Uncyclopedia:VFP/archive2

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

DO NOT SUBMIT NEW VOTES TO THESE PAGES. To vote on these images, use PFP.


Bunch of Windows errors

Featured picture candidate
Windows XP is renowned for its stability and reliability.

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image



Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 05:51, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Self-promotion. - User:Guest/sig 19:35, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Error 4-0-for. But really against since it's unreadable. I had to use the stupid pun. - Nonymous 19:44, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. "An error has occured whilst trying to display an error message". Genius. -- User:Codeine/sig 19:53, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Look at it carefully. :D --User:Hinoa4/sig 20:21, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against. This is HIILARIOUS when viewed much bigger than it will appear on the main page.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 20:33, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Cancel. Maybe back in 1995, where "lol microsoft errors" jokes were still occasionally funny... --Andrusi 22:25, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: one of the error boxes says, "Our of screen space..." instead of OUT of screen space... otherwise pretty good job. I think it's too big to be front page material though. But then again it's obvious what is going on. --User:Mahroww/sig 22:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Fixored the "our of screen space". - User:Guest/sig 01:40, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
      • Cool...but I just noticed that on teh ult. spam exp. "make money fase" is speld wrahng two. Anyway, you should leave it because spam is notorious for misspellingggss. --User:Mahroww/sig 06:23, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Against It's a bit funny, but only at a large and legible size. --Spin 00:42, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Valiant try, but I know people (my mother, my aunt, my other aunt) with desktops like this all the time. Dame http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/b2/PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:10, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I actually like this one, though you do have to see it full-size to appreciate all the effort put into it. Nice work, Sikon/Guest! User:Some user/sig 02:00, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • foroooohhh yeaaa--Nappy The Quarryman 05:01, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • for I think it'll work... It's cliche but it does have quite a bit of original work too.. id est all the Unclylopedia jokes. --User:Mahroww/sig 06:23, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • --User:Xiao Li/sig
  • for - even if you can't read everything, the image is a fun one. May I suggest changing the caption to something like "Windows XP is world-renowned for its stability and reliability."?--Wyattj 13:21, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. I like the image, it just isn't good shrunk down to featured size. Swordmaster 17:34, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against I've seen a lot of windows humor and this is merely mediocre--Count of Monkey Crisco 17:50, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong F-AN ERROR HAS OCCURED A FF0000 PRESS ANY KEY TO CONTINUE --[[User:Nintendorulez|User:Nintendorulez/sig]] 19:43, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Haha, one of them's an AAAAAAAAA! PURE GOLD! Also, I'm making this my new desktop background, to replace that flash-based cursor-following matrix. And, this reminds me of that time when my browser would crash every time I visited VFP. --[[User:Nintendorulez|User:Nintendorulez/sig]] 19:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • STRONG FOR. :) ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 20:22, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • +12 There... that should be enough votes to get featured. User:Tompkins/sig 20:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm gonna go ahead and vote for this one... --User:MoneySign/sig 22:01, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Abort. Retry. For. --Skyscraper 22:53, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For Hahh! So true.. this truly deserves the votes
  • For. It may be small, but you get the idea. --OsirisX 07:00, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Size.--Rataube 14:40, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For(24.207.91.40 15:38, 17 February 2006 (UTC))
  • For. Although it may be a bit dated, there's at least two references to Uncyclopedia that are NOT blatantly obvious, and that had me laughing out loud. --User:King In Yellow/sig 19:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For! This is fantastic! AAAAAAAAAA! 21:37, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Mulehunter
  • For. Funny stuff. --Ladypolitik 02:55, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Weak stuff. User:Dawg/sig 04:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For Every time i boot into Windows XP. User:Anidnmeno/sig 04:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For: You are pregnant. Abort. Retry. Ignore. 'nuff said. --User:Keitei/sig 04:43, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR!! Awesomingly fun in full view, many "funny" puns, just AWESOME. --81.226.110.29 11:15, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For: The Homestar Runner reference... --81.187.166.33 16:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
  • 'For, yeah it's small, but people will be intrigued and click on it to read it in full. ^^ Great stuff --T.W North 18:13, 21 Feb 2006 (EST)
  • Very strong for Good choice of messages in the errors themselves. Code.azul 01:32, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Your system is shutting down - a fatal error has occured in module 8x328for00. --User:Lugiatm/sig 17:07, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Joy of Killing

Featured picture candidate
The Joy of Killing starring Bob Ross.

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image



Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 04:43, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

...happy little corpses... --User:Keitei/sig 09:47, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

  • For.--User:Isra1337/sig 09:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Against(Uncyclopedian 15:49, 7 February 2006 (UTC))
  • For. Uncyclopedian, senses of humor can be rented at the front desk. :D --User:Hinoa4/sig 16:35, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for I only got this joke because someone explained it to me. It IS hilarious, but I didn't get it at first.User:Bradaphraser/sig17:30, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For 'I'm gonna bust a happy little cap in your pretty little head' User:Anidnmeno/sig 19:34, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. HAHAHAHAHA! User:Tompkins/sig 21:44, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Abstain, until KILLING is written in happy little trees. --User:Mahroww/sig 22:44, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - tough to see the word "killing", could be better --Jester 06:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Against or Abstain I have no idea who that guy is... 16:22, 8 February 2006

(UTC)Mulehunter

    • After a short research I find it quite funny! but I keep my first impression
  • For those of us old (read: 20-something) people who grew up with Bob Ross will appreciate this.Tom Veil 20:09, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For I fixed the lettering a bit so that it shows up better. Not sure why it showed up so dark before. Strong Rad 16:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Ya know, ol' Happy Trees was a 'Nam vet... I think that should be incorporated into the caption. (I always wanted to see him crack on the show and start mixing some Asian Yellow with Agent Orange) Conditional For. --User:King In Yellow/sig 20:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Against: The Joy of Killing ought to relate to The Joy of Cooking somehow. Also, the image isn't very funny. --User:Gwax/sig 21:32, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Having been reminded that in fact, the Joy of Painting is the reference, I retract my objections. I do think it could be made a slightly more obvious reference though (caption perhaps). --User:Gwax/sig 20:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 ??? Why? It relates to the Joy of Painting....Strong Rad 01:13, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I reject your reality and substitute my own! Actually, I think you either get this one or you don't, and no amount of prompting for laughter will help. Strong Rad 12:50, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Mix some Pink-o Commie with Olive drab and you get a happy little For that's right, RadicalX is back bitches!--User:Slackerboy/sig 15:27, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For What the hell? You kids are clearly too young or foreign to understand this joke. It's extremely funny, and the article is even funnier than the image. The Joy of Cooking was a direct name rip off from The Joy of Painting, along with others. User:Dawg/sig 07:06, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For Awesome. --Teapot 18:59, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm against its featuring. I do know the show, and I do think it's funny, but I don't think it's front page material. --Boy Toy bitch at me 22:00, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Jocke Pirat 02:58, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Made me laugh out loud. Must be good. :D. User:Carlos the Mean/sig 01:55, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For I can hear Bob Ross from the great beyond "Its your world, your massacre, and you can kill as many people as you want." Dame http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/b2/PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:20, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
That's Beautiful, Prettiest...I just added that quote to the Joy of Killing page...Strong Rad 01:59, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • '"For'" This is absolutely hilarious Unsigned Strong Rad 12:49, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Mr. Ross may only be recognisable to a certain demographic, but I am a member, and I do like this.--Winston 14:39, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For, and I shall derive joy from killing all who vote otherwise. --Andrusi 22:18, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I mean, Wow! I never seen such happy explosions. -- 69.248.43.27 15:31, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Hunting with Dick

Featured picture candidate
Cheney, who believe that Wittington represented a credible threat to the United States, later explained the shooting as a result of faulty intelligence.

