Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Pentium 4 (2nd review, quick)
The last review I got was somewhat rudimentary, and although I am not expecting anything more in-depth this time, I would nevertheless prefer a second opinion. -- User:Col.swordman/sig 17:33, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Lets see what this baby can do. (Im on to it) --kit 21:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
|Final Score:||34||Honestly I wouldnt vote for it in VFH as it is now because I didnt laugh enough. Its far away from bad and I surely enjoyed reading it though. But if ya want it to make that extra mile and get at least my vote, you should in my opinion go that extra mile yourself with some of the paragrafs. Think of some more great and original ideas and add them to your article; it should by then grow into one great piece of art (maybe not art.. but a good article at least =) ) Hope you didnt feel I was too harsh or anything. Remember this is simply my opinion and my suggestions are but mere suggestions. Cheers!
p.s My keyboard sucks so if my reviews has a bit too many typos (such as missing "v", "r" or "s", my apologies.
|Reviewer:||--kit 21:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)|