User talk:Sycamore/Archive9

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to navigation Jump to search


That is all. MrN Icons-flag-gb.png 13:00, Dec 27

Trousers, shirt and tie. Then shoesies:)--— Sir Sycamore (talk) 13:04, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Ok...--AnotherBadName 17:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


ICarly appears to be being re-created, fairly close to how it was when it was before, although it looks a little more restrained, at the moment.--Mnbvcxz (Annoy) 15:43, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

My understanding was that re-created material was to be QVFD, especialy if its an IP...?:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:51, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
I'll probably get complaints, but I've hopfully got it a good stage where it can be completed, or huffed in 30 days:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 16:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
I've been trying to fix the article some, without annoying the ip authors or getting into a revert war. Unfortunately, I don't know if I'm helping, or just making it worse. The main thing I doing is trying to turn the retarded "newt in utero" idea into a euphemism for pregnancy. Although the euphemism is worse than its subject, I think it might have some potential to be funny(ish), if I can purge the "tail sticking out of Carly's privy regions is a you-know-what" from the article. Also, I'm partially regretting some of the images that I uploaded; I'm afraid that they might draw the "wrong kind of" ips to that article, and only make the problem worse. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig2 03:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
It is a bit of a shame that the ips aren't helping here. I would suggest either going on the IRC, and asking for it to be semi-protected - meaning only regitered users will be able to edit it. Or moving it into your userspace like User:Mnbvcxz/iCarly and putting the old on on QVFD. I think a finished version might sort out the IPs. I don't like the idea of trying to get bans for something like this as I don't think these IP edits are in bad faith. Hope this helps:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 10:49, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Welcome note

I guess you're watching the new user lists - neat to get a welcome note so quick! :) I'm not new to wiki editing (you'll find me under the same username on en.wikipedia and *heaps* of other places), but it's really helpful to have the Uncyclopedia policies all laid out there. Thanks! Keep it up! Rosuav 14:38, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Groovy:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 14:40, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
It must be your chizzled good looks, I never get any "thank yous" from newbies :( User:Mordillo/sig3 14:40, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
I reckon it's the bad boy moustache... — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:12, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Nah, it's the kilt. And the fact that you're not wearing any underwear. User:Mordillo/sig3 15:15, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


'Bout time I got to give you this! --User:Under user/sig3 09:14, Jan 2

Thanks:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 10:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost 1st January 2009

MrN9001 01:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


IronLung 08:37, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks there:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 13:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


...for the fiddling - it'll get me on the sex offender's register one of these days - hopefully, it'll reduce nit-picking on Pee Review though. Nice article, by the way - sounds rather like my own musical tastes. I've put a link in Hasid House to it too. :-) User:RabbiTechno/sig 10:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the fiddle - heres to alienating music:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 10:23, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
/me np Blok 57 - This Is Not America. User:RabbiTechno/sig 10:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Swift Once-Over

This is not a review request, this is a request for you to take a swift glance at Jesus Christ, who brought that guitar?, which Prettiestpretty wrote and I embellished, and give one of the following responses on this talk page: 1. Needz moar workz; 2. Lol, dude that haz teh funniez; 3. Something intelligible. Whaddaya say? --User:Under user/sig3 13:19, Jan 6

I pick number 2 "Lol, dude that haz teh funniez." Yeah its good - nice pace etc. good stuff:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 13:38, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Cool. Ta. --User:Under user/sig3 13:40, Jan 6

UnSignpost 8th January 09

MrN9001 16:07, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


PsychotypeD 16:01, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Hey Sycamore, I need some help. I've got this really annoying IP user who keeps trying to completely re-alter my Spongebob V.S. Zim article. I'm usually an open guy, but I don't like what he's doing to it. This has gone on for three days and no matter how much I do away with his stuff, he just keeps coming (and messing things up). Do you know any way I can block him or something like that?

IPs can be problem from time to time (also very helpful sometimes). Luckly for you, you appear to have just the one that is causing trouble here: Template:U. Now you could post a message on the IP talkpage explaining things first. Also when you revert you can leave a message in the summary on why those edits were crappy. This is my advice on what to do first of all - I'll be keeping an eye on things now that you've brought it up - If you can deal with it this way, and it does not work, then we'll have a look at trying something else. Does that sound OK?:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 16:19, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

PsychotypeD 18:52, 10 January 2009 (UTC) Okay thanks. The guy is welcome to edit the page by adding new characters or new events, but when it comes to completely altering the entire article... well that's pretty serious. I have kept some stuff (such as General Godzilla) that he wrote, but I don't like how he is completely altering things like Spongebob beating Zim. If he wants there to be an article like this on the site, fine he can make it. But I don't want him taking apart my article and building it his way to do it.

