User talk:Roman Dog Bird

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to navigation Jump to search


UnSignpost 11th March 2010[edit]

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png 11:05, Mar 12

About the whole VFS mess[edit]

Do noms count as votes? I'm getting all confused.Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! CUN.png Icons-flag-us.png NOTM 01:03, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

No, noms don't count. Since you couldn't vote for the past two days, those who nominated will have to come back and vote. --Roman Dog Bird 01:05, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Here is a hippie[edit]



The Uncylopedia Moderates to Delete Your Account for saying a bad word

you said: F... UNCYLOPEDIA

your error ban expires in: FOREVER

thank you come again

UnSignpost 18th March 2010 (on time as always)[edit]

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png 11:50, Mar 18


18:33, March 18, 2010 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) protected "Pain of Salvation" [create=autoconfirmed] (expires 23:33, April 18, 2010 (UTC)) ‎ (Fucking BEST BAND EVER) (hist)

I fucking love you so hard. -User:Optimuschris/sig23:35, 18 Mar

the word must be spread. tell all da people. melvins are t eh greetest (even though i haven't listened to them in months. they've got a new album coming out on June 1st though, so i better start again.) --Roman Dog Bird 23:42, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
I told you I met King Buzzo, right? I'm so much better than you. -User:Optimuschris/sig23:44, 18 Mar

good news[edit]

-- 00:43, March 19, 2010 (UTC) I deleted that picture that was the reason you voted delete on the vfd

Except that I like that photo. It's adorable. Why did I use it for my vote? Well, why not? The page sucks, and I'm going to delete it. Sorry, but it's got enough votes now for me to go ahead and do so. Oh, and you didn't "delete" the photo, you removed it. There's a pretty clear difference between the two. --Roman Dog Bird 01:04, March 19, 2010 (UTC)


-- 00:47, March 19, 2010 (UTC) do you really want rick astely in your closet

Why does he need rick astely in his closet he got me for that--User:Iwillkillyou333/sig2 (Version 2) 00:55, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
gtfo --Roman Dog Bird 01:04, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
But your closet is so nice, it got free nachos--User:Iwillkillyou333/sig2 (Version 2) 01:07, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
M,m,m,m,m,m, nachos! (I think it may also have R. Kelly.) User:Happytimes/sig 25 Mar 2010 ~ 01:26 (UTC)


I noticed that you banned the ip until judgment day, although he deserves it, I thought it was admin policy to ban ip accounts for only a couple months, since ip address owners change? --Mn-z


01:38, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

ok --Roman Dog Bird 16:15, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

For personally lifting up In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida and throwing it onto the front page. Appreciated. Since two others get credit (PF4Eva and Funnybony) for the page I won't be funny ha ha or gross ech wtf in my thank you. And when the song is googled our page is the 12th listing. TomHanks again. Al in Chains 18:53 25 3 mmx

UnSignpost 25th March 2010 (hand delivered for added flavour)[edit]

--User:ChiefjusticeDS/sig 22:45, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Appeal to your better nature, or worse nature, depending on POV[edit]

"Poop throwing monkeys" is on Vote for Good, and some of the monkeys have been calling your name. "Roman," they call, poop in hand and at the ready, "Roman". Also many other good articles on display, ah, voter ready, at the page. Please come, at the bequest of the monkeys! (and Mn-z wrote a new companion piece to ptm, see the link at the bottom of the ptm page. One of us. One of us.) I am but a humble and obedient servant of the Poop throwing monkeys 12:41 26 3 mmx

Bed huff[edit]

why was the article bed huffed? -komputerkurt

UnSignpost 1th April 2010 - Always on time[edit]

PuppyOnTheRadio sig.gif                                                  Friday, 04:50, Apr 2 2010 UTC



King Dedede[edit]

Hello, Roman Bird Dog. I was just wondering why you huffed/deleted the King Dedede article? Evilgidgit 15:43, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

VFD --Roman Dog Bird 17:07, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

c u in da summah[edit]

You nigger. User:Necropaxx/sig Monday, 06:32, Apr 5 2010


UnSignpost 4/8/10 - Oh hi Signpost.[edit]

