Uncyclopedia:VFH/EDSAC (3rd nomination)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

EDSAC (history, logs)

Article: EDSAC

Score: 14.5 Large and Shit Computers

Nominated by: 800px-Flag of the Philippines svg.png | King Joseph® GiratinaOriginForme.png | Contact Goa Tse Clan Priest | Goa Tse Clan Sign Up | Rouge.gif | 02:08, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
For: 18
  1. It had been quasi-featured twice. It's funny, it's a good quality article and is placed streets ahead of other articles. 800px-Flag of the Philippines svg.png | King Joseph® GiratinaOriginForme.png | Contact Goa Tse Clan Priest | Goa Tse Clan Sign Up | Rouge.gif | 02:08, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
  2. For then, For now, Forever. Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:50, Jan 22
  3. I continue to be for. I can't wait to vote for it again in four months. Hurrah! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
  4. Symbol for vote.svg For.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
  5. For. as with last time ~http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/f/f6/Jewriken.GIF 10:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
  6. For. I think it's good enough to get featured, unless you people want to make it a recurring in-joke to quasi-feature this article. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
  7. For. Yeah okay. Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 01:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
  8. For Per my first two votes, and the one I would have cast, had I been paying attention to VFH the other time it was up. -RAHB 11:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
  9. For I like it --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 11:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
  10. For. I am sick of this nomination being in an Eric Holder-like deadlock.FEATURE IT!Saberwolf116 03:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
  11. For not suffering a fifth nomination of this article. Good enough, and everyone else seems to like it. --Mnbvcxz 20:52, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
  12. For. Some grammar issues, but very good nontheless. http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/9/93/Sig_pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
  13. For It's got garumbah. Colin Explode fire.gifALL YOUR BASEExplode fire.gifHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 03:17, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
  14. weak for, if only for the part with squirrels. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  15. For. Spang talk 00:36, 17 Feb 2009
  16. For. Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb.png kvetch Icon rabbi.gif Contribs Foxicon.png FOXES 12:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
  17. For. Just messing with the universe --Kit talk 17:52 27 February 22px-Flag of Sweden.png
  18. For per my other two for's. Sir SysRq (talk) 20:09, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Against: 3.5
  1. Against. Same reason as last time. IronLung 17:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
  2. Weak against. It's a reasonably solid article, I guess. Problem is, it's a little too close to the truth. What's true of EDSAC that isn't true of ENIAC, that's funny? That it became a vending machine at a frat house, I guess, but that's only slightly funny. http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/bf/Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 17:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
  3. Symbol against vote.svg Against. Moderately funny, but would be a whole lot funnier if it kept getting quasis. How much space on the article can we fill up with them? Gis ym esiladnav! Look at my itty bitty head.A-too-ta-teeh-ta-too-teh-tah-teh-har-fer-blarney.LOB 16:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
  4. Symbol against vote.svg Against. 18:12, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Abstain this is the fourth time its been on VFH. In addition to the two times it got quasi-featured, it was also nominated late November 2008. It scored 5 "for" to 2 "against", 0 "abstain", net +3 "for'. --Mnbvcxz 06:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Abstain. Per the last 2 times. I continue to completely miss what other people seem to find funny in this. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 10:40, Jan 22

Sigh. So close to being featured, yet, so far.Saberwolf116 22:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.