User talk:Zombiebaron/archive3

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

the GNO article

That article totally needed the NVR tag. I wish I hadn't made it. I tried to just delete it... but I failed miserably. how do I actually delete it? --T-Roooy 12:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Wow, you put this at the bottom of the page and I didn't see the message 'till now. Sucks. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 21:37, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Wall Street

Well, you NRV'd my short article on Wall Street earlier tonight, so I fleshed it out into a hugely sarcastic rebuttal of Dada. I left the NRV tag on, however, as I thought you should be the one to decide if the article is funny, too sophisticated, not sophisticated enough (highly probable), or just stupid. Best of luck, --Palsworth 04:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

I like this message alot. You seem to have a good grasp on how not to be a tool, which is more than I can say about the rest of the rabble who demand me to remove NRVs. You got class. Oh, and "Best of luck" made me chuckle...:D. Yup, the NRV is gone. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 21:35, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


Do you happen to know why can't I move article Infected mushroom? IG 21:33, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I don't know. Tell me where you want it moved and I'll gladly move it for you though. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 16:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC)


I didn't know that that comment wasn't yours. It looked like it was something you wrote because your signature was next to it, and not a IP comment without a signature. Honest mistake on my part. I was just reording the page to add the ==Week of September 17== tag and thought it looked better near your signature. Fucking IP puke got me. I got banned 6 hours for that, which I find fucked up, because I don't like to be banned at all. Anyway, I don't like it that you cried to get me banned either, but you got what you wanted, and it's over. -- Sir Severian Severian1.jpg CUN.png (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut.png 18:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Woah, no one cried. To me it looked like deliberate defamy, and in my opinion that is completely unacceptable. I merely pointed out the facts to wolf. I acctually just wanted to give you a stern talking to, but wanted wolf to somehow endorse the stern talking to (cause he's an admin and I'm not). However, he banned you. You however (I am told) came on IRC and whined about the ban. Dude, it was six hours. Go watch a movie or something, maybe call up your friends and do something. 6 hours is nothing. Anyway, if I were an admin, I would have first talked to you and then, depending on your responce, maybe banned you. Dawg handeled it his way, it was a closed matter, and I don't wanna see you whine to me about how I "cried" either, cause "crying" and "crying 'wolf!'" are diffrent things. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 22:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I admit it looked like deliberate defamy. What you said to Herr Dawg was this:

Let me point out that for some reason Severian inserted this IPs comment (now in italics) into my comment. Is that a bannable offence? So yah... --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 17:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Giving him the impetus to ban. You could have talked to me without ever talking to the Overlords (only figurative, unless you wanted to call them cat herders, which would be ok.) I did whine to an extent, to the Right Honourable Gentleman, because I didn't think he understood where I was coming from. Of course this will never happen again, and I would have much prefered to be talked to by anyone (admin or not) before such a sentence was levied against me. I don't care if the sentence was 6 hours or 8 days, the fact of the matter is I don't like to be banned for something I perceived as a simple fuck up, and that's what it was. It's like getting a parking ticket when the meter says you can park all day for free. It's painful to be accused of stuff and have to suffer, but my lady friend helped me greatly in my time of need. I was a total douche for accidently inserting it into your comment, and not checking the history. Perception is a bitch I understand. And ours was crossed. To amend my transgressions, I apologise in ernest and give you this.

Newcookie.gif Severian has awarded you a big cookie!
Now go play in traffic and drink your fucking milk.

-- Sir Severian Severian1.jpg CUN.png (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut.png 00:17, 20 September 2006 (UTC) damn my unsigning!

  • Hmmm...just before I say case closed, I'd like to point out that: A) I acctaully talked to Dawg on IRC, the comment on ban patrol was addressed to Hinoa, and 2) Questions are not the same things as commands. Oh, so yah thanks for the cookie, and I'd like to close the book on this ugly chapter of you're (and my) "Uncyclopedia life" for good. Feel free to get piss drunk this weekend and holler about how much you think I suck at the bartender. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 00:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

