"Expect it when you least expect it"It'll be done sometime, nae worry lad/ladette.
Okay, you mangy colonists.
I've been commissioned by Mooshy to rerererevitalize IC. I'm to be the glorious leader, etc. because Sissy, Gerry, and Opty have all fucked off. So, I have a few general ideas to start with on what to do. First of all, no fucking infighting. What's said by the authority figures goes. This is Imperial Colonization, not Imperial United States Congress. Second, there should be more of a limit on articles for nomination. Somewhere between 5 and 10. We'll never get to all 17 that are up there if people's votes are so scattered. Third, an active recruiting drive. It fits the name. We're going to draft Satirical Soldiers to deal with the bloody natives at those shit articles on IC. This said, I still want to hear all of your opinions on what to do. Either drop me a line on my talk page, or I'm on IRC damn near all day very weekday. So lets get going, Colonizers! Where the Wild Colins Are - LET THE WILD RUMPUS START! 16:56, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
From Praet., №2
I dared conclude our votings. Also, I've made a list of basic essentials. Look here :-) — . 21:06, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
Sid, would you inform the Ambassadors about the meeting on Saturday? Please give them the link on our Basic Essentials. — . 18:02, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Ok, thank you.--10:48, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I've read the message you left on my domestic talk page, and thank you for constantly keeping me up to date. Unfortunately, however, working duties actually prevent me from joining the big conference, so unless I can find some other Italian guy to attend it in my stead, I'll likely need you to provide me with some more updates. Have a nice time with the other dudes though :) --Citroen CX 11:54, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
Actually, it's pink and beetroot :D. I had no idea from whence it came but I like your explanation :) Ptokh-BenthonytchnoeHey! You can buy some sausage I illegally smuggle to Uncy! 18:28, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for my absent in meeting. I had got my new job and was sent to a lost world. Overthere, I was locked in a hell cell, turtured by someone looked like John McCain. Fortunately, Lord Vegeta came to rescue me and killed that wander with his mighty Final Flash, so I can write to you now.
Thanks to our uncyclopedia, I could lie anyone I wish to as long as it's not stupid, lol. Anyway, what I told you above is partly true.
Sorry about my absent and thank for your invitation
--Brandy Frisky 16:22, November 29, 2009 (UTC)
- Me2. However i am not an offical member, still thinking. Or just not a member but just following it. To make the no-visit a bit good, i made a new logo. See this or the Foreign office page.
//Roye *Wal'NTlet! *Danica Patrick! *7777777 \\
Want to join the Uncyclopedia Legal Dept.? If you do, I'll drop a summons template on your page. If not, I won't. It requires nothing but you can also do stuff if you like. --19:02, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Re: Continued Studies In Canine Defecation
User:DrStrange/Templates/Vortex While there are currently no available classes specifically covering canine defecation, this course will suffice and be counted as credit toward your degree.-- 16:28, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
Thanks again!--13:05, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
|Ladies & Gentlemen, Welcome To Violence|
...the word and the act. While violence cloaks itself in a plethora of disguises, its favorite mantle still remains... sex. Violence devours all it touches, its voracious appetite rarely fulfilled. Yet violence doesn't only destroy, it creates and molds as well. Let's examine closely then this dangerously evil creation, this new breed encased and contained within the supple skin of woman. The softness is there, the unmistakable smell of female, the surface shiny and silken, the body yielding yet wanton. But a word of caution: handle with care and don't drop your guard. This rapacious new breed prowls both alone and in packs, operating at any level, any time, anywhere, and with anybody. Who are they? One might be your secretary, your doctor's receptionist... or a dancer in a go-go club!....................................................
Gahooga!-- 16:07, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
|HITLER AND MUSSOLINI INVADED COUNTRIES
THANK YOU TEMPLATES INVADE TALK PAGES
TEMPLATES ARE LIKE HITLER AND MUSSOLINI
A vote "For" an article on VFH is a vote "For" Hitler and Mussolini!!
This talk page looks like France in 1941! --13:28, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
Hey Sid, don't know if you noticed but I've added a little more to Alice in Sunderland. What do you think? Also, I was thinking: if you have any ideas for it, but don't know how to put it into words, then let me know and I'll see what I can do, as once more I'm out of ideas. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 09:19, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
Cut me some slack, I'm
I have added a bit to the article. I could possibly add more, but we'll see as it is approaching time to go to work. I just wanted to mention this to you though, as your former adopter:
VFH voting is certainly your opinion, and I do not hold it against you at all. That being said, however, I noticed that you voted 'against' butter, an article hand-crafted by myself. Now you don't have to vote 'for' - that would be biased and unfair - but just so you know, I would never vote 'against' an article created by you, or any of my noobs, or anything but what I felt was an 'invalid nomination'. It's just a matter of principles and politeness, you know? Something to think about, that is all. If you wish to review your vote, as I said I have added to the article since you cast your ballot. If you really feel that the article is a fail, I will accept either decision.
- I'm commenting here not because I'm buttering--I mean butting--my nose in but because Zana posted a link to this for me. I see voting as a democratic right, which I'm sure Zana does as well. When I see an article on VFH, I do not read any comments. I click on the article, read it, make my opinion, then if I feel for or against, decide to vote (or sometimes just to comment, and other times to post nothing). After I decide how I'm going to vote, I look at other people's comments. This way they don't influence my vote, but could influence my wording--for example, if I was going to bring out a point I thought was a problem with the article but three people already said the same thing, I'll probably focus on something else. Most of the time I don't even know who wrote the article until after I voted; sometimes knowing who wrote it is unavoidable, as I may have seen it while in progress, made some edits to it, or even Pee Reviewed it. I try to stay as objective as possible, and have voted against articles that were written by people I really like here. I would hope that any noob I adopted would feel free to vote as they believe, and not based on who wrote the article. Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn) 19:37, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Absolutely, as I said, I would accept his vote for that very reason. I am merely suggesting he review, and as my noob I am offering some (perhaps unwanted) coaching. Why is not my noob, so he can disregard the prerogative bits, as he is a legal associate of mine and has no obligations to me other than that. Vote however you want, and maybe abstaining sometimes is okay too.
I remember when you were just the new guy.
Arbophilia looks like genius in the making. If you don't mind my asking, can we collab on it? I've got sone decent ideas, particularly a link to environmentalism ("tree-hugging.") ~~Oaktown Holla 00:47, January 14, 2010 (UTC)