Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive74

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Tzap Ispasitor

Keep
Delete
Comments

Pleb

Keep
Delete
Comments

Spifertulakfeon

Keep
Delete
Comments

Carl Levin

Keep
Delete
Comments

JFK Airport

Keep
Delete
Comments

Finland-Swedish

Keep
Delete
Comments

Gnu Klux Clan

Keep
Delete
Comments

Houghton

Keep
Delete
Comments

DDO

Keep
Delete
Comments

Super Series

Keep
Delete
Comments

Banksy

Keep
Delete
Comments

UnNews:UnNews article nominates itself for highlight

Keep
Delete

2007 (UTC)

Comments

Elke Heidegger

Keep
Delete
  • Who? --General Insineratehymn 02:01, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete -- Charmingly Germanic, but underdeveloped to the point of oblivion. ----OEJ 02:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments

V. C. Andrews

Keep
Delete
Comments

The Whiz

Keep
Delete
Comments

M-Men

Keep
Delete
Comments

One Piece

Keep
  • Yes, and there's been some rather bumpish edits to it for the past few weeks - it rather looks like someone's taking advantage of our good nature... I think there is a rule against construction tagged pages (at least an unwritten one), but in this case I think this is valid VFD material. Now can I be bothered to read it and vote...? --Strange.PNG (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, as per Unknownfile --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 19:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep - I would've abstained, but I'm just counterbalancing the anime-hatred that always happens around these things. --Strange.PNG (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • I don't have the energy to read it. The Oblong Lobster 23:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • <rant>I agree with what UF and SBU are saying, the construction tags FREQUENTLY get abused in my opinion as something to hide behind while the article is clearly rubbish. Its the first thing most new users creating new pages slap on their shite articles and when we quite rightly QVFD/VFD them they cry "But it was construction tagged! I'm working on it!" When 9 times out of 10 we know that if we left the article and didn't delete it they wouldn't ever work on it again, all they do is bring the page up to stroke their epeens or show their little friends how cool they are. Those kinds of pages are not contributing to our uncyclopedic efforts here. >.< </rant> ~ Dame Ceridwen ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:58, 07 June 2007
  • article struck by famine, and now goes to cvp --http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/thumb/1/17/Stupcarp_for_sig.png/14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 00:59, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Game:Grue_killer

Keep

Has many cool functions such as virtually surf the net and make a uncyclopedia myspace i have worked hard on this game instead of suggesting delete give me suggestions for the game also the name is similar to Game:Grueslayer but that is a coincidence i will rename it also i made this less than a week ago-The preceding unsigned comment was added by Java7837 (talk • contribs) , Also I have spent a few hours into it to try to make it more funny then before and I think you should give us suggestions rather than sending it to be deleted. --Starflame 14:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Delete
Comments
1. We already voted keeping/deletion for most of the games. If you find one that you think sucks, nominate it here.
2. There are NO RULES about what articles should and shouldn't be nominated for VFD. If you read the final section of the deletion policy, you should realise this. Icons-flag-au.png Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Games should only be allowed on Uncyclopedia if they are funny - and more than a one-liner with every page. Sir Roger 06:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Move to namespace if you must, including all associated templates and such (it's gonna be trickier than deleting though!). I know you've put a lot of work into it Java, I just don't think this is the medium for it. For example, there is no way to make the logon name persist for all moves, and no way to make anything you do persist either, without creating absolutely obscene numbers of pages. I'd recommend letting it be deleted and moving on to something else. --Strange.PNG (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Update: Java has moved the main page of the game to his namespace but the rest of it is still out there... It all needs moving if you really want to keep it Java. And then all the links will need fixing to point into your namespace - that's why I said it'd be trickier than a straight deletion. I know it hurts to lose work, but just pretend your computer crashed... --Strange.PNG (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I've left him a message. Tomorrow, it dies, unless he takes it all in. 06/6 20:50

Update: Various people seem to be making an effort, but half of it is still out there... --Strange.PNG (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 07:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Successfully Failing

Keep
Delete
Comments

Private Sözlük

Keep
Delete
Comments

The Holy Eight

Keep
Delete
Comments

jkl;

Keep
Delete
Comments

MandolinHaze turtle treats

Keep
Delete
Comments

2080

Keep
Delete
Comments

Ted Revolver Steve

Keep
Delete
Comments

Korkeasaari Zoo

Keep
Delete
Comments

Kellogg

Keep

Give it some credit. This article is soo horrible that I found it rather amusing. The author actually spelled the word "trying" - "tring." Isn't that some kind of linguistic irony in of itself; he actually tried and failed at spelling "trying". WOW... --AmericanBastard 05:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Delete
Comments