NRV Manbearpig

I just created this article, and see that it has been tagged as NRV. I'm new here and this is my first article -- does this indicate that it needs more work (what would be a stub tag on wikipedia), or what? For reference here [1] is the wikipedia article on Manbearpig (I tried to avoid any actual content in this article, of course). Thanks Kenj0418 23:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes sort of. We have stubs on Uncyclopedia, but they are out of use. An NRV is close to a stub, however it measures not only length, but also humor. So, it is subjective, and thus many people are made unhappy when after 7 days their work is deleted. Oh yah, did I mention that after 7 days your article gets deleted? --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 23:50, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Take a look at that

Sock Puppet? A minion? A rival? hmmm.....-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il.png GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI2 AnotM VFH +S 21:09, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Never heard of the guy. I link to my sock puppet in my sig though. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 22:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


what was the message on my talk page for, did I do something wrong? The preceding unsigned comment was added by Serminigo (talk • contribs)

Hmmm...this question seems to mean that you can't read. Which makes no sense. So maybe you didn't acctually read the message? It is quite obviously a "Welcome" message, welcoming you to Uncyclopedia, creating you're talk page, and spamming my signature. In short, no you've done nothing wrong. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 20:59, 17 September 2006 (UTC)


Since you seem to be doing it already I'd like to formally invite you to join the "Committee". -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb.png (talk to me)

Sure master, anything you say. ;) --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 16:19, 16 September 2006 (UTC)


I'm thinking that perhaps the pic would work better if you took it out of the dark ages and made it "now". Like an Ikea catalogue picture, with King Arthur (the Burger King, maybe?), in an ultramodern Ikea'd apartment, trying to assemble a round white-pine table. Just a thought...and I wouldn't worry too much about Image:KnightTable.png flunking VFP, just think of it as an involuntary ego reducer (if we didn't fail once in a while our heads would get way too big. Custom hats are expensive).--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:14, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Since you weren't around when I first showed up you don't know this, but, I have nominated all of my pictures (minus a few more recent ones which were merely to inhance articles, and had no inherant humor). All but one (Zombie Che) have been voted down. But still I try try again! --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 16:07, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Hey, I'm here for you, man. Just fall back...I'll catch you. <sound of ZB hitting floor> Oh, shit...sorry, I saw something shiny.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:01, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Things, stuff, and whatnot

  • There's a bit more in Image_talk:Fundiemag.jpg if you care, and thanks for fixing "Template:Societyformisspellingphilantropy‎" (how the heck did you find it, anyway? It's nowhere, man! Hmmm, there's a thumbprint on my gallery...).--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:52, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
I found that template while researching you. It seems you slipt under my radar (what radar) until just before my summer break (when I wasn't around alot). Anyway, glad to help fix anything you need me to break :D. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 02:55, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Although I joined Uncyc last October I'd mostly just tinkered with Canada until this summer, when pages just started popping out of me (with varying degrees of success). American Fundie Magazine was only the second (of three, so far) satirical pages that I've started (Solid Gold, the most recent, is far more successful in my opinion.) As for the templates, of those I quickly tired.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Yah I started off thinking that I was funny, and that I had alot of ideas. Turns out that I'm not (at least in writing), and that I don't. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 03:07, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
My theory is that everybody knows enough about something to make a funny page about that very something. Also, this having two different conversations on two different pages simultaneously is freaking me out. I do that, sometimes.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:12, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
I suggest cheddar, Mr. Ompal. You're child will enjoy it as much as you will. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 03:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Uh, yeh <backs away slowly>...good luck with that.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:19, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Acctually, since you don't seem to have uderstood my last comment, I was indroducing a third conversation. Now we are having 3 seperate conversations on 2 diffrent pages. Wow...maybe I should get onto IRC? Nope...:D. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 03:21, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
My bad, I'm trying to have two conversation and finish 'shopping a pic. There's no room left for a third talky-talk.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:39, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Wait! You were "researching me"? Freaky! If you're planning on stealing my life, you'd probably be better off sticking with your own.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:26, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

If I don't research you, how am I to know if you're any good? Also, I wanted to see what you had written, and going through your contribs was an easy way to find out. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 07:37, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Ah. I do good, I hope.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:45, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Let's just say I didn't run off to ban patrol to report you, eh? --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 07:47, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Cool. As long as you set the bar that low, I can't help but succeed.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Well in my books I'm the bar. So yah, everyone succseeds when the bar is Zombiebaron! --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 07:51, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Praise from ZombieCaesar, and whatnot.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:02, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
<que laugh track> --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 08:06, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Untitled Message's are for losers