By the way when you mean the IP address talkpage, do you mean clicking on the link there and brining it up on the discussion part (I've never had to do this before)?

Yeah, just click on the IP discussion page and leave a message. Often that will be enough, he does not look to be adding anything in bad faith, so its fair to assume he might be reasonable:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 12:46, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Oi! You!

You're supposed to be on a holiday no?! User:Mordillo/sig3 10:59, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

I know, I'm a very bad person;) /me goes to write 2000 word essay and pester people for internships--Sycamore (Talk) 11:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Did you finish your essay??? I'm not letting you slack on your studies there! O_O User:Mordillo/sig3 13:15, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes I did M-, SPECTRE has been defeated again and I have passed around that problem I have to several women...--Sycamore (Talk) 14:37, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Oh do pay attention Double O Sycamore. --User:Under user/sig3 14:39, Jan 16

UnSignpost 15th January

MrN9001 21:34, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Re:Is this ready?

Yes! --User:Electrified mocha chinchilla/sig 21:17, 17 January 2009 (UTC)



You look like Norbit. Mixed with John Coffey. And cross-bred with a carton of bumper stickers. NORBIT! --noamshouseparty 09:36, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

I actually look more like this. You have a lousy imagnination.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Oh, too bad. At least I had a guess. And my imagination is much worse than the everyday garden variety LOUSY model. But no matter. --noamshouseparty 09:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Sycamore

Just a friendly hello from AnotherBadName in uncyclopedia! And please have a good day! Im off! Oh, and GO CARDINALS!--AnotherBadName 17:49, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Yeah! Cardinals goin to the super bowl!--AnotherBadName 01:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Fred Phelps

Hey Sycamore, I added the Matthew Shepherd bit to the Fred Phelps page. Do you think it's a bit extreme? Or is it good?--Ericap 19:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, looks alright. It's tagged for rewrite so you can wade in there - check out these Uncyclopedia:Best of and HTBFANJS. Have fun:)--Sycamore (Talk) 21:32, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:VoteAOTM --Docile hippopotamus 04:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


are users allowed to vote for and against someone for the same award? --Docile hippopotamus 21:18, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Which awards are you talking about? - sometimes negative votes cannot be counted (normally)--Sycamore (Talk) 21:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
You voted against Benson and for sannse for uncyclopedian of the month. Choose. --Docile hippopotamus 04:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
No.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

A note for the Uncyclonazi

The facts:. I don't like you and I know you don't like me. However, I feel the need to clarify my insult so that it's crystal clear.

You have quite the collection of treatises about how everything sucks on this site in recent years, including numerous references to the quality of writing now being poor by comparison with the past (mythical idealized past). Excuse me sir, but you just voted Symbol for vote.svg For on an article that actually used "Dave" to rhyme with slave....there's no context or need for "Dave" and I can find numerous grade school children who are better at rhyming than that. Hey! Let's put it in the front page!!! Sir, you have no standards beyond political ones and your flowery prose reeks of pompous ass.--User:DrStrange/sig 09:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Calm down Doc - I voted for that too, and I did so because it was a funny article. The "Dave" rhyme amused me, partly because it's so incongruous, and reminds me of quite a lot of songs which are great for the most part, but have a dodgy rhyme or two in them. It's a funny article. Perhaps you should relax a bit, and remember this isn't all serious business. Syc's a good guy. You're a good writer, but seem very quick to get on your high horse about perceived slights. Chill, man! ;-) --User:Under user/sig3 09:59, Jan 22
I did not know that I did not like you - I'll be sure to update the vengeance list! Just to qualify I vote on the basis of what I find to be well written and funny - I don't really care what people choose to see it as; however the site being filled with pretty wacky types like myself and often what I vote for will reflect what a lot of other people find funny – there’s no covert bad faith issue here. My articles (I assume you are talking about Uncyclopedia) about the site are often laced with quite a bit of self parody as well - the truth is that a lot of the negative qualities I have parodied reflect something I think we have all contributed to, not a bitching session or any slights against users. I hope that nothing I have ever done on here has been to undermine people individually, however some actions that are unhelpful I will flag up without hesitation, as I would expect others to do of myself - this is all part of a collaborative project, not a one man quest. I would also make a lousy Nazi since I hang around with Jews:)--Sycamore (Talk) 10:25, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Somebody's calling a Sycamore a right wing racist?! I always got the feeling that Sycamore was a raging liberal. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig2 19:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Obviously, now get back in line Number 133 or I'll use this cattle prod on you...--Sycamore (Talk) 19:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Whoring Myself Out

