Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Hide in the closet

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search


[[{{#sub:HowTo:Hide in the closet|0|{{#rpos:HowTo:Hide in the closet|(}}}}]][edit]

I bet whomever reviews it thinks it's crap. --Pleb CUN KUN Dexter111344 Complain here Vote now! 02:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, this is the most retarded article I've ever read, someone ban this guy. -- 16:55, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

IP is right, you should be banned. =] Sir SysRq (talk) 17:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

No joke, phail him for the dialogue in an article -- 17:40, 2 January 2009

I was joking. Go away, IP. (Oh shit, I forgot all about this. Thanks for the reminder, IP!) Sir SysRq (talk) 19:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Nopee.gif PrIP'd!
Pee Review In Progress
Checkit bitches, this review is as good as peed on. I'm marking my effing territory. Said article is being reviewed by:
~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF 

: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|0|1}}comment}}}
: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|1|1}}comment}}}
: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|2|1}}comment}}}
: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|3|1}}comment}}}
: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|4|1}}comment}}}
Final Score: 25 While this isn't a great article just yet, IP still needs to shut the fuck up, because this wasn't "the most retarded article I've ever read." Also, I do not feel like putting you on Ban Patrol or anything. I do, however, feel like putting you to work. Your homework is:
1. Tone down the anger/douchiness at the beginning.
You need some buildup for the whole of the article.
2. Return the focus to the article's subject: closets.
If I had typed in "Substitute teacher" then maybe this would be better.
3. Replace the last two images.
Please, no unicorns. Try...men. Yeah. =]

Do these things and you should be golden. But this is a serious fixer-upper, I'm not gonna lie.

Reviewer: Sir SysRq (talk) 20:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)