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image



Featured With Raddy's blessing, so don't go whining about Mr. Ross not being featured yet. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 06:01, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Self-Nominate What the hell... Dame http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/b/b2/PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR!! He shot a 78-year-old man in the face!! User:Anidnmeno/sig 15:31, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • This is the sort of event that needs to be comemorated. An enthusiastic FOR, and let's hope he doesn't have the sense to retract any support he gives to the NRA. --User:King In Yellow/sig 15:42, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Oooh.. topical! Aaarrrggh 15:45, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Ah... the politics of shooting lawyers in the face. For.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 17:15, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Gotta love current event-related pics. Strong For. --User:Hinoa4/sig 18:37, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Totally inaccurate, insulting to vice-presidents and the NRA - for. User:Wild Weasel/sig2 18:54, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For! What the heck, I'm pretty sure the FBI is already watching me anyway. User:Some user/sig 00:09, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Let's get this featured while its still topical. --User:Isra1337/sig 01:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR!! if its featured while topical--User:Whywhywhy/sig.css 07:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Topical perhaps, but Dick's head looks as it is about to roll off.--Winston 14:33, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For I like it. Especially in the selection of the source image. Classic. Strong Rad 16:46, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Purrrr I like it too. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 20:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • for but you might resize and reshade a few things--Nappy The Quarryman 04:58, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • weak for Sloppy, stupid, topical but I still laughed my ass off--Count of Monkey Crisco 17:52, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Image could be better, but the caption's great. Though "Gun, Dick, gun!" ought to be "Shoot, Dick, shoot!" I'm not even a hunter, but I know better than to lower the gun to horizon level when hunting quail.--[[User:Nintendorulez|User:Nintendorulez/sig]] 19:45, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Against: Sure, the VP shot someone, sure that's funny but this image is too poorly done to deserve featuring. Also, a month from now it won't be funny anymore. --User:Gwax/sig 20:11, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. It doesn't please me. --Boy Toy bitch at me 21:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Rms

Featured picture candidate
Controversial picture: Freedom of Software or disrespect to Islam?

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image



Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 06:05, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Nominate and For. --Rataube 14:08, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. By the way, you don't need the br tags. - User:Guest/sig 14:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This joke will never get old. --User:Lugiatm/sig 16:19, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • This was made FOR his article, but is great as a stand-alone pic. ~ User:Todd Lyons/sig 17:40, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For We must mock those who respond to humor with violence, until they get the idea and mock us back.--User:Bradaphraser/sig 18:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Wrath has the idea. --User:Hinoa4/sig 18:24, 9 February 2006 (UTC*
  • For Very, very funny.User:ArcherMan15:24 9 FEB 2006
  • Conditional for: I like the image a lot but I dislike the caption equally much. Change the caption and it'll be golden. --User:Gwax/sig 21:36, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Suggestions welcomed!--Rataube 00:53, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For "The tragedy of open-source suicide bombings"? --Some user 01:03, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For - even better than the Lego Mohammed. --OsirisX 07:00, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
  • BLASPHEMY wtf... is that supposed to be a piccy of Mohammed?? This brings Uncyclopedia to a new low... how about this FUCK SOPH.... This entry was finished by the guy sitting next to him... he sits in a pile of ashes on the floor as he got struck by lightening User:Anidnmeno/sig 19:54, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For, caption could still use improvement, but no ideas here... Anon32 14:38, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For "This blatant desecration of Mohammed's gay twin, Faggotmed, enraged gay Muslims worldwide" --Jester 03:21, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
If not yoet done, correct spelling error of "direspect" on main page.--81.228.207.191 13:21, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Cabinet

Featured picture candidate
George Bush meets with his cabinet to work on a plan to spread freedom and love throughout the land.

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image


Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 04:51, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Nominate and Vote. Funnier than any of the other current nominations.--Rataube 13:53, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It's funny because it's true - Lunar_Yeti
  • For. I believe this is an actual picture. User:Anidnmeno/sig 15:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For Some of the heads don't look correct, but other then that yes it's sorta funny --User:Zombiebaron/sig 15:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For - but the article it's on needs expanding, and it might be funnier if at least one person (not necessarily Bush himself; maybe the guy in back?) was not wearing a furry mask. --Some user 16:13, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, until. What's with the wave of poorly done pictures? Make it look like the heads are actually attached to the bodies, then we'll see. --Boy Toy bitch at me 16:32, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
    • For. What the heck. If no-one else cares, why should I? --Boy Toy bitch at me 16:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For!!!!! Hilarious!(24.207.91.40 16:49, 5 February 2006 (UTC))
Likely sock. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 06:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For Needs a link in the blurb, but otherwise pretty good stuff.User:Bradaphraser/sig17:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I just saw this, and I was thinking about nominating it, but now i can't remember where it's from. User:Tompkins/sig 17:24, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Whee, fun. --User:Hinoa4/sig 18:39, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Thanks for the nomination. :) -- Rei 19:44, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Extreme For! This is perfect!(Uncyclopedian 00:54, 6 February 2006 (UTC))
  • FOR! What an accurate depiction. --OsirisX 02:58, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Xiao Li 09:39, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I like it, but WHAT THE HELL IS THAT GRAY THING AAAAAAAHHH GET IT OFF ME AAAAAAHHHH!!! (BTW, anyone else getting a strong Avengers: The Movie vibe from this?) --User:King In Yellow/sig 15:46, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For Very clever --Jester 18:42, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For Nominate this already!!!!(142.22.16.57 18:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC))
Comment: I think you meant "Feature this already." And I agree, but please don't use sockpuppets to vote. User:Tompkins/sig 20:01, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Likely sock. The IP, not Tompkins. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 06:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Against The quality is pretty bad, sorry. Some conservative freak 01:02, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Against I dislike ballot stuffing too --User:Splaka/sig 06:29, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Against It's pretty good, but some of the heads don't match. The hands look great through. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 06:37, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For Although I agree with Some User in that one guy shouldnt have a mask 16:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC)Mulehunter
  • Against. Too Crass. -- 69.248.43.27 15:33, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Individually wrapped M&M's (from OCD)

Featured picture candidate
NEW! Individually wrapped for people with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image


Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 06:41, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Nomination & Vote ~ MoneySign was kind enough to make this for me as a surprise. He says it's not one of his best works, but I think it's great. --User:Todd Lyons/sig 18:09, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Awesome, plus, someone would actually buy these. — User:Wild Weasel/sig 18:38, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For--Rataube 18:53, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Against I don't know why ... but this just doesn't hit me with the happies.--Bradaphraser 19:40, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Frankly, I don't like it. And this could be just because I'm in a bad mood. --Boy Toy bitch at me 20:17, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For. I love it, especially since OCD kinda runs in my family. However, it took me awhile to decipher the picture. User:Tompkins/sig 21:42, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Enthusiastic For. But you should work "OCD" into the caption. --User:Isra1337/sig 23:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Sure :) Anyone have a suggestion? --User:Todd Lyons/sig 00:01, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Dunno. "New for people with OCD:" maybe. I saw OCD in the header and got the joke. I just want OCD to be in the caption somehow. Doesn't need to be clever. -User:Isra1337/sig 00:06, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For, but I sra's right. I thought it was about condoms. Kakun 23:58, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. - Taken out of the context of the article, it makes little sense. There should be something in the caption about OCD. --Leo 02:53, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. - I was neither, for or against but now that it is the size of a house it must be stoppped. i dont want 2 stay on the fence --User:Whywhywhy/sig.css 09:38, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - too tiny to be fun on the front page Mtu 01:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Against- It's familiar, which means it should be funny. But it's kind of...not. I dunt know why. Frankenberry Grr 06:53, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For - David Gerard 12:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For --User:Anidnmeno/sig 14:17, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For Funny --Bananas21ca 01:43, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For My company had a discussion last night on whether to make these, but then we saw they were already featured here! - Birdzofafeatha
  • For --[[User:Nintendorulez|User:Nintendorulez/sig]] 00:22, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For --KWild 10:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For for being genuinely funny on its own without a lot of backstory -Drdisque 19:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • More or Less For --Ghelaetalk 20:01, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Funny, even when you know people who have OCD. --Joe857 16:17, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Made me laugh out loud; just subtle enough, nice wrapper text. Sj 03:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. That's a hilarious picture!(24.207.91.40 04:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC))
Likely sock. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 06:36, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Good job, whoever made this!(Uncyclopedian 00:58, 6 February 2006 (UTC))

Evil Cookie Monster

Featured picture candidate
Cookie Monster's last name becomes much more accurate when he is deprived of cookies...

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image


Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 05:31, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Nomination and for. I went looking for a pic worthy of this page, since it seems we all agree that more are needed. What do you think?--Bradaphraser 22:43, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For. That's good stuff. --Boy Toy bitch at me 01:29, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • After so long! another picture I can hapily vote FOOOOR, with no doubts.--Rataube 02:25, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Against nothing clever about it at all, put him next to a boiling cooking pot (with the hand sticking out aka cooking monster)with a spoon and then it might be funny--User:Whywhywhy/sig.css 03:07, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Weak For After looking at the current bunch this would have 2 be the second best of the lot after the wiki versions --User:Whywhywhy/sig.css 00:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Mickeys

Featured picture candidate
Mickeys - the drug of choice for today's trendy ravers.

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image


Featured I didn't even count the votes. Haha, suckers! --User:Rcmurphy/sig 03:55, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Self-nomination I made this a long time ago. Unfortunately the article it's on is pretty sparse and it could use a better caption, but what the hey, I'm feeling wild today. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 19:56, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Hey Dicks, I think someone slipped him a Mickey. For User:Dawg/sig 19:58, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Gimme a Hell yeah! Cuz Stone Todd sed so. --User:Todd Lyons/sig 20:47, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Very weak For. I can see them in front page, but they look like erasers to me. --Boy Toy bitch at me 21:02, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For--Rataube 21:24, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For. In answer to all of you non-believers' questions: So? User:Tompkins/sig 22:09, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For, if only because there have been no featured pictures on this site that have taken pot-shots at Disney, and that needs to be remedied.--Bradaphraser 22:32, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For. (conditional on it being that size or close to it on the front page). --User:Isra1337/sig 01:07, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For! --Leo 01:26, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For: they're totally trendy. --User:Gwax/sig 06:05, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Rf!o: Deez pilllzzz gotttts mereee FCUKDDD U!P1!! User:Anidnmeno/sig 05:01, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Oh dear! I haven't voted for yet! --User:Keitei/sig 05:11, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Hey man... slip me one a dose... I needs it FOR my hot date lateh... --User:King In Yellow/sig 19:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Now this is feature-material! --User:MoneySign/sig 06:30, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --71.32.75.47 07:27, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Abstained WTF is a Mickey? I Just learned what a Hickey is. And a Wedgie. But Mickey???--User:Suresh/sig 00:37, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Mickey Mouse, a classic Disney character.--Rataube 02:32, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
And a "Mickey Finn" (or just "Mickey") is a drink laced with drugs (hence the Mickey-drug connection). Not raver drugs though. I don't think. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 02:42, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Mono Lisa

Featured picture candidate
DaVinci's Hewlett-Packard printer was to be the undoing of his most famous work, resulting in what art scholars have termed the "Mono Lisa."

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image


Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 05:08, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

I move my For vote for the one currently on top, as well. It's better.--Bradaphraser 23:33, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

FORTRAN hee hee hee, tickle me --Joachim22 01:52, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. I, personally, like the bottom one, but I'm fine with either one. I think the caption should stay along the lines of the top one, though, about the printer running out of (color ink/ink). -JBob 06:48, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I'll vote for Monalisaink.jpg but not for the newest one. User:Keitei/sig 10:10, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC) <-- That was an AGAINST IN SCREAMING BOLD CAPS!!! --User:Keitei/sig 05:28, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. Prettiestpretty 13:15, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. I changed the quote. 172.209.250.56 14:45, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Against Sorry, but I just don't think this is feature-worthy. User:Dawg/sig 14:56, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

  • Against - Agreed! --Leo 06:31, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I'm for--Rataube 13:48, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)

  • For --- Kakun 22:56, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I'll assume, since he uploaded it, that Nonymous votes for. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 20:56, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. I love it. -- User:PinkDeoxys/sig

For indeed --User:Whywhywhy/sig.css 11:38, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

FOR!! Although Monalisaink.jpg is much much better --20:17, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)Mulehunter

LOL 4 --User:Nerd42/sig 17:18, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. I thought I alredy voted on this one. Acid Ammo 20:18, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

FOR. Those crappy printers have ruined the Da Vinci Code secret! User:Wild Weasel/sig 12:34, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. Pretty good, didn't make me bust a gut Aidos5

For --EvilZak 04:15, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Against - So RC has to stare at it longer. --User:Splaka/sig 06:05, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Comment: This image has more fors then Connect-the-Dots, how come it wasn't featured? Acid Ammo 19:13, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Newness. Connect-the-dots has been up for a long time. User:Dawg/sig 00:34, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
If I counted correctly, Mono Lisa had half a vote on Connectthedots when the latter was featured (For votes - Against votes), and as Dawg said (and as I said below), seniority on VFP gives a slight boost. And nobody can deny that Connectthedots had seniority in spades... --User:Rcmurphy/sig 08:48, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. I liked the newer version better, this just doesn't work so well. --User:Volte/sig 22:58, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Against: meh; snot good enough in my opinion. --User:Gwax/sig 05:24, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Monalisaink.jpg is far better. --Algorithm (talk) 09:03, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Quattro--Suresh 22:14, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Monalisaink.jpg is too detailed for the front page. Mtu 02:02, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
    • It is sooo not too detailed! Getting rid of the massive wall around it should help if this truly is the case 19:26, 25 January 2006 (UTC)Mulehunter

Bad News soup

Featured picture candidate
Just when you thought hospital food couldn't get worse...