I created pretty much everything i'm gonna contribute way earlier and want to eventually get out of college and turn some of it either into a cartoon or comic book or both. Can I put something at the end of say my Rangers article like "Anyone who would want to draw an actual comic book about these characters should contact....[my set aside yahoo account that can get hacked and die for all I care cause i only use it to store porn anyway]. I don't wanna break any uncyc rules buuuut i also don't wanna start putting up my ideas if i can't turn them into real life gold later. The jew in me needs to whore out but the writer in me is dying to give the world a taste of my creations. --Shingraham 16:28, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

My understanding is that would not be good option - any stuff you submit is not owned by yourself anymore and the characters you have created can be used by anyone - so getting publishing etc could be borderline impossible is someone could distrbute your work for free. You're sort of suggesting advsertising for future sequals and contributions outside of the site which kind of goes against the idea. Hope this helps:)--Sycamore (Talk) 19:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

K so then i'm gonna keep my other characters to myself, thanks. But just so i'm 100% clear from this point on if i myself wanted to take anything that I put on here and try and distribute it either for free or for profit that's just me being a money whore and doesn't really affect the site, right. Because i'm totally building towards being a money whore.

Its very prefereble that you don't whore for reasons (money, stuff) outside of the site as we're non profit; however being a money whore in life is the only way to go:)--Sycamore (Talk) 19:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


HeHe. MrN Icons-flag-gb.png 22:12, Jan 22

Twice in a row, impressive--Sycamore (Talk) 22:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Sylvia Plath

I want to edit my profile, but I have no idea what to do or put. Could you help me Sycamore? --Ericap 15:24, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi there, If you click on the red link User:Ericap - there will be a question of whether you want to create to the page, if you say yes you'll come up with an editng screen where you can add text etc just like an article. What you put is up to you, usually most put some stuff about themselves, to do list, or articles thet have written or will write - its a question of preference. Good exapmples of others would be like Template:U, Template:U or Template:U. Hope this helps:)--Sycamore (Talk) 15:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost 22 + 7 (+1) January

MrN9001 02:34, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


So yeah, people normally thank others for their vote if they won something, but I'm chuffed enough at being runner-up to Mordillo in UotY, and I'm on a thanking spree. Not with a template, but with words of genuine gratitude - cheers man, from an absolute trojan like yourself, that vote means a lot! --User:Under user/sig3 17:15, Feb 1

No probs, along with the evil Jew you keep the place going:)--Sycamore (Talk) 09:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Who ya calling an evil Jew eh? eh? Also, I'm in your bloody kingdom, and the whole place is shut down due to severe snowing. I thought you lot used to rule the world? You know? The sun always shines on the Union Jack? And you can't handle snow? O_O User:Mordillo/sig3 10:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
All the Northern countries lost their power after the Global Cooling started. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Glasgow actually not too bad, its the Limeys that are getting hit pretty bad - you should have come to Scotland for better weather:)--Sycamore (Talk) 10:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
I'll make a note on that for my next trip. Bloody limeys, honestly sic, I have no clue how they ever managed to conquer Scotland. User:Mordillo/sig3 10:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
We know precisely how to handle snow, thank you very much. If you see more than 3 flakes in the space of 24 hours, you: panic; close the schools; get into massive traffic jams; complain about it to anyone who'll listen (and several who won't); take the day off work, claiming it's "unsafe to drive". Did I miss anything? (None of which explains why I'm at work, now I come to think of it...) --User:Under user/sig3 10:51, Feb 2
You forgot the part about the trains being stopped and the airports being shut down and people wonder about waiving their arms like bugs on drugs. User:Mordillo/sig3 11:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
You should all do what I do when the weather gets bad, sit around in your pants for days on end and pull a Howard Hughs.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
That's what I've been doing for quite some time now. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Modusoperandi published a self help book based on the "smug layabout welfare lifestyle" - I was converted; its less emotianlly harmfull as Fight Club, more fun watching Science fiction.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost 5th February 2009

