Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Perfectionism (2nd Review)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

FAQ

[[{{#sub:Perfectionism (2nd Review)|0|{{#rpos:Perfectionism (2nd Review)|(}}}}]][edit]

After some forging, more forging, screaming, crying, and a little bit of dying, I have revamped the article into something somewhat new. Please tell me if I've screwed up somewhere. THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE PERFECT!!! (by law).Sir Not A Good Username360Stress.gif KUN 15:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Would you like me to do this, or would you rather have someone else's opinion this time around? BlueYonder GalaxyIcon.jpg - CONTACT - PUH-LEEZE EDIT GRUESLAYER!
If not, I'd be happy to volounteer and review it. Havent read it all the way through yet but enjoyed what I read so far. Btw, at some point you wrote inperfect and I had my doubts about that spelling. I checked it up and I'm pretty certain (not entirely so soz if Im wrong, but according to WikiAnswers I'm right) that it should be spelled imperfect. Pretty ironic you had a spelling error in a text about perfectionism (if it was on purpose then I really feel stupid now). =D Cheers! --kit 20:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
I'd rather see a second revewer's opinion, but I'd welcome your general opinion after KP, BY. There's room for everyone to be perfect! And Kit Paddle, I got my eye on you... Sir Not A Good Username360Stress.gif KUN 23:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Ok I got this one =) --kit 13:54, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|0|1}}comment}}}
: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|1|1}}comment}}}
: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|2|1}}comment}}}
: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|3|1}}comment}}}
: {{{{{#sub:HCPIM|4|1}}comment}}}
Final Score: 32.5 I liked it but there are both petty/small things to correct and some major decisions to make (go less or more bias). Once these are looked at; I have no doubts this article about perfectionism will be perfect itself - a guiding light and inspiration to all those imperfect writers ;)
Reviewer: --kit 14:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)