What's wrong with the Gay Fusion article? The preceding unsigned comment was added by Amplexity (talk • contribs)

Okay dear sir, and now before I answer your question, a quick word about instructions. You left you're message below the instructions which I painfuly placed on my usertalkpage, but seemed not to read the fact that you're message was supposed to go underneath the heading below. Also, since I know that you read my "Welcome!" message (in order to find this talk page), you should have known to sign your comment. And now to buissness. "gay fusion" is a really bad article. First the title should not be "gay fusion", but should be Gay Fusion. Secondly it looks really ugly. You should look at other articles (featured articles mostly) and see how pretty they look, and then using edit to view the wiki code emulate the style. You have seven days to make you're article look nice, have a proper title (I'm not going to move it for you, so that you will learn how), and maybe add some humor or pictures, or else you're article will be deleted by one of our highly skilled admin "staff". Oh, to move a page, click the move tab beside the history tab at the top of the article. Cheers, --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 00:19, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

-Would you be hurt if I said you're ugly? (notice the correct use of "you're", a shortened version of 'you are'. It's sounds similar to "your" - but don't worry, I bet you'll (you will) figure it out someday (see your second sentence). The preceding unsigned comment was added by Amplexity (talk • contribs)

Dude...I'm not even sure why you're mad at me. I'm not an admin. I only tried to help you out. No need to be a pedant, buddy. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 00:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Ban radar...pinging... —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 00:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Heh. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 00:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Muhammad and Jesus pissing contest

This stub was intended as a part of the Dead Sea article. I thought it worked better as another entry. Would you care to remove the NRV? NeedABrain 01:12, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Acctaully, you're going to have to get someone else (of higher authority then me I'm afraid) to remove that NRV, since I still belive that it is well placed. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 03:40, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Morton Feldman

Do you know who Morton Feldman is? If you don't, then you have no right to place the NRV tag. --User:Orolo 11:05, 29 August 2006

I'm not sure what knowing about American composers has to do with spotting crap. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 03:38, 10 September 2006 (UTC)


Hello, Zombiebaron/archive3, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for nooblets:

If you read anything at all, make it the above two links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button (Button sig.png) above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask at the Dump. Again, welcome!  —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 02:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)



Thanks for the vote. You just helped fulfill one of the more obscure prophecies in the Book o' Revelations.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Who's Afwaid of a Widdle Apokowips?
When death stalks the night, remember, it's all your fault


Untitled Message

The White Supremacist Club needs you to check your email. -- 03:44, 18 August 2006 (UTC)


  • Ha ha ha. A hostile jew, eh? Well at least I didn't have to vote using the goyish "For" or "Agaisnt" method, eh, eh, know what I mean? Oh yah, and you can use this page to prove that I voted For Mordillo. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 23:15, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Yay! -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il.png GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI2 AnotM VFH +S 05:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


Thanks for the warm welcome, Zombiebaron. I am experiencing some difficulty when I view one of the articles: Cardinalism. All of the links and stuff under the Uncyclopedia picture are gone/missing. Is this happening on your browser, too? Can I do anything to fix it? Thanks for the help. --ChairHead 00:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Hello there ChairHead. First off, I would like to point out that many users have a special way of organizing their talk pages, and this means that you must always read the blurbs at the top of user talk pages. Mine for instance says that I want new messages on the top. Anyway, to answer your questions, no viewing the page on the Safari browser poses no problems to the navigation bar. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 01:16, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
My apologies, Zombiebaron. In my haste to correct the atrocious problem I have, I didn't bother to read your blurbs at the top. Please accept my humble apologies, as it will most certainly never happen again. Anyways, do you know any ways I could fix my problem? I am using IE. 1000 pardons, ChairHead 04:52, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Well the first step is to get Firefox. Unless you like giant gaping security holes. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 12:15, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Untitled Message

ref: There were once weeks when I got a new message everyday. Now it seems my last message was from an IP on July 21st. It's summer and you should be outside. Personally, I'm only inside because sunlight makes me break out in a tan to get another beer. Now go out, already. Modusoperandi 22:00, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Question from a N00b