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image


Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 06:22, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Nominated by Carlb per this edit. --User:Keitei/sig 16:39, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

  • This is Cruel; I vote FOR it. Prettiestpretty 16:49, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Soup is good food. Fork! --Carlb 17:39, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • This is practically my favorite image on this site. --User:Keitei/sig 18:03, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For Funny, 'nuff said.--Bradaphraser 18:51, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For What else to say? --Dac Vin (Down with colorful sigs!) 20:52, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Maybe. Change the caption to something better and I will give it my vote. --User:Volte/sig 20:55, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • Against. Upon looking at it further, I think it needs to be a fixed up a bit; mainly the lighting, which makes it visually ambiguous as to whether it is a flat fruitcake or a bowl of soup. I still encourage a new caption, however. --User:Volte/sig 22:43, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Against. Funny, yes, but there are things we shouldn't laugh about. I'm ok with the aricle, but frontpage??? That's too much.--Rataube 22:24, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Ratman's got a point there. weak Against. plus, it's a cookie. Kakun 22:33, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • O it's the Tourette's story, all over again! Quit it. For. Acid Ammo 23:37, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --User:Isra1337/sig 23:43, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Only works in context for me, less entertaining as a featured image. Now, if the article wins VFH, this would be a good featured article image. User:Dawg/sig 23:55, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For, I agree with Volte's complaints but I think this is decent enough nevertheless. --EvilZak 00:03, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Do you people ever stop complaining? User:Tompkins/sig 00:35, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • I changed the caption yesterday. Hope it's better. --Acid bitch at me 00:07, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For - If my nomination can't make it this one damn better will. FireballX301 02:09, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For It's funny because it shouldn't be. Frankenberry Grr 03:40, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For Oh yeah. This is what I call humor. --DeathByPie 14:36, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For ROFL! JK! -AtionSong 22:50, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Against: just against. --User:Gwax/sig 05:26, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Leo 06:28, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Maybe. Change the caption to something more subtle and it'll be a For. --Algorithm (talk) 09:10, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • I have changed the caption to something we came up with on irc. Completely For the new version. --Algorithm (talk) 09:45, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • I can confidently vote for this image now.--User:MoneySign/sig 09:48, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • 6x=24. Love the actual article, "The 100 Worst Ways to Bring Bad News" or something like that. Swordmaster 17:28, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. I would have supported You are dyclextic.--Suresh 22:10, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For Not that I necessarily like the image (thought I don't necessarily don't either), but because I'm against the reasons against. --User:Spintherism/sig 23:11, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Its a good image.. but jokes about deadly illnesses aren't funny. --User:Anidnmeno/sig 15:20, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Remark I feel needs to be made due to all the "don't laugh at leukemia" votes: WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA1. On the About page, you can find the following sentence:"Offense is exceptionally likely, expected, and to be renowned while reading the Uncyclopedia." Still in doubt? Read that excerpt again.
      Sincerely,
      User:MoneySign/sig 16:19, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
      1(Tip of the day: You click blue underlined words or phrases to find out more.)
I am not saying the article should be changed or deleted, I am not even saying the article itself can't be featured (on this grounds). But I insist that puting this particular image in the FRONTPAGE is TOO MUCH. Wana keep argueing? go to the VFP discussion page.--Rataube 17:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Leukemia is inherently humorous - David Gerard 12:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC)


The Turkish Flag

Featured picture candidate
The Flag of Turkey, as it has appeared since 1844.

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image


Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 05:43, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Did you know?: The red hue of the flag of Turkey is Pantone 186 C!
Nominated by --Skyscraper 18:08, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

  • Four stars. Oh wait, my mistake, there are only three. --Skyscraper 18:16, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For: Not only does it have a minimalist charm to it, but if you compare it to the actual Turkish Flag, you will see that it is satirical genius. --User:Gwax/sig 18:29, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I love it. --User:Volte/sig 18:36, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For. - User:Guest/sig 18:38, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Because I'm nitpicking, I think it should be just one star, like the real Turkish flag. Strong Rad 18:43, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Comment. I agree with this. I am still keeping my for vote though, because either way it works just as well. Also, Pacman doesn't have any eyes in the game, but that's okay. --User:Volte/sig 20:05, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Comment. But why have one half of a Pacman reference when you can have two halves of a Pacman reference? --Skyscraper 19:05, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • The real flag was done after Mr PacMan ate the other two stars. FOR. --Rataube 19:49, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Eee! It's cute. --User:Keitei/sig 18:52, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • for Kakun 20:32, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For Brilliant.--Bradaphraser 21:08, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For But rather choose Pacmanistans flag since it also contains a pun.--Suresh 22:07, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Nice, though I would consider some of the caption change suggestions. --User:Isra1337/sig 23:17, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • 100% For. Genius. But I agree, maybe white out his eye, more authenticity that way. Unless it would be breaking a copyright or something, then you know, meh. User:Tompkins/sig 01:13, 18 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For! - Simply fantastic! --Leo 04:47, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR It's funny because its true - okochama 05:07, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • For 'Tis nice. That's all. --Code.azul 12:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • WTF? I don't get it... --User:Anidnmeno/sig 15:18, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. To quote Dawg, I can't tell what it is at a glance. --Boy Toy bitch at me 15:49, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For - This is freakin hilarious!!!! XD PiOfFive
  • Comment I agree with Suresh; using Pakistan's flag would be funnier. --Algorithm (talk) 22:20, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

The Last Supper

Featured picture candidate
Something seems to be missing but everyone is too stoned to care.