User:Dexter111344/sig 20:19, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost 15/4/10 - Yet another on time delivery.[edit]

--User:ChiefjusticeDS/sig 21:25, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

You tease[edit]

Stop playing with our emotions like that. Also, I'm planning an exhaustive, in-depth, meticulously researched story on your continuing attempts to leave us behind you like so much effluent for the next issue of the UnSignpost. Would you care to give me, let's say, a paragraph or so of quotes that I can easily pad out to look like a full story? --User:Under user/sig3 11:51, Apr 16

Well, it's just that, ya know, most of y'all niggas ain't funny. It's like, this suppos' t' be sum kinda Wiki parody right? Then what the hell is this? I really start to lose faith in y'all when you start writing bullshit like that. Now, granted, I ain't no writer myself. I'm incompetent-a-tent at it and tend to quickly lose interest in things. BUT, I feel I do have at least somewhat decent judgment about what's funny and what isn't, even though if I were to comment on such things, it would usually just amount to "This sucks" or "WTF". In addition to people makin' unfunny articles (but there are some GREAT ONES), the vandals are getting so boring! When I start seeing dumb little niggers goin' around blanking things with stuff about how awesome their friends be (when they AIN'T) or cussin' at us with their FUCK YOUS and KISS MY BLACK ASS and all, it gets me worried about what kind of degenerates are frequenting our hallowed turdpedia. Where are the "MOTHER FUCKING NIGGER FAGGOTS" and "I JERK OFF TO TELETUBBIES" douchebags of yesteryear? They're funny! And I miss them, quite dearly. So, in conclusion, I'm lazy and have a tendency to feign insanity. Hey, that's not very hard to pull off on the intronet, y'know? C'mooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn Oh, and why did I come back this time despite claiming I wasn't coming back 'til summer? C'mon girls, y'know I'm just teasin'. --Roman Dog Bird 16:57, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

You're back[edit]

Just saw your vote on Giant Jew Band )thanks( and what a nice way to find out you're back. People have been warring, knives and guns, since you left. Several dead and many injured. But now peace returns to the Kingdom of Uncy. A sigh of relief at peace returning. Al sans chains 23:32 16 4 MMX

peace? nigga u be trippin. and you're welcome! --Roman Dog Bird 02:23, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

Bruce Wayne[edit]

Hey. I've seen that you have a major bone to pick with this article. Do you mind being constructive with it and giving feedback as to why you hate it so much? PuppyOnTheRadio sig.gif                                                  Monday, 03:47, Apr 19 2010 UTC

