conclusion: Clemens177 should be Noob of the Month. User:Modusoperandi/sig 03:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  2. Symbol for vote.svg for This guy seems like he's been doing a good job for a new user. Staircase (aka: "Steps") 03:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  3. for User:Mahm00shA/sig4 06:22 May 26 '09
  4. For. Well spotted, Modus. --Dame http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/b/bb/Sonjesig.pnghttp://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/7/70/Cherry-blossom.gif 09:36, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  5. Ankh smite.png Eh, Now it's 5-5! User:Zheliel/sigz2 09:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  6. For. A n00b doing writing stuff, you say? Why, that's the very thing we need! --User:Under user/sig3 12:52, May 26
  7. For. Stap me, Jensen, this could be the very user we've been looking for! Zounds! User:Necropaxx/sig 15:54, May 26
    What, so you're cheating on me? How could you do this to me? Oh, and For--User:YouKnowWhatTheMusicMeans/sig 21:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  8. For per the above comments. Though we seem to have a lot of other nice n00bs this month as well. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 22:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
  9. For. Where's this guy been? Why haven't I even heard of him until about a minute ago? Why, I say? User:Guildensternenstein/sig2 00:11, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
  10. For. Whatever those guys said up there. http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/2/2c/JackOfSpadessig.jpg (talk) 01:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
  11. This guy is good User:Cajek/sig2
  12. Symbol for vote.svg For. per above. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig4 06:35, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
  13. Real for. -RAHB 20:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
  14. Symbol for vote.svg Noob. IronLung 07:04, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
  15. 4 - T.L.B. Baloon.gif WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 20:28, May 30
  1. I'm not voting for or against, because I do not believe people should vote for themselves. I just want to thank all of you for voting for me. I'm glad you have enjoyed my articles. I've definitely been enjoying this place and look forward to a long and happy association with you all. Some of the articles here are soooo brilliant - I came across one on Schrodinger's cat and the buttered toast phenomena that was remarkable for it's humor and science. You guys are just great!!! --Clemens177 07:10, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
P.S. My local store is the County Market - I will get complimentary beef jerky if I win, right? --Clemens177 07:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
  1. For Though I was ineligible for this award by 2 days, I believe Clemens here deserved the award more anyway and once I overcome this flu (no, the few proteins needed to make it swine flu were 2 days late, so I have to make do with the boring garden variety) I hope to write something with Clemens. I should probably conclude this ramble before someone thinks I'm voting for the libertarian party. --Nikau 15:35, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
  2. For This guy deserves it more than me or any other of the nominees Fahrenheit 18:21, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

June 2009[edit]

WotM[edit]

Orian57 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 27 stellar homos
  1. He's been writing excellent articles lately. I believe he deserves this. Staircase CUNt 04:26, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
  2. VERY STRONG FOR User:Mahm00shA/sig4 04:27 June 1 '09
  3. Yeah unless someone more deserving comes along. You know, Orian is a good writer and very helpful. I would enjoy seeing an encyclopedic article by him, but that's just me. User:Cajek/sig2
  4. For --User:Mnbvcxz/sig4 05:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
  5. For. Writes good, funny stuffs. Mind you, I agree with Cajek about the encyclopedic article though. --User:Under user/sig3 11:48, Jun 1
  6. For. I really think this belongs to him this month. --User:Todd Lyons/sig 11:59, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
  7. For. Saberwolf116 22:09, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
  8. Fuck it, why not? When have I ever been humble anyway? Anyway, huge thanks to everyone who's voted and anyone who may yet vote. As for experementing with my writing I do intend to try over the next month, but when that doesn't work out I'll just retreat back to where I'm comfortable. Probably. And just to turn this into a proper essay, I hope no one minds me changing the bullet points to numbers. aren't numbers usually used? User:Orian57/sig7 02:08 2 June 2009
  9. Super for. --Dame http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/b/bb/Sonjesig.pnghttp://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/7/70/Cherry-blossom.gif 10:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  10. Quite. Think he deserves it. I loved Nursery. Nameable ((talk?)) 16:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  11. For. User:Guildensternenstein/sig2 05:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
  12. For. With Todd voting for Orian, any possible doubts have been eliminated. He gets my full support. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 19:42, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
  13. 4. Per UU and Socky. User:Methamphetamine/sig3.5 (20:31 06-7-2009)
  14. Forgainst. I reckon he's one o' them queer fellas. -User:Optimuschris/sig20:56, 7 Jun
    Orian is queer?! Oh my!! Holy Water, Holy Water User:Mahm00shA/sig4 21:25 June 7 '09
  15. And to think I used to think he only reviewed stuff. Orian, your writing continues to get better and better. Keep it up. For User:The Woodburninator/sig2 20:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
  16. Ankh smite.png Bless. Sorry I'm late. User:CheddarBBQ/sig2 21:52,11June,2009
  17. for. User:Gerrycheevers/sig 19:23, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
  18. I am amazed he hasn't won this yet. For. User:LongLiverh3/sig
  19. Orian's writing has just been spectacular this month. http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/bf/Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 20:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
  20. Damn talented homos grumble grumble User:Mordillo/sig3 08:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  21. For I hear he's straight. True story. I was there when he came in. --User:DJ Irreverent/sig 09:24, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  22. For-User:YouKnowWhatTheMusicMeans/sig 00:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
  23. Symbol for vote.svg How I did giggle at Nursery. ImNotASunbeam 01:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  24. He's long deserved this. Best of all, not once did he whore himself to me for WotM. Sure, he's whored every single one of his articles to me. But they're all funny, so whatever. FORGIVEN. User:SysRq/sig3 03:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  25. For--IwillKILLyou333 Talk If you dare 20:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
  26. Ankh smite.png 'Eh, this is for' BENSON. User:Zheliel/sigz4 06:13, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
  27. Symbol for vote.svg For.. This guy has really stepped it up several notches this month. Deserves it. User:Necropaxx/sig 20:39, Jun 30