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image


Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 05:56, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

  • Nomination and for. I had the last version of this pulled because the cropped version wasn't as good. Before anyone complains about re-nominations, the other nomination wasn't finished and it had a positive vote score, but I pulled it in favour of this one. Also, it is a fairly wide thumbnail (300px) but Rcmurphy has given me the green light to nominate it anyway. --User:Volte/sig 23:52, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For I like this picture better without the caption, since the apostles are all like, "What the... where did Jesus go?" but I know you want to link it to the original article. It's still the good stuff.--Bradaphraser 00:03, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For I love how much sense this painting makes without Jesus. Doug 00:35, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Rataube 01:44, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For again.--User:Whywhywhy/sig.css 05:57, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Way too freaking wide. User:Dawg/sig 06:14, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment. It can be resized down to 275px (or 250px if absolutely necessary) without losing much, although I've tested it myself and the width of this one doesn't interfere any more than, say, the Truman Torch image did (it was 250px, and quite a lot taller). --User:Volte/sig 17:13, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For as a good parody of how Christ is being taken out of everything nowadays. --User:Nerd42/sig 17:17, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Acid Ammo 20:14, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Some user 17:52, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For. As much as I like the article, I think that this image could do with a better caption. Maybe something like: "Jesus making himself disappear at a routine birthday party gig." Just a thought. -JBob 06:24, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment. Yes, I think it could have worked with a "disappearing Jesus" themed caption, especially with the facial expressions. However, it should be tied to Nobody cares somehow, as that is what I made the image for. Since it's so far into the nomination, I will leave it as it is; changing the nominated item, even if it is just the caption, is not a good idea. Thanks for your input and vote though. --User:Volte/sig 06:33, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Donde esta Jesus? Jesus la yakun huna, sharmuta. — User:Wild Weasel/sig 12:42, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For Oh yah --User:Zombiebaron/sig 23:35, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --User:Keitei/sig 04:00, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For-anonyuser
  • For Good stuff. --Mosquitopsu 15:22, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For It's the only other good picture on VFP, so meh. --Poofers 00:51, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Connectthedots

Featured picture candidate
A state planning committee map of Connecticut.

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image


Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 06:15, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I think it's awesome. So I'm nominating it. And voting. --Keitei 07:42, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For Excellent image and pun. The spirit of Uncyclopedia is held inside its frame. --Mosquitopsu 14:06, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For This one was a lot of work! It's always been one of my favorite creations, if under-rated. --Strong Rad 22:13, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For Hadn't ever seen this one, heh. --User:Splaka/sig 22:20, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Aye I'd love to see their state flower also --Staxeon 05:17, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Pretty darn funny ;) For Rei 19:59, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For I like it. --Silius 06:13, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Against -- Not very clever enouogh for me... --Leo 17:59, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Against Sorry, there are more worthy Strong Rad images... --User:Rcmurphy/sig 23:19, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Man, someone's been drinking their Haterade! hehe --Strong RadX 03:22, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For. Ah-ha, I get it, the state.

Unsigned. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 18:29, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For Ohhhh, I get it! Ahahaha! Now we need an article for Connectthedots. Swordmaster 20:37, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

There is. It's called Connectthedots.Strong RadX 05:30, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For Gotta love der puns.--Bradaphraser 20:52, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. The fact it has exactally 69 dots makes it even funnier. Acid Ammo 02:06, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Finally, someone noticed that...hehehe Strong RadX 00:20, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Put a good comment on it and I'll be for it. User:Dawg/sig 13:27, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Now I am For this image, since it has a suitable caption. User:Dawg/sig 21:30, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

YES! This is a clever pun, visually communicated and its not an inside joke. Prettiestpretty 13:09, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

If we were not to feature inside jokes, Rumble in EuroiPods wouldn't be in the first page. Acid Ammo 16:51, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
My point exactly. Prettiestpretty 01:09, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Comment: Isn't 11 vs 2 enough to feature? Acid Ammo 11:41, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment Depends on the other vote counts. The last featured image had 14 votes. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 16:23, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • And now this one has 15 fors ^^... Acid Ammo 14:44, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • I may have been unclear. The image with the most votes of the nominees is usually featured (though older images have a slight boost in some cases). --User:Rcmurphy/sig 06:15, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For as long as that Babe Vigoda one is never featured.. which it probably will :(--User:Whywhywhy/sig.css 06:16, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For Anon32 21:22, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Against I'm not sure what this is, but it sure as hell is not funny. Unsigned --Acid Ammo 09:20, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC) (did i do right?)

For Awesome job. Teapot 05:04, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For I love Rhode Island! — User:Wild Weasel/sig 14:42, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Dog Hazard Labels

Featured picture candidate
In light of recent tragedies, the National Pet Association has released new warning labels for hazardous dogs.

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image


Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 04:43, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, need a revote. The individual images are no longer up for nomination. Previous votes are hidden; the tiled image votes go below. User:Keitei/sig 23:15, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)


  • The dog labels picture needs a fuckin' article. Other than that it is decent.--Alan Truism 06:31, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Comment Tiled, JPEG artifacts removed. - Nonymous 17:07, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For the all-together one. Acid Ammo 20:02, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Yes, but rename as bewareofdog.gif :) --Carlb 00:22, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

The captions were the main kicker for me, but this is still a for. FireballX301 07:51, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

ditto fire ball 'for--User:Whywhywhy/sig.css 09:42, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)* maybe i miss stated i ment"warning dog" was the whole reason--User:Whywhywhy/sig.css 05:51, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I Like It! Prettiestpretty 13:14, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Me likey long time. For -- User:Mhaille/sig 20:09, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. --User:Isra1337/sig 20:52, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I liked it with the captions, but still a for. User:Lugiatm/sig 15:15, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

"Original" caption back due to popular demand. And a blaséd FOR whilst I'm at it. --User:MoneySign/sig 16:10, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. User:Keitei/sig 16:17, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For--Rataube 19:25, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For because it's awesome as all get up. --User:Gwax/sig 21:32, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. it'd be better if they were flamingos... but still just too good to pass up. User:Tompkins/sig 02:23, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Fo(r?)..Celtiberian 22:50, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For!! Marvelous! --20:18, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)Mulehunter

I've already voted for this, but it got murdered when it was reformatted.--Bradaphraser 21:51, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

for but I liked it in it's pre-tiling, non-murdered state a lot more =|;{> --User:Carlos the Mean/sig 23:49, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For awwwww, it's sho shweet! maybe an article about the RSPCA or occupational health and safety requirements? --Arroganto! 11:01, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For It's better collated. User:Dawg/sig 21:22, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For Everyone loves puppies! --Some user 17:55, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For. -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 19:46, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)

For--Nytrospawn 01:58, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)

MS Paint screenshot

Featured picture candidate
Screenshot of MS Paint, a popular image manipulation program.

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image


Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 05:15, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

  • For - Nonymous 19:38, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • 4 - Nice screenshot User:Karaluch/sig 19:41, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. I must repeat. For me it takes more then a poor MS Paint job Acid Ammo 09:27, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • And I vote 'FÜR. I like this one. --User:MoneySign/sig 20:22, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For It looks exactly like the real thing... I can't differentiate between a screenshot and the actual program. --Code.azul 1:02 PM, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I bet this is what Katie made Hitlerbear in. [ducks]. --User:Isra1337/sig 06:43, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For. i love this program. Check out what i made here--User:Whywhywhy/sig.css 08:24, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • FORTRAN. Awesome. --24.74.97.190 18:03, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For --EvilZak 21:48, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Completely for.--RGGKaufman 00:41, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For It's great --Caiman 01:33, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For! Awesome pic. Eldarion 14:53, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Sort of obvious, but still. - Guest 17:05, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For. MS Paint is my favourite image editing program. User:Lugiatm/sig 19:37, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For--Rataube 19:29, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • For ~ It's better than sex ---Kakun 21:00, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Four. Er, I mean For. -- User:PinkDeoxys/sig

The Truman Torch

Featured picture candidate
After being given superpowers by the Manhattan Project, Harry S Truman (a.k.a. The Truman Torch) personally drops the bomb on Hiroshima.