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png 03:18, Feb 5


My main reason for editing to template was to keep the image from going outside the template borders. Also, I really don't like 100% width templates, they tend to look bigger than they are. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig4 16:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah - it could do with some work, I think it's an idea that they are not too intrusive, unless its something more major (like ICU). I like the Cleanup one - it can be added to the bottom or the top and its nice a clear about what its asking for and it does not muck up a page. Hope this helps:)--Sycamore (Talk) 08:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
I think this template is trying to function as a canned joke. It does serve a marginally useful warning purpose (i.e. it tells the reader to go any further.) Ideally, templates should warn without uglifiying and cluttering a page too much. I personally think the template should look like this:

But, I'm afraid that big of change will not go over well with certain people. Some humor is such templates is ok at times, but warning templates and sectional templates exist to convey information, not to (try to) be funny in themselves.--User:Mnbvcxz/sig4 17:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

I agree 100%, I like the one you've done, maybe a little more noticlable, but its the sort of thing that conveys the idea there:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Unfortunately, some people use this template as a canned joke. Also, that template is functioning both as a "warning" and as a "fix this" template, and maybe as a "foul this up even moar" template. --User:Mnbvcxz/sig4 22:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

It is your destiny.

Your fate is sealed. Nothing can stop me now. I promise you, with God as my witness, that I will make you op. You cannot win! Muahuahuahuahuaaa! User:SysRq/sig3 00:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

I am very flattered, bad sadly I do not really want to be an op:(--Sycamore (Talk) 08:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost 12th February 2009

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png 20:50, Feb 11


Seriously? What the hell? "and there would be no need for the stuff I do around here" Eh? Dude seriously... Look at Led. Did being an op affect him? MrN Icons-flag-gb.png 22:39, Feb 11

Led seemed to do a lot more writing before he was opped, at least as far as I can tell. I kind of feel that it would make being here a lot less fun, I’m gunning down to be a GUN (as you might guess from the amount of crap I’m pumping out) and I’m pretty content to terrorize the inmates as I am for now:)--Sycamore (Talk) 09:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for voting

And now, a special message from the President *pff...hehe* of the United States
You see, Obama, America just isn't ready for an Islamabad president quite yet. That was your problem. Never go against the Lord. My fellow Uncyclopedians,
This past vote on VFH has been an emotional one for our wiki. The people have spoken, and I am honorated to accept the privilegitude to servify the Uncyclopedia front page for another eight years.
What do you mean, articles are only featured for one day?
Thank you for voting. Much love, User:SysRq/sig3

Artemis Fowl

I simply reverted the Opal/Artemis section to its previous format because it was funnier that way. I'm new on Uncyc but it seems that many articles, particularly the Artemis Fowl article seem to be being rigidly controlled by certain users, particularly yourself (no personal attack intended). The irony being that when users add silly random things to articles (such as that nonsense about baby eating in the aforementioned AF article) that aren't nearly as funny as the stuff you remove, you permit it. There's a similar problem taking place on Wikipedia actually so I don't know if there's some sort of secret organisation of rigid, totalitarian comformists trying to take over Wikia but I assure you, as long as I'm on the scene it won't be happening. --FunnyMan 13:49, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