Todd Lyons (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 8 actual loins, 6 spiritual lengths of meat
  • NomFor As a returned and ancient admin, Todd Lyons has surprised us all by eliminating the standard actions of such a situation, in favor of getting actual things done. -RAHB 06:57, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Comment ~ ^_^ I'm gratified and completely surprised by the nomination, but I've voted for Orian this month. Indeed I've had 5 features since returning (with no more on VFH as of now), but I'm completely outclassed by him. I'm going to keep the "Alleged Works of Fact: Recent" portion of my page complete if anyone is curious what all I've done since returning in late April. --User:Todd Lyons/sig 12:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For.. I know he doesn't want the vote this month but the audio about white meat made me laugh out loud in the office. --User:Romartus/sig. 20:03, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg Spiritual For. Tood Lyons next month. Saberwolf116 13:29, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg Spiritual For. For no other reason than to make his scoring header say "2 spiritual lengths of meat", making it sound like he has 2 metaphysical penises. (though seriously. Awsome writer.) User:Orian57/sig8 14:42 14 June 2009
  • For; because I mistakenly assume that my voting for Toddy will in some way matter this month. Also because he deserves it. -- User:Zombiebaron/sig 17:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

UotM[edit]

Simsilikesims (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 5
  • Nom and for. Been around for a while, helping with the site in general. Saberwolf116 22:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Dig -RAHB 00:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  • For. I'm sure I said recently that Simsilikesims ought to win this, but nevertheless it's a very hard choice between her (?) and Multiliteralist. Next month, I'll nom Multi myself if he doesn't win this time round. User:RabbiTechno/sig 16:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. - RAHB and Rabbi--Sycamore (Talk) 17:51, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg <insert emotional speech here> User:Methamphetamine/AnnivSig (16:55 06-17-2009)

Mahm00shA (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 7
  • Ankh smite.png Nom + Bless He's worked very hard ever since he started off here, and has done fairly weel in all aspects of Uncyc. And he's cool. And Egyptian. So yeah. User:CheddarBBQ/sig2 23:00,1June,2009
  • Ankh smite.png Self Ra Blessing I love myself User:Mahm00shA/sig4 23:09 June 1 '09

Optimuschris (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 3

Guildensternenstein (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 4
  • Nom & for. Heil the UnFuhrer! Uncyclopedia's rewriting efforts have never been so organised. Also, he writes lots, votes lots, and generally makes a positive contribution. IronLung 00:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
  • For Yes, portals are nice, but I have to say Guildy has been doing a good job with the writing and rewriting drive. Staircase CUNt 05:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
  • For We're even now, right? --User:Multiliteralist/sig 15:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
    Yes, I suppose so. User:Guildensternenstein/sig2 23:05, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
  • UotY. --User:LongLiverh3/sig 00:30, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Multiliteralist (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 15

CheddarBBQ (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 0
  • Nom. Though my vote is cast elsewhere, I think Cheddar at very least deserves at least a nomination. He's without a doubt Uncyclopedia's most underappreciated member, in my opinion. User:Guildensternenstein/sig2 15:13, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
    Thank you Guildy. Damn, too late to vote for myself. User:CheddarBBQ/sig2 16:12,6June,2009
    Whore. User:LongLiverh3/sig3 16:57, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

NotM[edit]

Staircase (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 18

Fuentfue (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 7

Sog1970 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 1
  • N+F. Apart from his starting habit to upload a gazillion pictures all at once, the guy is coming out as a grand writer. And this, friends, foes and sockpuppets, is what we're all about. User:Mordillo/sig3 07:56, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Is he really a n00b? I looked at his contribs one day, because I was going to do this very thing, but I didn't think he met the age requirement... User:The Woodburninator/sig2 14:00, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
You know what, you're absolutly right, I didn't notice he was active since April. Sorry Sog, I guess we'll need to find another one for you, but keep up the good work! User:Mordillo/sig3 19:44, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Verto (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 1

Discussion moved to talk page User:Mordillo/sig3 15:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

LittlePinkSock (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)[edit]

Score: 4
  • N&F. Another contender. OK, so there don't seem to be that many people who haven't already voted, but nonetheless, LPS is worthy of your consideration. Has written a fine article, hasn't started any drama, has been friendly and so forth despite being sleep-deprived by a crying baby and has generally impressed me so far. --User:Under user/sig3 10:58, Jun 15
    • Next month, UU. I'll vote next month. She is doing good, or at least I think she is, I don't really know for sure. Staircase CUNt 23:48, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Spiritual For She has done well here, and is a promising n00b. She will most likely have my vote next month. User:CheddarBBQ/sig2 15:19,16June,2009
  • no drama? for. User:Gerrycheevers/sig 19:57, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
  • For User:Dexter111344/sig 00:23, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
  • For --Docile hippopotamus 11:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)