Hello, i am anoob and i ned help formatting my pages before famine deletes them and i complainging. anoob 22:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

The best way to solve your problem is to whine to MoneySign about Famine's sense of humor. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 00:25, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Happy? I'm here for you, man. You're lucky I came back for another beer. Modusoperandi 22:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC)


I gave you some more FAPs. 23:01, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


I got the problems all worked out and Mcgrue is a jpg again. Modusoperandi 03:49, 13 July 2006 (UTC)


Thanks for voting for my article on VFH! I'm glad u like it, and I am working on added the picture of DK as u requested. Sir C America...Fuck Yeah!!!! Holla | CUN --03:16, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Oh yeah, and why not just give u this while I'm at it...

Cbread.jpg Plate of cornbread!!!
Sir Cornbread has done awarded you a whole plate of cornbread fo shizzle! You should feel really special. Now, go get some pork chops and fried chicken, and have yo' self a nice home cooked meal. --Sir Cornbread



I nom'd Canada on VFH. As I type this it is stuck at +5 (no "Against"s, joy!). As you are registered with the Department of Canadian Uncylopedians of Canada I, and indeed all Canadians, encourage you to vote. "For" or "Agin", I don't care which, as long as it's a vote for "for". Granted, it's pure ego for me, as it was the first page that I really tried to improve, but still... Modusoperandi 04:43, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Okay I voted. Although next time, don't grovel for votes, cause some people will vote against it purley do to groveling. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 14:13, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Thanks, but groveling? Since when is whatever it is that I am doing groveling. When I grovel, you'll know it, mister. Besides, I don't really care whether the vote is Fer or Agin, as long as it's a vote (witness the bloodbath in VFP for "left behind" if you doubt both my integrity and my lack of it). Again, thanks Modusoperandi 14:52, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Acctaully merly by pointing it out, you are grovoling for votes. But whatever, I'm not the kind who will vote against your work based on anything you yourself have done. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 19:14, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Dignity goes out the window when the fate of our country is at stake! Or something like that. I've never been one for integrity, or for clothing for that matter. Wait, was that out loud? Modusoperandi 20:27, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


Thanks for the welcome....I thought I'd try editing here so I worked on Lapland which you had tagged. I thought after reading this I'd drop you a note and see if removing the tag would be in order. You be the judge, I'm not sure of the standards here yet. Thanks...3easysteppes 04:15, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Splenda discussion, continued

Moving this discussion over to this page makes sense since the VFP page isn't for discussions in the first place. While I know that assume good faith isn't as tighly followed on Uncyclopedia as it is Wikipedia, the premise is important to this discussion.

First of all, I came up with the pun during a discussion away from a computer. I did not seek it out and then claim that I had dreamdt it up. When I washed it through Google and A9 I went looking not for the words in the pun, but a an image of the pun itself. Not finding an another image that showed the packet of Splenda in the Grass I felt confident that I was on solid ground (and still do based on a search of images entitled "Splenda in the Grass"). Yes, I I checked blogs, (as noted on the images discussion page on July 2, 2006) but because this wasn't a strictly word play idea, I focused on the originality of the image.

My issue is that you came out swinging and instead of checking before making the charge that the idea was lifted, made the presumption that it sounded as if the image was lifted, adding "Oh, and can someone check that it not stolen..." Its one thing for you to vote against the image, but to impune my integrity by suggesting that it could be stolen without evidence of such (and expect someone else to find it for you), but before making the charge of idea/concept theft is simply bad faith and very bad form as you did it.

And for the record, yes, Splenda is sold in Canada. Finding that out is as simple as typing in Splenda and Canada into Yahoo! [2] and visiting the Splenda Canada web site. [3]

I can live with the fact that you don't like the image (I don't even need a reason, whether it be the image, me, whatever), but at the very least, I feel that I am owed an apology. Cordially, Dame PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:43, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Wow, you seem to have thought about this alot, to bad you didn't read the notice at the top of this talk page and put you message at the top. Anyway, I just came back from buying food, at a Canadian Loblaws, and made sure to check for Splenda, it was not there. Hence, I can safely say that where I live and buy food, there is no Splenda, making it a joke from a forgien land. I'm not gonna go check the Splenda website, cause I'm lazy like that, but I am of the belief that Vancouver (where the probably sell Splenda) is in a diffrent country from Toronto (where I live).
Now about the image it's self. I'm not very good at finding specific images, and in the past Rc has shown himself to be very good at that. My remark was intended for him, or maybe someone with the same skills/resources as him. I see now that my approach could be deemed hurtful, esspecially to you. However, I take VFP very seriously (because I find it hard to read through most articles) and thus try my hardest to keep stolen images from getting featured. In my defence, I was just trying to prevent featuring of non-Uncyclopedian's work, esspecially if was copyrighted promotional material (which this might have been).
Prettiestpretty, I am sorry that my use of the word "stolen" offended you. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 14:59, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
I started this forum to address what I see as the problem. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 15:30, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Zombiebaron, your apology is most welcomed and fully accepted. My thoughts on this matter are at that I try very hard to come up with original ideas. I have no patience for those who take another idea and pass it off as their own. And as for your thinking behind your comment, I accept that you too seek and respect originality. Perhaps I'm too touchy about my work because it is my work. Still, had you asked me, I would have told you to the pains that I took trying to find a patch of green of grass in our subdivsion on a miserably hot and humid day, several months pregnant and snapped the picture - five of them, actually, trying to come up with the right look and angle. In any event, maybe next time I'll have my husband taking a picture of me, taking the picture itself.  ;-) On another note, I am honored that you think so highly of my work that it might qualify as commercial and/promotional. Henceforth, if you see an ad campaign come out subsequent to this image thing, then you might hear me popping a blood vessel in the lower 48. Again, thank you for the apology. Dame PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Wow you're pregnant? What a rainbow of diffrent people... :). Anyway, thank you for thanking me for my apology. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 17:36, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
No, I thank you. And yes, I am with child on the inside and three children on the outside. Today it sucks to be me, around Christmastime it will be suckled to be me. Buddy said that were not naming the baby Zombie, sorry about that. Dame PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:41, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Ha ha ha. I have nothing but repect for that (the amount of children, not the naming). Out of intrest, are you Catholic? --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 13:50, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Actually Raised by a Jewish father (but I rebelled because I hated him, and for good reason). As for Kids=Catholic, nope. It comes down to it being a cold cruel world, and when you look at what stays the same, its your brothers and sisters. You can loose all of your money, your health and everything tangible in life, but when the kids are grown, no matter how bad it gets, they'll have each other and were raising them so that they understand that their number job in life is value and look out for one and other (we're also raising them to understand the ramification of their decisions, a skill lacking in modern society). Hell, if we could have afforded it and my body would have held out, I would have had twelve of them. But I'm getting older and they're getting faster. So four is it. Dame PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:45, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
I just finished watching Rainman. Although the American rating is R (in Canada its 14A, crazy Americans), I suggest showing it to them when you think that it is appropriate, as I belive that at least by the end of it, it Tom Cruise's character is looking out for his brother in the manner you suggested. Anyway, I've read Cheaper by the Dozen (and havn't seen the crappy looking movie), and thus feel informed enough to advise you that having twelve kids would be kinda hard. Anyway, cheers to four and all that. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 01:36, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


"Cambridge" is "Cam Bricg" or "Cambricg", and "Dictionary" is "Dictionarie". ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:29, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

  • I'm sure they are, exept I can't understand that article at all. I think you need some way of allowing people who can't read in whatever the fuck language that is to understand, and the dictionary could be the key. You could make it link to a subpage of the page (put the link in the comment) and have the subpage explain how to read the main article, and explain it in english. That was my idea in making the picture, anyway. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUNWotMUotMPotMAotMEGAEDMUPotMMAFEZotMIotMVotMUGotM (shout) 19:02, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Ok, will do... eventally. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 19:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Here you are, zMobiebaron. The original article has been moved to Babel:Ang/Eald Ænglisc. Anyway, my point was, will you change it (seeming as I don't have potochop or anything like that at home)? ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 19:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Thinking of you

I think you'll enjoy this. Your Brains--<<>> 04:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Untitled Message 1

man csabbah is a super cool site it is funny in our opinion The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lexxz (talk • contribs)

what do you mean by : "I have not visited said website" cuz I dont understand The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shatterstar (talk • contribs)