We're not a "silly random" site in a stupid sense - although this is very clear - check out our Our articles we want rewritten and see this and this for a bit of inspiration and help with you contribuitions.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:01, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
I don't think I'm the one who needs help with his contributions Sycamore. I think you are. The thing is, your contributions don't seem to be funny, whereas ... well, mine are. Uncyclopedia seems to have a funny idea of what's funny and what isn't, ranging from pseudo-intellectualism to just plain silliness. --FunnyMan 18:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Hm. How about I jump in here? We get a lot of people like you who think you're funnier than we are. The truth is, Uncyclopedia is a very particular brand of funny. We take time in writing our articles, and we're pretty damn proud of the hard work we do around here. Sycamore is one of our top writers. You are nobody. Sycamore is vigilant about making sure that all articles, including those that are not as funny, stay, for the most part, free from vandalism. No one user has time to fix every article. That's why we rely on each other to fix unfunny articles and make this a better place. This is a wiki. It's a work in progress that will never be complete. That's why we encourage users to Be italic when it comes to fixing what they think is unfunny. If your edits are reverted by a more experienced user, tough. You have much to learn.
But I don't care about how funny you think you are. I care about my buddy here, who happens to be our current Author of the Month. See, he knows what he's doing. He's funny. He's clever. His articles are satirical and have a general point to make, as is our wish for all articles. Are all articles like Sycamore's articles? Unfortunately, no. Is every article that Sycamore edits going to be funny? No, Sycamore edits many articles, and not always to make them funnier. Sometimes he just tries to prevent further damage from being done. But what I don't appreciate is a little noob like yourself who thinks he's so much better than us showing up and telling my buddy he's not funny when he clearly is. Sycamore happens to be one of the most valuable users on this site, you are nobody. Please be productive instead of talking shit about my buddy or get the fuck out. User:SysRq/sig3 19:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
I 21:32, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
The irony is that I didn't know he had been banned for being a sock until after I posted this. Now don't I look silly? =] User:SysRq/sig3 21:37, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Also wow Sys, I have to admit I guessed it was a sock of Narcissus a while back, but thats the way these things go:)--Sycamore (Talk) 10:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Yeah that's actually one of the funniest things I've ever read on Uncyclopedia, not that that's saying much. Furthermore the fact that this wingeing Scot is the nominated writer of the month or whatever is merely testament to the idiocy of the children who run this website. I am the Messiah of Uncyclopedia. Without me it is nothing. You, SysRq, are nothing. You're less than nothing. In fact, you're not even important enough to talk to me. Fortunately for the website I neither forgive nor forget so I will be returning and you will wish you'd never heard the name Narcissus Black. 17:01, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Oh, grow up! User:Modusoperandi/sig 17:12, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
He started it. -- 02:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Hmm...who would have guessed that the "Messiah of Uncyclopedia" would, in fact, have no writing talent whatsoever? Kinda makes you wonder what good this "Messiah" actually is, other than just talking a lot and getting banned. User:SysRq/sig3 02:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Better than the other one who talked a lot and got crucifed.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Probably only in the sense that he has no influence over people. At least neither of them are real. User:SysRq/sig3 01:42, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Pagan imbecile, YOU ARE SO OUT OF YOUR DEPTH! I'm just about the only person on this pathetic site with any writing talent. You on the other hand just stalk and insult editors superior to yourself. -- 02:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Actually, I don't think you could be considered the only person on this pathetic site with any writing talent, because you're not on this site. That's what the bans lead me to believe, anyway. User:Boomer/sig/2 02:35, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, why exactly are you here? We don't like you, and you don't contribute. There's no real reason for you to be here, unless you're just another troll like all the others that come here, beat their heads against the wall for a bit, and then leave. User:SysRq/sig3 02:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

If its all so pathetic why do you come here? - seriously if you think people here are just complete bastards find something else with your time. This site is maintained by a largely uncreditied group of users who help around and about and keep the place nice, and a small writers who produce work for us (most do both to some degree). Its really not the place to make some kind of "stand about something" - find some people outside to call stalkers and facists - its really pathetic to go around a wiki anonymously and be abusive to others. I hope this will be the last we'll here from you.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

I know this may be totally random

..and a complete waste of your time but I feel compelled to ask, whats your take on Encyclopedia Dramatica? They all seem to hate us and if you visit their site on almost every talk page someone is dissing Uncyc, flaming us with random insults and whatnot.--CannabisUser94 05:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

My time is always wasted. With regards to ED, I don't really have a take, although some feel there is a rivalry between the two sites which I think prompts the slating from both communities. The reality however is that there is little in common with both sites, although sometimes content can be comparible the aims are very different and overall the content of both communities is pretty far apart:)--Sycamore (Talk) 10:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


For nominating Memoirs of a Critic, its great to see your work appreciated, even after all this time. User:Giarc/sig

No probs, I've always liked that one:)--Sycamore (Talk) 19:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Also welcome back, seems you've not been around for a while:)--Sycamore (Talk) 19:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


Yeah, not sure if you saw RadX made Image:Satan-business-is-good.png for you - I've archived it as it's been there for a while now, but just thought I'd mention it. --User:Under user/sig3 12:35, Feb 18