{{{4}}}

Image credit: [[User:{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]
Archive - Discuss this image


Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 04:39, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Shameless self-promotion. --Isra1337 08:18, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

It's well-made, intelligent, and funny. What's not to like? --Peder 17:30, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

What's to dislike? I like it. Truman will always be known for being the Truman Torch. --Mosquitopsu 20:40, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

WTF? For! --Overlordzoloft 03:41, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Strange enough for me. --Dalar 03:54, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For Great play on words. --MuncherOfSpleens 01:03, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

In Favor This is awesome. --Code.azul 03:18, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I do like it. --User:Keitei/sig 16:08, 21 Dec 2005 (UTC)

FEATURE THIS! I have decided to throw my support behind this image. It's also one of the only images on this page, outside of RadX's latest, to have absolutely no votes against. User:Dawg/sig 18:43, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For One of the only funny ones I've seen nominated. Neegore 12:35, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

V to the izzO, T to the izzE --Savethemooses 20:31, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Flame on! Harry's on fire! Feature him! Strong RadX 18:45, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Feature! I feel like the article this is linked to (New American Justice Coalition) should be featured too. Jlove1982 01:48, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Comment: Who is Harry S Truman? Acid Ammo 16:52, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Harry S. Truman was the American President who ordered that the atomic bomb be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II. "Truman Torch" is a play on the Human Torch, a member of the famed comicbook team "The Fantastic Four." I proudly stand by my America-centric humor. --User:Isra1337/sig 17:54, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
For, then. Acid Ammo 18:02, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Stained Glass Mr. T

Mr. T is a beacon of hope in our cold and dark world.

Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 07:12, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I pity the foo' that don't vote for this image. Strong RadX 19:35, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Has to be For -- User:Mhaille/sig

For. --Isra1337 19:38, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For Now, this is actually funny and feature-worthy. Is this that hard, people? User:Dawg/sig 19:44, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. --Kakun 22:19, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

RadX again?! Awesome :p FOR --Caiman 22:37, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For --Spintherism 23:36, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)

FOR Pray his holiness, Saint-Mr. T --Tunel 00:19, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I'm all for beacons of hope. User:Keitei/sig 00:22, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I think I speak for everyone when I say "for." That looks really cool. --Mosquitopsu 05:59, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I think you're right. --MoneySign 10:41, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For St. T should be highlighted everywhere!--Bradaphraser 18:24, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. Awesome picture and an awesome caption. -JBob 19:50, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Despite my well-known antipathy for Raddy, I must vote for this image. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 20:13, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

FOR-GASMIC --Savethemooses 20:35, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. Ain't nothin like the T. FireballX301 22:14, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. --John Shutt 22:39, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For Now stop yo jibba-jabba and feature it...sucka!--User:Slackerboy/sig 00:49, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For Yes. Please. As if being very well-made and having Mr. T wasn't enough. Code.azul 12:51, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Fort Might aswell, I AINT GETTING ON NO PLANE User:Karaluch/sig13:49, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

FOR This is a HOOT! Prettiestpretty 00:54, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. Now quit yo' jibba jabba. --User:Lugiatm/sig 15:18, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Front page material. Acid Ammo 17:39, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Rumble In Euroipods

The infamous "Rumble in Euroipods" was wrought with ego-related injuries.

FEATURED Yee-haw --User:Rcmurphy/sig 04:18, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I just made this picture, to be added to talk:euroipods. I think it's pretty funny (but I would say that), and it'd be great as a featured image. --Carlos the Mean 04:54, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Oh, and I'm for. --Carlos the Mean 04:55, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC) Me too, but why the hell am I fighting you, CTM?--Sir Flammable KUN 05:27, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC) Here --Carlos the Mean 05:25, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Yes, it's self-referencing; yes, few people will get it; but it's hilarious, and I'm voting for it anyway. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 05:57, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC) Heh, I just noticed it says "VERUS" instead of "VERSUS" (on the original too). --User:Rcmurphy/sig 07:50, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

YES! Definetly an inside joke, for sure; but seeing as I'm inside of it... --Putz 07:43, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Yeah. Maybe it will prompt a few people to read the Talk page (which probably should have been nominated VFH itself). -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 09:33, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC) Clorox/Bleach should feel awfully proud for getting mentioned twice. ;) -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 09:35, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC) Quiet, you! --Carlos the Mean 02:50, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Give me a Hell Yeah! Should be a featured image......coz...RC...sez so!!! -- User:Mhaille/sig 12:32, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. --Katie loves you! 19:57, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Funny picture, even if I don't get the in-joke. For. --Hinoa4 01:30, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. I just looked at the talk page for the first time since the day of, and Good God! Someone needs to write an article on Meta-Humor. --Isra1337 01:42, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Neutral until I'm added to the picture, then For - Out of pure vanity. That is a very funny picture from an in-joke standpoint. User:Dawg/sig 07:27, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

You weren't involved in the conflict. And you should thank your lucky stars. I still get flashbacks when I see an mp3 player and a European flag in the same place *shudder*.--Carlos the Mean 08:33, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I was involved in the conflict before there was a conflict. I just wasn't involved in the Talk page portion. I was there when "feature!" was declared and I was the first (I think) WTF'er on IRC. Not involved... Pffft. User:Dawg/sig 05:47, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Oh sorry, I was merely documenting what I saw, I'm not a reliable source as such - which makes my output perfect for the front page of Uncyclopedia! --User:Carlos the Mean/sig 05:59, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Rcmurphy for teh win. I mean, For. --User:Lugiatm/sig 16:32, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Sonnet the Hedgehog

Alas, poor Sonnet...

Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 05:41, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Nomination and vote. This made me smile instantly, and I didn't enjoy Shakespeare. -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 16:06, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Do you never sleep? Fore and thanks... -- User:Mhaille/sig 16:16, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
To be against or not to be against: that is the vote. I love clever things like this image so I give it an Aye. --Mosquitopsu 16:51, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For: fantastic. --User:Gwax/sig 22:33, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For (log-rolling) --Johnny C. Raven 05:41, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For It took me a minute to "get it," but once I got it, I thought it was very clever. Yeah, I need to brush up on my Shakespeare. --Silius 02:55, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For, because my article-writing ego demands it. --Andrusi 23:07, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. I knew him, Horatio. Swordmaster 18:30, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Against. Not my bag Neegore 12:38, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For I like this picture, it's subtle and funny. User:Dawg/sig 01:24, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For - cute - David Gerard 10:36, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Verily, I say. --User:Keitei/sig 10:57, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Midol for Admins

The pill for what ails our administrators.