In all honesty, it IS well written for what it is, the theme is fine, and it's obvious how much work you and the others from IC put into it. It's really just a matter of me despising nearly every article we have that's written in first person. I just feel that we become even less of a Wikipedia parody as more are made. Granted, it would get pretty boring if every article had to be in an encyclopedic tone, but take a worthy subject and person willing to write about it and you can get some pretty phenomenal results. Certain people are just more accustomed to writing in this first person style I guess, and I probably can't do too much to change that since all I tend to do is bitch about it and never really back it up. All in all, I've been whining about the Bruce Wayne article recently probably because it's a more recent example. It isn't honestly my least favorite. It's just a matter of timing and me having some opportunites to be a big bitch about it. I know I've made a big deal about it, but I'm honestly not the type of guy who could give out any sort of genuine criticism. I haven't even written an article here, do you think I know what it takes to write one? No. I really oughta just keep my mouth shut since there's no way I could ever offer any real advice in this kind of situation. If there is a way you switch the tone around a bit and still make the article work, go ahead. But if not, leave it. If somebody else could pinpoint any sort of faults about it or whatever, try working it out with them. I respect you all for the work you put into it, but I simply can't bring myself to like it due to my bias towards this sort of writing style. --Roman Dog Bird 20:20, April 19, 2010 (UTC)
Oh, that issue. It's a good point, but I'm afraid that I don't agree with you. When I write an article my priorities are, in rough order:
  1. Is it funny
  2. Is it a parody
  3. Is it encyclopaedic
We will, by the very nature of the medium and the frame that we use, never lose the feel of a Wikipedia parody - almost every page here has the basic layout and framework of a Wikipedia article due to the way that the site is set out. But by the same token the Game space and UnTunes are by their nature not a Wikipedia parody. UnTunes, according to Wikipedia, is a parody of iTunes, and Game is not mentioned on the Wikipedia:Uncyclopedia at all. So I think the argument that we should stick solely to encyclopaedic articles was lost somewhere back in 05/06. PuppyOnTheRadio sig.gif                                                  Monday, 21:51, Apr 19 2010 UTC
And as for you being not the type of guy who could give out any sort of genuine criticism - Bollocks. I cannot think of a single theatre critic, food critic or film critic who has ever been a celebrated playwright, chef, or director respectively. You do know more about Uncyclopedia than most people, so your criticism is valid for that reason. (Even if I disagree with you.) PuppyOnTheRadio sig.gif                                                  Monday, 22:01, Apr 19 2010 UTC
As the recently retired head of IC who oversaw the article, I'll stick my nose in. I remember Gene Siskel once criticized Roger Ebert because Ebert had written a screen play (Ebert actually co-wrote Beyond the Valley of the Dolls with Russ Meyer). Siskel didn't write a film, but both were respected as prominent movie reviewers.
I tend to agree with RDB in that it seems like relatively few featured articles are encyclopedic. So far most of the few I've worked on that got featured were, but I've noticed that encyclopedic articles seldom seem to get chosen as best of the month. In the case of Bruce Wayne/Batman, the same person who suggested it be written encyclopedic also came up with the idea of having Wayne in Arkham Asylum. I was favoring a straight wikipedia take-off until I saw the Arkham Asylum idea, and it struck a chord with me and apparently with other colonizers, so that's what we did.
To add to Puppy's list, HowTos aren't encyclopedic either. When I wrote HowTo:Be Homeless in America, I tried to parody the style of real-life HowTos. I would like to see more encyc. articles, but do think the variety here keeps this site interesting to more people. Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  22:29, April 20, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your vote to hoist Giant Jew Band onto the front page. We stayed up all night and played for the neighbors. Al des chain 21 4
Actually, I didn't include HowTos or Why? because these are supposedly a parody of WikiHow and WikiAnswers respectively. And I don't think this would be improved by an encyclopaedic style, or even work comedically as well an an encyclopaedic style. The concept was more that it was a parody of a psych report, which meant that it hit point 1 and 2 above. I consider that if I wrote an article that was encyclopaedic and unfunny that I've failed - Orthodox Monsterist Church is one of these examples, and the only justification I can come up with is that this was a rewrite, and I was limited by the horrible title. Having an encyclopaedic style article about Batman would, imho, be significantly less funny, and as a result significantly less worthwhile being hosted on Uncyc. Funny first, parody second, enecylopaedic third. PuppyOnTheRadio sig.gif                                                  Wednesday, 02:39, Apr 21 2010 UTC
As a side note, when I got the article rolling based on Puppy's idea, I looked at real psychiatric reports, particularly one of a man who had committed homicide and got a report that said he was "insane." Several parts of the early version of the article were lifted from real reports (some of those remain, including the heading), and the drugs are real psychiatric drugs (some of those drugs, such as PCP, are no longer used for that as far as I know, and the later added margarita of course isn't). So this is a takeoff of real psychiatric reports in the same sense some articles are takeoffs of real encyclopedia articles. Rabbi Why do I need to provide this?, humble goylem rabbi of the Temple of Narishkayt and rector of The University of Uncyclopedia, Whynersville Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  05:34, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost 1 May[edit]

Brought to you by fucking magic. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 11:48, 1 May 2010

The Great Teletubby War[edit]

I genuinely appreciate the changes made to this article. I think it's far more interesting now that the cliches and ramblings have been removed. However, I honestly feel I can further refine this article. If you would, please unlock this article so I can work on it.

Thank you, Rbpolsen Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 01:04, June 11, 2010 (UTC)

It's all yours. --Roman Dog Bird 03:29, June 11, 2010 (UTC)