Hay thanks, I'm a bit snowed under, I had forgotten all about it:)--Sycamore (Talk) 14:57, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost 19th February2009

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png 18:14, Feb 19


Dont you even take a look at a sites history when you add categories? Arent you curious as yo why there are none =P Anyway, as you can see on the history I was workin on reverting the IPs empty work (his paragrafs were soo boring) to the old article. Even though that one aint great either it has categories and an image. Just lettin you know so you dont get all surprised if ya ever run into that article again =) Good to know we're both roaming "category-less" articles ;) Cheers. --kit 18:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

What don't I do! I even I have my own range of imitation noobs...--Sycamore (Talk) 18:41, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Where did he go? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:06, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Are you looking for a new job?

...With exciting new friends?

...With new challenges each and every morning?

...With new and shiny badge on top of your fedora hat?


The Poopsmiths want you to join the guild, sign up today, before it's too late! User:Mordillo/sig3 11:33, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Sure, you're wish is my command Princess Tinkles:)--Sycamore (Talk) 11:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

I warn you, this badge is VERY messy... MrN Icons-flag-gb.png 11:56, Feb 21

So, do we need another one? User:Mordillo/sig3 11:59, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Hopfully UU and MrN9000 will not abandon this completly?--Sycamore (Talk) 12:01, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
I think having two has worked well for me and UU... If one of us was not around the other filled in. Or shoveled out. Either way, I recommend two poopsmiths. MrN Icons-flag-gb.png 12:02, Feb 21
/me eyes RabbiTechno--Sycamore (Talk) 12:03, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
I ain't planning to abandon this completely ;-) Although I have to say this is such an inspired choice. --User:Under user/sig3 17:02, Feb 21


Thanks for tidying up my code :)The preceding unsigned comment was added by ChadiW (talk • contribs)

No probs:)--Sycamore (Talk) 14:21, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Fiona Apple images

Thanks for the image help - it looks much better, I'm impressed.

Although I still like the bottom photo on the left to balance the pictures out, but I'll defer this time.

If you have twenty three more minutes to help me with some image arrangement stuff (I'm still really trying to get the hang of it) I would be indebted to you if you could suggest some better arrangements for the Los Angeles Angels images.... I wouldn't blow you or anything, because my price for that is a lot higher, but I would appreciate any time you could give.

Thanks --TPLN 18:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Had a look, is that better?:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
The look is much better. But the jersey image necessarily "goes with" the "Latest Controversial Change" section, so it's a toughy. Plus the two other pics are inexorably tied together, so you can't put the jersey image between them. Oh, well. I don't know.
Also, I understand getting rid of red liks, but sometimes the joke is in the link ("drug addled thugs" - there is no joke without that clearly referring to the Oakland A's; and "worst president ever" - linking to Bush is a tired cliche, while linking to the Rangers is a bit fresher). Is there a way to address this fact without a red link? --TPLN 20:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Yeah it can be tricky, as you go along you can move the images about until they fit how you like - it can take time getting it to look cool. Usually I find that they come together as the article goes along, usually pretty spaced is the best way - either staggered or all aligned right looks good. The red links is tricky - they can be added again and its not bad thing to have a few (some say having red links looks more authentic as a parody of Wikipedia). Its really a preference thing, so I can add them again if you'd like?--Sycamore (Talk) 20:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
I'll work on it. Thanks for the time and the input. You are a kind and generous Tree. --TPLN 20:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
I hope I do my bit, you've been doing some really cool articles:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Well, thank you. I'm just over here playing in my corner, hoping that my mud pies come out at least a little bit tasty. --TPLN 20:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Are we...

Are we still good? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:21, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Of course:) - I'm told I can be gruff (especially in the morning) and I like to do things my way (heil!). MrN9000 put it pretty good, we need to keep these things working well, and fun on Ban Patrol is not good idea (I'd like some more patrolling and ban patrol use) - I've done and do a fair bit on here, if you have a question as to what I'm doing etc - however that should be done here, not on maintence pages etc (I'm accountable, and not above the same rules as everyone else). I do like to leave silly edit summeries however I usually find that your average vandal will leave pretty legit sounding ones so that you won't check them out:)--Sycamore (Talk) 12:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Okay. Glad to hear it. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:36, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Are we human or are we dancer? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)