Featured, hurrah --User:Rcmurphy/sig 04:46, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

No article for this one, sorry. ::The "articles" for this image are: 1 and 2 Vote for this great image. User:Dawg/sig 04:53, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

HAHAHAHA, now THAT's comedy! For --Peder 23:52, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Change the PMS symptoms text, increase size and then you'll have a good picture. But until then, I'm against it being featured. --Peder 21:01, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Good idea....I'll do that tonight! Strong RadX 22:06, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
I personally like the part about breast tenderness. But the part that says "Pre-Menstrual Syndrome" should probably be changed. I agree with the bigger too. But I give this a For whether it's changed or not! --Katie loves you! 22:56, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Vote for this great image. --Nerd42 04:55, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Its funny, bcoz its true. For - User:Mhaille/sig 16:19, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
For. I actually saw it in the delete log before I saw it here, and I laughed. -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 17:05, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
sure why not --Nerd42 17:23, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
For. Great stuff. Acid Ammo 19:42, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
For. Can I get this in packs of 200? -- User:Codeine/sig 02:28, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)
We should pool our money together and get a case of a few thousand imported from Canada. User:Dawg/sig 15:57, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

By the way, have a looksy at Wiki Administrators --Nerd42 03:02, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For - David Gerard 01:07, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Comment perhaps someone could smooth out the edges of the box? just a comment 204.38.191.99 19:15, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)
For, and how much does this go for on the black market? --Hinoa4 01:22, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Apple pie chart

The apple pie chart: A winning presentation

Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 07:15, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. 75% -the evidence speaks for itself --Whywhywhy 16:06, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For I like how the crumbs are left behind in the tin. --Mosquitopsu 17:08, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For I made this pic for the Delicious charts article, though i didn't nominate it myself. Cheers to who did. I also ate about 25% of it :p --Okochama 21:57, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For The picture simply and effectively provides me with a hilarious mental image of a board meeting where a guy who has just stuffed his face with 75% of pie is explaining its deliciousness quotient. --Quilty 01:52, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For Hey, it's pretty much great. 'Nuff said. --Oracleoftruth 03:35, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For I can't think of anything else to say. --T.W. North

For --Isra1337 08:20, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Conditional For. Add Apple Pie Chart to the caption. Acid Ammo 03:14, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Done and done. And for --User:Carlos the Mean/sig 03:10, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For Yeah. I'm at a loss for words. CX06:19, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For --Paulgb 21:44, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For. Perfect for those long, financial organization meetings! -JBob 19:46, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)


I Can't Believe It's Not Hitler!

It'll have the kids saying, "Jawohl, mein Führer!"

Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 05:44, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

This images is from the article I Can't Believe It's Not Hitler.

I came back form inactive for this one. it appears to have the power to ressurrect, as well as the power to kill. --TheLibrarian 21:36, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I died. --Keitei 06:23, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Definitely For. --Silius 07:01, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For, But what about people on a diet? I demand I cant beleive its not Hitler Light! --Kempokaraterulz 07:50, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For. Don't we have enough Hitler related featured images? Eh, what's another! --Strong RadX 13:01, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

for --Paulgb 16:10, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Against Hitler jokes are cliche. Too many of them to be funny. --Mosquitopsu 16:30, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Luckily, I never tire of Hitler jokes! And you shouldn't either! --Katie loves you! 07:17, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Against God that sucks, whoever made it should be locked up in a small cage with a dozen 18 year old cheerleaders. --User:Splaka/sig 05:16, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

          And thats a bad thing :P

Faboo -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 05:18, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Against God that sucks, whoever wrote that article should be locked up in a small cage with a dozen 18 year old cheerleaders. And we have an edible Hitler image already. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 23:28, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I made it! --204.38.191.99 19:18, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

FOR! --Leo 02:21, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

FOR HAHAHA --130.245.249.228 00:08, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Führer For Can't stop guffawing! --Freebasser 04:38, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For -- Miserable Failure 01:05, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Fore! Wow, that's funny. --Joe857 02:56, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Weak For --User:Morlark/sig 15:31, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Bewildered Against -- What's the joke? DrAwesome 16:57, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)

What isn't the joke? "I Can't Believe It's Not Butter" is a butter substitute and this is a play on it, with "Sweet Aryan Genetics" and "Naturally Socialism Free" and "100% Superior Breed". --Katie loves you! 23:05, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)

4 I'm still laughing. -JBob 04:46, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Against: we've already got too many Hitler featured pictures, not to mention this image uses exactly the same image as the chocolate Hitler does. --User:Gwax/sig 02:45, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For hilarious - InsaneHunter

For God that rocks, whoever wrote that article should be locked up in a small cage with a dozen 18 year old cheerleaders. User:Dawg/sig 22:41, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Fourrre --Xiao Li 02:01, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Lincoln's Laptop

President Abraham Lincoln was known to have typed the Emancipation Proclamation on his personal laptop.

Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 07:00, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Haha. Technology does date back father than you'd think. --Silius 21:49, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

- I like it! Especially the caption. --Mosquitopsu 23:20, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Bloody well brilliant. Bravo, sir! Bravo! --Brett Bretterson 05:18, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Abraham Lincoln lived strong. --Katie loves you! 07:20, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Lincoln + photshop = funny --Isra1337 22:55, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Fantastix --Carlos the Mean 21:21, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For! -- Subtle.....and funny! --Leo 17:55, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Well done, I think. For. -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 18:31, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For -- Miserable Failure 01:08, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For score and.. oh, wait... nm... --Dalar 07:10, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC) For Good quality


Sharks.jpg

Sharks with freaking laser-beams.

Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 07:18, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For: I would not want to be that cameraman. --User:Gwax/sig 11:58, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For Add some explosions to it --Nytrospawn 16:59, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For I like the lasers going off in the background. --Mosquitopsu 20:44, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For Excellence in my eyes. --Code.azul 11:32, 26 Nov 2005 (EST)

For All I want for Christmas...Strong RadX 05:33, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For I like it. A lot. Great job. --Silius 05:44, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For. Thats good stuff. Acid Ammo 20:59, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Cool! Um, that's a for. --MuncherOfSpleens 02:08, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For User:Rangeley/sig 22:07, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the nom of my picture. :) Rei 23:48, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For I want freakin' sharks with freakin' laserbeams attached to their freakin' heads. 17:20, 27 Dec 2005

Yuppers I like it alot. Only one that's atually made me laugh since someother one... T.W. North 15:58, 7 Dec 2005 (EST)

Catcher in the Rye

The protagonist from J.D. Salinger's novel, Catcher in the Rye

Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 05:05, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Vote for and Nomination I think this is clever and funny, more so if you know the book. --Wingzerotype 16:49, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For Very original. --Withers 19:56, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Not really laugh-out-loud funny, but I think it should be featured just to confuse stupid people. --Peder 22:00, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For. Hilarious. User:NeoEva88/sig

Jumbo Shrimp- A great book, and yes this is a vote for...when I read it thats what I thought it was about...you know Holden's brother has the baseball mit...And then I finished it and was like "Oh...", I really was. Yah, I was gonna make a picture like this...It woulda sucked though...so yah...Im Rambling...so yah Im voting for it, I really am...--User:Zombiebaron/sig 00:46, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Not Against I love the caption. --Mosquitopsu 15:32, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For User:Rangeley/sig 21:59, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)


For. Isn't this what the novel was about? --Overlordzoloft 00:46, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Yeppers love it! --Dalar 07:05, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

The protagonist from J.D. Salinger's "Catcher in the Rye".