Angus Whopper Smith

Keep
  • Hillarious, great article! I, the author, worked on the article for days. It is clever and hilarious. If you don't think it is funny, put whatever you have in your mind that would improve the article. Otherwise, it is like any other page where anyone can edit! The Cookie Monster Cookie.jpg[Spam Me]
Delete
  • Needs to be

left behind while the world was ending. Now.--Andorin Kato 15:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments
  • Andorin Kato, the nominator, wasted time putting the article up for deletion because of the Random/killed template. The nominator must give a good reason why the article should be deleted or else he's vandalizing the page. Therefore, it does not meet deletion criteria and should be taken off Votes for deletion or the aritcle should be kept. The Cookie Monster Cookie.jpg[Spam Me]
    • Actually, nowhere in VFD criteria does it say that a comment has to be made. --Andorin Kato 22:54, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Dickhead - NSFW

Keep
Delete
  • I nominate this article for deletion based upon the following criteria:
    • Excessive use of categories.
    • Playing out one dumb joke in an even dumber way.
    • Speeling misteaks.
    • The penis image is just... no.
    • One Piece was kept, so there's room for this one.
  • Join the fight! Burninate Dickhead now! --Andorin Kato 04:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete But I added NSFW to the link, because of the prominent penis picture at the top. I usually browse this from school, might want to give us a lil warning eh? ~ Dame Ceridwen ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 04:54, 08 June 2007
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au.png 05:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Grease

Keep
Delete
Comments

Famous people who are hiding their imperfections

Keep
Delete
Comments

Greg Pudade

Keep
Delete
Comments

KWRPG

Keep
Delete
Comments

Gauntlets of Chuck Norris Slaying

Keep
Delete
Comments

Phil Harding

Keep
Delete
Comments

Bishop of West Anglia

Keep
Delete
Comments

H.A.M

Keep
Delete
Comments

America's Vietnam

Keep
Delete
Comments

Frank Zappa discography

Keep
Delete
Comments

Lenin & Marx

Keep
Delete
Comments

Abduls

Keep
Delete
Comments

D.I.A.B.L.O.

Keep
Delete
Comments

England Is The Best

Keep
Delete
Comments

Dawn's Diary about sexual orientation

Keep
Delete
Comments

Pocket Protector

Keep
Delete
Comments

Undersecretary

Keep
Delete
Comments

Secretary of the Undersecretary

Keep
Delete
Comments

Secretary in Charge of Secretarian Affairs

Keep
Delete
Comments

Secretary to the Secretary in Charge of Secretarian Affairs

Keep
  • Keep Aww - I knew it would come to this... I vote move to Uncyclopedia space where the pyramidalness can be out of your way. They don't stand as articles, but as a group they're good. --Strange.PNG (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep As per SBU ~ Dame Ceridwen ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 06:33, 05 June 2007
  • Keep and Expand Think about it: "Undersecretary to the Secretary to the Sectarian Secretary to the Secret Sectarian Sects to the Secreting Secretary...to the Secretary in Charge of Secretarian Affairs" And more! Sir Roger 07:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • How about merging them all into one article? Sir Roger 07:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedian Liberal Conspiracy

Keep
  • Keep It's so weird and difficult to understand the author's motive that I find it quite...interesting. The Oblong Lobster 20:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Talps --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 21:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments


Taylor Polynomial Series formula

Keep
Delete
Comments

Secretary

Keep
  • Keep Aww - I knew it would come to this... I vote move to Uncyclopedia space where the pyramidalness can be out of your way. They don't stand as articles, but as a group they're good. I don't think we should rule out groups of articles altogether. --Strange.PNG (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • Put them all together, they don't make sense separately. -- herr doktor needsAV2 Rocket.gif [scream!] 18:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I agree: if such a Power Structure is to be retained, it should be a single article with headings for each position and a coherent description of the overall structure. ----OEJ 20:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Jibberish

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Putting some of the article in Gibberish/example would be possible. On the other hand, it would be just as easy to create an all-new "example" for Gibberish by hitting a keyboard randomly with spoons, toads, your neighbor's toddler, or any other object. So why bother moving the existing random stuff? ----OEJ 20:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Lawn

Keep
Delete
Comments

Afferden

Keep
Delete
Comments

Empire earth

Keep
Delete
Comments

Ivan the Funny-English-Accent-Man

Keep
Delete
Comments

Template:Trivia

Keep
  • Keep I support taking it off nearly all (if not all) the pages it's put on, but as an article by itself I find it quite a good satire on the useless template (whether or not it was meant to be), and I think it should be treated as such. --Strange.PNG (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:12, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - As above. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS NO!! 16:21, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - As above and as above the above. --Dexter111344 17:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments