User talk:KneeChee27

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Woah...I should check my junk mail more often, huh? I coulda sworn user pages were exempt from the whole "vanity" rule. Was I wrong, or is this just some kind of Communist retribution for being inactive? If that's the case, I totally deserve it – I was just curious is all. — KneeContributionsChee 23:25, June 15, 2012 (UTC)

Unless you were hyping patent medicine or pimping, you are usually free to be a little vain on your user page. An appeal to Xamralco with an explanation might get it un-huffed. Spıke ¬ 23:31 15-Jun-12
I restored it. A vandal replaced it with spam and someone must of QVFD'd it or something. Sorry about that. --User:Xamralco/sig 00:17, June 16, 2012 (UTC)
Oh hey, no problem. I'll try to be less of a target for vandalism in the future. Thanks guys! — KneeContributionsChee 03:52, June 16, 2012 (UTC)
To summarize, no one gets punished for being absent; but being absent meant your page fell into disrepair. Why the vandal picked you is an open question. Spıke ¬ 03:55 16-Jun-12