For I probably created this image. Strong RadX 03:31, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Raddy, do you still have the uncropped version? The caption is awkward with such a narrow image. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 06:12, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
I got it right here! Strong RadX 16:48, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Good stuff, I was sad that I couldn't get a bigger version of the image but I still wanted to nominate it anyway because it was just so good!--Wingzerotype 16:31, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I was meh about the thin version, but I love the big one. Much more effective. --Katie loves you! 17:45, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

22 - and agreed, the wider version is the better of the pair. --Carlb 07:04, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Wow......I want to live there....stringcheese 09:17, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

For can't argue with this one Okochama 09:18, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Sumo Wrestling

Sumo Wrestler dealing the final blow.


Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 05:33, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)

okochama In vanity I nominate my own Photoshopzed photo of sumo. Also created the sumo page to accompany.

For--Spintherism 00:19, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
For I like it. --Mosquitopsu 14:16, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
For. Alphax 04:45, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
For. Heaven help whoever gets crushed by this guy --Roger The Bum 01:20, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)
For It's the only pic on the page that has made me laugh! --Wingzerotype 20:15, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
For! Well done! --Leo 18:08, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For, but I want to see the picture that was taken 1 second later. -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 18:37, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For - Careax 02:01, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For. I grin everytime I see it. Acid Ammo 18:45, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Fore - Spartiate 09:33, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

against it's kinda funny but I don't like seeing sumo wrestlers on the front page --Nerd42 21:46, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)


Europe!

This is the valuable authentic NASA satellite image of the Great European Continent!

Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 06:00, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

From Europe.

  • This map is valuable because it is factual. You cannot find a better map of Europe elsewhere. -- Toytoy 06:09, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)
  • --User:Elvis/sig 12:44, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)
  • --Spintherism 05:42, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I find it amusing, at the very least ;) Rei 05:50, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For Clever. --Mosquitopsu 14:28, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Approved I second that clever. --MuncherOfSpleens 21:37, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Obviously. Because Atlantis and Pompeii should be on every map of Europe. --Katie loves you! 07:10, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

FOR! -- I'm a political science major, and this was simply inspired! --Leo 02:30, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For --User:Morlark/sig 15:31, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Yes, Aristacia --Just Tenn. You were expecting Sophia? 21:18, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For --I will never go by any other map. --Code.azul 17:31, 29 Nov 2005 (EST)

U2 Falls on Hard Times

During the late 1990s, the band U2 fell on hard times.


Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 04:18, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

RadicalX made this for one of my articles, and I think it's top-notch. ----User:Dawg/sig 00:27, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Vote. Note the stack of CDs...didn't know if anyone noticed what cover is showing. --RadicalX 19:50, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I did notice that. It's seamless and humorous on so many levels. --User:Dawg/sig 10:11, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)

The funny thing is that Bono pretty much looks the same as he always does. This U2 fan gives his unconditional vote for. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 23:03, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Vote Looks frighteningly hilariously real --Nytrospawn 00:08, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Great job! For Rei 05:40, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Amazing as always. For -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 05:30, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Amazing as often. :) For -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 18:40, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Bono has always scared me. He's creepy. I'm all for hobo U2. --Katie loves you! 07:07, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For! -- indeed, another job well done! --Leo 18:09, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

4 *thumbs up* --Freebasser 04:49, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Yayes, for the simple fact of it's funny. Acid Ammo 21:58, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For. Yup. --Silius 02:45, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Grand Theft Auto: Vatican City

GTA-VC-cover.jpg

Featured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 06:58, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Made me laugh out loud... --Caiman 03:19, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

FOR - in big capital letters. --Mosquitopsu 04:20, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I like this one. --Keitei 04:22, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

FOUR = a classic -- User:Mhaille/sig

4 it --Nerd42 16:42, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I like this image. Vote User:Dawg/sig 00:06, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For though hasn't RadicalX already had enough featured images? --Paulgb 02:28, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For ...and no, I haven't! I barely make up a third of all featured images! =P --Strong Rad 05:33, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

FOR - I'm Catholic, but I have to admit this is funny. - Bestbank Tiger, 9:07 CST 11/8/05

For -- And you can't blame RadicalX for being immensely talented. He deserves all the kudos he gets. -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 05:23, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I want to blame RadicalX for being immensely talented. -- User:Mhaille/sig

Against Okay, so it probably seems like I hate Raddy. Not true. I merely think that the "Grand Theft Auto: [insert city] City" theme is overdone. --User:Rcmurphy/sig 23:24, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Oh, you know you're just jealous! =P And...has it been done this well? hehe --Strong RadX 03:18, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Jealous? Absolutely. However, note that I didn't vote against the League of Extraordinary People image, which for me is like an affirmative vote. AND I voted for the U2 image, which for me is like six affirmative votes. ;) --User:Rcmurphy/sig 05:31, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
I forgot that your secret identity was Captain Negativity...heheh Nah, you're cool, RC, as always. --Strong RadX 02:03, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For! -- As a Catholic, this is fawesome! --Leo 02:28, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For. Just feature it already, everybody knows it's going to happen eventually. --neoEva88 12:01, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Blasphemers! I love it. FOR --Okochama 14:15, 11 Nov 2005 (ECT)

FOR!!!! --Chronarion 00:09, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I need to change into my Plus Fours --Gadgeophile 01:43, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For --User:Morlark/sig 15:35, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Hand Grenade

A typical hand grenade used against tanks in WWII

Fizeatured --User:Rcmurphy/sig 05:24, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For it I think its pretty creative --Wingzerotype 20:09, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I laugh, therefore I am. For. --Silius 20:24, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

4 --- Mandaliet 22:16, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For Sperm gun didn't really work, so I guess I'll vote for another weapon. User:Clorox/sig 22:22, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Four --User:IMBJR/sig 23:41, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For Gotta vote for on my own image since it is nominated after all. --Mosquitopsu 00:47, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For. It's brilliant. --neoEva88 00:48, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Amazing and not by RadicalX; nobody can refute its awesomeness! --Katie loves you! 12:20, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Against -- just not doing it for me. --Leo 17:43, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I'm not a fan of puns in general, but I think the picture is well executed. For. -- User:Todd Lyons/sig 18:29, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Pro --Strong RadX 21:37, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For It's awesome, made me laugh out loud - actually, it's one of the only ones here that did --TW

For It's great, I enjoyed it immensely. --NavyJeff 00:33, 17 Nov 2005

Rare to see an image that makes me spontaniously laught, thereFore... Acid Ammo 16:37, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Yes hell. --EvilZak 19:29, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For Very Clever --Grayconstruct 05:12, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)

19-15. Wacko, like something Monty Python would do. Swordmaster 18:07, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For--LordInquisitor 01:09, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)